Month: March 2010

  • Redd Volkaert

    Photo: Brio, courtesy Redd Volkaert.

    For Redd Volkaert, 2008 has been a good year. His band, Heybale, released an excellent debut in the spring, and with summer came his fourth solo disc, Reddhead. He’s on the sweet side of a career that began at age 13 in his dad’s band, backing dancers in the strip joints of Vancouver, and led to stints with dozens of country greats, including a longtime gig as one of Merle Haggard’s Strangers.

    You recently sat in with Jimmie Vaughan’s band at Antone’s, in Austin. Considering your history, it was a piece of cake, right?
    Well, maybe for them. But I was a nervous wreck. It’s a blues band – they don’t need my big country ass up there bumbling around (laughs)! But he’s got a smokin’ band.

    You’re a Tele guy, Jimmie’s a Strat guy, but the difference in your tones is more than just guitars.
    He likes a really dry kind of thin (tone) and his action’s low, with light strings. He’s trying to replicate the old blues guys’ “plink” sound they got playing Epiphones in the late ’50s – that John Lee Hooker tone. They didn’t use a pick, they used their forefinger and pulled up. And he nails it. In the T-Bird days his lead playing was a bit more wild – a lot more bending. Now it’s a lot of T-Bone Walker kind of licks.

    My favorites are still Roy Nichols (Merle Haggard), Don Rich (Buck Owens), and Jimmy Bryant. For Tele guys, they’re the top three. Nichols has a thicker, more midrange barking sound, Don Rich had a real thin sort of chicken-pickin’ sound. I’ve always wanted the big, thick, fat, clear jazzy sort of steel guitar tone – more neck pickup, use the lower end as much as you can. I turn the tone all the way up on the guitar, and to record I get the volume all the way up to get the ultimate sound out of the amp; I like ’em really clean. I have a couple ’70s Peavey LTD 400s, but ideally, it’s a Twin Reverb for me. I use heavy picks and LaBella strings .011 to .052.

    Are players using fewer unique tones these days?
    I think too many don’t bother to try for something different. They buy the identical amp, get the same kind of pickups, same kind of wang bar, same fuzz boxes and shoot for that heavy metal sound or the arena rock sound or the blues guy tone. It’s hard to say, “That’s so and so playing.”

    There’s something natural about a Telecaster…
    Exactly. It doesn’t have spiked hair with bleached tips. I’ve got a Glendale copy. It’s really well made. And I’ve got a couple of Tomkins replicas made in Australia. One has Jason Lollar pickups – one of which is a Charlie Christian copy. I’ve still got my ’58 Esquire with the real Charlie Christian – it’s noisy and sounds great. I also have a ’51 Nocaster. Got it in Nashville from a girl I worked on for about seven years and wound up swapping her a couple of Gibsons.

    REDD 02

    You used them all on Reddhead?
    Yeah, with several amps including a DR Z MAZ 38 on the rockier things and the Peavey LTD for the real clean country stuff. I got a pedalboard with a bunch of stuff. I have a Durham Sex Drive line booster, which is like taking the old MXR Blue Box compressor and turning the compression off with the volume all the way up; it hits the amp harder. I leave it on, put the guitar through it and the other pedals – but they’re not always on – and use the reverb in the amp, a little from the board. We used 2″ tape to record everything up until the mastering.

    That album was basically done live?
    Definitely. I wanted to sound like our bar band at a gig. I couldn’t get that sound in Nashville. My first CD was too compressed; the drums were all triggered, digital this and that. For this one I brought every amp I owned, set ’em in a half circle, spread the mics all over with an overhead condenser to pick up the room noise, and played all day and night. I wrote down “…this amp with that mic…,” etc.

    You used your regular club band. Have they all been with you long?
    Yeah, except Buzz Evans just moved to Austin from Vegas. He’s an unbelievable jazz guitar player and piano player, but he’s known as a steel player in the country thing. He just turned 70; he shows up for the gig, wags his stuff in on a dolly, sets it up, tears it down, and wags it out of there. No trouble, happy to be there. He’s like a ray of light – a typical old musician, funny as hell in a bitter sort of way. He’s seen all the s*** forever, dealt with it all. When I was a kid I played with older guys in their 40s who were old bitter sour guys, and funny as hell. And to meet him now I feel like a kid again.

    Like when you were a 13-year-old playing strip bars with your dad’s band…
    Yeah. I’d sit behind their amps, beside the drummer playing rhythm with ’em. Or thinkin‘ I was playing with ’em. It was great.

    And you had the benefit of your dad’s experience as a working player.
    But of course I wouldn’t listen to him. He was my dad (laughs) what’d he know? When I was 15 he said, “Well if you’re so f*****g smart why don’t you leave home while you still know everything?” (laughs). But he also said, “Listen to everything, enjoy everything. Take a lick from here and a lick from there. You think you’re good? Listen to Shuggie Otis and Mike Bloomfield.” I miss him every day.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s November 2008 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.



    Redd Volkaert & Bill Kirchen (Twangbangers)

  • West, Bruce, & Laing – Why Dontcha

    When one third Cream and two thirds of Mountain joined to form West, Bruce & Laing in 1972, expectations were not exactly high. This, their first album, was a decent effort and enough to appease fans of both bands. But how does the music hold up now? Not badly at all!

    True, time has been kinder to the softer, more musical Jack Bruce/Pete Brown compositions than it has to the hard rockers, but there’s one rockin’ 12-bar snippet that makes this CD essential listening; it comes at 2:35 during “Love is Worth the Blues” – 40 seconds of pentatonic plectrum bliss that defines Leslie West’s style and tone – Gibson through Marshall with violin-like vibrato and economy of notes that on a simple, emotive, concise 12th-fret solo.

    Most of this album is full of gruff vocals, too-busy bass playing, overdubbed guitars, and a mix of tempos. Things did get more interesting for the band after its second record and a live album issued after the band imploded. But Why Dontcha is the album everyone expected – nothing more, nothing less.


    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Sept. ’08 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Carl Martin Vintage Series Pedals

    CARL MARTIN ALL

    If you’re the type of hardcore gear geek who spends as much time evaluating guitarists based on what’s in their hands, rigs, and pedalboards as you do actually listening to what they’re playing, then you’ve probably noticed that a lot of pros these days are using Carl Martin pedals.

    After hitting the scene with its first pedal in the early 1990s, the Carl Martin company started to make serious waves early in the 21st century with the Hot Drive ‘n Boost and Contour ‘n Boost pedals (reviewed in VG, December ’01). In early ’05, the company’s DeLayla XL and PlexiTone were launched to more rave reviews (VG, June ’05), and Carl Martin pedals were enjoying a reputation for being top-shelf in terms of construction and sound.

    With its new Vintage Series pedals, the company is breaking new ground in regard to style and price while holding to its standards of quality and sound.

    CARL MARTIN CRUSH

    The three pedals in the series are the Crush Zone (a high-gain overdrive), Surf Trem (tremolo) and the Red Repeat (analog delay), all of which are manufactured not in Denmark, but in China. And while the words “made in China” have traditionally caused gearheads to recoil in disgust, these pedals suffer none of the low-quality, cookie cutter traits often associated with the tag. Rather, they boast Martin-designed (and tested) circuits and keystone-shaped heavy die-cast metal chassis with satin-finish paint and cream-colored stenciling, heavy-duty mechanical-bypass footswitches, easy-access 9-volt battery compartments, 9-volt power adaptor jacks, and cream-colored chickenhead knobs (the good ones, with the brass inserts).

    A quick look inside one of the pedals reveals its Euro-style chassis mounted on a high-quality PC board that is wired very neatly, with 1⁄4″ input/output jacks, and chassis-mounted Alpha pots. Unlike so many imported pedals that use jacks and controls mounted directly to the circuit boards (and are thus prone to damage even if you do something as innocuous as stepping on one of the cords), the chassis-mounted components on the Carl Martin offer the promise of years of trouble-free functionality. We couldn’t find any deviations or shortcuts in design or components compared to Carl Martin’s standard pedal line, though they do lack an internal power supply.

    CARL MARTIN RED

    Controls on the Vintage Series pedals are straightforward; the Crush Zone has controls for Level, Tone and Distortion; the Surf Trem has dials for Depth and Speed; and the Red Repeat lets you manipulate signal via controls for Echo, Tone, Time, and Repeat.

    We had a listen to the Vintage Series using a Fender Custom Classic Telecaster running through a 1966 Fender Bandmaster with an open-back 2×12″ cabinet loaded with Tone Tubby speakers.

    We began with the Surf Trem and were quickly pleased with the results. It proffered a lush ’50s-style tremolo effect with a smooth, deep “swish” and smooth waveform that really sounded great. Switching the pedal on and off several times revealed an exemplary purity of tone – very quiet, clean, and transparent. Comparing the Surf Trem to the Bandmaster’s own tremolo, we could dial them in to sound almost exactly the same; in fact, we’d give the Surf Trem the nod for its ability to produce a deeper effect, and its wider range of speed settings.

    The Red Repeater also added no appreciable noise or coloration, just classic analog delay/echo with those slightly dirty, not-so-sterile repeats. Its Time control created anything from a super-short slap-back all the way to a 600-millisecond delay. The Tone control, which is essentially a high-cut, rolled off high-end on the repeats, allowing us to soften them so they didn’t get in the way of the dry signal, somewhat like the low-fidelity repeats from a tape echo. The only nit we have to pick with any of the Vintage Series is with the Red Repeater’s Time control – and it’s a common shortcoming on many units of this type; the lack of a label for the control’s milliseconds setting. Yes, it’s a minor thing, but it would help a user more accurately set delay times.

    CARL MARTIN SURF

    The Crush Zone produced a full-out high-gain distortion with definite midrange boost and aggressive overdrive. Even with its Distortion dialed out completely, the pedal distorts the signal enough to eliminate it from potential use as a boost. But it excels in the high-gain category with a pleasant, crunchy distortion that isn’t thin or brittle, even with the Tele bridge pickup. The Tone control is well-voiced, allowing for flavors ranging from bright and “spitty” to dark and creamy smooth. The only time we could coax any mush from it was if we jacked Distortion past 3 o’clock, and even then, the sound was more like a cool over-the-top super-high setting on a fuzz pedal.

    This nifty-looking trio certainly lives up to the Carl Martin name in terms of pro-quality components, quiet operation, killer vintage tones, and a killer low price.



    Carl Martin Vintage Series pedals
    Price: $129 to $159 (retail).
    Contact: Gary Castelluccio & Associates, phone (973) 772-3333; www.carlmartin.com.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s July 2006 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.



    Carl Martin Crush Zone by Sledziuha

  • Hughie Thomasson

    The Outlaws.

    The Outlaws. Photo: John Gellman.



    (Ed. Note: This article originally appeared in VG‘s October ’06 issue. Hughie Thomasson passed away in September, 2007.)

    Hughie Thomasson was a founding member of the Outlaws and played guitar in Lynyrd Skynyrd for nine years. He’s now back with the Outlaws.

    Skynyrd contacted Thomasson in the mid 1990s.
    “They needed somebody to fill in for Ed King,” the guitarist recounted. “The Outlaws were still playing, but I told them I’d gotten a call from Skynyrd about filling in, and they said I should do it.

    “I went to Nashville and spent time with Ed before I ever went to rehearsal with the band, so he could show me what I needed to know; I wanted to make sure I got it right. Then I went to rehearsal in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Six months rolled around, and Ed didn’t come back; I’m not sure what happened – that was between them – but I stayed with Skynyrd until 2004. We made several albums, two live DVDs, and did dozens of TV shows. I co-wrote 32 songs with those guys. It was a pleasure and an honor.”

    Guitarist Ricky Medlocke, best known for his work in Blackfoot, joined Skynyrd soon after Thomasson came onboard as the “the Fender guy,” primarily playing a custom-made Telecaster-style guitar with a middle pickup and a volume control in a Stratocaster-like position. In his years with Skynyrd, Thomasson relied on a custom Fender Stratocaster with Seymour Duncan pickups, with coil taps.

    “That’s what Skynyrd wanted,” he averred. “And that’s what I was there for – a Fender sound between two Gibsons, and that sound would still cut through.”

    In late 1999 and 2000, Skynyrd and ZZ Top toured together, and jammed during a New Year’s Eve Millineum concert in Houston.

    “I’ve got a picture of that on my refrigerator!” Thomasson enthused. “That was a wild tour. The crowds were terrific every night, playing with ZZ Top was great, and a chance to jam with them was really cool.” 2000 also saw the release of So Low, which was really more solo Thomasson, with previous Outlaws members playing basic tracks. He plans to re-release the album as Lone Outlaw.

    As for his departure from Skynyrd, he says, “It was just time. It had been a great time in my life, and I love those guys. Vicious Cycle, the last album, kind of capped things, for me. I always gave 120 percent, never slacked off. Gary was very demanding about the way the band sounded, and that’s why the band is successful. But I wanted to play Outlaws music again, and I wanted to sing; I wasn’t doing much singing in Skynyrd, but I was doing a lot of guitar playing. Plus, Skynyrd likes to do a lot of unison guitar playing; that’s one of their trademarks. But the Outlaws do a lot of harmony guitars. I left Skynyrd on good terms, and we keep in touch. Who knows – maybe the Outlaws and Skynyrd will tour together again!”

    Thomasson describes 2005 as “the reunion year” for the Outlaws, detailing “Our original manager got involved and made some calls, and everybody was still playing. Henry Paul was playing with Blackhawk, a very successful country band, David Dix was teaching drums at the University of South Florida. Monte Yoho, the other drummer, was playing in Branson, Missouri. Everybody kind of dropped what they were doing to come back and be part of the reunion tour. After that, Henry wanted to go back to Blackhawk, but the rest of us wanted to keep the Outlaws going. Chris Anderson’s playing guitar with us now; he’d played with the Outlaws before but had never made a record with us. Randy Threet, who also played in Blackhawk, is the bass player.”

    Thomasson still has his 1972 three-bolt Fender Stratocaster, and noted “Ron Nevison, who produced the Ghost Riders record for us, suggested that I use that guitar only in the studio, which I did for a bunch of years. But I’m using it live again; it wants to be played – it doesn’t need to be sitting in a case in a closet!”

    The Outlaws are touring this year, and Thomasson is enthusiastic about the band’s future. They’re also completing an album titled Full Circle, portions of which can be heard on the band’s web site, which also details bandmembers’ axes.

    “We’re three songs into it,” Hughie said of the album, “and we’re going to try to finish it up by the end of the summer, for a fall release.”



    All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.



  • Gibson R&D Electric Guitar

    Alvino Rey

    Alvino Rey and the prototype lapsteel he has kept for more than 61 years. Photos: Lynn Wheelwright

    Talk about skeletons in your closet!! Believe it or not, this is the first electric guitar from the prestigious Gibson, Inc., today known as Gibson Musical Instruments.

    Obviously not a production model, this instrument, used in the first stages of research and development, is too crude to even be considered a prototype of the production model. For starters, the guitar was made entirely of brass, using no wood. This was a unique approach, particularly for Gibson!

    A simple ladder frame was brazed together to hold basically everything, starting with the “body” – a small piece of .050″ sheet brass mounted on top of the frame only, supporting the bridge. Also mounted to the top side of the frame only is the fingerboard, again of sheet brass. The scale length measures approximately 24 3/4″ (Gibson’s standard), although the 19 hand-sketched fret markers were only roughly laid out. The peghead shape verifies the Gibson connection and like the body and fingerboard, is made of sheet brass. A matching piece is mounted on the underside of the frame, for attachment of the tuners. These are the inexpensive strip tuners of the era, with plastic buttons.

    The nut was cut from brass and brazed to the frame (is this the first brass nut?) and a rough trapeze tailpiece, with very short arms, was secured to the bottom rail of the frame. The bridge was fabricated from a slab of brass, with strings sitting on six individual brass rod saddles, nonadjustable for height. Floating free and secured only by string tension, it’s possible they were experimenting with pickup/bridge relationships by moving the bridge instead of the pickup.

    The agenda for designers Alvino Rey (Musical Advisor) and John Kutilek (Electrical Engineer for Lyon & Healy) was to come up with a patentable pickup, to avoid the possible lawsuits and licensing fees common in the early radio market. Well, this pickup was certainly different from anything on the market (although they all worked/work on the same principles of basic physics). The arrangement of the components is similar to the early Fender “boxcar” pickups of the ’40s, with the strings running between the top magnet and the coil. All magnetic pickups use a coil of wire in a magnetic field, so the arrangement of these components was of the utmost importance. A second magnet runs underneath the coil and both are approximately 4″ long of 5/8″ X 5/8″ stock (the magnetic alignment appears to be quite different from the expected reading; unfortunately, no real experts have confirmed or checked this out in person, so we’ll move on). The single coil is wound with a heavier gauge wire than normal and has two bolts running through it, acting as the bobbin for the windings. The bolts are secured to the bottom magnet and three nuts on each act as spacers to hold the coil in place. The bolts also project through the coil and each has a roughly-shaped piece of metal that acts as a three-strings-in-one polepiece.

    Like the Electro/Rickenbacker, the top of the pickup acted as a handrest. The pickup was hardwired to a cable, so there is no output jack or controls. Considering Mr. Rey’s early employment of both volume and tone controls for sound effects, this seems odd. Unfortunately, the instrument “took a dive” a few years ago, so the electronics are not currently functioning, although it’s possible the guitar could be restored. The cable (with four-prong PA connector) has broken off and the pickup came apart from the body, although it has been reattached. The original asymmetrical shape of the guitar has been somewhat exaggerated by the tension of the four remaining original strings, which today do not quite line up with the fingerboard.

    Other than these “minor details,” the guitar would probably work as well as it ever was supposed to. There never was a case, and the requisite matching amp of a production model is also not available, as the research and development was done through the L & H factory’s PA system.

    So, as a “collector’s item” (as antique/flea market dealers love to say) it would appear to be incomplete and in only VG– condition. To anyone with an appreciation for the broad scope of Gibson’s history, it should be obvious that this is a most important disc-overy…and that its existence and documentation today is a miracle. Otherwise, who would believe it?

    Alvino plans to be present to “unveil” the guitar at the Gibson booth at the Winter NAMM Show (Anaheim Convention Center, January 16-18, 1997), coinciding with it being featured in their new catalog. It will also be on display at the Vintage Guitar magazine booth the weekend of January 17-19 the California VAMM Guitar Show (Orange County Fairgrounds).

    gen•e•sis (jen’ sis) n. [Gr] the origin or coming into being of something

    When Gibson released their first production electric guitar and amplifier in late 1935, they were already well-established as a progressive acoustic instrument company, known for both innovative design and high standards of craftsmanship. The electric instruments of the 60-plus years since have maintained the design and craftsmanship tradition while playing a continually influential role in the acceptance of the electric guitar.

    Popular with the general public since their inception, a vast majority of the models are still considered seriously for professional use. The number of Gibson instruments from the 1930s, ’40s, ’50s and ’60s that today reside in the elite $2,500-and-up section of the vintage electric guitar market is testimony to their timelessness, usefulness and desirability. Their near total domination of the “five figures and up” category speaks volumes.

    Needless to say, much has been written about the importance of Gibson’s electrics, yet little has been told about the mid-1935 experiments by Alvino Rey, John Kutilek and later, Walter Fuller, that led to their introduction. All three of these key figures are alive today and were contacted for their recollections on the subject. Amazingly, the research and development guitar from the earliest experiments has also survived – a silent corpse of trial and error today, but the inspiration for all those wonderful Gibson electrics that followed. The 27-year-old Alvino Rey had the wherewithal in 1935 to hold on to Gibson’s first electric guitar and has kept it relatively intact for 61 years. To help put the design of the instrument into perspective, here’s a look at the company’s involvement with electrics from Lloyd Loar to the ES-150.

    On more than one occasion prior to 1935, the folks at Gibson dabbled with the idea of electrifying the guitar, using a pickup and an amplifier. However, the contemporary state of electronic technology did not allow them much room for success. As far back as 1923-’24, Gibson employees Lloyd Loar, Lewis Williams and Clifford Buttleman were investigating the possibilities of applying recent advances in radio technology to stringed instruments. While some experimenting appears to have been done, there is little evidence a working model was ever actually built.

    lapsteel prototype

    Front and rear view of the brass-framed lapsteel prototype. Note how it has “deformed” over time.

    lapsteel prototype Back

    They encountered several problems. In the early ’20s, operating an audio amplifier required the use of inefficient B+ batteries (also separate A, and in some cases, C batteries), making the reproduction of music (broadcast radio and early electrified Victrolas) somewhat impractical, as well as expensive. The single-ended triode amplifiers were very low-powered and the one and two-stage circuits lacked enough gain to bring weak signals to full output. While local radio stations supplied a strong enough signal to allow for the use of a large speaker horn (similar in shape to the acoustic model of the Victrolas), headphones were often needed to hear distant stations. Cone speakers were still in the development stage. Only the largest (and very expensive) public address systems could amplify a signal to a level louder than the original, whether voice or music, and the frequency range of the giant horns lacked seriously at both ends of the spectrum. Even with the early development of talking pictures, electricity was used to transmit and audibly reproduce real world sounds, not make them louder. This suggests the extent, results and importance of the Lloyd Loar-era Gibson “experiments” have been exaggerated over the years (as does research into Loar’s vocations following his departure – he did not immediately jump into electric guitar building, as has been implied in the past). It would be a number of years before Gibson was again involved with developing an electric instrument.

    With the release of the rectifier tube in late 1927, amplifiers for audio reproduction became practical, no longer relying on batteries. Circuit and component improvements, such as push/pull outputs employing screen grid tubes, led to the amplifying of music for reaching more people than was possible with acoustic instruments. When the 1920s met the 1930s, Gibson electrified a small number of acoustic archtops, e.g. J. Bellson’s famous L-4 (with amplifier) photo and an extant L-5 model owned by collector Scott Chinery.

    Apparently, all of these were designed in the style of late-’20s Stromberg-Voisinet and Vega production models, using a pickup mounted to the underside of the top (leftover pickups from this time may very well have been mistakenly attributed to Loar’s tenure). While far from the volume of a modern electric guitar/amplifier set, stringed instruments were beginning to compete with the louder brass and woodwinds, as well as the recently-released resonator instruments by National and Dobro.

    The designs of all the early pickups were based on the reproduction of vibrations being acoustically transferred from the strings, through the bridge and into the body. The idea of an electric instrument with a string-driven magnetic pickup, as opposed to earlier electrified instruments, would become the industry standard by the mid-’30s (except for ViviTone), with the George Beauchamp designed Electro Steel and Spanish models hitting the market in October, 1932.

    Dobro followed with a full-page ad for the All-Electric in April, 1933, using an under-the-strings magnetic pickup design patented by Dobro and reportedly purchased for $600 from an Arthur Stimpson, listed as the designer (new info regarding Stimpson and Paul Tutmarc’s roles in the regionally released, early-’30s Audiovox electric instruments and amplifiers should hit the pages of this magazine soon). Vega offered the “Vegaphone Amplifier for all stringed instruments” (undoubtedly including some kind of pickup) in July, 1933, with the statement “Amplification is not new to Vega.” The Volu-Tone amplifier and pickup set of September, 1933, featured a pickup of the string-driven magnetic-type that mounted to the top of any steel-stringed instrument.

    The idea of adding a pickup (and amplifier) to an existing instrument actually made a lot of sense, especially considering the lack of quality common to the production electrics before 1936 (as in Harmony and Regal bodies with Rickenbacker and National/Dobro electronics). All the electric instruments were sold with an amplifier as part of a set, and priced as such.

    By mid 1935, it was obvious the electric guitar market was growing quickly, with favorable response from the general public. The Electro line had additionally taken on the Rickenbacker name and was being distributed and promoted on a national level by the Progressive Musical Instrument Corp. of New York, and the Coast Wholesale Music Co. of San Francisco. The National and Dobro companies had moved in together at 6920 McKinley Avenue, in Los Angeles, and were featured in large ads promoting aluminum steels and wooden Spanish models. A number of highly-visible guitarists were going electric, so when Gibson’s main archtop competitor, Epiphone, entered the electric guitar field, the folks in Kalamazoo seemingly had no choice but to join the race (for details on the Gibson/Epiphone rivalry see Jim Fisch and L.B. Fred’s new book Epiphone, The House of Stathopoulo).

    Looking at the mid-1935 Gibson R & D guitar gives the impression the company was starting from scratch, which is not entirely the case. Enter the highest profile electric guitarist of the time, Alvino Rey, featured daily over the airwaves nationally with Horace Heidt’s Brigadiers.

    Rey had purchased an Electro steel guitar in 1932, and quickly integrated the new sound into his radio act. When the band came to Chicago from San Francisco in May of 1935, Gibson’s General Manager, Guy Hart, quickly approached Rey (an endorser of the L-5 since 1929) for a new project, seeking his experience, his ear and his Electro steel guitar and amp (Andre Duchossoir’s revised edition of Gibson Electrics stated the year was 1934, based on statements from Gibson employees; however, the Rey’s family scrapbook – as well as Gibson catalogs – definitely place Rey in San Francisco for all of 1934 and not in Chicago until May of 1935).

    Lacking the necessary test equipment to develop an electric guitar and amplifier set, Gibson subcontracted the long-established musical merchandise giant Lyon & Healy, Chicago, to perform the R & D (Electro/Rickenbacker, National, Dobro, Vega and Epiphone also subcontracted the building of their amplifiers). Working at the L & H factory with their top electrical engineer, John Kutilek, Rey was given the opportunity to try some of the designs he had been accumulating during his years with the Electro set.

    As you will see in later features on Mr. Rey and his personally-designed instruments, the man created whatever he needed to make an instrument accommodate his musical id. Handwritten notes and diagrams on hotel stationary from 1935 have survived, suggesting a one-man think tank, e.g. placing two separate coils in series (humbucking), having the tuner shafts placed so that the strings pulled straight over the nut, having the tuners at the bottom end of the guitar acting as individual tailpieces (Steinberger style), adding variable capacitance to the tone circuit (Varitone) and jumping from the speaker output of one amp into the input of a second.

    lapsteel's pickup

    The lapsteel’s pickup, photographed from the bridge side.

    Less practical (but equally fascinating to ponder) were the ideas of piano hammers under the strings, running the strings in series with the pickup coil, and last but not least, connecting the bar (steel) electrically to the circuit! Unfortunately, this brainstorming did not produce a truly-unique instrument in the time afforded, and the guitar-half of the project was sent to Kalamazoo after approximately three months.

    It is important to remember that Gibson was an industry leader, and that simply releasing a clone of instruments already on the market was not part of its original plan. Avoiding a patent infringement on the pickup design was most important, and much of the time at L & H was devoted to that end. Different materials for the bodies were also tried, with a number of other “prototypes” constructed. But Rey’s Electro set, the experiment’s laboratory control, could not be topped before the project moved to the Gibson factory.

    Time had become a factor as the company basically started over on the instrument with Walter Fuller heading the R & D (Kutilek/L & H was still responsible for the production model E-150 amplifier). Electro/Rickenbackers had aluminum bodies, Dobros had aluminum bodies, Nationals had aluminum bodies, so the “new” Gibsons, released only a few months later, had aluminum bodies (Vega and Supro aluminum steels, advertised in 1936, were possibly also on the market in 1935).

    Electro/Rickenbacker’s horseshoe pickup was more identifiable than Dobro and National’s, so Gibson reworked the magnets-under-the-coil style, using the ends of two specially-ordered Alnico bar magnets at opposite ends of the coil to develop a stronger field than was available from any single magnet. This is the pickup referred to today as the “Charlie Christian model.”

    In only a few short months, the company was able to release a respectable steel guitar, placing Gibson in a growing market that would move approximately 2,000 sets in 1935 and twice that in 1936 (according to NAMM figures published at the end of 1936). The E-150 set included the tweed Lyon & Healy made amp, a matching tweed case for the instrument and the aluminum steel guitar which featured Alvino Rey’s tone roll-off control, the first production electric instrument with this oft taken-for-granted circuit. Rey, still involved with Gibson, received one of the first examples of this model for himself, as well as a doubleneck, made up of two aluminum instruments mounted into rubber and sunk into a Gibson-made curly maple body (more on these in future articles).

    According to factory records, 98 aluminum steels were assembled, including seven that went to the “Singing Guitar Orchestra” of Kalamazoo. These were still being shipped as late as March 1936.
    Epiphone began running ads for its wooden-body Electar steel guitars (also an electric Spanish, both with very Electro/Rickenbacker-like pickups) in November of 1935, and around the start of 1936, Gibson followed them in their choice of construction material. Negative dealer response to the simple aluminum body and difficulties in casting the bodies are other often-cited possibilities for the switch to wood.

    While the Epiphone was rather plain, Gibson’s new EH-150 steel was a superbly-crafted miniature guitar, featuring bound top, neck and pickup and inlaid fingerboards and headstocks.

    Was this guitar influential? In 1936, Rickenbacker, Dobro, National, Vega, Supro and Supertone, by Sears, all had aluminum bodies. By the end of 1937, they had all switched to wood, except Rickenbacker, which was actively pursuing Bakelite.

    There was no mention of any electric instruments in Gibson’s “New Models – Gibson Guitars” flyer dated January 1, 1936, which introduced the “Advanced Models,” “Improved Models,” and “New Models” of archtops, as well as all the flat-tops, the Roy Smeck Stage Deluxe and Radio Grande Hawaiian Guitars, and the new tweed cases (“Alvino Rey – Horace Heidt’s Brigadiers – Chicago” was pictured with a Super 400). A Gibson ad from May 1936 listed all styles of instruments made by the company, again with no mention of anything electric, even though the first electric Spanish guitars were about to be shipped. Finally, in October, 1936, an ad was run for the new wood-bodied EH-150 set with no mention of any other electrics.

    It seems the company was playing it safe and getting back endorser and dealer response before launching a serious promotional campaign. Gibson’s Catalog X, of December, 1936, was the first to feature electric instruments and Alvino and Horace were pictured with the wood-bodied EH-150. The EH designation distinguished the “New Model – Electric Hawaiian Guitars” (EH-150 and EH-100) from the “New ES-150 Model Electric Spanish Guitar” officially released late in 1936. The importance of the ES-150, with its pickup mounted near the neck in defiance to Rickenbacker, Dobro, National, Vega and Epiphone Spanish models, should be well-known to readers of this magazine. The rest, as they say, is history.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Feb. ’97 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Ampeg Dan Armstrong Plexi Guitar

    Ampeg Dan Armstrong ADAG Plexi Guitar

    If you were at the 1969 NAMM show in Chicago, perhaps you saw what was most regarded as that year’s show-stopping piece of gear – the Ampeg Dan Armstrong “see-through” guitar.

    While “see-through” guitars have never been commonplace, today they are offered by several manufacturers, including BC Rich, Dillon, and Ampeg. But when they were introduced in ’69, there was nothing like the latter’s axes, designed by soughtafter session musician/guitar expert Dan Armstrong.

    With a cool, unique body made of Plexiglas that was machined and finish-sanded just like a wood body, they had a bolt-on maple neck with 24 frets (a full two octaves) clear of the body for greater access, and interchangeable pickups so a player could tailor its tone. The six single-coil pickups were designed by Armstrong and pickup guru Bill Lawrence, given suitable monikers like Rock Treble, Rock Bass, Country Treble, Country Bass, Jazz Treble, and Jazz Bass, and sold for $35 each. Its aesthetics were topped off with a faux-woodgrain Formica pickguard and matching headstock overlay, while its tones were controlled via master volume and tone pots topped with cool metal knobs, a three-way tone toggle switch, and a metal Danelectro-style bridge with rosewood saddle. After early models experienced tuning stability issues, Ampeg started using high-quality Grover tuners as standard equipment, and slightly rewired the tone toggle.

    The instruments quickly became popular with many top rock artists of the day; the Stones’ Keith Richards and Bill Wyman used them on tour starting in late ’69, as did Leslie West and Paul McCartney, while Cream bassist Jack Bruce used the bass version. Financial issues between Dan Armstrong and Ampeg led to the guitars being discontinued in 1971.

    Fast-forward to the 1998 summer NAMM show, where Ampeg again launched the ADA guitar and bass, this time made in Japan by Fujigen and employing pickups made by Armstrong’s son, Kent, and with upgraded individual brass saddle inserts and a slimmer neck profile. It stuck around until 2001.

    The latest version, the ADAG, shares the same specs and improvements as the second version, plus a new neck joint with smaller, flush-mounted screws accessed from the back of the guitar (like traditional bolt-ons), a modern dual-blade humbucking pickup along with the stock Rock Treble single-coil, and a new TKL case with Ampeg’s Blue Diamond tolex. Also noteworthy is the return of the original neck profile. Ampeg recently invited us to take a turn with the new guitar, and we were happy to oblige.

    Our test axe boasted excellent fit and finish typical of Japanese-made instruments, including a nicely executed shallow-cut bone nut, clean, level, well-polished frets, and a meticulously routed, sanded, and polished Plexiglas body. While we were expecting the ADAG to be somewhat beastly, weight-wise, at just a bit over nine pounds it was quite tolerable, especially given its contoured body, which hangs comfortably and is well-balanced. The slim-taper neck profile and low action, with the 24.5″ scale length, give the ADA6 a fast feel, and its 24 frets clear of the body lend easy access to the upper registers.

    Ampeg Dan Armstrong ADAG Plexi Guitar pickup

    To hear the sounds proferred by the ADA6, we plugged it into two EL34-powered amps; an Ampeg Jet J-12T 15-watt 1×12″ tube combo and a Koch Twintone II 50-watt 1×12″ tube combo.

    Through the clean channels of both amps, the Plexi’s Rock Treble single-coil gave a very strong, punchy clean tone with plenty of P-90-style midrange and high-end bite. The guitar was noticeably resonant and more musical than we anticipated, with real personality. Adding a bit of amplifier overdrive and gain produced a pleasantly aggressive, bright rock tone with a fair amount of sustain and in-your-face bark as we played power cords. After we swapped the Rock Treble for the new Rock Sustain humbucker (easily accomplished by loosening a knurled thumbscrew on the back of the guitar) the Koch’s overdrive channel produced a thick high-gain distortion with clear, articulate highs and even mids. The tone toggle switch has three settings; a high-end roll-off, a tone bypass, and an active rotary tone control we thought was more useful with the single-coil. For most of our tests, we left the toggle in the middle (bypass) position.

    Whether or not you think it’s cool that major acts like the Foo Fighters and Red Hot Chili Peppers are using the Dan Armstrong Plexi guitar, there’s no denying that it has clung tight to every bit of the “coolness” that made a splash in ’69. Add the fact that it’s a solid player with a variety of very usable tones, and you’ve got a winner.


    Ampeg Dan Armstrong ADAG Plexi Guitar
    Price $1,899
    Contact Loud Technologies, Inc., 16220 Wood-Red Road NE, Woodinville, WA 98072; phone (866)858 5832; www.loudtechinc.com.


    This article originally appeared in VG‘s April 2007 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


    ADA6 knockin demo 2.mp4

  • Mike Stern & Yellowjackets – Lifecycle

    The Yellowjackets (Russell Ferrante, Jimmy Haslip, Bob Mintzer, and Marcus Baylor) are all great players in their own right, though they benefit from the occasional contributions of friends. On this disc, they’re joined by guitar whiz Mike Stern, who not only brings his considerable soloing skills, but adds two compositions.

    Stern’s quirky chorused sound highlights “Falken’ Maze,” where his bop sensibilities bring an urgency usually not heard on Yellowjackets efforts. Same goes for “Yahoo,” which starts out as almost a clone of the early Fourplay sound, but gets goosed by Stern’s solo. The Stern-penned “Double Nickel” has an cool, odd feel with Stern and Mintzer stating the head against a pounding drum. Ferrante and Stern both get a chance to show their soloing skills in a way that makes you wish the band did this sort of thing more often. Stern’s other composition, “Dreams Go,” is a lovely ballad with a gospel feel and nice interaction between Ferrante and Stern.

    While the Yellowjackets are all wonderful players, it’s easy to forget that Robben Ford brought them together, and his fiery playing is sometimes missed. So it’s good for them to bring in someone like Stern, who can supply that oomph.


    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Jul. ’08 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Robert Cray

    ROBERT CRAY

    You’d think a guy who has been making great records since the early 1980s, puts on a great live show, and is respected by his peers would have released a live record before 2006. Robert Cray’s new double-CD, Live From Across the Pond, isn’t exactly the first attempt at getting the Robert Cray Band’s live sound to the public.

    “The thing is, we’ve made attempts in the past and it always puts a lot of pressure on myself and everybody else in the band. It never really pans out the way you want it to for that one night, but it’s the anticipation – everybody knows the button has been pressed and you’ve got to do it right.”

    Cray and his band – Jim Pugh on keyboards, Kevin Hayes on drums, and Karl Sevareid on bass – solved that problem last spring when they opened seven nights for Eric Clapton at Royal Albert Hall in London. “It gave us a chance not to think about the machines. We were just trying to get some new fans.”

    For those lucky enough to have caught Cray in concert, this will be a real joy. And for those who haven’t had the pleasure, it’s a perfect capsule of what the band does live, right down to the noises Cray makes while soloing.

    “Yeah, it’s just gruntin’ and groanin’ – I’m just trying to get what I want. I guess it’s just a habit that’s hard to shake!” he says with an embarrassed laugh. “We actually had to turn it down a little bit for the live record.”

    The set list is varied and adequately spans Cray’s career. Classic cuts like “Phone Booth,” the blistering “Our Last Time,” “Bad Influence,” and “Right Next Door” mix with great new songs like “Poor Johnny,” “Twenty,” and “12-Year-old Boy,” a hardcore blues cover of the Elmore James story of love stolen by a kid.

    “We were doing 40-minute sets and changed up a few every night,” he noted. “We don’t work with a set list, but we do have a song list of about 30 to 35 songs that I use in case I get stuck.”

    Cray says that air of mystery surrounding the songs helps the band stay loose, and could be one of the reasons they’ve worked together for so long. “We have a good time. We’re friends and everybody participates in the songwriting and arranging. Also, not using a set list and turning around and calling songs to the guys keeps everybody on their toes and makes it fun.”

    CRAY CD

    The sounds on the record are trademark Cray; solos bite and sting where needed, and soothe things over at other times. He says the equipment was the same as he’s used for several years. “I just used my Fender signature Strat. I go back and forth between several. I use two Matchless Clubman 35s running together, and sometimes we use a stereo vibrato that’s a remake of the Magnatone. It’s a rack-mount unit that was made by our guitar tech, Greg Zaccaria. I also use the TC Electronics 2290 for delay on a couple of tunes. For reverb, I use a Peavey Valve Verb.

    Writers like to make a big deal out of Cray’s career, which seems to have shifted from bluesman to soul man. But he says he’s never really noticed a difference.

    “A lot of people considered us a blues band, obviously, from day one. But the evidence is there that we did different things besides blues. We just let what happens, happen, myself included. I listen to a lot of different things and when I sit down and write a song, I don’t tell myself I’m going to write a particular kind of song, you know? Like I said, whatever happens, happens.”
    The order that happens isn’t uniform either. “Sometimes I get an idea for a story, like ‘Twenty.’ That lyric came first and then the music kind of followed along. For ‘Poor Johnny,’ it was a melody I had from four years ago and I went back and revisited an old cassette tape I had. I said ‘I gotta use that one.’”

    Though Cray admits to listening to a lot of music, it usually doesn’t happen when the band is on the road. With a laugh, he says, “We like to consider ourselves part of a group called ‘Musicians Against Music.’ We get picked up to go to a gig and if the guy has music on we’ll politely ask him to turn it off. The term came from, I think, our drummer. When you’re on the road and once you get off, it kind of takes a little while to actually want to sit down and listen to something. I’ve got CDs here that haven’t been opened for years.”

    Cray says practicing can also be a problem for him. He grabs the guitar mostly for gigs or when an idea strikes him. “I’ve always been bad about fitting time in to practice. I envy our bass player, Karl. He takes his bass everywhere. And going out on tour with Clapton, I see Derek Trucks with his guitar in hand all the time. But for some reason, I don’t do it. I think my attention span is short these days.”

    Listening to Live From Across the Pond, you’d never know he hasn’t been working to keep up his chops. And if you were lucky enough to see him with Clapton on tour, you caught his band doing a blistering set, especially when he joins Clapton, Trucks, and Doyle Bramhall, Jr. for several songs during Clapton’s set. It’s a rare treat to see all those guitar slingers performing together for part of the evening.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s January 2007 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.



    Robert Cray Band – phone booth

  • Gibson Top Tension Banjos

     

    1940 Gibson TB-18. Photo: Dan Loftin, courtesy Gruhn Guitars.

    Although most bluegrass banjo players consider Gibson’s Mastertone banjos with one-piece flange and flat-head tone ring – such as Earl Scruggs’ Granada and Don Reno’s Style 75 – to be the ultimate banjos, those models represent only the penultimate, the next-to-last step in Gibson’s long series of banjo design improvements.

    The final step came in 1937 with Styles 7, 12, and 18, better known as the “top tension” models.

    The evolution of Gibson banjos spanned exactly 20 years. The company started with nothing in 1918, the year the TB (for Tenor Banjo) appeared. Gibson’s Jimmie Johnstone, a former vaudeville performer, announced to banjo players that “In a nutshell, boys, it’s in a class by itself.” Between the rim and the head, where the tone ring was supposed to be, there was nothing – no tone ring. It was indeed, as Johnstone said, in a class by itself, but not in the same class as the Vegas, Bacons, and other brands with roots in the “classic” banjo era of the late 1800s.

    Gibson’s original open-back design remained through 1922 as the tenor banjo grew in popularity and Gibson fell farther behind. Gibson introduced a new family of mandolins designed by Lloyd Loar in mid 1922, and then Loar turned his attention where it was desperately needed – banjos.

    In May, 1923, Gibson introduced a banjo worthy of the Style 5 designation. Loar not only added a tubular tone ring, he surmised that contact with the rim would have a deadening effect, so he raised the tone ring off the rim with a series of ball bearings. The new Gibsons also came with resonators – either a “trap door” (a hinged flat plate) or a molded Pyralin (plastic) piece that was fastened on by a screw in the center.

    Loar left at the end of 1924, but Gibson continued to improve banjo designs. In early ’25, a new ball-bearing style (probably Loar’s design) had the ball bearings resting on springs. Also, the tone ring was altered so the head angled downward just before it met the tension hoop. (Although this second version of the ball-bearing ring gave the head an arched effect, the ring described today as “archtop” didn’t appear until 1927.) At the same time, Gibson switched to a modern-style cupped resonator, attached to a flange by four thumb screws.

    By 1927, Gibson introduced a new tone ring featuring a U-shaped cross-sectional shape, with the outer arm of the U slightly shorter than the inner arm. This gave the head a beveled or angled border and became known as the “archtop” tone ring. The archtop remained the standard spec on the Mastertone models introduced before 1937, from Style 3 up through the All American, all the way to World War II.

    The archtop tone ring was an excellent design, but Gibson pressed on with new designs. In 1929, the tube that had served as a tension hook anchor in the pre-flange era was done away with. The old style would be called “tube and plate” and the new version would be known simply as “one-piece.”

    At about the same time, Gibson began fitting some banjos with a new type of tone ring, with the U cross-sectional shape inverted. The upper curve of the inverted-U was offset so that the head only contacted the tone ring at its outermost point. The bevel at the edge of the head was gone, and this new design became known as the “flat-head” tone ring. It continued to evolve, too, from a lightweight “low-profile” style to a higher profile and finally to a heavier weight (about three pounds).

    The last version of the flat-head tone ring – the high-profile, heavyweight – is the one preferred by today’s players, and it came as standard equipment only on the new banjo models of 1937 – Styles 7, 12 and 18. The calling card of these new models was not the tone ring, however, but their “top-tension” adjustment capability. Before the advent of plastic, banjo heads were made of animal hide. In a humid atmosphere, the player had to tighten the tension on a hide head or it would be too spongy, and in dry conditions the head would contract and would be in danger of tearing if the tension was not loosened. To adjust the hooks (there were 24 of them), the resonator had to be removed. If the head could be adjusted without removing the resonator, the player could save some time, and that’s what the “top tension” models offered. The player still had to remove the armrest (one screw) to get to the tension hooks that were located under the armrest, but all in all, top tension adjustment seemed like a better idea. (In fact, the Ludwig company had introduced top-tension models in the late 1920s). The only problem with the design was the threaded flange, which was made of pot metal. Many surviving examples have washers and nuts anchoring the tension hooks where the flange threads have been stripped.

    Several other new features came on the top-tension models. Where Gibson resonators since 1925 had been laminated and pressed into an arched shape, the new models had solid-wood resonators that were carved into an arched shape on the outside but were flat on the inside. The frets were guitar-size, which were larger than the standard banjo frets. And the fingerboards were radiused.

    The top tensions came in three different levels of ornamentation and materials. Style 7 had a maple resonator and neck with rosewood fingerboard, slotted bow-tie inlays on the fingerboard and headstock, and nickel-plated hardware. Style 12 had a walnut resonator and neck with large Art Deco-style inlays and chrome-plated hardware. Style 18 had a maple resonator and neck, the same Art Deco inlays as the 12 and engraved gold-plated hardware.

    Gibson was confident enough in the top-tension models that the company quit making all the Mastertone models except the new Style 75 (essentially a continuation of Style 3) in 1938. From 1937 through 1941, Gibson shipped 85 top-tensions with tenor necks, 28 plectrums and 28 five-strings, for a total of 141. The standard-adjustment Mastertone, Style 75, was less expensive and sold only slightly better: 104 TB-75s, 6 PB-75s and 55 RB-75s for a total of 165. Although the domination of tenors (TBs) ended after the war, the pre-war Gibson Mastertone tenors are still in high demand today because the neck can easily be replaced with a five-string neck.

    In the post-war years, banjo players religiously followed Earl Scruggs and Don Reno, and the top-tensions were largely forgotten until Bill Keith played a Style 12 (an original tenor with a conversion neck) in Bill Monroe’s Blue Grass Boys. His banjo had a smoother tone with more sustain than those played by the banjo icons, and it was perfectly suited for his innovative “chromatic” style. Not surprisingly, the top-tension models have found a home today in the music of such modern stylists as Bela Fleck and Noam Pikelny (known for his work with John Cowan and
    Chris Thile).


    This article originally appeared in VG‘s May ’07 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Savage Audio Macht 12x

    Savage Audio Macht 12x

    The Savage Audio Macht 12x

    Savage Audio gained a solid reputation for its repair work before moving into amplifier production in 1990. Today, the company builds a full line of studio and stage amps with a list of players that includes Mike McCreedy and Stone Gossard of Pearl Jam, Beck, Peter Buck of R.E.M., and Doyle Bramhall, II.

    The Macht series is Savage’s foray into 6V6-based guitar amps. The Macht 12x is its 12-watt, class A amp, with a built-in Studio/Stage attenuator that adjusts power output down to less than half, where Savage says is a “sweet spot.”

    The 22-pound, 12-watt Macht 12x head has High and Low inputs, controls for Volume, Tone, Tremolo Speed, Depth, the attenuator switch, and on/off switch. Other features include jacks for 4-, 8-, and 16-ohm speaker outputs and a jack for a tremolo footswitch. The tube layout consists of two JJ 12AX7s, a pair of JJ 6V6s, and a Sovtek 5AR4 rectifier tube, all mounted horizontally. In a nice throwback sort of touch, Savage installs a handy tube diagram inside the cabinet.

    One of the first things you notice about the Macht 12 is the size of its output transformer; you don’t normally see one so robust in a 12-watt amp.

    The matching cab is made of nine-ply birch, open in back and available with a variety with basketweave grillecloth options. Our cab was equipped with a Celestion Vintage 10, and other format options include 1×15″, 1×12″, or 2×8″ with speakers from Celestion, Jensen, E-V, JBL, Eminence, Mojotone, and Tone Tubby. The amp is also available as a combo, and can be ordered with a variety of coverings. The owner’s manual gives specs, a troubleshooting guide, and even suggestions for preamp tube substitutions.

    With a Fender Telecaster, the amp went from clean, sweet, brown-Deluxe-like tone to robust tweed Deluxe as the Volume knob was turned to its upper regions. And for the record, comparing the Macht 12 to a Deluxe is somewhat unfair not only because of its more robust transformers, but its Tone control is full-range, not of the treble-roll-off variety.

    The amp exhibits a wonderful compression that is especially evident when playing a Strat on the neck pickup or a humbucker-equipped guitar. The compression was not the stompbox variety either, but more high-end studio type. Never squashing, but always beautifully framing the sound.

    Fully cranked, the Macht 12x really shows its teeth, producing a tight, gritty overdrive that no pedal could possibly provide – that’s what cranked 6V6s do! The Celestion Vintage 10, of course, adds its own flavor of high-cholesterol midrange to every note. If you desire more clarity while staying crunchy, the optional Celestion G-12H-30 or an Alnico Blue might suit you better than the Vintage 10.

    Savage Panel

    The Studio/Stage settings are extremely well-conceived. In the low-output Studio mode, the amp retains its vibe, sacrificing only a slight bit of treble response, which is easily remedied with a touch of the Tone knob. As the amp is dimed in either mode, it becomes brighter, necessitating rolling back the Tone control. And it certainly is no surprise that the amp is pedal-friendly. From Zen Drives to modeling pedals, it accepts all with open arms. Even a pummeling from a cranked ’70s MXR Dynacomp produced smooth, splat-free overdrive.

    Speaking of effects, the Macht 12x has a built-in Tremolo circuit reminiscent of that aboard a blackface Fender. But unlike its Fullerton forefather, the Macht 12x’s tremolo can be dialed from a very controllable seasick slow to insanely fast. It is superbly smooth, and requires only a very small drop in overall level when engaged.

    Overall, the Macht 12x is a very toneful, well-built, well-thought-out amp, and its built-in attenuator makes it a godsend for those who strive for good tone but are always being told to turn down. Kudos also for making it a head/cab; separating the tubes from the speakers is one of the smartest things one can do to prolong tube life. And it gives the player the option of sitting in a studio control room with the head, while the cab sits down the hall. Though it may not offer the scooped mids of a blackface Fender or the glassy highs of a Vox AC30, the Macht 12x produces robust tones for 6V6 lovers looking for sweeter midrange and less twang.



    Savage Macht 12x
    Price $1,570 (head), $650 1×10″ cab.
    Contact Savage Audio, Inc. 12500 Chowen Avenue South, Suite 112, Savage, MN 55337; phone (952) 894-1022; www.savageamps.com.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s November 2007 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.



    Savage Audio: Rare DeArmond Tremelo into Macht 12x