- Advertisement -
Peter Stuart Kohman | Vintage Guitar® magazine - Part 4

Author: Peter Stuart Kohman

  • Big Beat Boys

    Big Beat Boys

    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Big Beat Beatles! Pacemaking with a Tennessean. The Mighty Big 3.
    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Big Beat Beatles! Pacemaking with a Tennessean. The Mighty Big 3.

    Americans tend to link the beginnings of the Beatles phenomenon to a specific date – February 9, 1964, when the group first appeared on “The Ed Sullivan Show.” The truth, as always, is that the band’s records had crashed the American charts weeks before, and the run-up to this seemingly overnight phenomenon had taken years.

    The Beatles runaway success in the U.K. began in early 1963, which means it has been 50 years since their breakthrough from regional popularity to dominance of the U.K. music scene. Despite all that has come since, no musical act has been more influential. They changed the way pop music was made, sold, even thought of, and brought the guitar even more to the forefront. It’s amazing how many players continue to cite the band as an influence, and new generations discovering their records are captured by the ingenuity, scope, and talent of the (in John Lennon’s words) “Band that made it very big.”

    Recently, this was highlighted by a period publication titled Big Beat Boys, issued by Britain’s top music weekly Melody Maker in the spring of 1963. There are thousands of souvenir booklets from the heyday of Beatlemania, but this early one is a bit different. The focus of this “look at the thriving international beat scene – in which Britain is playing a bigger part than ever before” was on the Beatles and other “beat” bands in their wake – alongside a few already established acts still rated as “Beat” performers. Melody Maker was aimed at music biz professionals and serious fans, especially musicians. All advertising in Big Beat Boys is for guitars and amps – the tools of the revolution, aimed not at a female fan base, but budding players. “Just get an electric guitar” every page hints, and this could be you! Not just the Beatles, but every act featured has a guitar-centric lineup, and it shows how inextricably linked this musical explosion was to the electric guitar. Of course, between the street-level skiffle of the late ’50s and the rise (from 1960) of the instrumental quartet The Shadows, it’s safe to say the youth of the U.K. were already in guitar-oriented mode. The Shadows had established electric guitar as a viable, even career-making solo instrument, and similar bands had sprung up all over England. Despite Decca producer Dick Rowe’s rejecting the Beatles in early ’62 with a pithy “Groups with guitars are on the way out, Mr. Epstein!” the truth was the groundswell of singing, jiving guitarists had not yet even been seriously tapped!

    Even at this early point, the Beatles combined guitars, drums, and vocal in a compelling way. Compared to the polite vocals of most English artistes, Lennon and McCartney’s full-throated singing and bracing harmonies were a revelation. The combination of uninhibited strumming and “big beat” drumming was less unusual on their Liverpool home turf, but to the rest of the country an excitingly novel sound. The more studied and controlled echo-soaked instrumental approach of the Shadows was the 1962 template for most English bands. The beloved “Shads” were still rated as major stars in Big Beat Boys, with a full feature. Others cut from the same cloth were also profiled. Top among them were Jet Harris and Tony Meehan, the Shadows’ rhythm section, who had quit the group but re-teamed as an instrumental duo. Their twanging, Duane-Eddyesque early-’63 smash “Diamonds” was led by Jet’s six-string bass; when he tried to sing, the jig was up! Another was The Tornadoes, producer Joe Meek’s chart-topping quintet that achieved a lone success in the U.S. with the inimitable single, “Telstar.” The record’s combination of unearthly electronic keyboard and shimmering, echoed guitar was certainly unique, but lost appeal quickly when the Beatles ushered in the new “singing, swinging” Beat style. In early ’63, these older bands were still rated as stars.

    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Very early Hollies – in leather! Yodeling Karl Denver with an Electric D-28.
    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Very early Hollies – in leather! Yodeling Karl Denver with an Electric D-28.

    While hardly achieved overnight, the Beatles’ U.K. success proved unprecedented in scope. By the spring of ’63, the band’s audience had been building for more than two years; domination of the massive Liverpool scene was secured in January, 1962, when the band won the first Merseybeat popularity poll. Their initial Parlophone 45, “Love Me Do,” released in November of ’62, was huge in the north (possibly juiced by manager Brian Epstein “buying in” thousands) but only a middling national hit. And while this catchy (if fairly crude) sing-along gave little indication of the songwriting talent of its authors, it was the fact that those writers were also the band’s vocalists that was noteworthy. While some American rock and roll artists composed their own material, in Britain it was almost unknown. At the time, the use of harmonica was trendy due to hits like Bruce Chanel’s “Hey Baby” and Frank Ifield’s U.K. smash “I Remember You.” Viewed as a bit of an oddball record by the U.K. press, “Love Me Do” was a solid start but it was the Beatles next single that would really launch them – and the Beat era – into the stratosphere.

    “Please Please Me” with its combination of vibrant harmony, pumping bass, harmonica, and guitar and drum hooks (and surprisingly urgent lyrical leer) was not like anything heard before. Released on Friday, January 11 1963 this record quickly stormed the U.K. charts, ending up at either #1 or #2 depending on which chart one consulted. Within a month, the Beatles were called to EMI’s Abbey Road studios to record a full LP. This first album was intended as a quick cash-in, but the Beatles insisted, despite the limited time and budget, that every track be given the same care as their singles. “We’d been through buying LP’s filled with rubbish,” Lennon recalled years later, explaining the groups’ insistence that the collection stand on its own merits. Luckily, EMI producer George Martin concurred, and the public responded – the band’s first LP would spend 30 weeks at #1 on the Record Retailer chart – only losing that spot to the group’s second LP late in the year! The group’s April 1963 single “From Me To You” shot straight to #1, consolidating their status – and the reputation of the Lennon-McCartney songwriting team.

    At the time Big Beat Boys was published, this was the sum total of the Beatles’ output (unless you count the earlier “My Bonnie”) but they were already described as “The most exciting sound ever to hit British records… Their crackling in-person performances knock out audiences all over Britain.” The band was then trucking up and down the country through one of the harshest winters in memory, touring with (and gaining headline status over) established stars including teen sensation Helen Shapiro, Americans Chris Montez and Tommy Roe, and even the great Roy Orbison. “Booming Beatles Beat All – They have the whole pop world in their hands,” mused Big Beat Boys author Chris Roberts. Of special interest to guitarists, this fabulous run-on sentence specifically credits the “Boys’” instruments: “John, who plays an American Rickenbacker guitar, used his harmonica as an experiment on a few dates of record, with George’s whining Gretsch guitar sound close behind, and Paul’s Höfner bass bouncing along beneath.” Interestingly, the pictures show Lennon’s Gibson J-160E, which was not mentioned. “And John, Paul, and George find time to sing – in snappy coloured voices – at the same time,” the text goes on, in charming phrasing. There’s only a passing mention of those “famous” haircuts!

    Other talent from their hometown was also featured. In March, 1963, “Please Please Me” was followed up the charts by Liverpool rivals Gerry and the Pacemakers, also under the wing of Brian Epstein and beneficiaries of a unique Beatles castoff. When George Martin signed the Beatles, he had a song that he thought perfect to launch them into the charts – “How Do You Do It,” an upbeat pop number by Londoner Mitch Murray. A defining moment in Beatles history came with the group – Lennon in particular – rejecting the idea. The band worked up an arrangement and recorded it in a brisk if half-hearted manor, but made it clear they preferred their own material. This refusal to be molded by an all-powerful producer was unprecedented in British pop. To his eternal credit, Martin acquiesced, but simply handed the arrangement to Gerry Marsden and his group, who scored an almost instant #1 hit in March of ’63, followed by a second with “I Like It.” Big Beat Boys’ Gerry proudly cradles his new Gretsch Tennessean on the back color cover.

    Several other northern acts were profiled – Liverpool musicians’ favorites The Big 3 merited a two-page spread showing them with a classic U.K. “pre-fame” instrumental lineup of a hollowbody Framus Star Bass and Japanese-made Guyatone solidbody. Epstein protege Billy J. Kramer & The Dakotas got a feature. From nearby Manchester came Freddie and the Dreamers, alongside a very young Hollies, still clad in leather like the Hamburg-era Beatles. All of these acts had released but one 45 at this point. London instrumental bands Peter Jay and the Jaywalkers and Sounds Incorporated merited mentions, as well – both brandished saxophones alongside guitars, but had limited chart success despite being crack performing outfits. Vocal/instrumental groups Shane Fenton and the Fentones, and Brian Poole and the Tremeloes, were in the older star-plus-backing group mode – the latter being the band Decca signed instead of the Beatles in 1962!

    The ’63 “Big Beat” umbrella covered more than Beatlesque bands. Joe Brown and His Bruvvers were an older-sounding act mixing rock and roll with English music-hall echoes. The Springfields were a pop-folk trio who hit with “Silver Threads And Golden Needles.” The group was short-lived, but gave the world the glorious voice of Dusty Springfield, who went solo soon after. An even more unusual crew was The Karl Denver Trio, fronted by an aging Scottish yodeler! They are shown with a Framus Star Bass, Guild X-350, and Karl’s Martin D-28E. Several veteran American performers rated write-ups, including Jerry Lee Lewis (re-starting his U.K. career), Duane Eddy, the Everly Brothers and the late Buddy Holly, with an update on the Sonny-Curtis-led Crickets. Still, the focus was clearly on emerging home-grown performers.

    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Selmer’s unbeatable lineup. Arbiter scores with Gretsch. Vox takes a holiday. Burns’ scientific approach. Hessey’s – the Beatles’ favorite shop!
    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Selmer’s unbeatable lineup. Arbiter scores with Gretsch. Vox takes a holiday. Burns’ scientific approach. Hessey’s – the Beatles’ favorite shop!

    Of interest to guitar fans, Big Beat Boys carries ads from most major British instrument importer/distributors. The inside cover was taken by Selmer, the 800-pound gorilla of U.K. guitar sales. Guitar specialists since the ’30s, Selmer represented both Fender and Gibson in England, plus long-time staple Höfner, from Germany, and the budget Futurama house brand, applied to various foreign-made pieces. The company had just begun importing the unusual Höfner 500/1 violin bass due to demand from players who had seen it in Paul McCartney’s hands. All these Selmer-distributed brands would be associated with the Beatles at some point, from George’s early Futurama solidbody through the silverface amps used in Let It Be. Arbiter had the inside back cover, featuring Gretsch guitars and the notoriously oddball Trixon drums. Rose-Morris did not yet have the Rickenbacker line – at this point John Lennon’s signature guitar brand was not officially available in the U.K.. The product proffered in Big Beat Boys was Ampeg amplifiers, which had little impact in the land of Vox. Rosetti offered the Epiphone line featuring the semi-hollow Rivoli bass, already a hot item in the U.K..

    The U.K.’s top musical manufacturers, JMI/Vox and Burns, had full-page ads, as well. Burns was relatively straightforward with typical pseudoscientific prose, introducing their ill-fated transistor amps and picturing the rare SplitSound six-string bass. JMI showed the Shadows (in full color) but oddly enough without guitars or amps, apparently so confident in their Vox gear they could relax “away from the bustle of show business and its attendant worries…”! Smaller fries Watkins/WEM and Fenton-Weill also had format ads – WEM’s an attractive (likely expensive) full-color spread. Both offered mid-priced gear popular with up-and-coming acts but rarely seen in professional groups. Watkins features the well-regarded Copicat echo and “New Circuit 4 Guitar” which had not yet been named the Rapier 44. There are interesting ads from the three top retailer’s in England’s north, where the “Beat boom” was still centered. Frank Hessey’s and Rushworth’s of Liverpool, along with Barratt’s of Manchester, touted their famous beat group customers and listed their extensive guitar offerings. Rushworth’s and Hessey’s counted the Beatles as customers – the Bigsby for Lennon’s Rickenbacker was fitted at Hessey’s, while their J-160E’s were ordered through Rushworth’s.

    With its breathless but musician-friendly tone, Big Beat Boys is a fascinating snapshot of the Beatles and early Beat scene when it was an emerging phenomenon, confined to the U.K. and viewed as a novelty. It must have seemed like a guitar-twanging flash in the pan at the time; it’s likely nobody had any inkling of what the Beatles would become or how great their influence would be – pop groups were expected to have a lifespan of months or perhaps a few years in the limelight. Still, it made showbiz seem like good fun, if nothing else! Few besides hardcore fans remember Carl Denver, Shane Fenton or even the once-mighty Big 3 today, but they were all part of this initial U.K. beat explosion. Guitars, electric basses, and drums (with the occasional harmonica or keyboard) were suddenly the most important thing in the world to any self-respecting teenaged boy (and even a few girls). While most of these acts are largely forgotten, thanks to the talent, determination and sheer brilliance of the Beatles, we’re still feeling those Big Beat reverberations 50 years on.


    This article originally appeared in VG May 2013 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Fab Four’s Big Three

    Fab Four’s Big Three

    The fretted lineup in November of ’63.
    The fretted lineup in November of ’63.

    For Americans, the legend of the Beatles has a very specific starting moment: 8 p.m., February 9, 1964. That Sunday evening 50 years ago, the group appeared for the first time in the U.S. on “The Ed Sullivan Show,” and spurred a phenomenon. The broadcast was watched by the largest television audience tallied up to that point – 73 million babyboom teenagers, baffled parents, the randomly curious – or 60 percent of the TV sets in use that night. Their second appearance, on February 16, was just as successful, and newly minted Beatlemania spread from the U.K. to the U.S. as the entire nation seemingly went mad over the Fab Four.

    Fifty years on, the impact of that moment still reverberates, especially among musicians. Nearly any guitarist who watched that show will tell you that playing guitar in a band suddenly seemed like the only thing in the world that mattered. The exact “Why?” has been speculated endlessly; it has been suggested that for an America saddened by the Kennedy assassination a few months prior, the embrace of the Beatles signalled the end of a period of national mourning. Whether true or not, it led to an era of cultural change that remains ongoing.

    Many critics slammed the group’s TV debut; the next week’s issue of Newsweek reported, “Visually, they are a nightmare.. Musically… a near-disaster. Their lyrics (punctuated by nutty shouts of ‘yeah, yeah, yeah!’) are a catastrophe, a preposterous farrago of Valentine-card sentiments… Odds are they will fade away, as most adults confidently predict.”

    To most younger Americans, this was just the “squares” talking. The rock-and-roll music of the ’50s had created a teen culture centered on music, and the Beatles instantly established the new paradigm for young Americans in the ’60s to create a cultural voice for the next generation. If the camera-eye sight of the band itself was not enough, the shots of screaming teenage girls in the audience was further incentive to any teenage boy – “Get a guitar, now!”

    Guitar had, for years, been on the rise as the popular instrument for young players, but this created demand that would never be matched. While any guitar associated with the group has attained “Beatles guitar” collector status, the three used on the Sullivan show occupy the peak of this elite family, and stand as the Beatles instruments even non-musicians associate with the group. The guitars – seen only in TV black-and-white – are John Lennon’s 1958 Rickenbacker Model 325, George Harrison’s ’63 Gretsch Chet Atkins Country Gentleman, and Paul McCartney’s ’63 Höfner 500/1 (forever after the “Beatle Bass”). Each instrument has is its own history apart from, and linked to, the Beatles phenomenon, but all three are forever wedded to this broadcast moment. In each case, the actual instrument used by a Beatle for that performance has specific features that have, ever since, proved frustratingly hard to replicate for fans and collectors. Manufacturers have long been known to change specifications without warning, but with these, minute differences mean a huge increase in a particular instrument’s collectible mojo.

    (LEFT) Bob Adams (second from left) shows a Country Gent to the up-and coming Cherokees in the summer of ’63.
    (LEFT) Bob Adams (second from left) shows a Country Gent to the up-and coming Cherokees in the summer of ’63.

    Rickenbacker debuted the 325 in early ’58 as part of its new Capri line, and Lennon’s was one of the first made. Bearing serial number V81, it was unusual in that had no sound hole and (at first) only two knobs. Rickenbacker displayed it at a mid-’58 trade show, re-wired it with a four-knob layout, then shipped it to Framus Werke, in Germany, that October. It found its way to a Hamburg music store to be purchased by Lennon in fall, 1960, during the group’s first stint there. Rickenbackers were at the time unobtainable in the UK; Lennon’s interest had been piqued by Toots Thielmans with George Shearing’s group, and finding one in Germany must have seemed like kismet! Interviewed in ’63, Lennon raved about the guitar’s playability, which was understandable given his previous instruments!

    With the heavy strings common at the time, the slim short-scale neck was perfect for Lennon’s chord-bashing style. His chiming triplet rhythm on “All My Loving” (the opening song of their first Sullivan appearance) is a perfect example of how the little Rick worked for him. “Just feel the action… get a load of that sound,” and “It’s the most beautiful guitar… the action is really ridiculously low,” he enthused to Beat Instrumental.

    (LEFT) Rose-Morris’ Beatles-backer 159 Guineas. (RIGHT) The Höfner from Selmer. Only 58 guineas?
    (LEFT) Rose-Morris’ Beatles-backer 159 Guineas. (RIGHT) The Höfner from Selmer. Only 58 guineas?

    The 325’s shorter scale was designed for ease of play before the advent of light strings, an idea kicked around by several manufacturers in the ’50s. It proved unpopular in practice (feeling cramped to most players) and limited the guitar’s long-term appeal (the other major 325 user in the ’60s was John Fogerty). Lennon’s 325 was extremely rare to begin with, and was soon unique, as he tinkered with it from the beginning. By the time of the Sullivan show, it had been extensively modified; were it not his, it would be “ruined” as a collector’s piece today! By February of ’64, it had been refinished to black, re-wired more than once, fitted with a Bigsby vibrato, seen several sets of knobs, and been bashed around by more than three years of non-stop gigging. The Sullivan show and ensuing Carnagie Hall and Washington gigs were its last stand, and by the group’s mid-February Miami shows (which were also broadcast on Sullivan), Lennon had received a replacement 325 from Rickenbacker (also black but with a white pickguard) that became his signature guitar for 1964-’65. Oddly enough, Lennon claimed in ’64 that he, “Didn’t like it half as much as the first one.” Still, Rickenbacker’s U.K. distributor, Rose-Morris, was quick to exploit the connection.

    Lennon’s use of the 325, even modified, was an incalculable boost to Rickenbacker’s fortunes. At the time, the company was still low-profile enough that many fans assumed John’s guitar was of German or English manufacture, not sunny California. The ’64 Model 325 listed at $399.50, but despite the Beatles endorsement seems to have not sold well. Still, with the prototype 360/12 soon played by George Harrison, Rickenbacker became forever identified with the Beatles. The 325 has maintained its iconic “Beatles” status, but the other full-scale thin hollowbody guitars of the 300 series, especially the 12-strings, have been the practical choice of most players, then and now. A 325 identical to Lennon’s “Sullivan” guitar would be the ultimate Beatles collectible, but no such instrument exists unless it has been similarly modified. Few original ’58s come to market, but Rickenbacker has made excellent reissues in its original and Sullivan-show livery.

    Unlike Lennon’s veteran, the guitar Harrison brought to New York was a recent acquisition – a ’63 Gretsch PX-6122 Chet Atkins Country Gentleman. By ’63, the “Gent” had been in production for six years, but recently modified (not to Chet’s liking) with a new double-cutaway body and adjustable string mutes. Atkins originally wanted a semi-solid guitar, like Gibson’s ES-335, but the 6122 had a closed thin body with heavy “trestle” bracing, but no center block. “The handsome showpiece of the fabulous Gretsch Chet Atkins line… with the styling and tone that have made it the most desired electric guitar in the world” was Gretsch’s blurb before Harrison appeared with the model! Listing at $595 in November ’of 63, the “Gent” topping the Atkins line was very expensive by any standard. Harrison had really stepped up with this instrument, replacing his veteran ’57 Gretsch Duo-Jet.

    The Country Gent, ’63-’65
    The Country Gent, ’63-’65

    The “Sullivan” guitar was actually the second Country Gentleman he acquired in ’63; an earlier one made that same year had already seen heavy use and was replaced, possibly after damage to the mute system.

    The Gretsch line was distributed in the U.K. by Arbiter, which listed the Gent at a whopping £330. Harrison got his at Arbiter’s Sound City shop in central London; an earlier version had the more-cumbersome dial-up mute, while a second, with the lighter “flip-up” mute, became Harrison’s favorite by ’64. It also had a very dark walnut-stain finish; on black-and-white TV it appeared nearly black. While a 1963-’64 Country Gentleman is not an exceptionally rare guitar, an exact Harrison-spec Gent has been a sought-after item virtually since ’64, and difficult to find, as Gretsch almost immediately (and inexplicably) began to alter the instrument’s features. By mid ’64, the company equipped the Gent with the then-new bar-polepiece Super’Tron pickup in the neck position. This was Atkins’ preference, but thousands of would-be buyers wanted a guitar like Harrison’s, irrespective of the namesake endorser’s wishes! Other changes included the pickguard markings, serial number on the headstock nameplate, and the deco-style buttons on the Grover Imperial tuners – all different by the end of ’65. It’s ironic that as Gretsch was desperately ramping up production of all guitars – especially the Country Gentleman featured on the ’65 catalog cover – they were altering the image that had sold it in the first place. Harrison’s original is sadly long lost, destroyed in a motorway accident in late ’65, but the bass played right alongside it is still very much in service.

    Another recent arrival in early ’64 was Paul McCartney’s replacement for his long-serving Höfner 500/1, acquired in Hamburg in 1961. His first bass had been used non-stop, getting battered in the process; photos from late ’63 show the neck pickup taped in place. “I ordered another… it was the only left-handed bass available and I thought I’d better have a spare,” he said at the time. This spare almost immediately became his stage bass, used almost exclusively through ’66. The new left-handed 500/1 was acquired in October of ’63 through Selmer, which served as Höfner’s U.K. distributor. Selmer had held the Höfner franchise for years, but the violin-body bass was not offered until McCartney created a market. “Probably the best known instrument in the pop world today is Paul McCartney’s ‘Violin Bass guitar.’ It’s distinctive shape plus the fact that it is played the ‘Wrong way round’ by the Beatles quick-silver front man Paul has made it one of the most in-demand guitars in the country today,” said Beat Instrumental. Oddly, though Selmer began importing the 500/1 in ’63, it was not shown in their catalogs for some time. Eventually, McCartney’s smiling face was put on a tag reading “Wishing you every success” and the group’s management secured a royalty. Even so, it was not called the “Beatle Bass” – and was still relatively inexpensive at all of 58 guineas.

    (LEFT) The 1965 Sorkin/Höfner catalog – $335 for us Yanks! (RIGHT) An extremely rare right-handed Höfner 500/1 with features identical to McCartney’s and likely made in the same period – mid/late ’63 – perhaps even the same batch. And a “Mac-spec” two-piece neck with strip tuners.
    (LEFT) The 1965 Sorkin/Höfner catalog – $335 for us Yanks! (RIGHT) An extremely rare right-handed Höfner 500/1 with features identical to McCartney’s and likely made in the same period – mid/late ’63 – perhaps even the same batch. And a “Mac-spec” two-piece neck with strip tuners.

    By ’64, the Violin Bass was widely available in the U.K., but Höfner, like Rickenbacker and Gretsch, routinely changed construction and fitting details, so earlier and later examples have small differences that now drive collectors crazy! McCartney’s mid-’63 500/1 has specific features – most unusually a two-piece maple laminated neck instead of the much more common three-piece construction. It was fitted with strip tuners instead of the individual units most often encountered – likely quirks of supply instead of design. In ’64, Höfner added white-celluloid binding to 500/1 fingerboards, and the pickup configuration – four-pole/four-screw with side-mount small, black plastic rings on Paul’s bass – differs year by year. McCartney’s was, of course, factory left-handed, but the headstock is still the regular right-handed configuration – a feature shared with his Rickenbacker! Compared with most electric instruments, it was easy to build a left-handed 500/1; its symmetrical design meant only the control rout and fittings like the pickguard needed to be altered.

    By ’65, the entire Höfner line was distributed in the U.S. by Sorkin Music, based in New York. Far less expensive than the other Beatles instruments at $335, these sold well to many teenage bands. This makes ’65 and later 500/1 basses fairly common, but with their top-mount pickup rings, bound necks, and other later features, they are not “Sullivan Show” spec – though likely few users at the time noticed or cared! Now, however, original 1962-’63 models are much more desirable, and Höfner has offered very accurate reissues.

    McCartney still uses his ’63 bass on just about every gig; it must be by this point the single most-filmed (and one of the most-heard) basses in history. Many other musicians have used a Beatle Bass (especially in the ’60s), but only ’70s reggae supersessioner Robbie Shakespeare made it his main squeeze. The quirks of the Höfner also make it alien to bassists accustomed to a Fender-style instrument; by comparison, the 500/1 is light and feels somewhat insubstantial. While the instrument’s Beatles legacy has ensured its survival, many players have also enjoyed its unique feel and sound. Lennon once commented that the many fans, players, and songwriters who have obsessively studied the Beatles’ sound over the years miss the point entirely; it was the band’s originality and seemingly endless creativity that ensured its legacy.

    As testament to that continuing influence, each instrument of that February ’64 Sunday evening has been re-created with near-obsessive fidelity for modern fans and players to experience anew. Still, the thrill of playing an exact original version of the group’s chosen instruments remains one of those bucket list moments for guitar fans of a certain age. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah!


    This article originally appeared in VG March 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • 25 Most Valuable Basses

    25 Most Valuable Basses

    Text by Peter Stuart Kohman. Data compiled by Alan Greenwood and Gil Hembree

    Vintage Guitar is marking 25 years of publication with a year full of features. This month, using data compiled for The Official Vintage Guitar Price Guide 2011, we continue the celebration with a list of the 25 most valuable basses.

    1. 1960-’62 Fender Jazz Bass
    ($25,000 to $38,000 in custom-color finish)
    The holiest of Fender Bass grails is a “stack knob” custom-color Jazz. The “J-Bass” proved the market could support fancy, pricier bass guitars; a solid duco-finish Jazz was a hot-rod four-string nonpareil. By the mid ’60s, they were ordered comparatively often – not so in 1960! Highly collectible since the ’70s, a custom-color Jazz Bass still tops the list today. Sunburst models from the period fetch $16,000 to $21,000.

    2. 1970s Zemaitis “Heart Hole” Bass
    ($24,000 to $29,000)

    England’s Tony Zemaitis hand-made his electric guitars for many years, but built very few basses, mostly for U.K. rock stars like Ronnie Lane and Greg Lake. With only four extant, this model would be the ultimate four-string in the Velvet Goldmine.

    3. 1963-’65 Gibson Thunderbird IV
    ($20,000 to $23,000 in custom-color finish)

    Arguably Gibson’s greatest bass, the two-pickup, “reverse-body” Thunderbird IV, with its neck-through design, combines style and function like few others. With a production run painfully short at less than two years, it could be ordered in any of 10 flashy colors and is the ultimate Gibson four-string (sunburst models from the same period go for $9,000 to $13,000).

    4. 1958-’60 Fender Precision Bass
    ($18,000 to 23,000, custom color)

    Originally offered in any color – as long as it was blond(!) – by the early ’60s, the Fender Precision could be had in a rainbow of finishes. The Precision ruled the ’50s, and a late-’50s (maple neck, anodized pickguard) model will rule many collector’s wallets, especially if not in the then-standard sunburst (which go for $8,000 to $11,000; ’51 to ’60 models sell for as much as $19,000). Any pre-CBS P-Bass will follow – the rarer the color, the higher the dollar!

    5. 1961-1964 Fender Bass VI
    ($10,500 to $14,500, custom color)

    Leo Fender’s answer to a cheap-but-practical Danelectro was this super-elaborate three-pickup/30″-scale twang machine – with vibrato! The $329 Fender VI was “bass-ically” an overgrown guitar, and was a hit with studio players, though few others could afford one. Jack Bruce started his career on a sunburst model; now, collectors crave flashy custom-color examples while sunburst models fetch $5,500 to $7,000.

    6. 1963-’65 Gibson Thunderbird II “reverse body”
    ($10,500 to $13,000, custom color)

    Gibson’s first long-scale competitor to the Fender Precision, the single-pickup Thunderbird II was built in larger numbers than the IV… but that’s not saying much. Anything other than brown sunburst (which go for $6,000 to $10,500) was a custom order, so few exist – even fewer without the common headstock fracture!

    7. 1970-’75 Rickenbacker Model 4005 L “Lightshow”
    ($11,000 to $12,000)

    With only a handful built, this psychedelically-minded hollow Rickenbacker with internal colored lights pulsing to the music qualifies as the company’s ultimate four-string rarity. One went to a girl group in Las Vegas, one went to John Entwistle. Find one, and Rick collectors will find you!

    8. 1965-’66 Gibson Thunderbird IV
    ($8,000 to $12,000, custom color)

    The second generation Thunderbird, launched in the summer of ’65, switched to a “non-reverse” body (with more-prominent upper horn) and abandoned the neck-through design. While not as favored by collectors, these T-birds are even less common than the first series – the two-pickup IV especially. Any finish other than sunburst (which sell for $4,000 to $5,000) is seriously rare.

    9. 1968-’69 Rickenbacker Model 4005
    ($8,000 to $10,000 8-string)

    In 1965, Rose-Morris inquired whether Rickenbacker might build a hollowbody bass. The company complied, but the awkward four-string 4005 never caught on. Just to drive collectors crazy, Rick also tried 6- and 8-string versions in barely more than prototype numbers. Rarely seen, even more rarely heard, but a major Rickenbacker collectible. The standard 4005 of that era goes for $5,000 to $6,500, while the 6-string version goes for $6,500 to $7,500.

    10. ’70s Alembic Custom Shop Dragon Doubleneck
    ($8,000 to $9,000)

    Nothing says ’70s badass like a doubleneck bass; being a hand-made Alembic is just icing on the cake! For sheer flash, nothing beats this imposing monster – and nothing could match its hi-fi sound possibilities, either.

    11. 1965-’66 Gibson Thunderbird II
    ($6,000 to $9,000, custom color)

    The “non-reverse” single-pickup Thunderbird II was produced in larger numbers than the IV, but is still rare (and has never been properly reissued). Add a custom color (sunburst models sell for $2,500 to $3,200) and a never-broken headstock, and you have a Gibson bass that’ll set hearts racing. Ask Glenn Cornick!

    12. 1958-’59 Rickenbacker Model 4000
    ($7,200 to $8,900)

    Rickenbacker’s first bass, and the earliest long-scale challenger to Fender’s Precision. With a neck-through design and a horseshoe pickup, the 4000 sounded great and the cresting-wave body was stylish and practical. It took Rickenbacker time to crack the bass market (making for low production), but the ubiquitous ’70s Rick 4001/4002/4003 models are this one’s children.

    13. 1962-’64 Gibson EB-6
    ($7,500 to $8,000)
    Gibson’s second attempt at a 6-string bass, it’s essentially an overgrown SG. With six big Kluson tuners and two P.A.F. pickups, this was one roaring monster of twang, but with only 66 shipped faded to obscurity very quickly. Also expensive like Fender’s VI, Gibson somehow omitted the whammy bar!

    14. 1968 Fender Telecaster Bass
    ($6,500 to $8,000 Blue Floral and Pink Paisley)

    The ’60s hit CBS/Fender in a big way in ’68, with the hippier-than-thou Telecasters with floral and paisley wallpaper applied to the slab bodies under a heavy clearcoat. The basses (especially the blue) are rarer than the guitars and is one of the few CBS-era four-strings with heavy collector appeal. For comparison, a blond version from ’68 brings $3,500 to $4,000.

    15. 1960-’61 Gibson EB-6
    ($6,500 to $7,000)

    Gibson’s first Danelectro-inspired “baritone guitar” was basically a single-pickup ES-335 fitted with a bass bridge. Much more expensive than Nathan Daniel’s $135 Masonite box, rather less versatile sounding, it died a quick death and thus is yet another very rare Gibson.

    16. 1961-’65 Rickenbacker Model 4001
    ($5,500 to $6,900)

    A deluxe development of the Model 4000, the flashy two-pickup 4001 would eventually become Rick’s signature bass. In the early ’60s, it was a very expensive obscurity until U.K. players like Paul McCartney, Pete Quaife, Roger Waters, and eventually, Chris Squire, made the export-model 4001S (with dot neck and unbound body) a bass icon, leading to mass acceptance.

    17. 1953-’58 Gibson Electric Bass (EB-1)
    ($5,300 to $6,400)

    With Gibson’s first electric bass, Ted McCarty’s disdain for Fender manifested itself in a wildly different design. With a solid mahogany violin-shaped body, big, boomy pickup, and even a stand-up end pin, these were intended to create the big, warm upright thump, but louder. In ’58, the model was renamed EB-1, and collectors often refer to the entire run by that name.

    18. 1965 Fender Bass V
    ($4,500 to $6,300, custom color)

    With a short neck, only 15 frets, a long body, and a pickup in a harmonically awkward spot, the Bass V was not Fender’s masterpiece. Five-string basses eventually prospered, but not in this form. Still, the magic of Fender’s custom colors and limited production make for another Fullerton collectible; sunburst versions from ’65 go for $2,900 to $3,500.

    19. 1971-’99 Alembic Series II
    ($5,000 to $6,000)

    In the early ’70s, San Francisco’s Alembic reinvented the electric bass, using low-impedance pickups, onboard preamps, and multi-laminate construction, they were like nothing before. The Series II, with the “omega” body cutout, typifies the company’s high-end approach.

    20. 1990-2000 Alembic Stanley Clarke Signature
    ($4,500 to $5,500)

    Many ’70s rock-star bassists embraced the Alembic, but it was jazz/fusion phenom Stanley Clarke who became most indelibly associated with them. Clarke’s personal basses included short-scale/vibrato-equipped models – even a “tenor bass” tuned up to guitar range!

    21. 1971-’79 Alembic Series I
    ($4,400 to $5,500)

    The original Alembic bass, with the “omega” pointed lower body designed to force the player to use a proper stand! Offered in three scale lengths and different wood combinations, this is still the classic ’70s Alembic of many player’s dreams.

    22. 1961-’63 Gibson EB-3
    ($4,600 to $5,300)

    Jack Bruce, come home! In 1961, the solidbody EB-3 replaced the semihollow EB-2; with two pickups and a rotary Tone selector it was Gibson’s most deluxe four-string. Later models are fairly common, but early-’60s EB-3s were produced in smaller numbers and today are hard to find.

    23. 1958 Gibson EB-2
    ($4,000 to $5,000)

    Gibson’s second bass, this mate to the ES-335 was initially judged a failure. Retired in ’61, an unexpected wave of popularity in the U.K. caused a revival by ’64 alongside its Epiphone cousin, the Rivoli. Still, the original banjo-tuner/black-pickup version is the collector’s choice – especially in the scarce blond finish.

    24. 1959-’60 Gibson EB-0
    ($4,000 to $5,000)

    Often referred to as the “Les Paul Junior Bass” (although it doesn’t carry Paul’s signature), the earliest EB-0s share the guitar’s Cherry-finish slab body. Gibson’s first entry-level bass, the EB-0 sold better than previous models, but by later standards is still a rare instrument.

    25. 1956-’63 Höfner 500/1
    ($3,300 to $4,800)

    Remembered now for its connection to the Beatles, the early violin-body Höfner 500/1 is also significant as the first European electric bass, original in its own right. Light and airy in feel and sound (unlike Gibson’s slab-o-mahogany EB) the Höfner is the progenitor of generations of 30″-scale hollowbody four-strings from all over the world. Lefty versions fetch top dollar.


    This article originally appeared in VG August 2011 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Vox Guitars Invade America

    Vox Guitars Invade America

    VOX_01

    The Vox brand may be quintessentially English, but it made a huge impact in the U.S. Riding in with the 1964 British invasion, Vox even displaced Fender for a time as the land’s most desired amplifier. Vox guitars lacked the same impact (the Beatles didn’t play them, after all) but were seen prominently in the hands of the Rolling Stones, Hollies, and others. In retrospect, Vox guitars are most often associated with a ’60s-/garage-band aesthetic. Fashionable for a time, by the end of the decade, Vox guitars and amps had fallen out of favor along with the Beat Group sounds they provided. Still, the best – or at least best-looking – Vox guitars continue to provide an instant cool ’60s vibe (check out the latest Toyota Corolla TV commercial).

    Tom Jennings signs off on America.
    Tom Jennings signs off on America.

    The Vox brand hit U.S. teens like a hurricane with the Beatles arrival, but Vox instruments were initially unobtainable, which added to the mystique! Jennings Musical Industries (JMI), a relatively small company in Dartford, Kent, experienced explosive growth supplying the British Beat Boom with its signature amplification. This runaway success was a double-edged sword; needing capital to build the vast amounts of equipment on order (but not paid for), Jennings had no choice but to seek outside financing. By September of ’63, the Royston group (a British electronics concern) had bought a controlling interest from founder Tom Jennings. Amps were the bulk of the business; most Vox guitars were cheap beginner’s models, though by the beginning of ’64 some professional-quality instruments were in-hand. Royston/JMI had no distribution in the U.S. when the Beatles opened this vast market, but one American company had a foot in the door…

    By the summer of ’64, Thomas Organ Company was JMI’s exclusive U.S. distributor. Like Hammond and Baldwin, Thomas made mostly large, expensive console organs for the upscale home market. These were big business in the early ’60s, and Thomas was a major player. If, in retrospect, they seem rather unhip (at least compared to Hammond), at the time, Thomas was building some of the most technically advanced organs of the day. Still, in ’64, their big endorser was Mitch Miller; Lawerence Welk was featured in the ’65 ad campaign, the spotlight product being an organ with lighted keys showing students which note to hit! They had no footing in the Beat market, not even building small portable units like Vox supplied to likes of the Animals or the Dave Clark Five.

    The Eko factory, 1964.
    The Eko factory, 1964.

    Thomas was actually a relatively young company – founded in 1956 – and by ’64 a subsidiary of Warwick Electronics, which was a major builder of portable TV sets. Thomas was an early pioneer in high-end solidstate technology – in ’59, the company introduced transistor organs, offering an unusual five-year guarantee. They even sold home organs with a built-in stereo phonograph!

    Thomas’ gung-ho founder and president was one Joe Benaron, a big believer in aggressive marketing. In ’62, the company advised music dealers, “Strong, aggressive merchants are selling Thomas – or should be! Join Thomas now… don’t wake up to discover yourself selling against it!” Even so, Benaron was watching its share in the overall market shrink as teenagers everywhere turned to guitars. By late ’64, even Piano Trade magazine was running features like “Guitar – The Instrument with the Golden Future!” Benaron, like many in his shoes, wanted a piece of that action!

    The Eko factory, 1964.
    The Eko factory, 1964.

    Personally, Benaron had much common ground with Tom Jennings, who also started with electric keyboards. Jennings admired the big “Classy” products Thomas built, and it’s been suggested he considered his amps, guitars, and organs to be less-admirable creations despite their success. Jennings was pleased to distribute Thomas organs in the U.K., and in turn Thomas secured exclusive American distribution rights to Vox. At the British Music Trade Fair on August 30, 1964, Thomas placed an order for $1 million worth of Vox equipment; at the time the largest single order for musical merchandise ever made with a U.K. firm. This was followed in mid November by a second order for $1.5 million and, in early ’65, with another for $2 million. Add various exports to Europe and the Far East and the situation for JMI looked rosy – on the surface. The challenge came in supplying the product!

    The Vox Teen Beat masthead.
    The Vox Teen Beat masthead.

    Compared to the American market’s appetite for Vox, the trickle of amps, guitars, and organs JMI was able to supply was a pinprick. Seeing this, Benaron deduced that exploiting it fully meant not just distributing Vox – he wanted his company to be Vox in America! This eventually led to what could be described as a bait-and-switch operation on a massive scale. Instruments sold under the Vox name in the U.S. became the product of a collaboration between English, Italian, and American concerns, many well-removed from their Dartford roots. Vox amplifiers proved very expensive to import. Thomas gave them English-sounding names like Berkeley, Buckingham, and Royal Guardsman, but soon enough they were actually being built in the U.S. At first, Thomas assembled imported chassis into locally-built cabinets, then began substituting domestic components, eventually the only English-made part was the speaker. Using their transistor technology, Warwick/Thomas re-engineered the Vox tube amps designed by Dick Denney at JMI into something completely different, made in a huge plant in Sepulveda, like Warwick’s TVs. In terms of design and construction, these American-made solidstate amps were by no means junk – they have endured better than Fender’s transistor efforts – but they were worlds away from the English “valve” amps they were marketed as being equivalent to.

    Reluctant endorsers the Bobby Fuller 4.
    Reluctant endorsers the Bobby Fuller 4.

    Vox guitars, too, were re-engineered for the American market, but not in Sepulveda. Guitar making at JMI ran a distant second to amplifiers; despite interesting designs, production relied on sometimes-spotty subcontractors. Solidbodies were assembled in the U.K., but JMI tried several Italian guitar builders as sources for plywood hollowbody guitars nobody in England had the facility to make. After working with Welson and Crucanelli, by early ’65, JMI settled on the Eko operation in Recanati, Italy. Run by founder Oliviero Pigini, Eko was (according to themselves) the largest and most advanced guitar factory in Europe. It already exported to England and America, and was more than willing to pick up contract work on Vox guitars. In ’66, JMI/Royston, Eko and Thomas entered a partnership named EME, to further Vox production worldwide. Jennings, Benaron, and Pigini all had ambitions for the operation, but the goals were not always the same. Eventually, Thomas and Eko essentially cut JMI out of the loop, running their own pipeline from Italy to the U.S., even while the guitars still carried the tag line “Vox – The British Sound.” What Benaron really cared about was clearly advertised in June, 1965, to U.S. music dealers: “Vox: The Sound Of Money… The top beat groups have made a lot of money with Vox… so can you!” Vox was sold to the public with slightly less crass slogans like “VOX: The Greatest Name In Sound,” “The Sound That Travels with the Stars,” “VOX – King of the Beat,” and most famously, “Vox: It’s What’s Happening.”

    Presenting the amazing Voxmobile!
    Presenting the amazing Voxmobile!

    Amplifiers for European sales, and small numbers of guitars, were still made in the U.K., but by the summer of ’65, most guitar production shifted to Eko. Practically all guitars imported into the U.S. after the first wave were of Italian origin, though JMI-made budget instruments like the Shadow, Clubman, and Super Ace seem to have been brought over in some quantity as early stopgaps. U.K.-made guitars imported in 1964-’65 can be seen in the hands of some early users, but Italian examples soon predominate. Thomas’ early-’65 Vox “King Of the Beat” catalog showed a mix of English- and Italian-made models; by the next catalog, it was all Eko product. The Eko/Vox line was extensive, including distinctive JMI originals like the trapezoidal-bodied Phantom line and teardrop-shaped Mark, alongside others “inspired” by the likes of Gibson’s ES-335 and even the Mosrite Ventures model.

    Differences between English and Italian interpretations of Vox designs are often small but significant. JMI used at least three subcontractors for guitar necks and results were inconsistent, especially the fretwork. Most JMI necks are one-piece with a rosewood or ebony fingerboard and have a thinner finish, even when the body is swathed in polyester. Eko necks carry heavy poly finishes, but the actual construction and especially fretting are more consistent. Italian necks used maple (originally one piece, later often multi-laminate) with a bound ebony fingerboard and a truss rod adjusted via an easily accessible plug at the body end. This rod was coupled with a metal T-shaped center section under the fingerboard, and has sometimes worked too well over time – some Eko-made Voxes today show neck and fingerboard crack issues where the rod has been overtightened. Still, at the time, the Italian neck seemed a more-reliable improvement. It’s easy to tell the difference – Eko necks have “Made in Italy By Vox” in small print on the back of the headstock.

    (MIDDLE) Brother James feels good with Vox! (RIGHT) The Banana Splits Vox it up.
    Win the battle, get a movie contract! Brother James (middle) feels good with Vox. The Banana Splits Vox it up.

    Other problems can emerge as the guitars age. Eko’s heavy polyester finishes sometimes crack or check heavily. Unlike JMI versions, the Italian pickguards used an unstable plastic and many have shrunk and warped, though this was not a problem at the time. Much of the hardware was well-made and nearly identical – both used similar Van Gent tuners fitted with stamped metal Vox-branded covers, and Eko copied JMI’s bridge and vibrato designs very closely. An important sonic difference was the pickups; Eko-made units look much like their English antecedents, but produce a thinner sound and weaker output. Most Thomas Vox guitars shipped in a distinctive oblong grey case – attractive, light, and handy, but fairly flimsy, as well with a plastic handle that has an annoying habit of snapping off.

    Vox had a ready-made teen market, but Thomas still engaged in energetic promotion, sponsoring Teen Fair and Battle Of the Bands events in California. Thomas’ blatant exploitation of the newly hip “teen” culture seems somehow equally savvy, crass, and somehow endearing almost 50 years on! JMI’s U.K. market strategy of getting gear into the hands of any newly prominent artist proved impossible in the U.S., so Thomas did the next best thing – milking Hollywood connections to get Vox featured on film and TV, sometimes over objections by an endorsee; the Bobby Fuller Four appear in AIP’s Ghost in the Invisible Bikini with a full Vox rig – which a Fender-toting Fuller strongly resented. Bands sometimes appeared on TV with a Vox lineup they likely only saw that day! The Gentrys, Beau Brummels, Seeds, Electric Prunes (who recorded a promo for the Vox wah pedal), local faves the Guilloteens, Dino, Desi and Billy, and many other mostly-L.A.-based acts appeared on TV shows like “Hullabaloo,” “Shindig!,” and “Shebang” with Vox rigs. Garage legends The Standells were sometime Vox endorsers who used their own guitars in their golden movie moment in AIP’s Riot on Sunset Strip (with Vox amps) but the other bands in the film (the Chococolate Watchband and the Enemies) both appear using an identical Violin Bass/Mark VI /Bobcat guitar lineup that was likely part of the set! The Who mimed with matching Vox guitars on the Smothers Brothers show – convenient for Townshend’s smashing routine! As intended, this exposure gave the impression Vox guitars were in much wider use with major groups than was really true!

    A bewitching Vox guitar.
    “Samantha” and a bewitching Vox guitar.

    Looking beyond California, Thomas published its own nationally distributed “Vox Teen Beat” newspaper full of propaganda, and expected aggressive promotion from Vox dealers who were encouraged to sponsor local battle-of-the-bands contests and other teen events. The wildest promotional hardware of all was the Voxmobile, built by L.A. customizer George Barris in the shape of a giant Phantom bass. This traveling $30,000 “guit-car” had 32 guitar inputs, three built-in amps, hidden speakers everywhere, and a dual-manual organ on the trunk. Fender somehow missed that idea! For a time, there was even a Vox retail outlet in Hollywood.

    Thomas pursued endorsements in the R&B market with Ike and Tina Turner, and most successfully, James Brown, who for a time featured Vox gear on the back of his LPs. “Instruments by… Vox” was an album credit. His band can be seen with Vox lineups in 1967-’68, and it’s interesting to speculate what brother James’ crack players thought about these relatively flimsy instruments replacing their Gibson guitars and Fender bass!

    Another unlikely Vox act was Velvet Underground, the seminal New York cult band. While now considered one of rock’s most influential acts, when active they were a commercial non-starter. Still, thanks to the patronage of Andy Warhol, the band received a package of Vox gear in ’66, which can occasionally be spotted in use.

    Thomas’ Hollywood connections entered a surreal phase when Samantha Stevens from TV’s “Bewitched” (played by Elizabeth Montgomery) strummed a Vox Apollo with psychedelic paint livery in the 1968 episode “Hippy Hippy Hooray.” By September of that year, the fading brand received its wildest TV endorsement, equipping Hanna-Barbera’s live-action Saturday morning cartoon stars the Banana Splits! The Vox Ultrasonic and Starstream played by Fleegle and Drooper may have been the last nails in Vox’s credibility coffin. Thomas shut the operation down not long after, plagued by a shrinking market, fading sales, and quality issues. From the Beatles and the “World’s Top Beat Groups” to the Banana Splits in just five years – the Vox brand had a uniquely strange journey. The aesthetic of electric music changed rapidly, and by the early ’70s Vox was as uncool as it had been cool in ’64. Still, Vox amps – even some of Thomas’ transistor babies – maintain a devoted following that has only grown over time. The guitars have not fared as well, but have an enduring appeal to some players – at least for their visual style. Next month, we’ll look at some interesting models from this most varied – and storied – line.


    This article originally appeared in VG January 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Fender Jazz Bass

    Fender Jazz Bass

    Fender Jazz Basses

    “Stack-knob” is a catch phrase that for decades has perked the ears of collectors; these relatively rare examples of the earliest Fender Jazz Bass are among the first electric basses to be “collected” instead of just bought, sold, and played! Along with the ’50s Precision, they stand as the ultimate Fender bass – sought for their tone, feel, and aura of cool. Built during the transition between the ’50s and ’60s, they combine the craftsmanship of Fender’s pre-guitar boom period with the modern look.

    Nobody knows how many Jazz basses were made before Fender switched to the three-knob configuration, but, as a new and more-expensive model in an era when the electric was considered an illegitimate upstart, the Jazz took time to establish itself as a popular alternative. The number of extant examples is small compared to the number of surviving early-’60s Precisions.

    Fender took its time getting a second bass to market. The Precision had been an increasingly familiar sight for about eight years before the Jazz made its debut. Basses from Gibson (the Electric Bass, or EB-1, followed by the semi-hollow EB-2) Rickenbacker (Model 4000), and companies like Kay must have shown Leo and his crew how the market for electric basses was big enough to include a “deluxe” model. Instead of simply updating its one model, as Fender had done in ’54 and again in ’57, it decided to complement the Precision Bass with an upscale sister. Borrowing the new “Offset Contour” body from the Jazzmaster but keeping the long “horns” needed to balance a bass neck, Fender created a beautiful and harmonious design. The pickups were new, keeping the dual polepieces from the ’57 Precision, but with narrower, more-focused field. The stacked knobs gave individual Tone and Volume controls for each pickup – a novel feature for a bass at the time. The three-knob configuration was at the prototype stage, but got the commercial nod, only to be discontinued within two years. A 1960 Fender catalog bound into the July 21 issue of Down Beat shows on its cover what appears to be a three-knob Jazz with a ‘50s-style Fender logo. The bass in the catalog, and the ad in the January ’61 International Musician, is a stack-knob with no logo. Other distinctive “stack” features include the adjustable mute pads under the chrome tailpiece, prominently featured in promotional literature (but eventually removed by most players), the “patent pending” fine print on the headstock decal, and – on the earliest examples – the beloved “’50s bump” on tthe lower cutaway. Fender also promoted the new narrower neck as permitting “rapid technique” – one wonders if a young Jaco Pastorious took this to heart. The original catalog blurb for the Jazz says, “this… is the standard by which others will be compared” and for once a bit of ad copy has held true through the years! The early Jazz is still the standard by which any electric bass can be judged, and most are found wanting.


    This article originally appeared in Vintage Guitar Classics No. 2 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Forty Quid of Klunk

    Forty Quid of Klunk

    The H-22’s pickguard raised eybrows.
    The H-22’s pickguard raised eybrows.

    Duh-Duh-Duh-Duh-Duh, Klunk!

    It’s not the most artful musical introduction, but it was effective. And by the time a screaming Hammond organ slides in over the pounding bass-and-drums, most listeners are hooked. The song is “Gimme Some Lovin” by the Spencer Davis Group, and the 1966 record is a showcase not only for the vocals and organ of a young Steve Winwood, but the sound of the Harmony H-22 bass in the hands of his brother, Muff.

    While budget-priced four-strings are rarely given their due, the hollowbody H-22 has more than once proven a surprisingly efficient low-end tool – and made its mark on classic recordings.

    The H-22 Hi-Value was Harmony’s first electric bass, debuting in 1962 and featured on the catalog cover. The name was descriptive, if unromantic (like Kay’s Value Leader), still, Harmony was the largest student-level guitar maker in the country and this model helped make the electric bass obtainable for kids everywhere. It had been a long time coming – 10 years after Fender’s first bass and local rival Kay’s response. Kay was America’s premier upright bass maker, and in a quick reaction to this new low-end idea created the hollowbody bass in late ’52 with the flat-top/arched back K-162 Electronic Bass. The H-22 bore a general resemblance to the original, but at a much lower price – and it hit just in time for the ’60s rock explosion.

    The H-22 was well-conceived despite being built with price as a primary consideration. “The value built into it is unsurpassed!” claimed the catalog, and it’s hard to argue. A full/16″ body – thin-rimmed, flat-topped, and hollow (it almost looked like an archtop) – gave the instrument better balance than many short-scale basses. There was a lot of space between the simple wooden adjustable bridge and the tailipece, so it required long-scale strings though its scale was just 30″. And it’s hard to imagine a pickup design simpler than the DeArmond Golden Tone Indox mounted near the fingerboard; a flat single-coil with an internal magnet, it puts out a surprisingly powerful tone with plenty of definition. Indeed, the Harmony offered a much clearer sound than the upscale Gibson EB-2 and Epiphone Rivoli basses, with more output than similar Höfner, Kay, or Framus instruments. The wiring was basic but functional, with Volume and Tone knobs and a lever-activated Klunk switch for a baritone effect.

    Muff Winwood; gimme some thumbpick! “Plonk” Lane and his battered Harmony.
    Muff Winwood; gimme some thumbpick! “Plonk” Lane and his battered Harmony.

    The H-22’s oddest feature was a large white plastic pickguard that covered much of its face, with a vaguely batwing shape along the lower edge. This carried a rosewood finger rest below the strings, and both were often removed. One of the best features was the maple neck with an “ebonized” fingerboard and Gibson-style truss rod that keep it functional long after many other cheap bass necks of the era had packed it in. The instrument’s weakest point was its tuning pegs – instead of tuners with large shafts, it was given the same open-back Waverly strip units Harmony used on banjos. In this, Harmony followed Danelectro, the other notable purveyor of bargain basses.

    Overall, the design was visually similar to a Kay and Gibson, but closer in price to the Dano – a Lincoln look at a Ford price!

    In action, the H-22 was very light, handy, and surprisingly professional-feeling bass. It debuted at $95 in 1962, only $10 more than the boxy shorthorn Danelectro model and $15 more than Kay’s Value Leader 5961, which had a 24″ guitar-scale neck and felt more like a toy. Other lower-end four-strings like Danelectro’s Longhorn, Supro’s Pocket Bass, and Kay’s full-scale 5965 Pro were $150 or more. Harmony’s price rose to $99.50 in March of ’63, then $104.50 in ’65 and 109.50 by ’67. Even with the increases, the H-22 was still the best value on the market – lending truth to Harmony’s slogan, “The best you can buy… for the money you spend!”

    Harmony introduced the H-22 with this page in its 1962 catalog. The H-22 –under 40 quid!
    Harmony introduced the H-22 with this page in its 1962 catalog. The H-22 –under 40 quid!

    The H-22 was produced in fairly large quantities in the mid ’60s. Along with Danelectro and Silvertone basses, it was a popular choice to equip the first-time bassists of many budding surf and garage bands across the U.S., including the pre-“Wipe Out” Surfaris. One notable user was the San Diego combo Count 5, remembered for the 1966 hit “Psychotic Reaction.” Still, if they kept at it, many young bassists would buy a Fender or other professional-quality bass as soon as they were able, leaving the Harmony in the garage.

    However, such was not always the case across the pond!

    The Harmony line was marketed in England by Boosey & Hawkes; the H-22 was listed in ’62 at just under £40, up to £45 by mid ’65. Either way, it was one of the best values in a bass for the U.K. in the mid ’60s. Professional-level semi-hollow U.S.-made choices like the EB-2, Rivoli, or Gretsch cost four times that – even a Fender Precision was triple the price. Others in that range were mostly dodgy imports from Europe or Japan. At 31 guineas, Selmer’s single-pickup Höfner Senator was the only similar bargain, and arguably neither as good-sounding nor as hardy. Whether for economic or stylistic reasons, two soon-to-be-celebrated R&B groups embraced the H-22 and took it with them to the top of the charts – and into pop history.

    The $199 Harmony H-27.
    The $199 Harmony H-27.

    Birmingham’s Spencer Davis Group started in mid ’64, playing American R&B, and soon caught a buzz among musicians and critics as one of the country’s best unsung bands. Throughout ’65 it was tipped for success if it could just score the elusive hit single. Even at this early stage, bassist Mervyn “Muff” Winwood and the other members (including Spencer Davis) were rather in the shadow of Muff’s younger brother, Stevie. After all, the kid could sing like Ray Charles and play organ like Jimmy Smith! Still, the hits which lifted them to the top of the U.K. charts in late ’65 – “Keep on Runnin’” and “Somebody Help Me” owed a lot to the bass player’s contributions. Both were Jamaican-influenced numbers written by island expat songsmith Jackie Edwards, but the records were powered by the thudding hammer of Muff’s bass riffing under Stevie’s powerhouse vocal and trendy fuzz guitar. Unusually, the group had recorded a full LP before gaining hit status, but the two singles made them bona fide stars in the U.K. This was repeated with the worldwide breakout of “Gimmie Some Lovin’” and “I’m a Man” a year later, which made them a top act in the U.S. Both were produced and co-written by Jimmy Miller, who would go on to produce Steve Winwood in Traffic and Blind Faith, then work with the Rolling Stones. By the spring of ’67, Steve Winwood had moved on to form Traffic, bringing about the end of the original Davis band. During the group’s two-year run, Muff Winwood was occasionally seen with other basses (like a Höfner 500/1), but the Harmony remains his signature instrument, visually and sonically. The whole band was even Harmony-equipped for a while – Davis himself brandished a Stratotone Jupiter, as did Steve Winwood for a time, before picking up a Fender Jaguar (and most famously the Hammond organ).

    The H-22 was also the instrument of choice for a London band, the Small Faces, which broke on their home turf at nearly the same time. Bassist Ronnie “Plonk” Lane was nearly always seen with a Harmony – his first H-22 was the spark that ignited the group to begin with. The core of The Small Faces, considered the ultimate mod band, met when Lane went to the J160 Music Bar in east London looking for his first bass. He bought the H-22 from fast-talking salesman Steve Marriott – at “A whacking great discount!” Marriott glommed the Gretsch Tennessean Lane had intended to trade in, and the two struck up a musical rapport that would carry them through the ’60s. Marriott and Lane became the creative team that powered the Small Faces, writing and singing their increasingly sophisticated material. While they never became stars in the U.S. (despite a top 40 hit with “Itchycoo Park” in ’67) the original Small Faces are revered as one of the finest of all English pop groups.

    The 1968-’69 Harmony bass line.
    The 1968-’69 Harmony bass line.

    Thanks to a fiercely energetic stage show, their gear took a lot of abuse. The group also showed no compunction about modifying instruments. Mariott’s Gretsch guitars changed finish and hardware over time, and Lane’s H-22 took a beating. As 1966 went on, the bass lost its knobs, the pickguard became black, then went missing entirely. “The… thing to suffer is the equipment,” Lane reported to Beat Instrumental in May of ’66. “My Harmony bass has been through so much action – there were no Volume controls left and I had to turn the volume up and down with a pair of pliers. I’ve just bought another couple…. The old friend is being renovated.” Lane’s loyalty to the H-22 is unusual, but he stayed true to his first love at least until he met her posher sister!

    By late ’66, Harmony expanded its bass line to three instruments. The H-22’s price dropped to $99.50 again as it gained two classier siblings. The H-27 was much fancier; it kept the 16″/thin-rimmed form but as double-cutaway, fully arched, laminated maple hollowbody with a honey-brown sunburst finish. “Styled and electronically equipped to meet the highest professional bass tone standards,” was how Harmony announced it. The H-27 carried two fancier DeArmond pickups, each with a double row of adjustable poles in an interesting variation on Fender’s offset-bobbin idea. The strings terminated on a nifty metal bridge and tailpiece with adjustable saddles and detachable covers. There was no pickguard but two body-mounted finger rests with tortoise celluloid tops and a conventional four-knob/one-switch wiring rig. The maple neck led to a large oddly droopy Fenderesque headstock, also faced in tortoise plastic and equipped (at last!) with actual bass tuning machines. In a sign of the times, these were of Japanese origin. The H-27 listed at $199.50 – double the price of the H-22, but by the standards of ’66 still an excellent value. While it feels classier, the H-27 does not handle or balance as well due mostly to the heavier headstock and different bridge placement.

    The first H-27 in England, on display at the British Music Trade Show in September, 1966. A skinny Plonk with low-slung H-27 in 1968.
    The first H-27 in England, on display at the British Music Trade Show in September, 1966. A skinny Plonk with low-slung H-27 in 1968.

    The new model did find one enthusiastic fan – Lane bought the first H-27 into England from central London’s St. Giles Music Centre, fresh off Boozey & Hawkes’ display stand at the September ’66 British Music Trade Show. “Plonk has gone for the very first of a new line in harmony Bass guitars,” reported Beat Instrumental. This bass can be seen (and heard with a persistently flat E string!) on the band’s September, 1966, German TV “BeatBeatBeat” broadcast, available on DVD, which captures them at peak power. “The sound I want is chunky and sharp,” Lane explained, and based on this footage, he succeeded! The bass in the hands of a prominent player created a buzz, but few other pros took up the H-27. And while they are rarer than the H-22, today they are also far less sought-after.

    Also introduced around that time was the solidbody H-25, given the ungainly moniker, Silhouette Solid Body Deluxe Multi-Voice Electric Bass. This was a vaguely Fender-shaped solidbody initially built with a centrally located pickup and rocking tone switches – a second pickup was soon added. Neither distinctive or attractive as its hollowbody sisters, The H-25 was never popular and saw few professional users. At $139.50, it remained a budget instrument, but had none of the stylish look (or distinctive feel) of its hollowbody siblings. Offering little advantage over many similar imported Fender-like basses in the late ’60s, the rather warped looking (if decent-playing/-sounding) H-25 made minimal impact.

    In the meantime, the original H-22 moved through the decade with a few changes. The tailpiece, originally a block of rosewood screwed to the top under a metal cover (the same stamped metal piece seen on Gibson lap steels before World War II!) became a cheaper integral unit that performed both functions. The major change came in ’68, when the H-22 went to a double-cutaway body shape. This made little functional difference, but the classic look was lost a bit. By the early ’70s – dawn of the era of stadium volume – hollowbody basses fell out of favor. Former user Muff Winwood had laid down his upon leaving Spencer Davis in ’67, moving into production as an A&R man for Chris Blackwell’s Island Records. Among his notable production credits are Sparks and the first Dire Straits album. Ronnie Lane (no longer going by “Plonk”) stayed with the Small Faces in ’69, after Steve Marriott departed (replaced by Rod Stewart and Ron Wood). Lane’s love affair with Harmony ended as well, and he switched to Fender then Zemaitis basses. Lane left the renamed Faces in ’73, but his enduring talent and charm were much admired on the English music scene, despite an aesthetic allergy to commercial success and slow decline in health due to Multiple Sclerosis.

    The H-22 was gone by Harmony’s 1972 catalog; the other basses remained, but in an era of cheaper imports the once-mighty Harmony faced a shrinking market and ceased operation in ’75. They outlasted domestic competition from Kay, Valco, and the like, but could not compete with the increasingly sophisticated Japanese product that eventually cornered all but the highest levels of the market. The mostly forgotten H-22 became a pawnshop prize or garage-band revivalist’s trophy in the ’70s and ’80s.

    After this long period of obscurity, there has recently been a revived interest in the H-22, from younger bassists taken by its vintage sound and look. There’s even an Asian-made reissue. Somehow, the H-22’s unique visual and sonic character summons a time when the electric bass was more fun, before rock got “heavy.” Really not a bad legacy for 40 quid!


    This article originally appeared in VG August 2013 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Surf Bass

    Out of the Doghouse

    The big twang of surf guitar is still an instantly recognizable rock and roll idiom today, more than 35 years after the style was developed. People who weren’t alive when the pounding tom-toms of “Wipe Out” hit the airwaves know what a “surf beat” is, but ask even the most well-schooled music fan to define surf bass and you’re likely to receive, at best, a blank stare.

    In fact the surf/instrumental rock genres of the very early 1960s were crucial proving grounds for the still-newfangled electric bass, and many of the seminal records in these two interrelated styles are also early showcases for the Fender Bass sound. You can’t really imagine surf music without a Fender Bass – this is not true of any earlier rock and roll style. During this era, the bass guitar went from optional to essential equipment and set up the electric bass for its dominant role in the British Invasion, folk rock, and all that followed.

    While the electric bass is thought of as a rock and roll instrument, the majority of ’50s classic rock records featured the unamplified upright. 1957’s “Jailhouse Rock” is the first Elvis disc to feature the new sound, and Eddie Cochran’s L.A.-studio rockabilly concoctions of the next year are notable for the prominent use of a plucked Fender, but even most late-’50s records still thump along with the bass fiddle’s less-distinct bottom. A notable exception is Duane Eddy; while the patented twangy guitar sound of his string of hits was influencing budding guitarists across the country, the bracing sound of his rhythm section, featuring a sharply defined electric bass, must have been subtly influential as well. Most records of the era were made by studio bands of one form or other; the self-contained band was not considered essential. While Bill Haley’s Comets appeared on his Decca records, major stars like Chuck Berry, Little Richard and Fats Domino recorded mostly with musicians working for the label, not the road band. These groups of experienced players invariably featured a bassist well-schooled in the upright. The bass is most-often recorded as something of a blurred boom on these discs anyway, making the type of instrument used rather a moot point!

    The bass fiddle is not an easy instrument to learn – to the thousands of kids newly-interested in guitars and rockin’ out, it must have seemed quite a mystery. The electric bass required only a rudimentary knowledge of guitar to operate – yet there wasn’t likely to be one lying around in the school band room! Unlike the sax, drums or even the guitar, there was no academic tradition for the instrument – it must have been brave young souls who tried to get Mom and Dad to cough up or at least co-sign for that first Fender or Danelectro! Early on, there was no beginner’s Fender – it was either the $229.50 Precision Bass or nothing.

    Nathan Daniel did the world’s budding bassists an enormous service when the cheap-but-reliable four-string Danos went on sale in 1958! Taking this instrument to at least connoisseurs’ immortality were important pre-surf instrumental hitmakers Johnny and the Hurricanes. Led by wailin’ saxman Johnny Paris, the Hurricanes’ 1959 hit “Red River Rock” featured not only powerful noise from the guitar and sax, but a booming bass from Lionel “Butch” Mattice’s Shorthorn Danelectro. “Tequila,” by the Champs, a instrumental smash just six months earlier, had prominently featured the upright bass. While never a surf band (predating the style anyway), the Pacific Northwest’s Ventures were widely-influential and gave solid exposure to the sound and the look of the Fender bass. Their first hit, “Walk Don’t Run” features a plunking electric bass, but the group’s first two album covers really drove the message home with full-color photos of the Fender-wielding band, noting of course that the “musicians” on the cover of that first LP are really Dolton Records mailroom workers – the instruments are real enough, anyway. The cover of the second Ventures album (featuring the actual band) is the classic turn-of-the-decade band shot and Nokie Edwards’ maple neck Precision Bass serves notice to teenage rockers everywhere that the doghouse is on the way out!

    At about the same time in Southern California, the two major progenitors of surf guitar were starting to make noise. Dick Dale was the most important influence in the genre’s creation, but The Belairs would also lay claim to being the seminal surf band. Dale’s story is still ongoing, almost 40 years later, but his reputation is largely based on his early Deltone recordings and legendary shows at Balboa’s Rendezvous ballroom in 1961 to ’63. Dale’s sound was always fast, aggressive and phenomenally loud for its time, and depended heavily on the electric bass. A former bassist of his once remarked Dick had three requirements for his bass player: play a Fender P-Bass, with a pick, and use only downstrokes! The jazzy thump of the bass fiddle was useless in this context. Listening to those early records today does not really capture how different Dale’s Deltones sounded to the kids who began flocking to his shows in the early ’60s – the hyperamplified power of those live shows must have been like nothing heard before, and the electric bass was a crucial component.

    The Belairs, kings of the South Bay surf scene, represent a different root in the history of the “surf bass” sound, for they had no bass at all! Starting as an amateur teen combo – albeit an excellent and ambitious one – the band relied on co-leader Paul Johnson’s powerful rhythm guitar playing to provide bottom for the entire group. The staccato chunk produced on his low strings defined the sound of the band at least as much as Eddie Bertrand’s lead guitar, and when other bands began to emulate The Belairs, the downstroke rhythm carried over to the bass as well. The style teenaged musicians adopted as they followed the lead of these bands was to use the bass as a double of the rhythm guitar, resulting in the characteristic “churning” sound that says “cowabunga” to the listener, even without the reverb-laden lead or pounding drums. A common device was to repeatedly hammer on to the tonic note in a flurry of downpicking – a trick first popularized by Eddie Cochran’s “Summertime Blues” in 1958, and used prominently in Dick Dale’s 1962 hit “Miserlou.” This is a more guitar-oriented approach to the bass, distinct from the riffy, walking jazz and R & B-derived styles prevalent before this in rock and roll.

    Instead of having a traditional bassist’s conception, the young players who made up the instrumental bands forming in emulation of the Deltones and Belairs heard the electric bass in a new context, more allied to the guitars. While many surf tunes do feature moving basslines, the overall feel is less “swingy” and more agitated. Perusing photos of these first generation instrumental surf combos, it is evident the electric bass is considered an essential component of the band – not as some strange freak instrument, as it was still regarded by many “legitimate” players.

    At this time a majority of mainstream pop, R & B, and rock and roll records made on both coasts still used the upright bass, and in Nashville, only the six-string “tic-tac” bass was used to supplement the bull fiddle. The surfin’ kids of California were growing up in Fender’s backyard, and his bass was the ideal sound to them, not a poor substitute for the “real” bass. The new Fender piggyback amps were widely influential as well. Finally, the bass could really compete in the volume stakes without fear of blowing out the amp at a crucial moment.

    It seems strange, in retrospect, that neither Leo or the normally-astute Don Randall attempted to capitalize on the groundswell of interest in the bass guitar among teens, but while Fender sold truckloads of cheaper Musicmaster and Duo-Sonic guitars to beginners, the Precision Bass was given only a more-expensive relative in the Jazz Bass – no budget bass was offered until the 1966 Mustang. While Fenders are rightly always thought of as the surf bass, early photos reveal that many hitmakers relied on cheaper four-strings until the band was established, and there was at least a modicum of money coming in! When that happened, the entire group was quickly fitted out with the latest Fender gear, including what often looks to be the flashiest custom-color Precision or Jazz Bass available! The cover of the Surfaris Decca LP Wipe Out features beautiful Fiesta Red Fenders. However, pictures dating from the time of the original “Wipe Out” single feature bassist Pat Connolly sporting not a P-Bass, but a $95 Harmony H-22. Odds are that’s what’s thumping away on the single, as well.

    While The Chantays, of “Pipeline” fame, are usually seen (in a publicity photo well-known to guitar collectors) with two tortoise-pickguard Stratocasters and a sunburst Precision, the earliest shots of them reveal bassist Warren Waters holding the same type of coppertop Danelectro as good ol’ Butch from Johnny and the Hurricanes! The Blazers’ John Morris started on an old Kay. For the non-professional, a Fender was the ideal but not always the reality, at least at first. The Nobles’ Paul Geddes went the furthest in this regard – instead of buying a “real” electric bass, he built his own, which featured all of two strings! For a lot of what these budding bands did with the bassline, one string would probably have sufficed, yet though perhaps technically primitive the sounds of these bands were a step into the future away from the piano and saxophone sounds of the ’50s and into the all-electric twang of the ’60s.

    The guitar boom was building steam and the Fender bass going from novelty to necessity. The relatively-expensive Gibson basses of the early ’60s are sometimes seen in teen “garage” bands and R & B combos, but virtually never in true surf bands. As the surf sound began to be played in places where actual surf was as common as the dodo bird, the Fender formula was usually followed like a mantra – Denver’s Astronauts featured the most sublime lineup of matching white Fenders you’re ever likely to see, including Stormy Patterson’s Jazz Bass! The ever-bizarre Trashmen, from Minneapolis, started out as an excellent straight surf band, but found fame with the indescribably vocal “Surfin’ Bird.” Bassist Bob Reed defied convention by plunking on the ever-bizarre Danelectro Longhorn Bass alongside the band’s two sunburst Fender Jaguars – though when they went to a matching set of Candy Apple Reds, he switched to a Jazz Bass, as well.

    The most prominent example of sustained use of a non-Fender bass in the surf idiom (does that sound scholarly or what?!) lies with an excellent Orange County band called the Lively Ones, with bassist Ron Griffith laying down his Lake Placid Blue Jazz Bass to play an early Mosrite Ventures Bass. Although Mosrites are now remembered primarily in connection with the instrumental rock sound, they were seldom used by true surf bands and in fact post-date the boom years of the surf era. While the guitars have proven popular over the years, the early single-pickup short-scale bass is more in the league of an EB-0 than a Precision.

    Apart from anomalies like these, the basses used in surf bands were universally Leo Fender’s, and if you want to get the big bass sound of the surf era today, here are just a few simple steps to surf nirvana!

    First, find an early-’60s Fender Precision or Jazz Bass, preferably in a custom color. Candy Apple Red, Lake Placid Blue, Fiesta Red or Olympic White would be ideal. 1961 through ’63 would be the best years for authenticity’s sake, although any clay-dot rosewood neck bass will do. A few players, including the Deltones’ Rick Rillera and The Sentinals’ Gary Winburne, were seen to use older maple-neck Fenders, but that’s a rarity. Make sure the strings are heavy-gauge flatwounds, the original royal blue silk-end LaBellas would be best, but if some modernist has removed them I find that Rotosound Jazz Bass flatwounds are the best currently available substitute. All chrome covers must be intact on the bass, as well, it doesn’t change the sound but will put you in the right mood (I call them the Funk Preventers)!

    Next, plug into an early Fender Showman or Dual Showman amplifier – the only true surf amp! An early blond Showman would be the most authentic, but a later Blackface Dual Showman with two 15″ JBLs gives the most headroom. A blond Bassman will do in a pinch, but the reserve power won’t be there for a true surfer’s stomp ballroom gig. Don’t even think about non-Fender amplification – it’s almost unpatriotic! No outboard gear allowed, either. Put a pick in your hand and crank it up!

    Based on pictorial and aural evidence, nearly every surf bassist played with a pick, with the guitar-like all-downstroke technique being most prevalent. Now all you need are a couple of guitarists and a drummer who can play “Wipe Out” correctly (do not trust any drummer with more than one mounted tom-tom in this situation!)!

    The guitarist(s) should also be Fender-equipped, though there was a surprising amount of deviation from this in the original California surf bands, with Gretsches, Guilds and even Gibsons being occasionally spotted. A Stratocaster or a Jaguar would be perfect, along with the obligatory Fender outboard reverb unit and piggyback amp. Alright, we’re talking fantasy here for most people these days, but hey, if you can’t at least aim for perfection, what fun is it?

    Like many vintage musical styles, Instrumental Surf is easy to approximate but difficult to master, as the true zen of the style lies in the tiny details.

    The kids of southern California in 1961 had no such worries – they just wanted to rock out in the style of Dick Dale and the Belairs, and the history of the electric guitar and, in particular the electric bass, was profoundly influenced by those who brought home all those shiny new Fenders. As vocal surf music became the new rage the idiom’s guiding light, Beach Boy Brian Wilson was himself a bass guitarist – at least in public.

    The British Invasion of 1964 swamped the Surf Instrumental style, and many bands mutated into vocal folk rock units in the wake of the Byrds’ success, the shining example being the Crossfires’ rebirth as the Turtles. The bass guitar made this transition, and to the thousands of garage bands of every style that sprang up all over the world, the old “doghouse fiddle” was no more than a dim memory. Surf bass may not be your bag, Ho Dad, but all of us four-string Fender thumpers owe those far-off pioneers a debt of gratitude – we’re all Leo’s children!



    The Ventures were widely-influential and gave solid exposure to the sound and the look of the Fender bass.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s May ’97 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Surf Bass

    Out of the Doghouse

    The big twang of surf guitar is still an instantly recognizable rock and roll idiom today, more than 35 years after the style was developed. People who weren’t alive when the pounding tom-toms of “Wipe Out” hit the airwaves know what a “surf beat” is, but ask even the most well-schooled music fan to define surf bass and you’re likely to receive, at best, a blank stare.

    In fact the surf/instrumental rock genres of the very early 1960s were crucial proving grounds for the still-newfangled electric bass, and many of the seminal records in these two interrelated styles are also early showcases for the Fender Bass sound. You can’t really imagine surf music without a Fender Bass – this is not true of any earlier rock and roll style. During this era, the bass guitar went from optional to essential equipment and set up the electric bass for its dominant role in the British Invasion, folk rock, and all that followed.

    While the electric bass is thought of as a rock and roll instrument, the majority of ’50s classic rock records featured the unamplified upright. 1957’s “Jailhouse Rock” is the first Elvis disc to feature the new sound, and Eddie Cochran’s L.A.-studio rockabilly concoctions of the next year are notable for the prominent use of a plucked Fender, but even most late-’50s records still thump along with the bass fiddle’s less-distinct bottom. A notable exception is Duane Eddy; while the patented twangy guitar sound of his string of hits was influencing budding guitarists across the country, the bracing sound of his rhythm section, featuring a sharply defined electric bass, must have been subtly influential as well. Most records of the era were made by studio bands of one form or other; the self-contained band was not considered essential. While Bill Haley’s Comets appeared on his Decca records, major stars like Chuck Berry, Little Richard and Fats Domino recorded mostly with musicians working for the label, not the road band. These groups of experienced players invariably featured a bassist well-schooled in the upright. The bass is most-often recorded as something of a blurred boom on these discs anyway, making the type of instrument used rather a moot point!

    The bass fiddle is not an easy instrument to learn – to the thousands of kids newly-interested in guitars and rockin’ out, it must have seemed quite a mystery. The electric bass required only a rudimentary knowledge of guitar to operate – yet there wasn’t likely to be one lying around in the school band room! Unlike the sax, drums or even the guitar, there was no academic tradition for the instrument – it must have been brave young souls who tried to get Mom and Dad to cough up or at least co-sign for that first Fender or Danelectro! Early on, there was no beginner’s Fender – it was either the $229.50 Precision Bass or nothing.

    Nathan Daniel did the world’s budding bassists an enormous service when the cheap-but-reliable four-string Danos went on sale in 1958! Taking this instrument to at least connoisseurs’ immortality were important pre-surf instrumental hitmakers Johnny and the Hurricanes. Led by wailin’ saxman Johnny Paris, the Hurricanes’ 1959 hit “Red River Rock” featured not only powerful noise from the guitar and sax, but a booming bass from Lionel “Butch” Mattice’s Shorthorn Danelectro. “Tequila,” by the Champs, a instrumental smash just six months earlier, had prominently featured the upright bass. While never a surf band (predating the style anyway), the Pacific Northwest’s Ventures were widely-influential and gave solid exposure to the sound and the look of the Fender bass. Their first hit, “Walk Don’t Run” features a plunking electric bass, but the group’s first two album covers really drove the message home with full-color photos of the Fender-wielding band, noting of course that the “musicians” on the cover of that first LP are really Dolton Records mailroom workers – the instruments are real enough, anyway. The cover of the second Ventures album (featuring the actual band) is the classic turn-of-the-decade band shot and Nokie Edwards’ maple neck Precision Bass serves notice to teenage rockers everywhere that the doghouse is on the way out!

    At about the same time in Southern California, the two major progenitors of surf guitar were starting to make noise. Dick Dale was the most important influence in the genre’s creation, but The Belairs would also lay claim to being the seminal surf band. Dale’s story is still ongoing, almost 40 years later, but his reputation is largely based on his early Deltone recordings and legendary shows at Balboa’s Rendezvous ballroom in 1961 to ’63. Dale’s sound was always fast, aggressive and phenomenally loud for its time, and depended heavily on the electric bass. A former bassist of his once remarked Dick had three requirements for his bass player: play a Fender P-Bass, with a pick, and use only downstrokes! The jazzy thump of the bass fiddle was useless in this context. Listening to those early records today does not really capture how different Dale’s Deltones sounded to the kids who began flocking to his shows in the early ’60s – the hyperamplified power of those live shows must have been like nothing heard before, and the electric bass was a crucial component.

    The Belairs, kings of the South Bay surf scene, represent a different root in the history of the “surf bass” sound, for they had no bass at all! Starting as an amateur teen combo – albeit an excellent and ambitious one – the band relied on co-leader Paul Johnson’s powerful rhythm guitar playing to provide bottom for the entire group. The staccato chunk produced on his low strings defined the sound of the band at least as much as Eddie Bertrand’s lead guitar, and when other bands began to emulate The Belairs, the downstroke rhythm carried over to the bass as well. The style teenaged musicians adopted as they followed the lead of these bands was to use the bass as a double of the rhythm guitar, resulting in the characteristic “churning” sound that says “cowabunga” to the listener, even without the reverb-laden lead or pounding drums. A common device was to repeatedly hammer on to the tonic note in a flurry of downpicking – a trick first popularized by Eddie Cochran’s “Summertime Blues” in 1958, and used prominently in Dick Dale’s 1962 hit “Miserlou.” This is a more guitar-oriented approach to the bass, distinct from the riffy, walking jazz and R & B-derived styles prevalent before this in rock and roll.

    Instead of having a traditional bassist’s conception, the young players who made up the instrumental bands forming in emulation of the Deltones and Belairs heard the electric bass in a new context, more allied to the guitars. While many surf tunes do feature moving basslines, the overall feel is less “swingy” and more agitated. Perusing photos of these first generation instrumental surf combos, it is evident the electric bass is considered an essential component of the band – not as some strange freak instrument, as it was still regarded by many “legitimate” players.

    At this time a majority of mainstream pop, R & B, and rock and roll records made on both coasts still used the upright bass, and in Nashville, only the six-string “tic-tac” bass was used to supplement the bull fiddle. The surfin’ kids of California were growing up in Fender’s backyard, and his bass was the ideal sound to them, not a poor substitute for the “real” bass. The new Fender piggyback amps were widely influential as well. Finally, the bass could really compete in the volume stakes without fear of blowing out the amp at a crucial moment.

    It seems strange, in retrospect, that neither Leo or the normally-astute Don Randall attempted to capitalize on the groundswell of interest in the bass guitar among teens, but while Fender sold truckloads of cheaper Musicmaster and Duo-Sonic guitars to beginners, the Precision Bass was given only a more-expensive relative in the Jazz Bass – no budget bass was offered until the 1966 Mustang. While Fenders are rightly always thought of as the surf bass, early photos reveal that many hitmakers relied on cheaper four-strings until the band was established, and there was at least a modicum of money coming in! When that happened, the entire group was quickly fitted out with the latest Fender gear, including what often looks to be the flashiest custom-color Precision or Jazz Bass available! The cover of the Surfaris Decca LP Wipe Out features beautiful Fiesta Red Fenders. However, pictures dating from the time of the original “Wipe Out” single feature bassist Pat Connolly sporting not a P-Bass, but a $95 Harmony H-22. Odds are that’s what’s thumping away on the single, as well.

    While The Chantays, of “Pipeline” fame, are usually seen (in a publicity photo well-known to guitar collectors) with two tortoise-pickguard Stratocasters and a sunburst Precision, the earliest shots of them reveal bassist Warren Waters holding the same type of coppertop Danelectro as good ol’ Butch from Johnny and the Hurricanes! The Blazers’ John Morris started on an old Kay. For the non-professional, a Fender was the ideal but not always the reality, at least at first. The Nobles’ Paul Geddes went the furthest in this regard – instead of buying a “real” electric bass, he built his own, which featured all of two strings! For a lot of what these budding bands did with the bassline, one string would probably have sufficed, yet though perhaps technically primitive the sounds of these bands were a step into the future away from the piano and saxophone sounds of the ’50s and into the all-electric twang of the ’60s.

    The guitar boom was building steam and the Fender bass going from novelty to necessity. The relatively-expensive Gibson basses of the early ’60s are sometimes seen in teen “garage” bands and R & B combos, but virtually never in true surf bands. As the surf sound began to be played in places where actual surf was as common as the dodo bird, the Fender formula was usually followed like a mantra – Denver’s Astronauts featured the most sublime lineup of matching white Fenders you’re ever likely to see, including Stormy Patterson’s Jazz Bass! The ever-bizarre Trashmen, from Minneapolis, started out as an excellent straight surf band, but found fame with the indescribably vocal “Surfin’ Bird.” Bassist Bob Reed defied convention by plunking on the ever-bizarre Danelectro Longhorn Bass alongside the band’s two sunburst Fender Jaguars – though when they went to a matching set of Candy Apple Reds, he switched to a Jazz Bass, as well.

    The most prominent example of sustained use of a non-Fender bass in the surf idiom (does that sound scholarly or what?!) lies with an excellent Orange County band called the Lively Ones, with bassist Ron Griffith laying down his Lake Placid Blue Jazz Bass to play an early Mosrite Ventures Bass. Although Mosrites are now remembered primarily in connection with the instrumental rock sound, they were seldom used by true surf bands and in fact post-date the boom years of the surf era. While the guitars have proven popular over the years, the early single-pickup short-scale bass is more in the league of an EB-0 than a Precision.

    Apart from anomalies like these, the basses used in surf bands were universally Leo Fender’s, and if you want to get the big bass sound of the surf era today, here are just a few simple steps to surf nirvana!

    First, find an early-’60s Fender Precision or Jazz Bass, preferably in a custom color. Candy Apple Red, Lake Placid Blue, Fiesta Red or Olympic White would be ideal. 1961 through ’63 would be the best years for authenticity’s sake, although any clay-dot rosewood neck bass will do. A few players, including the Deltones’ Rick Rillera and The Sentinals’ Gary Winburne, were seen to use older maple-neck Fenders, but that’s a rarity. Make sure the strings are heavy-gauge flatwounds, the original royal blue silk-end LaBellas would be best, but if some modernist has removed them I find that Rotosound Jazz Bass flatwounds are the best currently available substitute. All chrome covers must be intact on the bass, as well, it doesn’t change the sound but will put you in the right mood (I call them the Funk Preventers)!

    Next, plug into an early Fender Showman or Dual Showman amplifier – the only true surf amp! An early blond Showman would be the most authentic, but a later Blackface Dual Showman with two 15″ JBLs gives the most headroom. A blond Bassman will do in a pinch, but the reserve power won’t be there for a true surfer’s stomp ballroom gig. Don’t even think about non-Fender amplification – it’s almost unpatriotic! No outboard gear allowed, either. Put a pick in your hand and crank it up!

    Based on pictorial and aural evidence, nearly every surf bassist played with a pick, with the guitar-like all-downstroke technique being most prevalent. Now all you need are a couple of guitarists and a drummer who can play “Wipe Out” correctly (do not trust any drummer with more than one mounted tom-tom in this situation!)!

    The guitarist(s) should also be Fender-equipped, though there was a surprising amount of deviation from this in the original California surf bands, with Gretsches, Guilds and even Gibsons being occasionally spotted. A Stratocaster or a Jaguar would be perfect, along with the obligatory Fender outboard reverb unit and piggyback amp. Alright, we’re talking fantasy here for most people these days, but hey, if you can’t at least aim for perfection, what fun is it?

    Like many vintage musical styles, Instrumental Surf is easy to approximate but difficult to master, as the true zen of the style lies in the tiny details.

    The kids of southern California in 1961 had no such worries – they just wanted to rock out in the style of Dick Dale and the Belairs, and the history of the electric guitar and, in particular the electric bass, was profoundly influenced by those who brought home all those shiny new Fenders. As vocal surf music became the new rage the idiom’s guiding light, Beach Boy Brian Wilson was himself a bass guitarist – at least in public.

    The British Invasion of 1964 swamped the Surf Instrumental style, and many bands mutated into vocal folk rock units in the wake of the Byrds’ success, the shining example being the Crossfires’ rebirth as the Turtles. The bass guitar made this transition, and to the thousands of garage bands of every style that sprang up all over the world, the old “doghouse fiddle” was no more than a dim memory. Surf bass may not be your bag, Ho Dad, but all of us four-string Fender thumpers owe those far-off pioneers a debt of gratitude – we’re all Leo’s children!



    The Ventures were widely-influential and gave solid exposure to the sound and the look of the Fender bass.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s May ’97 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.