Month: January 2010

  • Bearfoot Bluegrass – Follow Me

    Bluegrass bands are often male-only affairs. But the women in Bearfoot Bluegrass are in a majority position. Annalisa Tornfelt plays fiddle, sings lead, and is responsible for seven of the songs. Kate Hamre plays bass and sings tenor vocals, while Angela Oudean plays fiddle and handles baritone vocal parts. The men in the band are Jason Norris (guitar and vocals) and Mike Mickelson (guitar and vocals). From the opening song, a Tornfelt original called “Molasses,” the band’s tight three-part harmonies and intertwined twin-fiddle leads make their sound infectiously unique. The second song, a Western swing-influenced original, “Go On Home,” displays the band’s musical breadth. Tornfelt’s powerful vocals coupled with the tasteful guitar, mandolin, and bass solos make this song special.

    All the band members hail from Alaska, where they met at music camps. It would be presumptuous to say Bearfoot sounds “Alaskan,” but they do have an approach that is markedly different from Southern or New England bluegrass bands; more old-timey and Celtic, with a greater emphasis on folky euphony. Bearfoot isn’t about hard-driving rhythm. Instead their versions of traditional songs, such as Alton Delmore’s “Deep River Blues,” lean on the swing and shuffle side of the tune.

    Produced by Nashville Bluegrass Band alumni Gene Libbea, recorded in Denver at Notably Fine Audio, and mixed by veteran location engineer James Tuttle, Follow Me retains the feeling of a live performance rather than a studio effort. Bearfoot Bluegrass has a refreshing approach to bluegrass that should appeal to young and old alike.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Jun. ’08 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • B.C. Rich Eagle

    1981 B.C. Rich Eagle

    1981 B.C. Rich Eagle. Photo: Michael Wright.

    When my son was young I used to do “guitar shows” for his classes, showing off 10 or so electric guitars that started with conventional shapes – a Les Paul and a Strat – and progressed to more unusual designs. I’d often conclude with this cool 1981 B.C. Rich Eagle and a rousing rendition of the theme from TV’s “Swamp Thing” that ended by me throwing the overdrive switch. The move always had the 30 little kids putting hands over their ears (and put big grins on their faces!). I’d ask the class to vote for their favorite, and the Rich almost always won the day (though the metallic green Ibanez Maxxas and the black graphite Bond Electraglide with LEDs were in the running).

    That B.C. Rich ended up making unusual-shaped guitars was a bit ironic because Bernardo (Bernie) Chavez Rico, the brand’s founder and namesake, began his career following in the footsteps of his father (Bernardo Mason Rico) making classical and flamenco guitars in East Los Angeles. (Rico the elder also made other stringed instruments for local Mexican musicians.) Young Bernie actually studied with flamenco great Sabicas and hob-nobbed with Paco de Lucia and Carlos Montoya. In 1953 or ’54 Bernie started working in his father’s shop and by the mid ’60s was doing a lot of work for country western musicians, though he felt his name didn’t fit with his clientele. A friend named Bobby Rich performed as Roberto Rico and, taking a cue from his buddy, he anglicized his brand to B.C. Rich circa ’66.

    Like another L.A.-area guitarmaker before him – Paul Bigsby – Rico was a biker. This gave him a taste for flashy finishes and soon he had a thriving business doing wild refins of electric guitars. By 1968, this led to his making his own custom solidbodies, mainly copies of Gibson and Fender models. By ’69 he was hanging with other guitar makers, including Rick Turner, which steered him in the direction of neck-through-body guitars with no heel. In ’71, Rico designed his first odd-shaped guitar, the Seagull, which debuted at the ’72 NAMM show. It was basically a tricked-out Les Paul-like single-cutaway shape with the cutaway horn flopped downward and a balancing point on the top of the upper bout. The guitar was embraced by Dominic Troiano, who’d just replaced Randy Bachman as lead player in the Guess Who. Troiano favored active electronics, which were provided by Neil Mosher, who would play a big role in the brand’s success through the 1970s. Weird shapes, neck-through construction, and active electronics – Rich’s holy trinity. B.C. Rich guitars were on their way!

    The Seagull was heavily promoted and sold fairly well, but players didn’t like its pointy “feather” on the top, which kept jamming them in the chest. In ’75 or so, bassist Bill Bodine lodged this complaint about his Seagull Bass, so Bernie redesigned the Seagull, adding a second cutaway and carving off the offending point on top. This became the Bodine Bass for a short while, but then the guitar got the same makeover and the model became the Seagull II (or sometimes, Seagull Junior). In late ’76 or early ’77 the name game stopped and the model became known as the Eagle, as seen here.

    Throughout this time B.C. Rich was really somewhere between a manufacturer and a custom shop. All B.C. Rich guitars could be – and were frequently – ordered with a range of options including custom electronics, vibratos, inlays, and finishes. As a result, there is an enormous range of guitars out there. You could get your guitar passive or tricked out with every conceivable mini-toggle for tapping, phase reversing, or activating other on-board active electronics. The 1981 Eagle shown here is one of these atypical guitars.

    This is a swell guitar, like a stripped-down hot rod. It has the usual heelless neck-through-body construction. As you can see, it’s relatively plain in its appointments, with simple pearl dot inlays and no binding on the rosewood fingerboard. The body is a resonant mahogany. It’s pretty thin, so the guitar is not heavy but sounds great. It has great balance and is even comfortable to play sitting down. Whoever ordered this puppy didn’t care about mellow neck tones, just high powered crank out of the bridge. This is a Rich pickup, by the way. You’ll often see these described as having DiMarzios, but Rich usually made its own pickups. There may have been a few with DiMarzios, but those would be special cases, and usually any such description is just wrong.

    The guitar shown here was equipped with a Rich-designed vibrato, one of their early designs – the locking vibrato was not widely available in 1981. Most B.C. Rich guitars from the 1970s and early ’80s were stop-tails. The color is interesting, too; it was called “Jump-at-Me Yellow,” a name given to it by a rock star visiting the factory one day.

    But, like any good hot rod, the most impressive elements are “under the hood.” While it only has one hot pickup, the mini-toggle hooks up to an onboard preamp. Throw that sucker, and the output doubles. If you’re running at any volume at all, this turns into a nice distortion! The controls are a volume control for passive mode and a volume control for the preamp, so you can control the differential. There’s also a master Tone control that works in passive or active mode.

    This particular Eagle has a six-in-line headstock. Previous guitars all had asymmetrical three-and-three heads. In 1981 – the year this guitar debuted, B.C. Rich introduced this design as an alternative.

    B.C. Rich guitars aren’t especially rare. This one has a serial number of 85376, and Rich numbers were sequential, not date coded. Once they passed 1,000 in a year, the numbers started getting ahead of the year.

    By 1982, the taste for switches and onboard preamps began to wane, and the line began to shift in a more conventional passive direction. This guitar thus represents the apex of that first golden age of B.C. Rich guitars. It’s simple – and great. Great enough to make you cover your ears and wear a great big grin!



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s June 2008 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Webb Wilder

    The V is a reissue, but the solidstate Gretsch Nashville amp is all original

    The V is a reissue, but the solidstate Gretsch Nashville amp is all original. Photo: Tom Comet.

    In 1986, when singer/guitarist Webb Wilder and producer/songwriter R.S. “Bobby” Field pressed up 1,500 copies of It Came From Nashville, they could have just as easily called the debut It Came To Nashville – because it was as novel for a rootsy, hard-rockin’ band to invade Music City as to call it home. The album was immediately picked up by Landslide Records, who last year issued an expanded “full-grown” edition and announced that Wilder was recording his first new CD in eight years, with Field producing. On the resultant About Time, Webb puts his indelible stamp on rockabilly, R&B, western ballads, garage/Invasion rock, blues – as he says, “We sorta like to call it ‘progressive country.’”

    In 2001 Wilder became one of XM Satellite Radio’s first deejays, and can still be heard on “Cross Country” (Channel 12). But as cool as his radio show is, the best way to experience Webb is onstage, with his band, the Nashvegans. Webb and the “Tone Chaperon,” guitarist George Bradfute, stopped to talk shop, en route to a town near you.

    Vintage Guitar: When your first album came out, a roots rock band in Nashville was quite a novelty. Has the scene changed much since then?
    Webb Wilder: Yes, it’s more diverse now. When we first hit the club scene, there were very few people playing roots rock with energy. The Scorchers were starting up. Energy for days! Tim Krekel and the Sluggers [with Nashvegan Tom Comet on bass] kicked ass, but that was about it. There was a big buzz about us, but it being Nashville, no one knew what to do with us. We never got a record deal out of here, really. The record companies were all out of New York, L. A., Austin, or Atlanta. Now you’ve got BR-549, the Legendary Shack Shakers and others. There was always a “different side of the street” here, but it’s more accepted and less novel now. I still don’t think there’s anybody here who really does what I do. There are a lot of people more talented, but they don’t do what I do.

    Bradfute: When I moved to Nashville in ’84, I started seeing posters for Webb’s band around town. I went to see them play with some co-workers, and really dug them. I was working at Gruhn Guitars as a repairman at the time. I got to know them and eventually started working on their guitars.

    Wilder: George is an incredible musician – a very sympathetic player, who listens more than he talks. He has great ears and can play lots of instruments. He plays tons of them including clarinet and cello on About Time. He’s like a renaissance man, in that he is musician, luthier, producer, songwriter, and engineer. He’s a good harmony singer, and very few people know he’s got a lot of funny characters that he can channel without warning in a moving van!

    Who brings what influences to the group?
    Wilder: I’m pretty aware of the sources of things I do and like, but sometimes they came to me through the next generation. Chuck Berry is a huge part of my guitar style, but it’s definitely largely by way of the Stones. I love Steve Cropper, but it comes out more like Faces-era Ron Wood with me playing it – and really neither! Dave Edmunds is a huge influence; my inside-out sounding take on his “monkey beat/racka-racka” is my modus operandi for almost everything, rhythmically. Hearing Johnny Cash and Mick Jagger at a young age gave me some clue how to sing, and you can’t underestimate the Beatles. I love the Everlys and Beatles, but I can’t sing like that. The influences are really too many to name and I always leave people out. Bobby [R.S. Field] and I were really into NRBQ, Rockpile, the Thunderbirds, the Rock & Roll Trio, Free, Badfinger, the Band, the Stones, the Who. It’s all in there somewhere – even Mott The Hoople, Bob Wills, Haggard, Hank, Waylon.

    About Time

    About Time

    Bradfute: I grew up in Memphis, listening to all sorts of stuff. My grandmother, mom, and aunt taught my brother and me how to play ukuleles. Then we saw the Beatles on “Ed Sullivan,” and you can guess the rest. I listened to the obvious big guitar heroes – Hendrix, Clapton, Beck, B.B. King, John Lee Hooker, Billy Gibbons, Duane Allman, Leslie West, Steve Cropper. Lately I’ve gotten into Chet Atkins, Tony Mottola, and Al Caiola. Tone is such a variable commodity. You can plug a particular guitar and amp in, and have three different people play the same rig, and you’ll get three totally different sounds. As an engineer, I work every day with endless variables that affect tone. It’s a thin line between magic and mediocrity.

    What’s your main setup onstage?
    Wilder: I always have one or two Teles and usually a Gibson – often my mahogany Historic ’58 Flying V. I almost always run my 50-watt Hiwatt head through either a one- or two-12 cabinet. Currently, the only pedals I have are a first-generation Fulltone Fat Boost, a Marshall Vibra-Trem, and a tuner. Most of my guitar tracks were cut with the Fat Boost on. The Hiwatt sounds surprisingly clean in the studio. On the CD, I used my Custom Shop 335 with Voodoo pickups, my ’67 rosewood-board, Lake Placid Blue Tele, an ’89 Gretsch 6120 reissue, and a Les Paul Jr. refinished by Tom Murphy.

    Bradfute: On the CD, I used a lot of different stuff – a Les Paul Custom through a Condor guitar synthesizer, a recent Danelectro 12 string, a Gold Tone 6-string banjo-guitar, a homemade four-pickup Strat – and brought out my old [Gibson] GA-40 Les Paul amp, which Webb also used some. Live, I usually use a couple of DeArmonds – the Starfire, an M-77, and sometimes a Jetstar for open tunings – and sometimes a Tele or a Les Paul. I usually go through a Dr. Z Route 66 and 1×12″ cabinet, sometimes a Dr.Z 65-watt 2×12″ combo, sometimes a Prescription head and cab. My pedal board has a Roland Wah, Nobels and Ibanez overdrives, Ibanez PDM-1 Modulation Delay (way cool – wish they still made them), Boss tremolo, and Boss tuner.

    You have quite a collection of DeArmonds.
    Bradfute: I love the DeArmonds! I also have a T-400, the big Duane Eddy model. I like them because they’re so stable. I’m always amazed at how well they are constructed. Very high quality workmanship – made at the Cort factory in Korea. They’re great budget guitars; the best bang for the buck out there.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s June 2005 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.



    Webb wilder – Human Cannonball

  • Jimmy Gaudreau – 2:10 Train

    Jimmy Gaudreau and Moondi Klein have been playing together for more than 10 years. They first met when T. Michael Coleman, Mike Auldridge, and Klein asked Gaudreau to join them in Chesapeake. When the group disbanded in the late ’90s, Gaudreau and Klein got together occasionally to play concerts in D.C., where they both live. 2:10 Train is an outgrowth of this collaboration.

    Stylistically, 2:10 Train is a throwback to the old-time string-band duets of the 1930s and ’40s. The lead vocals are combinations of solo and harmony singing with a strong emphasis on the tenor parts. Gaudreau and Klein’s voices meld together as well as any true brother act. Their similar vocal timbres and seemingly innate sense of each other’s vocal rhythms and phrasing sound as if they’ve played together all their lives. This uncanny simpatico extends into their instrumental work. Their rendition of the old chestnut “Arkansas Traveler” sounds as spontaneous as if it was freshly penned. Most of the material is covers, though Gaudreau and Klein’s unadorned style hones it to its purest essence.

    Recorded by Stuart Martin at Stonebridge Studios in Leesberg, Virgina, and mastered by David Glasser at Airshow Mastering in Boulder, Colorado, this disk sounds as natural as the proverbial cool mountain stream and relaxed as a well-worn baseball cap. The recording captures all the subtleties of Guadreau’s hybrid mandolin style and Klien’s smooth flatpicking. One guitar and one mandolin and two voices; do you really need anything more to make great music? Nope.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Jul. ’08 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • An Early Manuel Ramírez

    Ramirez

    This fascinating instrument from the shop of Manuel Ramírez ca. 1909 is unusual in that the complete history of the instrument is known to us, there having been only two previous owners.

    According to family history, this guitar was ordered by the famous Catalan guitarist Miguel Llobet, who was a student of Francisco Tárrega (and teacher of Andrés Segovia), for a student named Elvira Mieres, of Buenos Aires. Elvira had become fascinated with the guitar and traveled to Europe to study with Llobet while he was in Paris. This instrument was Llobet’s wedding gift to her. Upon her death, the guitar passed to her son, who was not a guitarist, but who nonetheless preserved the instrument for the memories of his mother that it held. From him, it passed to the current owner.

    The Manuel Ramirez catalog lists 48 models of guitars ranging in price from 10 to 1,000 pesetas, and while the original price of this instrument is not known, we can only speculate, as this guitar does not precisely conform to any of the listed models and specifications. It is made with a 632-millimeter scale and smaller body size – what is often referred to as a “ladies’ guitar.” In those days, the sizes of instruments was not written in stone, but it was expected that a musician would have an instrument made of the correct dimensions, which would facilitate their technique, rather than impede it. Smaller sizes did not necessarily imply a cheaper price, although the use of smaller sets of wood might have helped to keep costs lower, as in those days the ratio of materials costs to the final selling price was much higher than it is today, and suppliers generally charge less for sets of wood that are smaller.

    Aside from the extensive mother of pearl inlay, several other features suggest that this was an expensive deluxe instrument. The sides and back are made of Brazilian rosewood, and in those days, any rosewood was a very expensive choice of materials used only on the most expensive instruments. The fingerboard is made of ebony – again, the most expensive choice of wood. The instrument was fitted from the beginning with machine heads, and although this original set by today’s standards would not be considered expensive, it was very expensive in those days, as these were imported into Spain at great cost from Germany, England, and America. The Ramírez catalog lists machines as an option for all the guitars, which are priced with wooden pegs as standard.

    Headstock of one of the lefty 'bursts

    Front of the head.

    Keys

    German-made machines with bone buttons – an expensive option. The typical Santos heel.

    neck-joint

    The sloppy, asymmetrical treatment of the heel-to-neck transition is more typical of Esteso’s work.

    Migual

    Miguel Llobet, who commissioned the guitar.

    Internally, the top is fully barred with seven fan struts, and the soundboard itself is made of premium German spruce of medium grain, a very high-quality cut of wood. The instrument is also fully varnished, including the top. In the Ramírez catalog, the lesser-priced guitars do not include varnish on the soundboard. The internal linings are made of carefully formed individual Spanish cedar glue blocks for the top, and a beautiful kerfed lining for the back. Kerfed linings were the most expensive type in those days, as they were labor intensive, hence only the more expensive instruments were fitted with them. Cheaper guitars would be fitted with solid bent linings, often bent from green (or wet) wood to facilitate installation.

    This instrument was probably made between 1905 and 1909, when the Ramírez shop was located at Arlaban 10. During this period, Antonio Emilio Pascual Viudes was working in the shop, along with Domingo Esteso, Santos Hernandez, and perhaps Modesto Borreguero, who would have been a teenager at that time. This guitar was primarily built by Santos Hernandez, several distinct features suggesting this; the accuracy of the head details and machine installation, the careful purfling work, the skill of the pearl inlay and setting (I’ve seen several other Manuel Ramírez guitars with similar pearl work, all done by Santos, who seems to have been the in-house pearl specialist), and the fact that the neck is made up of two longitudinal pieces of cedar. It seems that making fingerboards (or neck) of more than one piece is a Santos trademark. The interior kerfed linings are identical to those installed in the 1912 Ram&#237rez owned by Segovia now in the Metropolitan Museum of art in New York, as are the brace profiles and fan-strutting treatment.

    Where the instrument shows the hand of Domingo Esteso is in the neck carving, especially around the neck-heel joint, where the neck was aggressively carved, leaving a slightly asymmetrical heel joint visible in the photo. The transition of the neck to the head is also more typical of Esteso’s work, being less crisp and somewhat asymmetrical. The bridge, while eccentric by today’s standards, also may have been made by Esteso, as it is not as delicate at the edges, nor as carefully formed as typical Santos bridges. But this is more difficult to determine, as Santos never used this style of bridge in his own instruments.

    inside-edge

    Interior view of the top, showing typical Santos treatment of the braces. Note the glue residue, typical of Santos’ work.

    07-inside-top

    Interior of the top, showing the ends of the fan braces and typical glue residue indicative of Santos’ work.

    08-roseete

    MOP in the rosette is set in “mastic,” an amalgam of glue and black sawdust. Top borders are inlaid using the same technique. The bridge, which has a fanciful shape popular at the turn of the century. Note that the inlay of the MOP is not very precise, uncharacteristic of Santos’ work.

    09-Lable

    Interior label with the Arlaban 10 address, used by Manuel Ramírez until 1912, when he moved to Arlaban 11.

    In 1976, the instrument was restored by Roque Guagliardi, of Buenos Aires, who repaired a top crack and, according to the repair label he inserted, refinished the guitar. However, the varnish and ground is totally consistent with original Manuel Ramírez instruments of the period, so at worst he only padded over the repaired areas very lightly, without removing any of the original varnish. Perhaps the owners ignorantly had asked for it to be refinished, but Guagliardi wisely did not, though perhaps they were charged for the work. Who knows? Clearly, the instrument retains its original ground and French polish, and consequently shows none of the distortion or other problems a heavily-thinned refinished instrument exhibits. The action setup is as it left the shop of Ramírez – still in perfect playing condition. It’s the intention of the current owner to make the instrument available to fine players for recordings, a wonderful and remarkably generous offer on the part of an enlightened owner who understands what these instruments intended use.



    Richard Bruné began making guitars in 1966 and is a former professional flamenco guitarist. He has written for the Guild of American Luthiers and other organizations and lectured at guitar festivals and museums including the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. He collects classical and flamenco guitars. He was recently featured on the PBS documentary, “Los Romeros: The Royal Family of the Guitar,” and his new book, The Guitar of Andrés Segovia: Hermann Hauser 1937, was recently published by Dynamic, of Italy. You can write to him at 800 Greenwood Street, Evanston, IL 60201, or visit rebrune.com.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s February 2008 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • 1934 Martin 12-fret D-28

    1934 Martin 12-Fret D-28

    1934 Martin 12-Fret D-28. Photo courtesy Daniel Salvo.

    The Martin D-28 was first issued in 1931. And all dreadnought Martins made from 1931 through ’33 featured a 12-fret (a reference to the point at which the neck meets the body) slotted-head neck and extended-length body, rather than the more familiar squared upper bout and shorter body of modern-style dreadnoughts. Martin’s first 14-fret-neck model was the OM-28 issued in ’29. By ’32, 14-fret necks were issued on the 0- and 00-size style 17 and by ’34 the 14-fret neck became standard on most steel-string Martin guitars with the exception of styles 21 upward in the 0 and 00 sizes.

    Unlike Gibson’s approach, which was simply to keep the same body style and shape, but move the bridge position when shifting from 12-fret to 14-fret necks, Martin approached the issue by keeping the bridge in essentially the same position, but shortening the upper bout to accommodate a 14-fret neck. Therefore, 12-fret Martin guitars have a longer body and larger air chamber than equivalent 14-fret models. This results in a somewhat different sound. In the opinion of many, 12-fret extended-body Martins have a smoother, mellower sound with better balance and more sustain than 14-fret models.

    Twelve-fret Martin D-28s are extremely scarce. Company records indicate a total production of one in 1931, four in ’32, and 12 in ’33. Records also show the D-2, which has essentially the same specs as the 12-fret D-28, with four made in 1931, two in ’32, none in ’33, and one in ’34. Four 12-fret D-28s were made in 1934, along with 65 14-frets.

    Although Martin serial number records do not indicate this guitar has custom features, it is indeed an unusual custom-order instrument. Not only is it a 12-fret instrument issued at a transitional time (the 14-fret model had already been issued), but it features a solid (rather than slotted) peghead, the typical 17/8″ nut width seen on 12-fret slot head guitars, and style 45 neck ornamentation with triple-bound peghead, single-bound fingerboard, vertical C.F. Martin peghead logo inlay, and the typical style 45 snowflake fingerboard inlays. The body is the same as a 1933 12-fret D-28 with the extended-length Adirondack spruce top with scalloped bracing and herringbone trim, Brazilian rosewood back and sides, typical style 28 “zipper” back stripe and ivroid body binding. The open-back Grover tuners are the earliest Grover design for a solid peghead, and are gold-plated, rather than nickel-plated, as was typical on style 28 Martins.

    1934 Martin 12-Fret D-28

    1934 Martin 12-Fret D-28. Photo: Kelsey Vaughn, courtesy Gruhn Guitars.

    As is typical of 12-fret pre-World War II Martin dreadnoughts, this is a fantastic-sounding instrument with great power, balance, and sustain, but a less percussive sound than the 14-fret dreadnoughts. It’s about as good as any flat-top. And while some players might prefer a narrower neck, this one is quite comfortable.

    The history of this instrument has been traced to circa 1940, when it was bought used by the father of the people who brought it to Gruhn Guitars. It looked the same in their very early family photos as it does today. Although Martin’s records make no indication it was a custom order, they do indicate the serial number was entered in their records March 8, 1934, and that this was the only D-28 in the work order batch. There is no evidence that the neck or the ornamentation is anything but original. Had it been sent back to the factory to have style 45 neck ornamentation added (which the factory did offer to some performers such as Gene Autry, who had two 12-fret slothead guitars, a 0-42 and a 00-42, converted with more fancy neck ornamentation and his name on the fingerboard) the work would have been done to whatever specifications were available at the time, including modern fret wire after late ’34. Since this guitar has the earliest Grover tuners and bar frets, which were discontinued in late ’34, it almost certainly left the factory in its present configuration rather than having been altered at a later date.

    This is an exceedingly rare instrument. Martin’s records show a notation of only one earlier 12-fret D-28, dated February 19, 1934, with style 45 neck trim, solid peghead, gold-plated tuners, and sunburst-finish top. Martin historian, the late Mike Longworth, apparently saw this guitar during his tenure, but we have been unable to trace its whereabouts.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Jul. ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Steve Vai

    Steve Vai

    Steve Vai photo: Lisa Sharken.

    Considered one of the most talented musicians on the planet, Steve Vai constantly strives to better himself as a player and musician. He enjoys experimenting with different sounds, instruments, and musical styles, always searching for ways to raise the bar and introduce something unique.

    VG spoke with Vai about creating the compositions for his latest release, Real Illusions: Reflections (Epic), explaining how they were realized from ideas to the actual tracks. Without further ado, here’s a bit of insight into the eclectic mind of Mr. Vai.

    Vintage Guitar: How were the songs conceived for Real Illusions?
    Steve Vai: My last studio record, The Ultra Zone, was five or six years ago. Since then, I released a lot of material, but none of it as focused. I originally wanted to recreate a musical that had all these characters and a story, and it became such a robust story line and concept that I decided to spread it out over several records. So this is basically the first installment of a series of two or three, depending on how things unfold, that expands the story and the concept of the music.

    That aside, because a lot of people may not be interested in digging that deep, there’s just the music. And with the music, I bring the things I enjoy. I’ve been doing this for 25 years, and you come to a point where you’ve got to pick a lane and drive. I’ve had all the success you can have, as far as playing in big rock bands, and there have always been times when I felt I needed to create something acceptable or accessible, and deliver what people wanted. But you just get bored of doing that because you’re undermining yourself, and not really giving them what they want. I’m talking about the people who are “in the club,” that get a particular artist. You’re not giving them what they want unless you’re giving them what you want. So I decided it’s time to make a record and be as expressive as possible. And I do that by incorporating things like a story or by listening to that little inner voice that tells me what the melody should be and the chords.

    When it comes to playing the guitar, I make conscious efforts to try to introduce something a little unique and special to each song or to each performance. The guitar is boundless in its potential. Its only limited by your imagination, so that’s what makes it such a glorious challenge to play. You can be as expressive as you can, and still, there’s just a plethora of elements you can apply to express yourself. So I made a conscious decision to pick up the instrument every day and try to come up with one thing that’s new. That’s what builds your musical vocabulary – coming up with a concept or an idea, even if it’s just three notes that have a particular bend to them, or an entire solo, or new technique or approach. The next thing you know, you’ve created an aura, or a catalog of riffs, songs, and techniques that are really you. It’s one way to explore your own uniqueness. On every song on this record, I tried to introduce something like that.

    What are some good examples?
    For instance, on the opening song, “Building The Church,” there are these wild hammers going on through the intro and the middle section. It’s a very difficult technique and I’m not just satisfied with doing something that’s flashy and just technique-oriented. If you listen to those hammers and break them down, and listen to the notes and how they affect the track with their harmonic structure, there’s a lot more to them than just a funny, fast technique.

    Real Illusions Reflections

    Real Illusions: Reflections

    On “Dying For Your Love,”the whole chord concept is very rich, and the melody in the beginning is all about phrasing. Phrasing is one thing the guitar offers that’s so unique to itself. It’s different from a piano because the dynamics are so much more exaggerated. And with the use of effects, it’s a tool for really deep expression. Then there are songs like “Yai Yai,” which is this bizarre little tidbit where I created a piece of music around an effect. I built a patch in the Eventide DSP4000 that’s basically a modulating filter program. As you hit a note, it takes the frequencies and it modulates them so it sounds like the note is going “yai, yai, yai.” I just played a melody around it.

    For “Under It All,” I wanted to use the seven-string, but didn’t want to pick it up and go “daga-daga-daga-daga.” How often has that been done, and done very well? So I challenged myself to do something different. The seven-string can create chord voicings that the conventional six-string can’t. I heard the rhythm guitars for “Under It All” in my head, which is a very thick, rich, tensiony cluster of chords banged together, and the way that I produced the guitar parts, those notes actually speak, so you hear all the notes in the chord with all that distortion and those low strings.

    What was your setup in the studio?
    I mostly used my Carvin Legacy amps. I usually use a stereo setup with a head and two 4x12s, but you have to let the song dictate. I also used a Strat through an older Fender Professional tube amp. But there are some tracks where I ganged a lot of amps together. You’ve got to do that very carefully when mic’ing and amping things, especially if you’re mixing them with dirty DI sounds because you’ll lose everything in phase cancellation. For “Under It All,” to get those notes to speak like that, I used two guitars through about 10 different amplifiers.

    I used my main Jem guitars, Evo and Flo. Flo has the Sustainer pickup. Another Jem I used was a floral model with a Roland guitar synth pickup to trigger MIDI information. I also used a plethora of other stringed instruments, including the Jerry Jones Coral Sitar which you can hear on “Freak Show Excess,” a new acoustic that I designed for Ibanez called the Euphoria, and a seven-string acoustic made for me by Emerald Guitars in Ireland. The entire guitar is one piece of carbon-fiber and has this unique sound. When you amplify it and put a mic on it, you get this nice balance between electric and acoustic atmospheres. Then I used a saz and an oud, which are these Turkish instruments. I also used my ’77 Fender Strat on a couple of things like “Firewall.”

    For effects, I used the Eventide DSP4000 and T.C. Electronic G-Force – my main workhorse. On the floor, I had my Morley Bad Horsie wah and Little Alligator volume pedal. I usually use a Boss DS-1 for distortion, but occasionally, I use a new TS-9 Tube Screamer reissue. I also used a Sobbat phaser/flanger box on “K’m-Pee-Du-Wee.”

    What was the greatest challenge you faced in making this album?
    There are always time constraints, but my big challenge is this: Most of the time, I conceive a piece of music in my mind before I even touch an instrument. Then I go about realizing it. Sometimes I get overwhelmed with these intuitional flashes of music. An entire concept or an entire idea for a piece of music will just come to me like that. For instance, “Dying For Your Love” and “Freak Show Excess” were just there in a moment. But making it real is unbelievable work, and many times, it’s not fun because I never compromise on any of this stuff. Everything is exactly the way that I wanted it.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s June ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • January 2010

    FEATURES

    Holy Cripes!
    The Story of Jerry Garcia’s Last Guitars
    Steve Cripe was not a guitar player, not a songwriter. But the cabinet maker became part of the fabric that makes up the story of the Grateful Dead when he built guitars for the legendary Jerry Garcia. By Steve Armato and James D. McCallister

    The Flot-A-Tone
    Flot-a-what? The word doesn’t exactly inspire sonic simulacrums of unearthly tone. But when an amp looks this groovy, one can forgive the marketing schism. By Dave Hunter

    Paramount Style C
    Interesting not only because it is beautifully ornamented and fine-sounding, this early-’20s instrument was also one of the first banjos with truly modern playability, and a sound for bluegrass. By George Gruhn and Walter Carter

    Roger Giffin Builder To The Stars
    The renowned British luthier began dabbling in guitar repair as a teen, after seeing an acoustic built from a kit. How could he have known it would lead to working with the likes of Clapton, Page, Beck, Van Halen, et al? By Ward Meeker

    The Alvarez Dana Scoop
    When it comes to guitar design, history is replete with stories of bad accidents. But sometimes, there are good, or “happy,” accidents. This unusual ’80s classic is a good example. By Michael Wright

    The Robn Wedge
    Regular VG readers are familiar with Robin, the Texas brand of guitars and basses that have been staged by the Vaughan brothers, Billy F Gibbons, and others. This model is the company’s entry in the “funky-bizarre guitar“ category. By Willie G. Moseley

    DEPARTMENTS

    Vintage Guitar Price Guide

    Builder Profile
    Widman Custom Electrics

    Upcoming Events

    Vintage Guitar Classified Ads

    Dealer Directory

    Readers Gallery

    FIRST FRET

    Reader Mail

    News and Notes
    Steve Wariner inducted, Verheyen tours, L.A. Amp Show, Mark Doyle, In Memoriam, more!

    Stanley Clarke
    Jazz in the Garden
    By Lisa Sharken

    Whit Smith
    Long Road to Swingtown
    By John Heidt

    Ask Zac
    By Zac Childs

    Dan Toler
    New, But Still Dangerous
    By John Heidt

    Jim Davies
    Electronica Meets the Riff
    By Pete Prown

    Greg Koch
    Soundscapes, Soul, and Greeting Cards
    By Willie G. Moseley

    Gettin’ Heavy
    …With Heavy Trash
    By Michael Dregni

    Mike Stern
    Big Neighborhood, Small World
    By John Heidt

    Jim Weider
    It’s All in the Groove
    By John Heidt

    COLUMNS

    The (Way) Back Beat
    The Plastic Fantastic Electro Spanish
    By Peter S. Kohman

    Q&A With George Gruhn

    Fretprints
    Mike Stern
    By Wolf Marshall

    “401K” Guitars
    Determining Market Size
    By Gil Hembree

    Acousticville
    His, Hers, and Ours
    By Steven Stone

    TECH

    Talkin’ Amps With…
    Blackie Pagano: Secrets to Vintage Tone
    By David Jung

    Dan’s Guitar Rx
    Something Old, Something New, Part III
    By Dan Erlewine

    Shop of Hard Knocks
    A Les Paul Mystery
    By Will Kelly

    REVIEWS

    The VG Hit List
    CD, DVD, and Book Reviews: Rory Gallagher, Steve Vai, Happy Traum, Robert Cray, Ricky Skaggs, Robin Trower, The Grateful Dead Scrapbook, more!

    Check This Action
    Bromberg is Back!
    By Dan Forte

    Vintage Guitar Gear Reviews
    Teye Electric Gypsy La Mora S Plus, Mack Amps’ Heatseeker/Skyraider, Regal RC-58TT, Pigtronix Mothership/Philosopher’s Tone, Carvin BX500/SB4000, Blackstone Effectors Whetstone, Campbell American UK-1, Normandy ATB-CH

    Gearin’ Up!
    The latest cool new stuff!