- Advertisement -
Tony Nobles | Vintage Guitar® magazine

Author: Tony Nobles

  • The Collings I-35

    The Collings I-35

    Price: $6,000
    Contact: Collings Guitars, 11210 W. Hwy 290 Austin, TX 78737
    (512) 288-7770
    collingsguitars.com

    Occasionally, in the world of guitars, events influence the market. The introduction of a new guitar can send ripples through the industry. Not so long ago, Paul Reed Smith redefined quality workmanship and set a new standard.

    Bill Collings has been building highly regarded acoustic guitars for decades. He created an organization that produces boutique-quality instruments in a factory setting, and he recently charged this organization with creating electric guitars on the same level, both functionally and aesthetically. The result is the I-35.

    Named for Austin’s infamous traffic artery, the I-35 is aesthetically reminiscent of a Gibson ES-335. But it’s by no means a thinly veiled copy. The body is pared down slightly at 15″ wide, and it has a slightly more angular shape that comparatively reduces its size and weight. In terms of appointments, the guitar is pure Collings, with ivoroid all around and perfection in its detail.

    Construction of the I-35’s body is quite different from the standard semi-hollow electric. In contrast to the traditional method of using pressed plywood and bent sides, Collings carves the back and sides from a single slab of mahogany. A solid top is then carved from bookmatched maple. The body is heavily chambered to duplicate the density of the traditional style. This technique is cleverly used to yield a sonic advantage, but preserves the aesthetic under the f-holes. The neck joint illustrates the attention to detail and proper execution of superior design. The back actually extends over the heel (like a violin), eliminating the ledge typically seen between the top of the back and the back of the heel. To execute this look, the heel is actually bound in matching ivoroid and carved to match. The result is a no-compromise neck joint, functionally and aesthetically.

    Mahogany used to build the body and neck is superior quality, as is the maple top. The headstock and fingerboard are unbelievable cool Brazilian Rosewood, an upgrade bordering on extinction in most circles. Every visible plastic part is from the same batch of traditional ivoroid-colored nitrate plastic. The truss-rod cover, pickup mounting rings, and knobs are all manufactured in-house to ensure that is the case. Even the handles of the Sperzel tuners are ivoroid!

    Hardware continues the theme; pickups are a custom set built by Jason Lollar and are among the best PAF-style. They’re faithful copies with a full, medium-output sound that exhibits the true texture and requency response of a good PAF. The pickups are not bright, and their treble response can be tailored by adjusting the pickup’s saturation. As they’re pushed, they react with a smooth compression without becoming excessively bright. And they allow for a smooth, darker tone when distanced from the string, but when adjusted closer have just enough aggression to cut through.

    The bridge and tailpiece are a nickel-plated TonePros locking tailpiece and ABR-1-style set. This is a solid setup that tightens the guitar’s attack. Because the saddle adjustment screws are held firmly in place by snap rings, the characteristic tendency to crackle is eliminated, and notes have a cleaner attack. A properly cut bone nut, in conjunction with properly leveled and polished frets, complete the system.

    Physically, this guitar has no weaknesses. It sounds great unplugged (as all guitars should). The feel is very comfortable with a medium C-shaped neck and a 111/16″ nut width. The edges of the fingerboard are slightly rounded, giving it a broken-in feel, and the setup was well-done from the factory and is easily adjustable after unlocking the set screws that secure the bridge.

    The many details in the design of this guitar are illustrated by the machined ivoroid knobs and pickup rings. Most manufacturers use cream for the rings and amber or another stock color for knobs. But Collings’ effort to make them match illustrates the consistency and execution of the details making this guitar. Granted, such near-perfection comes at price, but great guitars are products of innumerable details, all executed to achieve certain goals. Among them are tone, playability, a look, and a “soul” that the best guitars seem to possess.

    It’s a tall order, especially in a factory setting, but with the I-35, the crew at Collings delivers a very well-executed guitar with a cool vibe and real “soul.” Some guitars swagger when you strap them on – this is one of them. The re-tooled design of a classic look is very well done both aesthetically and functionally. – Tony Nobles


    This article originally appeared in VG‘s November 2006 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


    Collings I-35

  • VG PAF Shoot-Out 2005

    Given the unwavering popularity of the humbucker pickup, the constant injection of new builders, and the popuarlity of our 1998 comparison feature, we thought we’d note the anniversary of the design of the humbucker with another “shoot-out.”

    We started our test with the pickups in the 1956 Gibson Les Paul Model before beginning the arduous swapping of pickups into our test mule Les Paul Standard with Brazilian rosewood fingerboard. All pickups were tested without covers and in the bridge position with the same set of SIT .010-.046 strings, chosen for their upper harmonic clarity. We removed the covers so the differences would be more apparent, because nickel covers reduce treble response and output, while adding focus.

    Our test amp is a Laney AOR 50 from the mid 1980s with a 12AX7/EL34 tube complement. We disconnected the negative-feedback tap from the output transformer and re-capped it with Orange Drops. This reduced compression in the signal chain and added a degree of “tweed-ness.”

    We set the amp to slightly favor high-end response, which favors the true tone of the pickup. The speaker is a Celestion G12-85 from a Peavey Butcher, in a homemade cabinet. Our pick was a Fender Heavy, which also tends to the bright side.

    To make sure our thoughts and hearing were good, we recorded each pickup to its own track in ProTools, using the same amp settings, a Shure SM-57, and the same mic preamp (Digi001 interface). We recorded over the course of a few hours.

    All of these units are very good – there truly are no bad choices. But there is some nice variety, and all do something (or even a few things) really well.

    We lead with our impressions of the hand-wound PAFs in the ’55 Les Paul test guitar.

    Humbucker Test Guitar PAF

    Humbucker Test Guitar PAF



    Humbucker Test Guitar PAF
    Ohms: 7.2K
    This pickup is bright and transparent compared to its latter-day copies. It has some of the single-coil sound similar to the Wolfetone and Gibson Burstbucker, with a bit less focus. It does compress brightly, more like the ’57 Classic, with nice texture, and some fuzziness that’s drowned out by the sound of the pick attack. It’s a little quacky.

    Duncan 59

    Duncan 59



    Duncan 59
    Ohms: 7.97K
    Medium-output pickup. A little dark, it has plenty of bass and treble, with good balance and focus. Quacks a little, but not enough to overshadow the tone. Very well-balanced and clean, with good definition. Compresses a little when played hard, but retains good balance and focus.
    Bottom Line: Clean and focused, with strong mids.

    Duncan Seth Lover

    Duncan Seth Lover



    Duncan Seth Lover
    Ohms: 8.07K
    A medium-/low-output pickup with nice tone and texture. Mids are fairly complex. While the notes have a certain graininess when the pickup compresses, it never loses focus. It has a little quack, but it’s not shrill. It has less bass than some of the others, but sounds natural and musical.
    Bottom Line: Very clean and smooth, but not sterile.

    Gibson 57 Classic

    Gibson 57 Classic



    Gibson 57 Classic
    Ohms: 7.86K
    Low-/medium-output pickup with crisp character. It’s the most quacky of the group, but has very nice texture – bright, but very musical. Played hard, the attack washes out the tone of the string, which is an authentic PAF trait. The character and texture make its brightness forgivable. A little fuzzy, but in a good, musical way.
    Bottom Line: Bright and spanky yet musical.

    Gibson Burst-bucker Classic #2

    Gibson Burst-bucker Classic #2



    Gibson Burst-bucker Classic #2
    Ohms: 8.17K
    A low-/medium-output pickup with lots of character. A little bright, but with more of single-coil texture. Lots of harmonics, and compresses well when played hard. Another one that swirls around when a left-hand vibrato is used. The pickup has some musical fuzziness, but a lot of transparency. Has an old-fashioned, jingly musical tone with less bass then some, but a very musical texture.
    Bottom Line: Complex, musical, fuzzy, and bright.

    Lindy Fralin Vintage Hot

    Lindy Fralin Vintage Hot



    Lindy Fralin Vintage Hot
    Ohms: 9.0K
    This is a medium-/high-output pickup. Fat and loud, but not messy. Has almost no quack and retains mid peak when pushed hard. Has good bass and slightly reduced treble. Not excessively dark, and mids are great. Has a really cool texture – fuzzy without being bright or losing bass. Texture is complex and the pickup is responsive. Compresses very well and harmonics are swirly and thick. Harmonic overtones are distinct, and do not wash out each other.
    Bottom Line: Rocking, big, fat, and a little swirly.

    Harmonic Design V+ Classic

    Harmonic Design V+ Classic



    Harmonic Design V+ Classic
    Ohms: 8.95K
    A medium-output PAF (though it breaks form with its brass cover) that’s voiced very well. Well-balanced, tonally and musically. Upper harmonics are there, but never saturate the pickup. When compressing, it retains tonal balance and transparency. Has subtle fuzz, which is always musical in texture and can be removed by dialing in a saturation point. Also has plenty of bass without sacrificing clarity in the high-end. Clean and dark.
    Bottom Line: Rocking without losing focus, with adjustable compression and texture.

    Lollar Imperial

    Lollar Imperial



    Lollar Imperial
    Ohms: 8.19K
    A low-/medium-output pickup, it’s clear and bright with some softness in attack. Has good transparency, with a little quack. Compresses when played hard and rolls off some treble. Has an overall smooth texture without being fuzzy. Tone is smooth and balanced. Has a very musical fuzziness that softens the tone when played hard. Very natural, non-metallic sound.
    Bottom Line: Clean, balanced with a little softness.

    Razor Tribute Vintage Plus

    Razor Tribute Vintage Plus



    Razor Tribute Vintage Plus
    Ohms: 10.7K
    A medium-/high-output pickup, it’s punchy and fat, with minor quack when played hard. Has good (but not muddy) bass and a fuzzy mid peak.
    Bottom Line: Really rocking, with a darker resonance, low price.

    Wolfetone

    Wolfetone



    Wolfetone
    Ohms: 8.20K
    Low-/medium-output with nice texture and softness. The most compressed/fuzziest of the group, it has a nice jingle, but doesn’t quack much and when it does it’s fairly musical. Highs are rolled off, but it isn’t bassy. Good transparency even through the abundant overtones.
    Bottom Line: Squishy and warm, not too loud. A soft, pleasantly funky pickup with lots of personality.



    PAF Shootout Glossary
    Output – How much sound does the pickup produce.
    Sparkle – Upper trebles.
    Focus – Purity of musical tone.
    Grain – Distortion of the true musical tone.
    Harmonics – The higher frequencies which make up tone along with the fundamental.
    Compressed – When the pickups output is maximum and the peaks get cut off.
    Transparency – Absence of masking by certain frequencies.
    Texture – The overall non-musical component to tone.
    Quack – When trebles mask the other tones when the string is picked.
    Squish – When harmonic’s volume ratios change as note sustains.
    Sterile – Perfect to a fault.
    Spanky – Attack that quacks as a percussive effect.
    Musical – Enjoyable quality of sound.



    For more information on the Humbucker, check out 50 Years of the Humbucker.

    For more information on the Seth Lover, check out Seth Talks Humbuckers.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s March 2005 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Collings I-35

    2006 Collings I-35

    2006 Collings I-35.

    Occasionally, in the world of guitars, events influence the market. The introduction of a new guitar can send ripples through the industry. Not so long ago, Paul Reed Smith redefined quality workmanship and set a new standard.

    Bill Collings has been building highly regarded acoustic guitars for decades. He created an organization that produces boutique-quality instruments in a factory setting, and he recently charged this organization with creating electric guitars on the same level, both functionally and aesthetically. The result is the I-35.

    Named for Austin’s infamous traffic artery, the I-35 is aesthetically reminiscent of a Gibson ES-335. But it’s by no means a thinly veiled copy. The body is pared down slightly at 15″ wide, and it has a slightly more angular shape that comparatively reduces its size and weight. In terms of appointments, the guitar is pure Collings, with ivoroid all around and perfection in its detail.

    Construction of the I-35’s body is quite different from the standard semi-hollow electric. In contrast to the traditional method of using pressed plywood and bent sides, Collings carves the back and sides from a single slab of mahogany. A solid top is then carved from bookmatched maple. The body is heavily chambered to duplicate the density of the traditional style. This technique is cleverly used to yield a sonic advantage, but preserves the aesthetic under the f-holes. The neck joint illustrates the attention to detail and proper execution of superior design. The back actually extends over the heel (like a violin), eliminating the ledge typically seen between the top of the back and the back of the heel. To execute this look, the heel is actually bound in matching ivoroid and carved to match. The result is a no-compromise neck joint, functionally and aesthetically.

    Mahogany used to build the body and neck is superior quality, as is the maple top. The headstock and fingerboard are unbelievable cool Brazilian Rosewood, an upgrade bordering on extinction in most circles. Every visible plastic part is from the same batch of traditional ivoroid-colored nitrate plastic. The truss-rod cover, pickup mounting rings, and knobs are all manufactured in-house to ensure that is the case. Even the handles of the Sperzel tuners are ivoroid!

    Hardware continues the theme; pickups are a custom set built by Jason Lollar and are among the best PAF-style. They’re faithful copies with a full, medium-output sound that exhibits the true texture and requency response of a good PAF. The pickups are not bright, and their treble response can be tailored by adjusting the pickup’s saturation. As they’re pushed, they react with a smooth compression without becoming excessively bright. And they allow for a smooth, darker tone when distanced from the string, but when adjusted closer have just enough aggression to cut through.

    The bridge and tailpiece are a nickel-plated TonePros locking tailpiece and ABR-1-style set. This is a solid setup that tightens the guitar’s attack. Because the saddle adjustment screws are held firmly in place by snap rings, the characteristic tendency to crackle is eliminated, and notes have a cleaner attack. A properly cut bone nut, in conjunction with properly leveled and polished frets, complete the system.

    Physically, this guitar has no weaknesses. It sounds great unplugged (as all guitars should). The feel is very comfortable with a medium C-shaped neck and a 111/16″ nut width. The edges of the fingerboard are slightly rounded, giving it a broken-in feel, and the setup was well-done from the factory and is easily adjustable after unlocking the set screws that secure the bridge.

  • Tony Nobles Resonator

    This guitar is a special project built after I was approached by the new Braunfels (Texas) Museum of Art and Music to show a guitar in an exhibit of Texas musical instrument builders. This exhibit was to coincide with a the traveling Smithsonian exhibit “Hearts and Hands,” which features photos of instrument builders. I was joined by Bill Collings, Mark Erlewine, Jamie Kinscherff, and others. I feel honored to be considered a part of this group, because these guys build great guitars.

    I’ve been building more acoustic guitars recently, including a few resonators. One was for Ray Wylie Hubbard, and is pictured with him on his new album, Growl, and Kevin at Hill Country Guitars recently sold the only other one I’ve finished to date. So I decided to build one for the museum. Here’s what I came up with for them, and how I got it done.

    I wanted to do something with a lot of flash, but not so much that the details would be overshadowed. Aesthetically, I wanted a teardrop-shaped cover because I think it works in the frame of a guitar’s shape. I dug out a prime piece of hard, flamey maple for the neck, back, and sides, along with an ebony fingerboard. These woods are bright and stiff, and they look cool with the right sunburst. I can choose colors to compliment the brass cover and tailpiece I’ll make later. I also decided on a tri-cone resonator mechanism, along with my standard small-bodied 12-fret slothead acoustic guitar. The top bracing was scrapped in favor of a stiff but lightweight assembly that holds the cones the required distance below the top. I used another stiff maple brace running the length of the guitar. Stiffness is always good with the load-bearing members of a guitar.

    It became evident to me soon after that I would have to make a “spider” to connect the cones and support the saddle. The standard tri-cone spider orients the cones so two are on the bass side and the arm that connects the third acts as the bridge. This wouldn’t fit under my cover, so I had to fabricate a spider that puts the saddle and cones in the proper location under my cover. The spider should be stiff and lightweight, so the energy goes into the cones.

    I quickly resigned myself to making a tailpiece that would recess into the cover, to put downward pressure on the saddle. A few sketches, and a few weeks later…



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s April ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • David Grissom and David Holt

    Two-Guitar Story

    When Austinites entertain music-loving friends from out of town the typical question is, “Who should we go see while we’re here?” And in a city loaded with good bands, the most repeated answer was always, “Storyville!”

    Austin’s version of a supergroup (a label the band hated) was fronted by singer Malford Milligan – one of those guys who hits every note every night. Tommy Shannon and Chris Layton (bass and drums – as if you didn’t know) delivered the solid groove, whether or not they were called Double Trouble. But perhaps the best thing about Storyville was the guitar playing of David Grissom and David Holt – it was some of the best anywhere. At every performance, the two continually bounced tasty licks off each other, elevating the performances of not only themselves, but the band as well. And of course, the audience was always appreciative…

    Grissom is a favorite of guitarists everywhere. They’ve heard him play with Joe Ely, John Mellencamp, and many others. Holt is a veteran who has played with Carlene Carter, the Mavericks, and a long list of others. Anybody not familiar with his work should pick up the band’s latest album, Dog Years, and check the interplay between them.

    But alas, there is good news and bad concerning the Davids and Storyville. Good news first – they both recently sat down with VG to talk about the band, guitars, and a host of other subjects. The bad news is the band’s recent New Year’s Eve gig was its last, as the members have made a mutual decision to call it quits.



    David Grissom:
    Vintage Guitar: I saw you on the cover of the Chronicle. How did that feel? Was it a kiss of death to be on the cover?
    David Grissom: I don’t know, but I guess no one is immune.

    I thought it was a little strange. My tastes generally differ from theirs.
    Andy Langer wrote [a great article]. The review at the end wasn’t so great, but I guess you have to take the good with the bad. Everybody is entitled to their opinion. I tried to make my mind up about [Dog Years] before any [reviews] comes out.

    Have people actually approached you at Storyville gigs and asked if you were the guitar player for Stevie Ray Vaughan?
    That has happened probably 10 times, and they ask David (Holt) the same thing. It sounds unbelievable, but after you hear it five or six times you begin to realize people are not as informed as you think.

    I have spoken to engineers you have worked with who said you try to get a sound without any EQ at the board.
    Yeah, I prefer that. I usually listen to the amp in the room and get it to do what I think it should be doing. After that it becomes an issue of finding the right mic, the right preamp. I can usually tell in about 30 seconds after I hear it through the monitors whether or not I will succeed at making it sound right. There are studios that, for whatever reason, just never get a great sound. Then there are other studios, like Cedar Creek, where it’s hard to get a bad sound. If you can get the sound to come out of the amp, it’s not that hard.

    I have a small studio at my house, two or three microphones and about six little old tube amps – trashed out Fenders and Gibsons, a Matchless – and I have really not been able to get a bad sound.

    Is that because you know what you want?
    It’s because generally little amps are easier to record than big amps. When you record at home and at most studios, you go straight from the mic to a preamp, then maybe to a compressor and then straight to tape. You bypass the console and minimize the wire.

    Do you use special cable, like George L’s?
    Cables all sound different, no doubt. If I had it my way I would have it all done with George L’s. I finally broke down and had a pedalboard put together about a year and a half ago. I got tired of going to sessions with a gym bag while everybody else had refrigerators full of stuff. I finally got Bob Bradshaw to put all that stuff on a board and make a good power supply for it. It basically sounds the same with everything turned off as it does plugging straight into the amp.

    How did he do that?
    I think mostly by putting things in the right order, using a good power supply and a clean signal path.

    What’s in the pedalboard?
    I’ve got a couple of different compressors I go to first, because it’s a buffered input. I use the compressor mainly for the studio. Then it goes to the Centaur. It’s the best overdrive I’ve found, it retains the clarity of all the notes. Then it goes into a clean boost that Lee Jackson made (see interview in this month’s “Guitar Shop” column). Then it goes to an Arion chorus I use for chorus and Leslie sounds. It’s funky and cheap. I’ve used the TC for years but Bob Bradshaw suggested the Arion. From there it goes to a volume pedal, then a Boss delay, and then into a Bradshaw tremolo. That’s a great tremolo with two separate channels and two types of tremolo. All my tremolo effects on the record are that unit. I can’t say enough good stuff about it.

    You like your sound punchy and percussive.
    I like some natural compression from the amp. My favorite amp, live, is an old 50-watt Marshall. It has a solidstate rectifier for tightness. Most of those old Marshalls compress when you get them up to a certain level, but they don’t go away. A lot of amplifiers sound great in a room but then you get them onstage and you can’t even hear them. There’s a fine line between something that moves air and thumps you in the chest, but at the same time the top notes give a little bit. It’s a hard balance to keep the tight clarity on the low strings make the top notes warm. I am really picky about the type of high-end – I want it to be warm and not hurt at all. Loud and warm.

    Do you have a preferred type of tube?
    I use Svetlana EL34s. I also have one [amp] that uses the old GEs because it has about 575 plate volts – the big-bottle 6CA7s.

    Why do you have two heads onstage, and one cabinet?
    One is a spare and I alternate them.

    What is the story with the Booze Weasels. I saw you at a fundraiser for Danny Thorpe’s family, with Shaver, and with Sonny Landreth at Antone’s.
    We’ve done about one gig a year for the past couple of years. We used to do it a lot more. It’s a lot of fun, we never rehearse.

    What about guitars? I heard you do use the PRSs to record.
    I do, especially now that I have the McCarty models. Mine have tremolos. I prefer the sound of a tremolo in the guitar. It goes against conventional wisdom but it feel it makes the guitar more alive. It adds some life and springiness. Plus the tremolo is the best made. The McCarty’s solved the problems I’ve had with the PRSs in the past – not quite enough low-end. The new McCarty pickups are the best they’ve ever made. It’s a 22-fret guitar, it’s thicker. And the heel and neck are bigger. And it has more headstock angle.

    I’ve seen you play Teles, as well.
    I’ve got a ’50s Esquire I use a lot, it’s on “Born Without You.” I’ve got a couple of black-guard Teles – a ’52 and two ’53s. Those seem hard to duplicate in a reissue. On three of the four old Teles I have, you can talk through the pickups. They pick up everything, there is some sort of magic about them. Ever since I heard the first two Roy Buchanan records I’ve sort of been obsessed with re-creating that sound.

    You used to have a ’59 Les Paul Standard, didn’t you?
    I don’t have that anymore. It was an amazing guitar, I just wasn’t playing it. Frankly, I bought five acres of land with it. I could never seem to make it work for me. I’ve got a ’59 335 I used for most of the solos on the album. I also have a reissue from the Custom Shop that I’ve been playing live. It’s a phenomenal guitar.

    How is it different from the old one?
    Well, the feel. Now that I’ve played it about eight months, it’s getting juicier. I keep telling our guitar guy not to wipe it off. I am beginning to like guitars with cavities. I got a new PRS hollowbody – not the archtop. It’s not as big.

    What is the Gretsch on the cover of the Chronicle?
    It’s a reissue White Falcon. I use it in the studio a lot.

    What amps did you use on Dog Years?
    I used a 20-watt Marshall for most of the rhythm tracks, a Park 75 for most of the leads, and an AC-30 on a couple of things.

    What wah are you using?
    Mostly a Vox.

    What is that sound on “Fairplay?”
    That is the Arion set on stun. Turn all the knobs up.

    What do you do in the studio, other than Storyville?
    I do things around Austin a lot. I did a cool record in Nashville about a year ago, with Chris Knight, on Decca. It was really fun. We had three guitar players – me, Kenny Greenburg, and Richard Bennet. It’s a great record.

    Do you have any cool flat-tops?
    Yeah, I have a ’56 J-50, which is pretty much out of the ballpark. I have a Collings D3, and a Harmony Sovereign, which is cool. I tune it down sometimes.

    What kept all of you in Storyville instead of hiring out for possibly more money and less work?
    We all just wanted to. I liked the idea of being in a band and playing the way I wanted to. I also liked to write songs and have them played. When I work for someone else, my first priority is to make them sound good and to complement whatever they’re doing. In Storyville we all played for the song, but you do have the opportunity to stretch. When I played with Joe Ely I got to stretch a lot. When I played with Mellencamp it was much more structured. I went out with the Allman Brothers for three weeks recently and it reminded me of how much I like to play guitar. Storyville was a great vehicle for that and a great vehicle for writing songs – a combination of people who are really special.

    Malford (Milligan) had Storyville originally, with none of you.
    Yes, that band broke up just as he was beginning to make a record. So Chris Layton and Tommy Shannon played on a few songs, then I came in and played on a few songs. That’s the first I ever met Malford. We ended up putting together a bunch of people who played on the record to do a South By Southwest show. We decided to make a go of it.

    Are all your guitars stock?
    Yes, I don’t like to change the old things. I do like to set up my own guitars. It is important to do that when you’re out on the road because there is never anyone around to help. I am pretty tuned in to what I like in terms of a setup, and it makes difference in how the guitar sounds and feels.

    What else have you done that you really enjoyed?
    I got to do a Buddy Guy record. That was a great thrill. I recorded with John Mayall and he ended up cutting one of my songs. Ringo Starr…I am forgetting something.

    Those are cool enough.
    I have a hard time going into the studio and not having a good time. I am lucky enough to get called to play for people who want me to play the way I play. That is a great privilege.



    David Holt
    Vintage Guitar: You have played guitar in mostly country situations in the past. Do you think it is rare to be able to go from country to rock the way you have?

    David Holt: Yeah, I think it is. I can do it because I can emulate what I hear. It is not easy. Anyone in a rock band who thinks they can go play country is probably mistaken, but it can be done. I can play a Hendrix song without it sounding like its coming from a country player, and I can play a Merle Haggard song without it sounding like a rock guitarist. I grew up on a lot of that stuff, my father listened to a lot of it. I just absorbed it.

    Are Strats the only guitars you play?
    Yes, mostly. I play a Custom Shop with fat 50s. It’s got a great curly maple neck.

    I see you use a pedalboard. What’s in it?
    I have never been a big fan of effects, period. I just use something to get a better level for solos, a more saturated tone. I used some vibrato on the first record that I needed to recreate. I have a delay and a reverb pedal – just the basics. Lee Jackson made the board I’m using now, it’s really quiet.

    I see you playing Marshalls with Storyville, exactly which one is it?
    It’s a ’72 50-watt with no master. I run it on about five or six, relatively clean. The cabinet is loaded with Vintage 30s.

    What is it like playing with Chris Layton and Tommy Shannon?
    It’s great, they play great.

    How old are you?
    37. I’ve been in bands since I was 15, travelling on the road. I’ve played with a lot of good players.

    Who were your guitar gods when you were learning?
    Hendrix, Clapton from the Cream era. I had three older brothers and we all played guitar. My dad played guitar. When I was a kid we would all have to go in the kitchen and perform, one by one. Whatever they were into, I was in to. My father always played country songs, so I got a lot of that, too. He knows all these Hank Williams and George Jones songs. I knew all the words to these songs I’d never heard the recorded versions of. I would hear them later at some point and think, “That’s not right.” I later realized dad had adapted the songs – they were all in G.

    Were you born in Dallas?
    Yeah, we moved to Lubbock when I was five. There were a lot of rural-minded people there.

    If money wasn’t an issue, what music would you play?
    The only reason I did the country thing is, well, partially for the money…but the main reason is I was a friend of Nick Lowe’s for a long time, and he was married to Carlene Carter. He called and said, “You should really go do this gig.” It was all coliseums and Johnny Carson and all these monstrous places, 18 months worth. That snowballed into MCA’s President, Tony Brown, who had been producing all the coolest stuff coming out of Nashville. He called me and wanted me to play with the Mavericks, down in Miami.

    He flew me down and did the whole record in a few days. I also played with Rosie Flores for a year in ’89. Pete Anderson played on and produced her record, so that was fun. I had to play Pete’s stuff with her and then I had to play James Burton’s and Albert Lee’s parts. Then I played for Joe Ely and I had to play David Grissom’s parts. I played with Bill Carter and I had to play Stevie and Jimmy Vaughan’s parts. I was fortunate to be always learning a really cool guitar player’s style. I won’t say I ever got it perfect, but I was close enough for everyone to raise an eyebrow. No one was the wiser. When I was playing country, I was getting to play some of the best country – the cool stuff. The Mavericks started out that way but it was becoming retro, really stripped down, like Carl Perkins. I felt like a racehorse on a trail ride. That’s when I bailed, to play with Joe Ely.

    How long did that go on?
    I did the Love and Danger tour and then went straight into Storyville. I’ve known Joe since I was a teenager. He is a spiritual and musical icon in my mind – a musical guru. A musician’s musician. His thing is entertaining people wherever you are.

    What guitar players do you like to watch?
    Jimmy Vaughan, that’s about it. Do you know any other guitarists around here who are any good?

    Eddy Shaver?
    Yeah, he’s a friend of mine. He’s from Waco, but he lives in Nashville now. We were in a band together at one time.

    What have you recorded that you are most proud of?
    I’m proud of all of it, and don’t regret any of it. I’m proud of the fact I did the Mavericks record in two days without ever hearing it. It was in Criteria studios in Miami, where Clapton cut “Layla.” It’s a beautiful place and I saw the inside of it for two days.

    They had wiped out all the guitar tracks and I had to go back and do all of that. I don’t think that’s something just anyone could do.

    Have you never gotten to play with any of your heroes?

    Yeah, Hubert Sumlin and Albert Collins.



    Grissom and Holt duke it out during a Storyville gig at the Brookhaven Amphitheater, Long Island, June ’97.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s March ’99 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • PAF Test Run

    From VG's

    Sorry the shop is a little crowded today, but I’ve invited some friends over to listen to a few PAFs. I have some Gibsons, Tom Holmes, and Lindy Fralins loaded into some really cool Les Pauls. Before we get loud, let me introduce my friends.

    Terry Oubre, from Kendrick Amps, Dave Hazlett, from Guitar Resurrection, Les Paul connoisseur Bill Webb of Fullton-Webb amps, Black Dog Electronics’ Mac Pfieffer, who just plays guitar really well, and Jim Wilson, from Cedar Creek Recording.

    We are going to compare Gibson patent number PAFs, ’63 humbuckers, ’78 reissue PAFs, ’57 Classic and Classic Plus PAFs, Tom Holmes PAFs, and Lindy Fralin PAFs, and pass the results directly on to you. We are playing through a Fullton-Webb 18-watt amp. It sounds like a cross between a good plexi Marshall and a new Bogner; in other words, it retains more clarity in the midrange than a Marshall, especially when overdriven. And it is surprisingly loud for an amp that uses two EL84s and approaches the volume of many 50-watt amps. Anyone concerned about their hearing may want to step outside…here we go!

    All these pickups are pretty cool, and each its own personality. The old Gibsons were great for reference, but believe it or not the panel preferred most of the new pickups to the old ones. This may sound unbelievable, but the opinions of the panel were very consistent and differences in the pickups were fairly substantial. This is what we heard, along with the DC resistance of each pickup measured while it was in the guitar:

    Patent Number PAF (9.3K) – (a very early one, identical to an original PAF). This one was on the brighter side and was fairly loud. It was smooth, but lost mids when pushed hard. It was a little harsh when played clean, but the highs were useful when overdriven. It contributed little texture or compression. One panelist termed it “quacky.”

    ’63 PAF (7.3K) – This pickup was low in output and otherwise had little character. It was very smooth and again turned bright when pushed hard.

    ’78 PAF (7.1K) – This was almost identical to the ’63 but with a little more compression and warmth. The clean sound was good but was somewhat muddy when overdriven.

    ’57 Classic (8.1K) – This pickup has a very nice texture and a medium output. The complexity of the high end is very cool, but hard to describe. It is fairly smooth, but tended to lose mids when pushed hard. It works well for a clean sound and also overdrives fairly well. May be a little bright for some.

    ’57 Classic Plus (8.5K) – This was almost identical to the Patent Number pickup. It is a little louder than the ’57 Classic but more harsh with less character.

    Tom Holmes PAF (8.3K) – This pickup is similar to the ’57 Classic but with a little more character. Rich high-end without being too bright. It compresses smoothly when played hard, again with disappearing mids.

    Lindy Fralin PAF (8.9K) – This pickup had the most output, most character, and most pleasant compression. It has a smooth response and had great clean and overdriven tones.

    Since the verbage may mean little to most, here are the results in a very easy-to-understand format, best to not-as-good. I didn’t say worst because none are bad, some are just better.
    Grand Prize Lindy Fralin in a unanimous decision. Biggest and smoothest, hands down. This was the obvious favorite. Double fat.
    2nd Tom Holmes by a nose. A very cool pickup that defies description. Good vintage tone.
    3rd ’57 Classic. This was preferred to the Holmes by two members who wish to remain anonymous. Not quite as complex, but very similar.
    4th Patent Number PAF. Good, but a little sterile.
    5th ’57 Classic. Almost fourth, but a little less character.
    6th ’78 Reissue. Smooth with good clean tones.
    Last ’63 PAF. Still good, but unremarkable.

    There you have it. I hope you enjoyed your stay. I have to take that Patent Number out of Terry’s Townhouse and put in a Fralin. See you next time.



    A host of humbuckers and media in which they were tested. Photo: Tony Nobles

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Sep. ’98 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.