Last month’s “Hit List” review of the Beach Boys’ U.S. Singles Collection: The Capitol Years (1962-1965) pointed out that, as great as the music is, what your $132.95 list price really goes toward is fancy packaging. As if to illustrate this point, Collectors’ Choice compiled the 21 singles Jan & Dean cut for Liberty (42 songs, which is five more than the Beach Boys set) into a two-CD set that lists for $27.98.
Granted, Jan & Dean don’t hold the lofty position, artistically, that the Beach Boys do (Rolling Stone once said they played Spike Jones to Brian Wilson’s Beethoven – which isn’t fair to Jan & Dean or Spike Jones), and that’s a shame, because their work deserves more scrutiny and respect.
Up ’til now, their singles (the medium in rock’s pre-album consciousness) have never been properly or completely anthologized, although there are various collections with substandard stereo mixes. This set sidesteps that problem by removing any subjectivity (this is all the singles, period) and presenting the work the way it was originally intended to be heard out of transistor earplugs and car radios – in glorious mono.
The program begins with 1962’s “A Sunday Kind Of Love,” finding the duo still trading on their earlier doo-wop success from hits like “Jennie Lee” and “Baby Talk.” It’s not until track 11 that they were given a new lease on life thanks to Brian Wilson’s co-write (and high harmony vocal) on 1963’s “Surf City,” riding the sports/music craze the Beach Boys had forged.
Unfortunately, other than being lumped together as the “Wrecking Crew,” the L.A. studio musicians who played with a mix of precision and spirit on hits like “Honolulu Lulu,” “Dead Man’s Curve,” “Drag City,” and “The Little Old Lady (From Pasadena)” aren’t listed individually. (The contracts for these dates are sitting in the union archives, you know.) Dean Torrance crediting partner/producer Jan Berry for virtually creating the Wrecking Crew is a bit of an overstatement (same case could be made for Duane Eddy), but guitarists Glen Campbell, Tommy Tedesco, Bill Pitman, Billy Strange (and session honchos like Leon Russell and Hal Blaine) did some of their best pop-rock work here.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s Nov. ’08 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.
1962 Gibson EB-3, serial number 78748. Photo: VG Archive. Instrument courtesy of Gil Southworth.
When it came to electric basses, Michigan-based Gibson spent the ’50s playing follow the leader to California’s Fender. So it’s a touch ironic that while Fender made only one model in that decade (the Precision), Gibson introduced three – the violin-shaped solidbody Electric Bass in 1953, the semi-hollow EB-2 in ’58, and the solidbody EB-0, which replaced the Electric Bass in ’59.
Fender’s first two-pickup bass, the Jazz, was introduced in 1960, and to what extent the two-pickup EB-3 (introduced in ’61) was actually a “response” to the Jazz is debatable. The similarities in approach were obvious; the Jazz was perceived as an upgraded/two-pickup version of the Precision. Likewise, some saw the EB-3 as an upgraded/two-pickup EB-0 (which, incidentally, was given a pointed-double-cutaway SG-shaped body in ’61), but the reality was there was much more to both.
Like the EB-0, the EB-3 had a mahogany body and neck, and the 30.5″ scale shared by all Gibson basses at the time. The headstock had a crown inlay, and the rosewood fingerboard joined the body at the 17th fret. Standard finish was Cherry, both had dot inlays and a one-piece bridge/tailpiece with an angled portion for compensation. The EB-3’s hardware also included a handrest and string mute. Early versions had a large, black-plastic-covered humbucking pickup near the neck and a small metal-covered humbucker near the bridge. By ’62, both were metal-covered.
The EB-3’s electronics were versatile. In addition to a Volume and Tone knob for each pickup, an unusual four-way rotary switch offered operation of the neck pickup only (position 1), both pickups (2), bridge pickup only (3), and neck pickup with “choke” (4) that produced a brighter, baritone-like sound; its circuit was similar to the pushbutton “baritone” switch on the EB-2.
Fans of classic rock and its guitarists know that Jack Bruce, bassist with Cream, was the most visible EB-3 player in the ’60s. After learning bass on an upright, he switched to a 30″-scale Fender Bass VI (six strings, tuned an octave below a standard guitar) while playing with the Graham Bond Organization and began playing an EB-3 in the early days of Cream.
“I wanted to play bass like a guitar, and you can’t do that on a regular Fender – you can’t bend the strings,” Bruce told VG in 2002. “But the most important reason was that I didn’t want it to sound like a Fender; I wanted it to sound very personal. The EB-3 fit the bill; I was able to get some great distortion, and it didn’t sound like a Fender at all!”
Bruce’s improvisations were a vital part of Cream’s legendary jams, and music critics of the time did indeed apply the term “guitar-like” to his playing, as they did to that of Free’s Andy Fraser, who also played an EB-3. Other noteworthy EB-3 users in the ’60s included Big Brother & the Holding Company’s Peter Albin, and David Freiberg of Quicksilver Messenger Service.
The 1962 EB-3 shown here doesn’t have the standard finish or fretboard inlay. Instead, it has a factory-original white finish and large-block markers that match the Les Paul Custom of the era. According to Gibson records, it was a special order entered as “EB-3 – white” on September 12, 1962. It was apparently made to match a Les Paul Custom made for members of a band.
In its history, the EB-3 went through several configurations, including having a slotted headstock for a brief time, and long-scale variants. Company records indicate that white became available as a standard finish beginning in 1976 and going through ’79, the year the EB-3 was discontinued.
Like most short-scale basses, the EB-3 may have a sonic disadvantage thanks to its inherently decreased string resonance, but also like most short-scale basses, it’s very comfortable to play. And in the hands of certain players, it has provided many a memorable low-end lick.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s January 2008 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.
“I love the green on this ’68 Mosrite,” Roth noted. “It has great tone, butter-smooth action, a great whammy bar, and really hot pickups. Photos courtesy Rogers and Cowen.”
“When I got this ’53 Telecaster, it really set me free,” said Roth. “It was my main guitar from ’75 to the mid ’80s. When I got it, it had hardly any neck wear; that’s all from me. I just played the hell out of it. When Fender was getting into the reissues, they used that guitar’s neck as the template.”
This mid-’60s Epiphone Sheraton has mini humbuckers Roth calls, “The greatest pickups Gibson ever made.”
“I always had a fascination with the Guild Duane Eddy model,” Roth said. “It’s basically like a Starfire 6, but with one cutaway. It’s an original one, but I wish it was an earlier model with the D’Armonds instead of the humbuckers.”
“Duke Robillard used this Epiphone Emperor Regent Deluxe on his ‘Hot Licks’ video, and I made him swear he’d sell it to me one day. It’s a ’51, and Duke had replaced the original low-output Epiphone pickups with mini humbuckers.”
By any measure, Arlen Roth’s recent spate of creativity would be impressive. It began with his solo acoustic CD, Drive It Home, in 2001, and was followed by an eclectic collection of ensemble instrumentals (2005’s Landscape), daughter Lexie Roth’s debut, One Long Blink, which he co-produced and played on that same year, and the just-released Toolin’ Around Woodstock CD/DVD – the latter three on his own Aquinnah label. And he has two more CDs already in the can – acoustic instrumental tributes to two acts he has worked with, Bob Dylan and Simon & Garfunkel, tentatively titled Take Two.
But taken in the context of the life-altering events that befell Roth in 1998, his prolific burst is an amazing testament to the human spirit. Indeed, it’s a wonder he’s able to just get out of bed every day and put one foot in front of the other.
That year, Roth lost his wife and business partner, Deborah, and their 14-year-old daughter, Gillian, in a car accident. What Arlen refers to as simply “the tragedy” happened just two days after Gillie had recorded the theme song for a Nickelodeon show about an all-girl rock band, in which she acted, sang, and played guitar.
Arlen shut down. The name and face familiar to anyone who has ever opened a guitar magazine – thanks to his solo albums; sideman stints with John Prine, Eric Anderson, Duane Eddy, Janis Ian, Don McLean, and the icons mentioned above; and the extensive catalog of instructional tapes and videos (by Arlen as well as players like Buddy Guy, Danny Gatton, John Entwistle, Tal Farlow, Eric Johnson, Steve Morse, James Burton, and others) of his family-owned Hot Licks company – was gone.
Initially, the original songs of his younger daughter, Lexie, but ultimately the guitar and music itself pulled Arlen through, as he details below.
Lexie is also featured on the Woodstock project, along with Sonny Landreth, Bill Kirchen, the Band’s Levon Helm, and his daughter, Amy Helm, of Ollabelle. A followup to 1993’s Toolin’ Around – which teamed Arlen with Gatton, Eddy, Jerry Douglas, Brian Setzer, Duke Robillard, and Albert Lee – it is Roth’s strongest effort to date. As dazzling as the first Toolin’ was, the Woodstock sessions, recorded at Helm’s studio, are more relaxed yet more focused. And with Arlen handling some of the vocal chores, more personal.
The album’s centerpiece is Arlen’s searing instrumental tour de force on “Unchained Melody,” reminiscent of his interpretation of “When A Man Loves A Woman,” from his 1980 album, Hot Pickups. But with rocking versions of old standbys “Matchbox,” “Sweet Little Sixteen,” and “Just One Look,” and duets on “Games People Play” (with Kirchen) and “Deep Feeling” (with Landreth), it illustrates that life not only goes on but that you can have a good time – especially with the help of music.
Roth’s interview for VG in 1997 covered his background (growing up in the Bronx, attending Manhattan’s High School of Music and Art, his artist/cartoonist father and uncles), the founding of Hot Licks, his relationship with the late Danny Gatton, and the first Toolin’ Around album. This intimate, often emotional interview picks up with his return to active duty.
There are certain styles and techniques that are associated with certain guitars. And even though a Tele, for instance, can be a country guitar or a blues guitar or a rock guitar…
Or a jazz guitar!
People think of it mainly as either a chicken-pickin’ country guitar or in terms of the piercing tone and bends of Roy Buchanan or Danny Gatton or Albert Collins.
Yeah, that’s actually a very limited way of looking at that guitar. Just what Danny would do with it – it’s an everything guitar. I’ve got a picture of me with Joe Pass at the ESP booth at NAMM, playing an ESP. I remember him saying, “I want this.” Nothing made more sense in the world than sitting there listening to Joe Pass play that guitar.
People also think of you as a “Tele player.” Do you think that’s fair?
Hmm… yeah. It’s nice to have something that you’re remembered for. I think with the Tele it’s because of my string-bending. But when I was listening to and being influenced by that type of playing, I wasn’t thinking, “Gee, if only I had a Tele.” I was doing it on a ’52 Les Paul.
Of course, Tele is my guitar of choice, but it doesn’t mean I won’t be just as prone to pick up a Strat or a Gretsch for a certain part. And now I’m playing the Warren, which can do Strat sounds as well and even Les Paul-type tones. I think it’s the feel of the Tele that I like the most. I love those thick maple necks and the way the Telecaster body sits on your knee without sliding away like a Stratocaster. It’s the most user-friendly instrument out there. I think they really got it right the first time. It’s ridiculous what an amazing design it is. It’s a total work of art.
For me, there’ll be nothing like my ’53 Tele, but I really enjoy playing the Warren because it’s a one-piece, light, ash body, and it’s got all the right elements that make me feel at home. If I don’t feel at home on the instrument, I can get off doing that – like having a blast playing the Mosrite – but I know that I’m doing that.
Another big side of me is the acoustic, which is why I feel very strongly about the OM Pre-War Santa Cruz. To me, the OOO Martin has always been like the ’53 Tele of acoustics; that’s where my comfort zone is. Anything else is kind of adjunctive to that.
There are guitarists who are also collectors, but there are examples of legendary guitarists, like Lonnie Mack or Buddy Holly, who only played one model of guitar. Did the collecting grow out of just being a guitar fanatic?
Yeah, and I think also because I wanted different sounds. I wanted to emulate certain players and capture a little bit of what they had. But mainly it was just because I thought they were cool. I first wanted a black-pickguard Tele because I saw those pictures of Jeff Beck with his Esquire. When I was getting into Teles, like when Bloomfield was on the first Butterfield album, it was always white-on-white, and they looked boring.
And there’s just an aesthetic beauty about them, the same as with vintage cars. And I do come from a family of collectors. My father [Al Ross] is an art collector and a painter and New Yorker cartoonist – he’s 96 now, still doing it. I’m nuts with that stuff. I get as passionate about collecting vintage decals as I do guitars. It’s the coolness factor. Like, when I see Carl Perkins with the ES-5 Switchmaster, I go, “Man, I wish I had one of those!” And they’re related to old memories. I always wanted a 355, just because that’s what B.B. plays, but it’s not something I’ve got to have.
I’m also not a big fan of the idea that guitars have to be mint. I think that’s a terrible thing. When you find a guitar that’s never been played and has no soul to it, it feels that way. I don’t care how old or how flawless it is, the guitar gets better with being played, broken in. I don’t hesitate to fall in love with guitars that are totally beat up. It’s what they sound like and what they play like that makes me happy.
How would you contrast the two Toolin’ albums? Was there a different objective this time?
I think the original objective was probably the same, and then they both evolved. On the new one, once I got involved with Levon Helm, and he really became like my partner in the album, it became much more of a personal record from the standpoint of, “We’re going to explore a bunch of tunes here and go into some sessions not even knowing what songs we’ll be recording.” When I started that day with Bill Kirchen, we didn’t know we were going to do “Games People Play.” Or what the hell, let’s do “Deep Feeling.” Sonny and I just decided to do it and found that groove. I needed to keep that spontaneity factor. The great thing about the first Toolin’ was that it was a guitar extravaganza, but this album I wanted to be, first of all, more vocals. I like playing off vocals, and I was very encouraged by singing with Levon and with Bill Kirchen, who is a very fine singer. It’s also more focused. It wasn’t about quantity; it was about quality. Getting Sonny on there, we had our own special thing that’s just him and me. But we didn’t know Levon was going to sing. I went to the bathroom during one session, and I came out and there was my girlfriend, Maria – who’s now my wife – and she’s singing “Cryin’ Time” with Levon, snapping their fingers like it’s a doo-wop thing. Next thing you know, Levon’s like, “Let’s roll tape. Let’s do it.” And he was real excited about singing “Sweet Little Sixteen.” He was like a little kid. This guy has not lost his innocence one iota. He may be embittered by the music business like all of us are, but the minute that tape is rolling we all remember why we did it in the first place. He was just a joy.
Just getting to know what it’s like to play with him as a drummer – my God. “This is the most world-class drumming!” You can stop the CD and go back to the beginning of the song, and he’s not using any click tracks, and the tempo is absolutely spot-on perfect. There’s so much feeling in every hit – like when he hits the snare. And he took a lot of care with the sessions. He was very often the one who was least satisfied, who wanted to do another take. I felt like he wasn’t treating it like just another session, that it really meant something to him.
I think it’s got more personal depth to it than the first Toolin’ Around. This was a little more of an artist’s record, I think.
Did you know Bill Kirchen and Sonny Landreth before you got together to record?
Bill, yes; Sonny, no. Sonny I felt I knew just from the way he played; it so intrigued me. Bill I had played with at a couple of Danny Gatton benefits, and I always thought he was incredibly likeable – just a funny, cool guy. We had a blast working together. And Sonny and I – that’s what professional musicians do. You can get together and right away you just become one with each other and one with the music. In fact, the other day he played at a club here and had me come up and sit in – which I didn’t expect at all; I didn’t even bring a guitar. He’s such a gentleman.
You talk about the collective experience in the room sometimes; it’s like hundreds of years of musical experience all thrown together.
The first Toolin’ album was amazing, memorable experiences, but this time we allowed the sessions to go on longer, and there was more interaction with the artists. On some songs, we were just doing tracks. When I did “Burnt Child,” which is just me on acoustic, that was actually a sketch I was doing for Lee Roy Parnell. We were going to do a duet, but Lee Roy came down with a case of double pneumonia and couldn’t do the session. I decided I liked the song the way it was. Lee Roy and I will pick up on another record. He’s another great player and has that great vibe.
How do you include so many distinctive personalities, with an eclectic repertoire, and have the result be a cohesive whole instead of a patchwork quilt?
Well, unlike the first Toolin’, I wanted to do most of it in the same studio, and I really fell in love with the sound of Levon’s studio. Very live sounding room. So we kept the consistency from the sound factor first, then we kept the consistency from the band members. Levon played on nine out of 11 drum tracks. Then when other people came in, they were already becoming a part of the bigger picture. And the album evolved. I decided at one point that Sonny and I could take a left turn and do something that was just us, with no band.
I also did sessions up at Levon’s for this acoustic Dylan album I’m doing. Obviously, he played on one electric Dylan track for this album, “Ballad Of A Thin Man.” Which is kind of historic, and he just tore into it.
I was hoping to have written more songs, like I did with the first Toolin’ CD, but we ended up attacking some of our favorite old songs. What the heck – it was fun doing it this way. I’m a big believer in spontaneity. I can’t stand being overly prepared for something. I like to go in with a bunch of musicians you trust, and try to get the best out of Sonny or Bill or Levon – and that’s going to be when they’re not confined. The unhappiest times for me as a musician are when you think you’re getting called to do something because they love the way you play, and then they just tell you what to do. “Could you play that solo more like Eric Clapton?” “Well, why did you call me?” I’d rather let people have their creative freedom.
You’ve been in the position of being someone’s hired gun, as an accompanist. So how do you strike a balance between being enough of a chameleon to fit into another artist’s identity but still have it come out with your stamp?
If you go all the way back to the beginning of it, I think it was always Arlen Roth, but I had to do gigs to make a living. There were definitely times when I felt like my music wasn’t going anywhere, playing “Scarborough Fair” for the 59th time in a row, with no room for improvisation, when I was not getting off on it. But at the same time I was always thinking of myself as a solo artist, working on that side of my career. My first solo album came out in ’78, but I recorded it in ’76. I was always hell bent on being about my own style, and I think the people who afforded me the most flexibility and learning with that were a lot of the acoustic artists I toured with. For many years I played with Eric Anderson – just him on guitar – and he gave me a broad, open canvas on which to paint. Tony Byrd, a South African artist, was another interesting musician I played with. When Paul Simon heard what we were doing, he kind of borrowed that for his whole African period. That taught me a lot about being a sideman, but at the same time learning to paint with somebody else’s song. I’m very relaxed when I don’t have to sing and can back up someone, like Lexie; that taps another whole side of me.
Roth bought this ’52 goldtop in 1967 and immediately replaced the trapeze tailpiece. “I played it at one of Les Paul’s birthday gatherings at the Iridium, and he autographed it for me,” he said.
Roth’s two-pickup “flame” Tele was put together by Warmouth and Zion in ’93. “Danny Gatton set up the electronics for me, and it’s got Joe Barden pickups,” he said.
“I’ve had a number of Fender Bass VIs over the years, but I always liked this white ’62 the best,” Roth said. “I tune it an octave lower, but like to capo it sometimes.”
After playing Paul Simon’s Gurian on “Trailways Bus” from his Capeman album, Roth found this early-’70s rosewood model.
Roth says this Kay flat-top “…sounds like a piano! It’s got the biggest top I’ve ever seen – just a gigantic guitar. It reminds me a little of the old Stella 12-string, just in terms of the top mass; you don’t see guitars that big anymore.”
I think James Burton is the quintessential sideman, but he’d have no trouble doing a great solo album. Even his old solo stuff sounds terrific. All I can say is, I kept it in perspective.
What’s your focus when you’re playing behind a singer?
I’m responding to them like they’re another instrument, on an absolute, one-to-one, millisecond-behind thing. Very often I don’t even need to go over a song. A guy can just go onstage and say, “It’s in C,” and I’ll say, “Don’t worry about it. Don’t tell me anything about the song; just play.” I can usually fall in within the first two or three lines, because I pick up on the whole overall sound. A lot of our favorite records we remember from when we were kids, we don’t remember particularly the lyrics or the music, we just like the overall sound of it. When I heard the Byrds doing “Mr. Tambourine Man,” I didn’t really care what they were singing, because I couldn’t understand half the words anyway. But just the tone of the 12-string and the voices and the jingle-jangle – it was just perfect.
I try to keep the stuff not derivative. Unfortunately, a lot of singers want to hear things they’re comfortable with, that they heard somewhere else. But it’s been a long time since I’ve been doing sideman, backup work.
But when you’re playing with Lexie, you’re backing her up.
For Lexie I’ll do anything [laughs].
Sometimes I lament not doing more sideman work. I’d love to have some good gigs, but at the same time I’m being given the breathing room right now to really be the solo artist I always felt I was and that I want to be. That needs time to nurture and develop and kind of take hold. In the old days, it seemed like every time that got rolling, a phone call would come to do a Simon & Garfunkel tour or something. And I’d have to do it, because it was a good thing for my career, and it was good for monetary reasons. There’s not much money most of the time in trying to do your own thing.
Is the eclectic bent a result of growing up in a creative family?
I guess so. I never really thought of myself as being that eclectic. I try to always stay true to keeping things my style. That’s why some people have a hard time categorizing me. They’ll hear a country lick and call me country, then hear a blues lick and call me blues – or think of me as folk because of some of the artists I’ve played with. It took a long time for me to acquire a jazz appreciation within my own playing, but I deliberately kept it something that I would evolve into. I always let my playing evolve, instead of going, “Gee, now I’m going to go to two years of Berkeley School of Music” – which would totally destroy me. I just wanted to let it evolve, and by listening to some of my favorite players – grab a little here, a little there – but I never wanted to actually emulate somebody note-for-note. I’d just grab little snippets. I’ll hear some beautiful thing Scotty Anderson does and think, “Wow, I’d love to be able to do a little something of that.” Or certain things that influenced me tremendously without even knowing it, almost subliminally. Bobby Fuller’s solo on “I Fought The Law” has affected me since I was a little kid. I go into this block-chord melody thing that I do – it can be on “When A Man Loves A Woman” or “I Can’t Stop Loving You” – but the root of that is something I heard a long time ago on “I Fought The Law.”
I think the eclectic thing was just because I appreciated all American musical styles. I love the sound of the steel guitar, so around ’68 or ’69 I started playing steel guitar. Then I got sick of lugging that thing around, and I realized I could make the guitar sound like a steel. I preferred taking that thought process and applying it to the guitar. Like “Night Life.” There’s Buddy Emmons blowing your mind with his steel playing, but he’s a steel guitarist who sounds like a guitarist. So when I’m playing the guitar there, I’m playing like a steel player trying to sound like a guitar player.
I never think that I’m playing any particular style at all. In fact, I hate being boxed in. If I sit in with a country band, and they just want me to play country licks, I quickly get bored. It’s got to be an eclectic palette. If you listen to people like Danny or Roy, it’s the same kind of thing; it’s all combined together – everything they ever heard. For me, it’s like everything I’ve ever heard; it’s there when I play. I just think of it as my style.
On the other hand, though, you’ve done Hot Licks lessons under many different specific styles.
Oh yeah. You have to categorize those. But at the same time, if you ever get into those videos, you see that it goes way beyond that. There’s always much more of a mixture of stylistic things. I can’t just stay focused on one little ditty. That’s why I’m proud of the new one that Music Sales released under the Hot Licks name – The Art Of Soloing. At first I was thinking what I wanted this DVD to do was teach the unteachable. Because you can’t really teach soloing; you can kind of inspire or spark it. I realized, “Teach anything.” Because it’s all going to be applicable. I went into that tape not even having an outline written. I just went for it. It’s such a broad subject, you can paint in broad strokes.
Like I say in the intro, “Why is it that, for me, every time I pick up the guitar, the first solo, the first impression I have of the song, is in my opinion the most successful?” It’s because that’s the way I learned the guitar. I learned the guitar from how music moved me and what it made me say inside, and then it actually came out one day in the fingers. To this day, I can still do that. Once you start over-analyzing and doing too many takes and picking it apart, then you’ve got to walk away from it and refresh yourself. There’s nothing like that first take.
On Drive It Home you said most of those were first takes.
Not only first takes but also very improvised.
In the current world of fingerstyle acoustic guitar, things seem very arranged.
Yeah, they spend a lot of time working stuff out – no question about it. When Solid Air first wanted me to do that album, they sent me a bunch of albums, and I said, “This sounds like a bunch of guys who finally said, ‘Okay, that’s the take.’” It sounded like a bunch of recordings with no mistakes. I wanted the complete opposite. I wanted it to be musical photography. I want a snapshot at that particular time. What am I really feeling? What am I trying to wrench out of the guitar?
That album was very emotional for me. A lot of it was about the loss of my wife and daughter, and I wanted to say it instrumentally – because I think notes say much more than words. I would sit there in my recording room and say, “Okay, I’m feeling it now; let’s go for it.” What I loved about it was that I approached the project just as alone as the feeling was. I stayed in some dark room in a hotel, and then I’d come into the studio like an actor keeping himself in character. I was just one man with one guitar, and the guitar was just an extension of my heart. Very little thought went into it. Sometimes I just knew the skeleton of what I wanted to do. And then I had an extra hour left, so, “Let’s do ‘Layla.’” And, of course, that’s the one everybody loved.
Roth’s ’64 National Belmont has a replacement DiMarzio humbucker in bass position. “I use it all the time as my main electric slide guitar. It just screams for slide.”
“Phil Kubicki had sheets of Fender Wildwood veneer and sent me about 100 sheets to choose from,” Roth said of this ’83 Tele. “I picked the only one that really had any green or turquoise in it, and he made me this beautiful Tele with early prototype Seymour Duncan pickups. It became my main guitar when I retired my ’53 from the road.”
“This ’54 Strat was my main guitar from when I found it in ’71 until ’75, when I got my Tele,” said Roth. “It’s got the one-piece ash body and a very round, Tele-type neck.”
Roth bought this 1888 Martin OO-28 from its original owner, a renowned psychiatrist. “He was almost 100 years old [at the time] in the ’70s, and the only payback was I had to play for all his patients at his home in Connecticut. It’s got an ebony board, and the binding is ivory.
“I’ve never used the comb on this Rickenbacker 6/12 Convertible; I just use it as a 12-string,” Roth noted. “It’s a ’67 or ’68 with great action, a very fast neck, and beautiful tone. It’s a deep maroon color.”
It also brought out a little of my early classical training. But I’m very proud of that album, and also the upcoming acoustic things I did – one Simon & Garfunkel and one Dylan. I approached it very much like that, from the heart. Maybe the arrangements aren’t quite right in spots, maybe I missed a bridge, but it’s how it comes out in me.
Like when I played “When A Man Loves A Woman,” that’s actually how I heard the song. That’s how it comes out of me, how it’s assimilated. It’s not like, “Gee, I’d love to do a new version.” It’s actually how it’s heard through my head and my hands.
Now there are so many guitar players who blow my mind – like Scotty Anderson and Tommy Emanuel. I’m starting to warm up to the sort of pre-arranged, thought-out things, because some of it you just have to do that. When I did “Mister Sandman,” on Landscape, that was one of the first examples of anything I’ve done like that – where I had to work it out. I still have a lot of improvisation in it; I kind of made up my solos as I went along and took the best takes. I think it’s fun to push yourself in that direction, because I’m getting much more into solo acoustic guitar, and people like to actually be able to hear songs. Something like Drive It Home was something I needed to get out of my system – which was very expressive, from the thought process and emotional process. There will always be a big part of me that does things that way.
Who were your main building blocks on guitar in terms of early influences?
Unquestionably, Mike Bloomfield. I can’t say enough about him, because it was not only his Paul Butterfield recordings but also what he did with Dylan. All that fiery stuff. Then very quickly after him, B.B. King, Chuck Berry, Buddy Guy. I was very much into those little harmony licks Buddy Guy would play.
Clarence White had a huge impact on me; I loved Roy Nichols’ playing with Merle Haggard; and Merle Travis. I’d have to say that Roy Buchanan influenced me, although at that time I was already kind of doing a similar thing like that, but I guess it gave me more incentive to keep going in that direction – when his first Polydor album came out, around 1970.
With what he was able to do, what Bobby Fuller accomplished in those songs was monumental – and the tone. Most unbelievable sounding guitar maybe ever recorded. And John Fogerty is not only a gigantic hero of mine, but also a big influence. Again, not only from the standpoint of what he played but how it was recorded and the kind of sound he got. From a country standpoint also Hank Garland, like on “Little Sister” by Elvis. Always gotta mention Zal Yanovsky – the Lovin’ Spoonful’s music was so great, and everything he did was beautiful country-rock guitar.
Son House had a big effect on me early on, as did Elmore James. Little Walter, just because of his harp playing; that had a big influence on my slide playing. Some of Ry Cooder’s early slide stuff influenced me, of course. Wonderful phrasing.
What do you use for a slide?
I like real heavy brass. It’s got a lot of sustain. I like when it gets kind of scratchy and funky. The truth is, the more weight you have on your slide, the less you have to press down; you just let the weight of the slide carry.
On Lexie’s CD you’re wearing two hats, in that you’re the producer and also guitarist, but actually you’re wearing three hats…
I’m her father [laughs].
Was it hard making critical decisions because of that?
Well, I think our situation was totally unique. Number one, I really hadn’t done that much “producing” before that, where a record came out saying “Produced by Arlen Roth,” unless it was my own. It was a totally organic situation, because all it was was an extension of our life. We took it from the house into the studio. Lexie had these songs that I saw as very pure things that I barely wanted to touch. The only thing I wanted to do was keep her guitar parts more consistent, so I started playing her guitar parts on the album. But those nylon-string parts you hear are pretty much just the way she intended them to be and how she wrote the songs. I decided to keep the fingerpicking parts central to the music, because there was such innocence to them.
It wasn’t like, “You’re my daughter; you’ve got to make an album.” It was like, “Wow, Lexie, you’ve really got some great songs here that deal with a very powerful subject that’s important to you and me, and I think this is an important step in our lives right now that we do this.” I only thought she was going to do “Angry River,” and that would be on my album. That was it. By the time we finally got around to recording that song, she’d written about seven or eight more songs. They really hit me. Of course, I’m her father and producer and guitar player, but the beautiful thing is I got to appreciate it on all three levels while at the same time understanding that I could step back far enough to say, “These are really good songs.”
She was 15 when she started it and 18 when she finished. She’s coming at music from a very different standpoint than me. She’ll create these guitar parts not quite knowing what they are yet. She’s so organic and natural, she’s teaching me little things as she goes along. It gave me an opportunity to feel that this would make us all kind of shine together. Imagine for a father and daughter – there was not one disagreement during the entire process. The whole thing was on a higher plane. It was about growth, about Gillian, about her mom. Father or not father, I was just proud to be a part of it. I was awestruck.
After Drive It Home, you entered a very prolific period – five albums, counting Lexie’s and the two acoustic CDs that have yet to come out. Anyone who’s experienced a loss like you did would naturally shut down for a period.
I guess in the long run the guitar and music – that was always my life stream from as far back as I can remember. So it became the only natural thing that I could cling onto and grab hold of again. The devastation was so great, I didn’t play for many, many months. The first time I picked up a guitar in four or five months was to do my Acoustic A To Z instructional thing – seven hours of instructional video. I had to do it because somebody else cancelled out. And that was kind of a healing thing as well.
It was also because of Lexie. She felt the same way. She said, “Dad, I can’t go on, because I was supposed to follow in Gillie’s footsteps.” The family was so geared towards Gillian’s career and the fact that she was going to be part of this female Monkees kind of TV show called the Gunk Girls. She was kind of the Mike Nesmith of the group; she was the only one who was going to actually play and sing.
Was there something that triggered you coming back?
There’s no such thing as healing, but music became part of the process by which you understand that life goes on. Any art form – that’s the reason it shuts down when you have that great loss; the first thing you lose is the will to do that. My strongest will is embodied in my guitar playing. So when you lose that will to live, that’s the first thing to go. It was very important to see Lexie blossom and then say, “Hey, if it’s all right with her, it’s got to be all right with me.” It has to be. My job as her father is to go on, even if I’m broken. It’s now my job to raise her and do the best I can for her. God knows Gillian and her mom are looking down on her, saying, “You please do this. Please be all of this.” When I see how it gets very black for her, I have to be there to pull her through. That’s what the whole process of making the album was about and coming back as a guitar player. For me, I think it’s my most expressive period ever. Because when I play I don’t care about anything; I’m just playing. I think people know that. When you’re onstage and saying something with a note, you’re speaking right to someone else’s heart; they do pick up on that. Somehow. I don’t know what it is; I can’t define it. But I feel it’s happening on even a higher level now.
“As far we know, this carved-top Gibson is one of a kind, but the dimensions are the same as an L-10 or L-7,” Roth said. “It was ordered from the factory around 1934 with Bella Voce inlay on the headstock, like a Gibson banjo. It sounds amazing – great for chunk-chunk rhythm like the old Western swing records where the rhythm guitar almost sounds like a hi-hat.”
Roth used this ’51 Gibson J-185 a lot on “Drive It Home.” The truss cover says “Roy,” signifying that it was yet another J-185 that belonged to Roy Book Binder.
This Kay Thin Twin is like the model made famous by Jimmy Reed. “It has a fat neck and beautiful, clear, fat bass response, which I love about those guitars,” said Roth. “I always liked the tiger-stripe pickguard. Based on the headstock logo, it’s probably mid to late ’50s.
Roth’s brother found this 1934 round-neck Regal at a lawn sale. “When he got back, he said, ‘You owe me $2’!”
“I got this ’31 square-neck Style 2 National Tri-Cone from its original owner,” Roth recalled. “She gave me pictures of her performing with it, wearing a Hawaiian dress, from the ’30s. It’s flawless.”
When you talk about becoming prolific, I think part of me realized that, let’s face it, we’re not here very long, and I want to be able to leave behind as much good work as I possibly can. One of the saddest things for me is knowing that when somebody passes away, what passes away with them is all their knowledge. It’s like the loss of a culture. In a way, each one of us is a civilization unto ourselves. I owe it to Lexie, and I owe it to the rest of the world, and mostly to myself, to leave behind as much good stuff as I possibly can. We all get to go up and play in front of people and move them, and they leave with a great feeling, but that music all goes out into space and it’s gone. I want to record and get as much of my heart and soul down on that canvas as possible.
Will you be touring?
I don’t know how much of the heavy road touring I’m going to be able to withstand like the old days, but I’m going to get out there as much as I can to support the records. A very freeing experience for me is the idea that I can do the solo guitar thing. In my shows now I open with seven or eight acoustic solo pieces, and then the band comes out and joins me. I want everybody to know the full spectrum – solo slide, solo fingerpicking, things from different albums. Because I don’t think the Telecaster/group thing paints the whole picture.
Also, Maria, my wife, has given me great reason to know that life can go on. That love can actually exist again – that didn’t seem possible. We got married last August. She’s been very deeply encouraging about my music. We love to sit and sing together; she does beautiful harmonies. She lets me know when it’s the real thing. So even if there are a thousand people out there, you know there’s one listening extra closely.
And with Lexie, who better to get through it than her and me? We’re the ones getting through it in real life. It’s the same thing getting through a song or a solo, whatever it might be. No matter what life ever throws at me again, it’ll never be as hard as what she and I have had to endure. In a way, that’s what makes me even more fearless, to go ahead and do the best you can musically.
Sometimes you’re the last one to know it, but eventually you realize that that is the healing process taking place. That’s why you have it in the first place. It did something to us when we were kids when we picked up the guitar. Then you owe it to yourself to be true to yourself and let that speak for you. For me, the act of making music is a deeply serious thing, but that means that you can be having fun doing it too.
How many Hot Licks lessons did you produce by other artists, and how many lessons were there with you as the artist/teacher?
All told, there were about 180 tapes by different artists and 30 by myself in the catalog. After all, this was a true passion for me, and the documenting of these great players is truly a timeless creation that will always have a large demand.
Can you explain what exactly happened with Hot Licks? Why did you sell it? Who owns it now? What’s your involvement with the company? What titles are in or out of print?
The business was always about me and Deborah and it being a family company. When I lost Deborah and Gillian, I really ceased to live or want to live for quite some time, and I relied heavily on the workers and helpers I had for Hot Licks, because Deb was really the one who ran the ship. I was the creative one, and my job was to create new tapes and get new artists. She ran the office, the business things, and also did all the artwork for Hot Licks. So from ’98 to 2005 I was in and out of many deals to sell the company.
Meanwhile, some terrible things were going on – from some new workers for Hot Licks stealing enormous amounts of money behind my back to one of the “fulfillment” houses (a true contradiction in terms) really killing things. An extortionist lied to me about buying my company for a huge sum, and all he did was “capture” my entire business under one roof, take over the 800 number and website, cripple the business, and then try to take the company from me in my crippled, helpless state. He even tried to contact as many of the artists as possible behind my back. He’s on trial now for doing this same thing to many others.
In 2005, after another year-long negotiation, I sold Hot Licks to Music Sales Corp., the folks who published my books back in the early ’70s – like Slide Guitar, Nashville Guitar, and How To Play Blues Guitar – basically just for the debt it had accumulated. I always thought they’d be a great home for the catalog. I was signed on for a three-year production deal, with a possible second three-year extension. And I was going to see royalties for the videos, which were for the first time going to be reissued as DVDs. I also was supposed to create new DVDs for them.
As it turns out, they just dropped me from the production deal without renewing, and they only had me create two new tapes in the entire three-year period – The Art Of Soloing and Beginning Dobro, both tapes I’m very proud of. They’ve only released about one-fifth of the catalog so far, leaving a huge void in the marketplace, and barely releasing any of my tapes, which, of course, were the backbone of the business and are critical to me making royalties and a living! I know they will eventually all be released, but for some reason Music Sales has been rather slow in doing this, and the public has basically been left to wonder, “Whatever happened to Hot Licks?”
So that beautiful, one-of-a-kind catalog and 25 years of my life’s work still hangs in the balance, but I know eventually it will all be re-released, and the public will get what it’s been waiting for. I also plan on creating many new tapes of me and other artists in the near future, so stay tuned.
For more information, visit arlenroth.com and click the “Hot Licks” link.
The Arlen Roth collection
Like his playing, Arlen Roth’s guitar collection is eclectic and very personal. Although he’s an avid collector of not only guitars but also art and vintage Buicks, there’s a pragmatic side to his arsenal.
“With me, yes, I have a collection, but there aren’t many superfluous guitars,” he states. “I have the stuff that’s the most meaningful to me and that I’m really going to use. I never got much of a kick out of having guitars lying around where I’d open up the case once a year and say, ‘Oh, look what I own.’ I used to have a bunch of Gretsches, like a ’54 Silver Jet and a ’57 Duo Jet. They were nice, but I hardly ever used them. To me, it’s always been about necessity. I started getting vintage instruments in the ’60s, during the Blues Boom, because they were just the better guitars; they played and sounded better. You didn’t think about investment or money; it didn’t matter. They were just the right things to have. I’m still kind of that way. But I’m very happy with what I do have, and that, in terms of my arsenal, I feel like I can pretty much get any sound that I want that applies to me.”
In addition to his vintage instruments, Roth plays several newer and custom-made models, including two resophonics by Mark Simon. “He’s been my luthier since the mid ’70s,” he says. “I gave him the cue for a lot of interesting design things with those guitars – like having the stop tailpiece on top of the resonator, so you don’t get rattling. The chrome cutaway Terraplane model also has a pickup built into the resonator plate – all you see are the six screws – and a neck pickup you can raise or lower into the body. There’s a blend pot between the two pickups. The square-neck brass noncutaway model – one of the most amazing instruments I’ve ever played – has one pickup. Its neck is a big piece of Cuban mahogany. The two circular insets, where you’d normally see screens on a Dobro, are the cylinders of two six-guns. That’s why it’s called the 44 Special. He’s making a smaller version for Sonny Landreth, which he’s calling the Zydeco.”
His “new acoustic of choice” is a Santa Cruz that will be issued as an Arlen Roth signature model, and Curtis Guitars is making an Arlen Roth archtop.
Here, Arlen gives a guided tour of some of his instruments in his own words.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s April 2008 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited. Photos courtesy Rogers and Cowen.
Les Paul is an acknowledged musical icon who influenced so much and many in his 92 years, yet he still has an amazing enthusiasm for the guitar. A new book, The Early Years of the Les Paul Legacy, 1915-1963 (see review in this month’s “Hit List”), adds yet another element to his amazing life and story, reminding all that he is much more than just a guy with his name on a really cool guitar.
The new book is impressive.
Well, it took a while! We actually started 20 years ago and as we went along there got to be more and more going in, so finally [author Robb Lawrence] decided to make it two books; the second is coming out in the fall. There are a lot of great photos of things like album covers, sheet music, and a few guitars, too!
For you, what stands out about that early period?
Just before World War II I felt I was playing my best, had command of the guitar, and really knew the instrument. Then during the war I was playing with all sorts of people, all the best – people like Benny Goodman, Nat Cole, Sinatra, Crosby… I witnessed the early versions of be-bop music when I used to jam in Harlem.
When the war was over, the soldiers came back and they had no music to dance to – just bebop, which you couldn’t really dance to. But the people wanted to dance and hold a partner! They wanted music with a beat. So I came along and was the opposite of be-bop, and it was the perfect thing to play. It had a melody and a dance beat.
At that time there were only two groups that made it big – Nat Cole and the Les Paul Trio. We concentrated on driving rhythm and memorable melody lines so people could dance. And that’s the band that joined Capitol Records, made multi-track records, and had lots of hits.
Many guitarists who grew up in the late 1960s and early ’70s were more familiar with Les Paul the guitar than a guy named Les Paul.
That’s correct, and I remember it well. I took a break. I did something foolish – I retired in 1964. I was having problems with arthritis in my hands, and I didn’t think I was playing as well. So I stopped for 10 years. In the early ’70s, Chet Atkins asked me to make a record. I said “Okay,” but then I had heart surgery and the doctor said the best thing to do was to get busy.
In the ’70s, guys like Steve Miller started talking about all the things you did, then you did the record with Chet, and we heard for ourselves what all the fuss was about.
Chet was about to work in A&R for a big record company, and I had already retired, so making the record was a big thing – like a final chance for us to work together. Then we won a Grammy award, I did gigs at a club on Broadway once a week!
These days, some players seem to switch allegiances from one guitar company to another. Did any company ever try to steal you away from Gibson?
Oh sure, they came and sat right here at my house and made offers. But I was always a Gibson player. Leo gave me a Fender guitar, but I never played it in public. And there were plenty of others, too. But when I worked out my deal with [Gibson president Maurice] Berlin way back more than 50 years ago, I felt I was making the right decision, and I’ve always liked the design of that guitar and how it plays. So my name is still on it.
Was there anyone you wanted to record with but were never able to?
There were a lot of great players I would have loved to played with – Django, Wes Montgomery, and many others. And some modern guys, as well. In fact, I will be making an album with some great guitar players that’s little different from [Les Paul & Friends]. I will be producing and it’ll have the top players from over the years. Really the cream of the crop, all Grammy musicians.
Public television has been airing the documentary “Les Paul: Chasing Sound.” Do you think it captured the flavor of Les Paul?
I hope so. It’s pretty good. A person looks back and he’s amused to hear how he played when he started, and the imprints that never leave you and make you recognizable from the others. And you hear how you matured over time and what that means to your playing.
Starting from when I was Rhubarb Red, I thought there was some pretty good playing on there. I was still developing. But I thought the thing was well done.
Are you still having fun with your gig at the Iridium in New York?
We have a lot of fun, and I look forward to it every week. But it can be frustrating when you can’t play what you hear and play like you used to do. I can’t play a C or F chord, so I play around that. I make an arpeggio or something else you can play – use your head instead of your hands!
Is that the secret to a long life?
(laughs) Yes! Use your head. Your mind is a muscle!
You’re known for a lot of things, but is there one that you especially want people to remember you for?
Just that I tried to do the best I could. I tried to adjust to please the fans. Many artists say “We are here to teach the people and educate them to good music.” I say give the people what they wish to hear. Both of those are good things, but I always like to give the people what they want to hear.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s February 2009 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited. Les Paul & Mary Ford Show: World Is Waiting For The Sunrise
While not a great Taj Mahal album, this is a very nice tribute to a guy who’s been serving up great music for as long as most of us have been listening. The songs are fine and guest artists show up to tip their caps to Taj while helping make good music.
Fuzzy guitar tones, killer harp, and inspired vocals from Taj and Ben Harper are all that’s needed on cuts like “Dust Me Down.” Los Lobos do backup vocals on a couple – one the (surprisingly) island-like “Never Let You Go,” the other a stompin’ blues called “TV Mama.”
Other highlights include the musical contributions of the New Orleans Social Club, which includes Ivan Neville, George Porter, Leo Nocentelli, Henry Butler, and Raymond Weber. They tear through a fine version of “Hello Josephine” and the Mahal original “I Can Make You Happy.” There are other nice guest shots from Ziggy Marley, Angelique Kidjo, and Jack Johnson. Taj is mostly backed by the Phantom Blues Band, which includes Johnny Lee Schell on guitar.
As with almost every Taj album, there are moments of fun and frivolity. He slips into a deep Howlin’ Wolf growl on two cuts, and he has a great line about rapper P.Diddy on the classic “Diddy Wah Diddy.”
Again, this isn’t his best work, but it stands with other contemporary efforts.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s Nov. ’08 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.
To say Tony Zemaitis made eye-catching instruments would mean uttering one of the great understatements in modern luthiery.
A cabinetmaker of Lithuanian heritage, Antonio “Tony” Zemaitis (1935-2002) began building guitars in the 1960s and while his client list reads like a Who’s Who of British rock, he is remembered primarily for his “metal front” electric instruments, which by the early ’70s were seen in the hands of Ron Wood and bassist Ronnie Lane of the Faces. Each metal-front had a distinct look thanks to the skills of gun engraver Danny O’Brien, and among the most distinctive of such models was a massive doubleneck made for Greg Lake of Emerson, Lake and Palmer (“The Bass Space,” September ’06).
One of Zemaitis’ most recognizable (and visually striking) instruments of the era was “Ivan the Terrible,” a jumbo-sized 12-string acoustic made for Eric Clapton, who used it in 1969 on the one and only album recorded by Blind Faith. In various accounts, Clapton has recalled that the guitar was the first Zemaitis built with the heart-shaped soundhole, and that it was played by George Harrison and Dave Mason. “Ivan” was sold by Clapton at a Crossroads Centre benefit auction in 2004, where it brought $253,900.
Zemaitis made other acoustic instruments, and in the ’70s ventured into the realm of the acoustic bass, previously occupied by instruments such as Mexican guitarrons and the 1930s Gibson Mando-Bass. Zemaitis would ultimately handcraft special-order acoustic basses for David Gilmour, Ron Wood, Mike Oldfield, and Tony Visconti. Veteran Zemaitis retailer Phil Winfield believes the fretted acoustic bass made for Oldfield, creator of Tubular Bells, was possibly the first one made, and the 1972 fretless instrument seen here may have been the second.
The original owner of this instrument was Jeff Allen, who ran a musical equipment rental company and a recording studio in London. Allen reportedly ordered the instrument due to the increasing number of artists who were seeking an acoustic bass sound.
In terms of construction, the bass has a mahogany neck, fretless rosewood fingerboard, spruce top, and solid mahogany back and sides. The bridge and string retainer are hand-carved rosewood, with abalone inlay on the latter.
The jagged headstock silhouette is fairly common to Zemaitis basses, as is the decorative red wood-stain stripe in its center. The fingerboard may lack frets, but side dots provide position reference.
Curiously, this bass doesn’t seem to have a truss rod; no truss rod cover is visible, but Winfield reports that the neck on this example is “super-straight.”
The overall length of the bass is 48″. Its upper bout is 123/4″ wide, and the lower bout is 181/2″ wide. The body depth isn’t quite uniform – it’s 4″ deep at the neck end, 41/2″ deep at the bridge end. Scale is 34″ inches. It weighs five pounds, nine ounces, and is nicely-balanced.
The heart-shaped soundhole is an obvious aesthetic facet, but Winfield noted that he cannot detect any sonic differences in the instrument and other similar instruments that had soundholes of different shapes.
“We should bear in mind the experimentation of T.Z.’s soundholes around this time,” Winfield emphasized. “‘Ivan the Terrible,’ a moon-shaped soundhole on a guitar for (folk singer) Donovan, another heart-hole guitar for Ron Wood, etc. He also built instruments with a harp-shaped soundhole.”
The instrument has a sound described by Winfield as “loud, but excellent; very earthy, very woody, almost like an upright bass.”
It doesn’t appear Allen ordered any particular woods on this bass. “Nothing (was) specified by the owner,” Winfield averred. “Most were happy to get what they got. I have spoken to owners who received different builds from what was ordered, but no one complained.
“The funniest story in this regard involved Ron Wood, who insisted that his disc-front have a bolt-on neck,” he added. “T.Z. explained that he didn’t do bolt-on necks, but Wood was adamant. So Tony built a glued-neck disc-front and simply screwed a neck plate on it. The screws do not go through the body at all – it looks like a bolt-on, but isn’t!”
A comparison of this instrument to a 1978 acoustic bass ordered by Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour (pictured in Tony Bacon’s The Ultimate Guitar Book) underlines the individuality of each Zemaitis creation. Like this one, Gilmour’s has a spruce top and heart-shaped soundhole. However, the later instrument has an ebony fingerboard, which, while fretless, has lines and position markers on its face. Gilmour’s also has a maple back and sides, and the bridge and string retainer are ebony. There’s also the aforementioned truss rod cover, engraved with Gilmour’s name.
Long before the advent of “unplugged” music, Tony Zemaitis created rare and unique instruments, including a few rare and acclaimed basses. Their reputations now resonate worldwide.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s March 2008 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.
David Grissom is at or near the top of any list of significant Texas guitarists, having toured or recorded with artists ranging from Ringo Starr to the Dixie Chicks and Buddy Guy. He has also penned songs for Trisha Yearwood, John Mayall, and his own band, Storyville.
Paul Reed Smith Guitars has an impressive roster of artist endorsers, but when they set out to make a guitar that would bear Grissom’s name, it was a unique situation; where most “graduated” to a PRS after playing other brands, Grissom has used one of Paul Smith’s axes throughout his professional career.
Introduced at last summer’s NAMM show, the PRS David Grissom Trem (DGT) is unique in the company’s line. Essentially a McCarty Trem, it includes tweaks to the pickups and wiring, a smaller neck, bigger frets, and typical high-quality PRS fit and finish.
The body is mahogany with a carved, figured, or painted maple top, while the neck is the usual 25″ almost-Fender scale with 22 jumbo frets on a rosewood fingerboard. Green abalone inlays are available, shaped as moons or birds. At one end of the strings is the standard PRS tremolo, at the other, locking tuners with a 14:1 gear ratio. The knobs are two controls for volume and one for tone. The Tone knob is push/pull for coil-tapping.
Most notable among the differences is the neck. Instead of the flat/wide neck for which PRS guitars are generally known, this one feels great to the typical Tele and Strat freak. The DGT ships with an .011-.049 string set with a plain G.
To test its “all-American” sounds, we ran the DGT through a Victoria 5112 combo with a 12″ Jensen speaker and single 6V6 power tube. The neck pickup sounded round without being muddy or producing excessive lower-midrange and bass. The Victoria has only one knob (Volume/on-off), leaving the tone of the guitar unadulterated. As you dial up the amp’s Volume knob, notes remain distinct as distortion swells. Pulling the coil tap moves the tone toward a Stratocaster middle pickup. A certain roundness of the humbucker remains, creating one of those hybrid sounds that was in many ways superior to the two tones being combined. Individual notes within chords remain distinct, even with the volume knob almost dimed.
The bridge pickup has a nice snarl in full humbucking mode, though it never gathers full humbucker gain, instead creating a cleaner, more note-distinct sound than a “standard” humbucker. When the Volume knob on the Victoria hit 8, the bridge pickup started to really sing. The pickup is free of that nasal-quality midrange tone that can affect (some say compliment) a bridge humbucker. With the guitar’s Volume rolled off and the coil tap engaged, the bridge pickup offers up a very appealing jangle with lower-mid fullness.
With the three-way pickup selector switch in the middle position, the DGT’s sound fills a room even at very low volume while covering the entire tonal range and then some. Pulling the coil tap lightens the tone slightly, and when the coil tap is pulled with both pickups on, a small amount of hum enters the picture.
Playing the DGT through a Reeves Custom 6 combo (1×15″ with Bass, Middle and Treble controls) left very little to enhance, disguise, or delete. While the Victoria provides American flavor, the Reeves, with its single EL84 power tube, covers the British tonal spectrum.
The DGT’s neck pickup was extremely warm through the Reeves, but maintained note definition. Even when pushed, the pickup refused to mud out. Pulling the coil-tap scooped the mids very nicely with only a minor drop in volume.
Compared to most humbuckers through a “British” amp, the bridge pickup on the DGT is the bright side of humbuckers, tonally speaking. Pushed, it warms up very well and gives a great lead tone. With the coil-tap pulled, it sounds like a really good Telecaster bridge pickup, though not as robust as the best Teles. Overall, it provides a very useful tone.
With the three-way in the middle, the DGT can cover jazz with ease. And when the coil-tap is pulled, one of the best sounds shimmers from the guitar. The coil-tap lightens the midrange, reduces low-end response, and gives an almost acoustic tone.
The DGT’s hardware is superlative. The vibrato is incredibly stable and has a Jeff Beck-approved range, moved both up and down. The locking tuners work well (even if they don’t have to do much!). Once in place, even with a floating vibrato, string tension is remarkably constant. The brass barrels on the tuners, along with the nickel (instead of chrome) pickup covers give the guitar an “aged” vibe.
PRS Guitars DGT Price $3,277 (street), $4,610 retail with 10-top and bird inlays, $3,600 with standard top and moon inlays. Contact Paul Reed Smith Guitars, 380 Log Canoe Circle, Stevensville, MD 21666; phone (410) 643-9970; prsguitars.com.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s March 2008 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited. DGT Model Demo
The essence of contemporary “roots” music, The Duhks’ music combines instrumental and vocal textures from folk, blues, country, and soul with the rip-roaring energy of rock and roll.
On their fourth album, the Duhks introduce a new front-woman, Sarah Dugas, to replace original lead singer Jessica Havey, and not surprisingly it results in profound changes. Dugas’ last band, Madrigia, had seven female vocalists and performed material from international cultural traditions. The experience serves her well in the Duhks, where her vocals, as on “Toujour Voulour,” demonstrate her vocal power and delicacy. Sure, she can belt with the best of ’em, but Dugas’ primary strength is her subtlety and ability to deliver a nuanced performance. Tania Elizabeth’s fiddle, Jordan McConnell’s guitar, and Christian Dugs’ percussion have more room to create musical textures. The current roster also has greater range and musical unpredictability. Instead of organic white soul, they focus on Celtic melodies and Middle Eastern polyrhythms.
The Duhks keep a grueling touring schedule, going from Canada to Australia through Europe and across the U.S. during the festival season. In an effort to minimize the negative environmental impact, the band has launched The Duhks Sustainability Project (visit greenduhks.com) and tours using biodiesel in its vehicles, food from local organic farmers, and eco-conscious clothing. I’ve always thought naked was the most ecologically-correct attire, but I digress. At least they’re trying…
Anyway, Fast Paced World serves up a healthy helping of the Duhks’ special sauce. The results are more than ducky.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s Sept. ’08 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.
“…when you’re onstage, in the heat of the moment in the middle of a solo, you want to have bandmates who can read you loud and clear and know where you’re going. It’s just a godsend to have that with these guys.”
Nashville monster picker Johnny Hiland has been a wonder to guitar nuts ever since a ’96 Nor’easter blew him into the Music City from his home state of Maine. Hiland has more endorsement deals than he can keep track of, and more importantly, the admiration of a number of bona fide guitar icons, and a slew of pickers of varying abilities who count themselves as fans. Most of these go one of two ways after seeing him perform – back to the woodshed with an unprecedented vengeance, or off into a corner muttering about burning their own guitars.
A performance by Hiland is something every true axe devotee deserves to see at least once, but his second CD, Loud and Proud, gives a well-rounded display of what he can do, which is to say everything. It’s got driving rock instrumentals, an acoustic fingerstyle tune, country chops to die for, and chicken pickin’ that’s downright hazardous to your health.
What guitars did you use on the record?
The only electric I used is my new signature model PRS, which is the most unbelievable guitar I’ve ever played. It’s essentially a PRS Tele with a 24-fret maple neck, and you can bend behind the nut on it, which is kind of neat. It has custom humbuckers and you can split them; the bridge pickup sounds exactly like on old, overwound Tele pickup – it’ll just bite your head off. And the neck pick-up is nice and warm and smooth. It has a flame maple top and mahogany back and sides, and a stock PRS vibrato.
I wanted to have something with a Tele sound, but a really cool vibrato. So many people have asked me why I’m not playing a Telecaster anymore, and really, I just needed a guitar that could do it all. You can play any genre of music with this guitar or jump on any stage in any environment and feel totally comfortable. I’m wicked proud of it and I feel really blessed to be with PRS.
The only other guitar I used on the record is the ’68 Martin D-35 I played on the acoustic tune I wrote for my wife, “My Sweet Kimmie Girl,” and a resonator on part of “Chicken Pickin’ Heroes.”
How about amps and effects?
I mainly used two Peavey ValveKing half-stacks with Celestion G12 Centuries. Speaking of that, I’m working with Peavey to design a Johnny Hiland amp. There may even be something visible at Summer NAMM. I’m totally stoked about it! But the ValveKing is really like a Twin and a heavy metal monster with reverb and a bass dampening section all rolled into one, with a knob in the back where you can split between class A and class A/B. It gave me the best of all worlds in matching my PRS and for playing multiple genres of music.
For effects, I’m still using the Visual Sound pedals: the Route 66, the Jeckyl and Hyde, and the H20. And I’ve recently added a couple of pedals – the Hendrix Wah from Dunlop, and the gig-FX. I’m also using the Digitech Whammy II. It’s so fun and cool… it just makes me giggle! You can get different harmony tones and octaves.
Tell us a little about your current band members.
Oh man, I have a band with me now that I hope will stay with me until the day I die – Cody Leppo on drums, Solon Smith on keys, and Mike Hill on bass. We just love to play music. If I call a rehearsal, they’ll show up early, eager to play and write new music. And when you’re onstage, in the heat of the moment in the middle of a solo, you want to have bandmates who can read you loud and clear and know where you’re going. It’s just a godsend to have that with these guys.
You close out this record by bringing in some very special guests on “Chicken Pickin’ Heroes.” How did that come together?
I really wanted to pay tribute to some of my heroes. So I wrote that song with the intention of Ricky Skaggs, Steve Wariner, and Vince Gill playing on it with me. But then I thought, “Okay, now what am I going to do?” I needed to find out if they’d actually do it (laughs)! I played on Ricky Skaggs’ Brand New Strings album, so I thought I’d give it a shot by starting with him. I was bowled over when he said yes. Then I was able to get in touch with Steve, and he said, “Count me in!” Then I called Vince, and he just said, “Sure!” I lost my breath for about 30 seconds. Ricky asked if he could play either acoustic guitar or mandolin for his solo. I told him he could stand on his head and spit the “Star Spangled Banner” if he wanted to, as long as he was on the record! So he played acoustic. Anyway, to have that kind of time with those guys was just unbelievable. I had been hoping for it forever. That’s why the last line of the song is, “Yeah folks, dreams do come true.”
This article originally appeared in VG‘s May 2008 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.
Circa 1850 James Ashborn guitar. All photos: M. E. Brune.
James Ashborn was born in England circa 1816 and came to New England in the late 1830s, for reasons unknown. He landed in the a small woodworking town of Torrington, 30 miles northwest of Hartford, Connecticut. Because of the area’s many mills, many woodworking shops were emerging. Torrington was primarily a wagon-making community, and had a plentiful wood supply, as well as ease of transportation. Due to the considerable amount of natural resources, including plentiful power from rivers that allowed for water-driven tools, Ashborn concluded that Torrington would be a perfect place to make guitars.
Ashborn had his shop in Torrington, but soon after start-up, he began selling guitars to the New York distributor William Hall & Son, whose name appears inside the instruments.
There is little written background about Ashborn, but given his training and skills, we can presume he was once either a clock maker, gun maker, or machinist. This is apparent due to the intricacy of his tuning machines, seen in several patents, and the fact that he seems to have applied a machinist’s approach to working wood. Ashborn’s shop was apparently quite advanced for its time, employing water-powered table saws, routers, and band saws. With equipment of this caliber, Ashborn produced as many as 119 guitars in June of 1844, and averaged 54 guitars per month. This is an astonishing rate of production, considering his relatively small number of employees, rarely exceeding 10.
Ashborn did not follow the conventional guitarmaking method of having only one person work on each guitar, nor did he take on any apprentices, as was customary. Instead, he hired woodworkers from the community and gave them specific tasks according to their expertise. For example, Issac Thorton was a polisher, as he claimed in the 1850 U.S. Census. A polisher applied varnish and was responsible for the placement of the bridge. Due to the difficulty and skill required by his position, Thorton was the highest paid worker in the shop, making $1.50 a day.
Ashborn’s design for the guitar was quite innovative for the early 19th century. Instead of making guitars fashioned after the typical parlor-style guitars, he made them in the Spanish style, by taking interior bracing cues from the Spanish while retaining the body of the English guitars. This included a fan brace pattern rather than the more common ladder pattern. Although Ashborn incorporated the newer Spanish bracing pattern, as well as the six-string configuration, he still used the body style of the English guitars, which were fashioned roughly after the design of Louis Panormo, one of the leading makers in England in the early 19th century, whose instruments were in turn inspired by Spanish models. The influence for the Spanish model may be due to John Coupa, a Spanish expatriate who was also partnered for a brief period with C.F. Martin.
The three guitars we had the privilege of studying are remarkably similar in measurement. Labeled William Hall & Son, 159 Broadway, NYC, they have the serial numbers 1673 and 2281. Both are model 4s, and 6017, which is a model 1, with estimated build dates between 1848 and 1869.
Surprisingly, all three have very close measurements. There’s less than 1/16″ variance in almost all dimensions among them, which is a stricter tolerance level than many contemporary mass-production shops require. Many measurements are exact on the three guitars, such as the depth of the sides at the butt, as well as at the neck. The uniformity of the measurements is an indication that Ashborn used jigs or fixtures to cut the depth of the sides.
Detail of head.
Necks
Ashborn guitars have a very complex dovetail V joint for attaching the head to the neck (photo 1). The headstock was cut in roughly five steps, using some kind of tracing router, as suggested by the chatter marks on the inside ears of the pegbox. In addition to the complex head design, Ashborn made his own tuning machines in-house (photo 2). They’re made of brass, very much like contemporary machines, with worm gears, cog gears, and rollers (photo 3). The worm gears were most likely cut on a lathe. The tabs, which hold the worm gears in place, appear to be stamped. The machine plates seem to be cut and filed by hand, but machine-drilled to ensure accurate spacing for each head – an operation done on a dedicated three-head drill press. When the machines are removed from the guitar, there is a lot of side-to-side movement. The holes on the side of the head keep these shafts from moving, holding them tight against the side of the cogs, and acting as reinforcement for the shaft. The spacing and alignment of the holes is absolutely critical to the operation of the machines. The procedure used to cut the holes was most likely accomplished using a single drill press with a shaft going into a gearbox which in turn spun three drill bits in order to accurately drill the holes for the machines.
The neck-to-body joint on these guitars was previously thought to be another dovetail joint. But, after removing the fingerboard on guitar 2281, it was apparent the neck-to-body joint is a butt joint (photo 4), which is impossible to produce cleanly with just a few knives and chisels. To manufacture such a complex joint, Ashborn must have had access to advanced items such as cloth-backed sandpaper (possibly even long loops of sandpaper). The butt joint is made by putting the body and neck together with a piece of sandpaper between the two, and sanding the neck until it conforms perfectly to the shape of the body. Once the two fit together, a biscuit is inserted into a previously cut slot in the body and a corresponding slot on the neck, and the two are joined. Done properly, this joint is much more reliable than the more common (at the time) dovetail.
The necks of Ashborn guitars are quite interesting, as well. The profiles, widths, and lengths of the necks from guitars 1673, 2281, and 6017 are exactly the same. Not only are that, but they’re laminated. They have either a chestnut or butternut core, with a relatively thick veneer (roughly 1/16″ of an inch) of a tropical hardwood or Brazilian rosewood. It appears the Ashborn shop used a counter form as well as some strong clamps, and most likely a fair amount of steam and heat to coax the wood into the final lamination. Another possible method is the hammer-veneer method, which requires copious amounts of glue. After covering each side with hot hide glue, a wooden squeegee with a very long handle is worked across the surface, essentially aiming for an even distribution of glue in order to create suction between the two pieces. The work pieces are soaked in a water-glycerin mixture to relax the wood, which allows the wood to easily bend around curves and remain relaxed until long after the glue has set. The glycerin will evaporate with the water, leaving a piece that is firmly glued. Either method would be a daunting prospect to a shop trying to produce 100 guitars per month.
Each Ashborn guitar has exactly the same scale, meaning the fret slots were cut using the same jig. This process would most likely have been done on a table saw with a jig that incorporated pre-measured slots. Once completed, the fretboards were attached to the neck using small nails at the first fret, as well as at the 13th fret, possibly for positioning, but more likely to keep the fretboard from sliding around on the neck during the gluing process.
Body
The sides of all Ashborn guitars were laminated using a thicker inner core of maple veneered with rosewood, a process most likely done on a custom-made press. Each component was pre-bent using the bending iron, or perhaps even custom-made charcoal heated iron forms, then glued together using a press. None of the instruments showed any evidence of bending-iron scalds.
Detail of the glue blocks showing circular saw marks. This construction technique is typically Spanish.
Tops and backs were attached to the sides by individual triangular glue blocks cut on a table saw using a sharp circular blade, meaning the blade had no set (photo 5). The closely spaced glue blocks were more in keeping with a Spanish design rather then the usual northern European models.
The purflings are advanced even by today’s standards. Made from one large continuous strip that surrounds the body, they are a unique feature because at that time there were no suppliers that offered inlay material in such great lengths. This means Ashborn would have had to produce it in-house. The single-piece purflings have a mechanical advantage over the standard two-piece purflings, as they make the instrument much stronger.
The channels for the purflings are also quite innovative for the time. They are a “stepped” cut, meaning the channel around the perimeter of the instrument is cut in two thicknesses; the inner channel (shallower of the two) is less than the thickness of the top, while the deeper outer channel holds the one-piece bindings (photo 4). This method is difficult with a knife, so it probably was done with a router or some sort of revolving cutting/shaping device. The cleanliness of the slots is stunning, showing the Ashborn shop possessed extremely sharp equipment as well as suitable-revolution speed capabilities, so as to not tear the grain of the wood.
The guitars’ tops are a prime example of the lutherie techniques applied by the Ashborn shop. The thickness of each is slightly different, which means each top was individually brought down to thickness, rather than having the tops pre-sized. Wood is inherently weaker off the quarter than on the quarter. Ashborn’s shop apparently evaluated each piece of top material to determine where the grain fell. To compensate for the compromised strength of the wood, they made the tops thicker to make up the strength needed to support the torque of the strings.
Bridges
Upon removal and close inspection of a mangled bridge on guitar number 2281, it was apparent there were many striations in straight, parallel lines over the entire piece (photo 6). One might hypothesize the striations were caused by bad repair work. However, upon comparison with Ashborn number 1673, it’s obvious the striations were, in fact, caused by a mechanized cutting device, as both guitars possess the same tool markings. Scrapers can leave the same sort of markings, but because the two bridges have the same dimensions, the marks were made by a router on a tracing copy (pin router) machine. A tracing copy machine uses a pin that mimics the shape of the router bit that slides over a form or identical piece.
On each Ashborn bridge, there are seven cuts; the valley (where the strings are tied off) was cut first, then the first top scallop on the edge of the tie block. This cut extended from the edge of the tie block to the edge of the bridge, but in pictures is only visible at the very corner. The next cut is the lower scallop, which also extends to the edge of the bridge. The fourth cut is the final scallops at the very edge of the bridge. The fifth cut is the angled cut on alternate sides of the arms. The sixth is the same as the fifth, except on the remaining untrimmed part of the arm. The last cut is the scalloped recess on the backside of the bridge (photo 7). The last cut appears to have been made by a precision circular saw blade that had been rounded on the edges, yet was extremely sharp.
Interior
A circular saw was used to cut the bracing stock, the glue blocks, and the neck support extension inside of the guitar. There is very strong evidence that circular saws, most likely used on a table saw, were used to cut many pieces. Some showed the telltale circular cut marks (photo 7). The table saw was most likely powered by a belt driveshaft, coming from a water driven wheel, a system that would have run centrally through the entire Ashborn shop.
Detail of the arm of typical Ashborn bridge. Note the striations from the cutter. Note how clean the perimeter of the bridge is, showing that it was installed after the application of the varnish.
On the inside of the guitar (around the soundhole) are two pieces of wood – the soundhole braces. There are two pin marks on each piece, and on all three guitars, they are spaced at the same interval. These indicate a locating jig was used to place them consistently on each side of the guitar. The jig was referenced to the soundhole, which adds to the great deal of consistency between instruments. The rosettes around the soundhole on the top are incredibly consistent among the three guitars. Each set of rings set into the top is exactly the same width, corresponding to the other instruments, which demonstrates some sort of cutter that referenced a central point on the soundboard, as well as the two channels for the rosette, which were all cut at the same time. This would be possible only if the shop had some sort of drill press, most likely run off of the belt-drive system that powered the other machinery in the shop. To cut the soundhole, the cutter would have a shaft going through some sort of plate with a circle cutter, as well as two chisel-like cutters outside of the soundhole cutter, which would cut the depth for the rosette.
Varnish
The varnish on the instruments is standard shellac, most likely used as a French polish. French polish is a method where resin is collected from the exudation of a bug, the Lacca lucifera or Lucifera lacca. The resin is dissolved into grain alcohol and once impurities are removed, the solution is applied by hand using a small wad of cheesecloth wrapped in linen. This process builds the varnish up layer by layer. It is extremely slow, but the end result is a glossy instrument that has no measurable buildup of varnish to deteriorate the sound. The French polish method is still one of the most soughtafter varnishes for high-end instruments.
In the early days of guitars, a person would only buy a guitar, the case was extra. But Ashborn had an in-house case maker, just as C.F. Martin was the in-house case maker for Stauffer. This is one example of Ashborn’s marketing genius, as it kept this aspect of the business under his control and, hence, profit.
Conclusion
The guitars made by Ashborn were distributed through the shops of William Hall and Son, Firth and Hall, and Firth, Hall and Pond. All of these companies were run by the same people, mainly William Hall, John Firth, and Sylvanus Billings Pond. Firth and Hall worked together beginning in 1812, when both served in the military. They opened their own shop in 1821 and by 1833 became Firth, Hall and Pond. With Hall and Pond living in the Albany area, it’s presumed they were acquaintances prior to becoming business partners.
The guitars were primarily labeled as William Hall and Son, and were made by Ashborn until 1869. To the best of our knowledge, there are no Ashborns labeled as such. It appears he never labeled guitars with his own name, but was strictly a maker who sold exclusively through these dealers.
Ashborn’s shop was extremely advanced for its time, having a great deal of know-how and technology. Ashborn understood the need to have the technology as well as the skill, but more importantly he discovered a new way of making high-quality instruments that were affordable. He was able to create a factory environment where workers did what they were good at and, with practice, became very fast and consistent. With a new level of consistency in mass production, he created the path followed by other companies such as Martin, Gibson, and Taylor. Using designs ahead of his time, he was able to bring the sound and change to people who otherwise never would have been able to acquire an instrument of this quality.
M.E. Bruné has been studying under R.E. Bruné for more than 10 years and has studied violin repair with violin maker Carl Becker. He recently completed his first guitar, and performs restorations on classical guitars. He can be contacted at (847) 275-2983 or mebrune.com.
The author wishes to thank Dr. Philip Gura for the information provided through research from his article, “Manufacturing Guitars for the American Parlor: James Ashborn, Wolcottville, Connecticut, Factory, 1851-1856, Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, 104, part I (1994), 117-155.” The author also wishes to thank George Gruhn for his assistance.
This article originally appeared in VG‘s April 2005 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.