Tag: features

  • Chordal Colorations

    Chordal Colorations

    Brian Setzer

    Brian Setzer
    Stray Cat Axe: Brian Setzer’s Gretsch 6120 Suppose you had to select just one guitar to personify rock and roll. One with a resumé complete with battle scars, stage-side repairs, an impressive song list, and worthy gigs and tours. Brian Setzer’s 1959 Gretsch Model 6120 may be the one.
    Though their colors are complementary, Brian May’s Red Special and Brian Setzer’s ’59 Gretsch 6120 couldn’t be more different in terms of their origin or their roles in helping to create legendary music. One is home-made, the other represents the innovation of its era. One appeared on stages worldwide, rendering purist tones of a bygone era, the other traveled similarly while helping create a definitive new sound. Both rank among the most storied instruments in pop music. Here are their stories.

    The recipe for such an iconic rock guitar might include an instrument that was part of the establishment – in this case, the Cadillac of old-school archtops as endorsed by none other than Chet Atkins. Then, that chosen guitar had to be forced to play the “Devil’s music,” and along the way was covered in scratches, stickers, and hot-rod emblems. Finally, it had to have a voice of its own – proven here by the jangly D-chord intro to “Rock This Town” or that oh-so-cool diminished-scale solo that crowns “Stray Cat Strut.”

    Setzer might not have been part of the first wave of rock and roll – coincidentally, he was born in 1959 – but, the original Stray Cat guitar, serial number 33024, has a suitably rock-and-roll story that Setzer recently shared with VG, along with many a laugh, hoot, and song accompaniment played on the guitar.

    “I bought the Gretsch in ’76 or ’77,” he says. “Making it playable, that was the 40-year struggle!”

    The inspiration? One man; the consummate rocker, Eddie Cochran.

    “What really started me on the Gretsch, I remember walking into the local record store in my home town, Massapequa, on Long Island,” Setzer says. “The owner hung the album covers on fishing line so it looked like they were just floating in midair and spinning around. When I saw that picture of Eddie Cochran on the cover of that ’72 Legendary Masters LP and he had that Gretsch and his hair slicked back, I said, ‘Oh my god, that’s the guy.’

    “I didn’t know who this guy was. I’d never heard his music, but I wanted to be him. I wanted to look like him. I bought the record and went home and it absolutely changed my life.

    “It was the whole package. It turned my life around. I just wanted to get out of school, get that guitar plugged in, get a look going, and start a band. Cool is cool – doesn’t matter when it’s written.

    “Naturally, I had to track down that guitar. I didn’t know a Dynasonic from a Filter’tron from a humbucker, I just wanted that orange guitar. I saw one in our local shopper, the Buy Lines Press. It said, ‘Gretsch guitar. Orange. 100 bucks.’ I called the guy and asked, ‘Is it like Eddie Cochran’s?’ And he said, ‘Who?’ He goes, ‘If you want it, you better come over because I have all the electrics out and I’m going to refinish it.’ And I said, ‘Okay, I’ll come right over.’ I had scrapped and saved that hundred bucks, you know? That was a lot of money for a 16-year-old kid.

    “Anyway, he had the pickups and the wiring harness in a shoe box, and had started to sand one little spot right above the knobs, by the f hole… it looked as if he was going to stain it natural.”

    After saving the guitar from refinishing and other potential indignities, Setzer took it to a local repair shop run by Jess Oliver, of Ampeg fame. “He put it back together for me. So, I had a whole guitar!”

    Setzer’s guitar dates from what may have been the last batch of 6120s built in ’59, according to Edward Ball, author of the seminal book Gretsch 6120: The History of a Legendary Guitar.

    “Its vintage is an interesting story,” Ball explains. “The 1959 model-year 6120s are characterized by their 2.75″-deep body spec and black-enamel-faced Bigsby. The 1960 6120s are defined by their 2.5″-deep body and V-style Bigsby. But it’s not quite that clean, because the V-style Bigsby was introduced early in the last couple ’59 batches of 6120. So, body depth becomes the defining feature between the ’59 and ’60 6120 guitars.

    “Brian’s has a non-original Bigsby, and it would have had the V-style unit coming out of the factory; most people don’t realize that, and it has contributed to the confusion about that guitar’s vintage. In reality, the batch with serial numbers that start with 33 where made when the 1960 model year debuted, and that occurred midway into the batch of 100 6120 guitars.

    “My research has verified that Brian’s guitar, with serial number 33024, was one of the very last 6120s to receive the 2.75″ body depth, which is why I’m comfortable attributing it to the ’59 model year. If it was two guitars later on the production line, it would have received the shallower body and would have to be considered a 1960 guitar.”

    After visiting Oliver’s shop, Setzer went in search of a case to protect his $100 investment. “I took the bus with my guitar in-hand, like only a kid would do, and went to Sam Ash – that was our store. I said, ‘Do you have a case that would fit this?’ The guy rolled his eyes, like this was the last thing he wanted to deal with – a kid needing just a case. They had a big conveyor belt that went into the basement, and he yelled down, ‘Saul, we need a case for a Gretsch.’ And up comes that original cowboy case. They had one!

    “Somehow, it was just meant to be! I don’t take things like that for granted any more. I used to, but I don’t think it was coincidence. Somebody had something planned!”

    Brian Setzer
    The inspiration: Eddie Cochran rocking and rolling with his 6120.
    Next began that 40-year journey in making the Gretsch suitable for playing rock and roll.

    “The first thing I did was take a hammer and chisel, and knock out that zero fret. I knew that thing was up to no good. It was just holding the strings, and they would make a groove in it. It was an idea that might have worked for Chet, but it didn’t work for me. I also had someone move the nut up to where that zero fret was. So, behind it then, there was just an empty slot.

    “The next step was to swap on the best tuners you could get then, which were Schallers. They didn’t lock, but they were a step up from the old Waverlys.”

    His next step was to “fix” the bridge. “It had that bar bridge that was useless because I couldn’t get the guitar to intonate properly. It was always sliding around. So, I first put a screw in it, then we finally got the bright idea to use double-sided tape.

    “I needed something with saddles so I could move them back and forth. The only thing available was the Gibson bridge, which I still use because that thing works great. And that got it pretty close.”

    Pretty close to playable, but not loud enough.

    “I wasn’t getting enough volume from the rear pickup, so I stuck matchbooks under it to raise it. The pole pieces weren’t adjustable; I actually took the pickup out, folded a couple of matchbook covers [under it], then screwed the pickup covers back on so I could get the thing closer to the strings. That was the mind of a 16-year-old: ‘I need to play a gig, the guitar ain’t rocking, something’s not right.’ So, I made it work. It’s still that way, still with the original pickups.”

    Next, he turned his attention to the tone. In ’59, the 6120 had been given a second toggle switch with a Tone knob near the three-way pickup selector on the upper bout. If he was going to play rock and roll, Setzer quickly realized that Tone control had to go.

    “I call it the ‘mud switch.’ I don’t know if I coined that or someone else did, but it’s become a popular term.

    “The real pickup selector was on top, the mud switch was on bottom. I thought, ‘What’s the use of this thing?’ Maybe if you’re trying to be Johnny Smith or something, it gives you a really good jazz sound. But I had no use for it.

    Brian Setzer
    Setzer’s Stray Cat 6120, serial number 33024, with its “Lucky Lady” pin-up sticker.
    “So, I moved the real pickup selector switch to the bottom position and stuck my pinky in and shoved the other one into the guitar. So, there’s a hole there. I just wanted it out of the way, because I’d hit it when playing live and turn the guitar off! I had to make the thing usable.”

    Setzer was indeed using the guitar. In the late ’70s, he played in an art-rock band called the Bloodless Pharaohs. “It was cool,” he remembers. “Kind of like Roxy Music meets some other weird English band. It was very musical.” Setzer usually played a Strat with that band; today, it’s hard to imagine. “But, I had the Gretsch, and we ended [shows] with a rockabilly song that always brought the house down. I thought, I’ve got to make up my mind here. The rockabilly stuff is what’s paying the bills.’”

    In January of 1979, Setzer launched the Tomcats, playing rockabilly in Long Island clubs. The band included his brother, Gary, on drums and fellow Pharaoh Bob Beecher on bass. But, as Setzer made his realization that rockabilly might pay – hard to believe in those days of new wave – tension broke the band apart.

    Setzer then joined with two Long Island buds, bassist Lee Drucker (soon to be Lee Rocker) and drummer Jim McDonnell (a.k.a. Slim Jim Phantom). In the summer of 1980, the trio became the Stray Cats, and moved to London, where rockabilly had never died. Setzer went there with the Gretsch 6120 in hand.

    He never updated the electronics, but did hot-rod its looks.

    “I had to rock it out. I got the decals from Ed’s Lawn Mower Repair… I kid you not! He had decals from the ’50s in a box on a shelf. I said, ‘I want the pinup girl! I want the skull!’ I had to customize it like a hot rod. You know, I wanted to make it my guitar. I thought they looked cool… For some reason, I thought the skull would look good over the [original headstock inlay of a] horseshoe, which might have been a little old-fashioned – it was the era of punk rock and all that.”

    The Stray Cat guitar went through a series of decal iterations. Setzer first added the skull-and-crossbones to the headstock, plus the small black cat and “Lucky Lady” decals on the lower bouts (this version was replicated for Gretsch’s Tribute reissue in 2006).

    Ball notes that at some stage, Setzer replaced the original pin-up-girl decal with one of a sunbathing beauty riding a hot-wax platter. He also added dice to replace the staid Gretsch control knobs with their wild-west arrows.

    “It’s an old hot-rodder trick, putting dice on anything. The guitar didn’t have the original knobs when I got it, so I got the dice out of my old game of Monopoly, took Dad’s drill, and I drilled a hole so they’d just fit over the shaft, then poured super glue in there. It was that simple.”

    The Gretsch lived a hard life in Setzer’s hands – one it was not truly made for.

    Asked if he had any issues with the neck bowing, he said, “Absolutely! The neck was always bowing and would have to be put in a steam press.

    “I’ve left that guitar in the back of London taxicabs after playing some pub, and they were honest enough to say [switching to his best Cockney accent], ‘Oy, mate. You left your guitar here!’

    Brian Setzer
    The back of the original 6120 headstock. The guitar has worn numerous sets of tuners over its working life – the many screwholes are hidden behind the current batch. (RIGHT) The 6120 as it appears today, with the “Lucky Lady” sticker replaced by a sunbathing beauty perched on a record album.
    “It was stolen for two years at one point. A guy broke into Rock-It Cargo’s storage and stole a bunch of stuff, not just mine. They caught him, and the judge told him, ‘You come into this courtroom with something or you’re going to jail.’ And he walked in with my guitar.

    “It’s not coincidence! I’m telling you, you got to believe in something.”

    These days, the guitar is in well-earned semi-retirement. “I’m giving it a break. I don’t take it out on the road anymore, just because I’m afraid it’s going to get lost or stolen.”

    Over the years, Setzer has kept his eyes open for solid ’59 6120s to serve as backups. His main reserve bears dice knobs and the same bathin-suit-beauty decal.

    “Just because it came from 1959 doesn’t mean it’s going to be a great guitar,” he warns. “The ’59 I use now I bought from a guy, also from Long Island, just after the first Stray Cats album. It had holes drilled in the back of the headstock and other things that we had to fix, but I didn’t care because I was going to customize it anyway. It sounded great and played just as good, maybe even better – they’re both ace guitars. So, I fixed that one to be playable, knocked out the zero fret and all. But that time, it was done professionally, done right. And that’s the one I’ve used since like ’93.

    “I just got a third one because I don’t like taking the original guitars and messing around with them, and I needed one more backup. That one had to have the neck put in a steam press twice, along with two pages worth of other work.”

    He continues to use the original for recording – his recent CD, Rockabilly Riot!, was cut entirely with one of the ’59 Gretsches, a ’63 blond Fender Bassman piggyback amp, a ’50s Magnatone, plus a Roland RE-301 Chorus Echo. As Setzer says in lauding the sound of his vintage gear, “When the old stuff’s working, I don’t want to fix it because it ain’t broke.”

    On stage, however, he often plays several of his new signature 6120 models. “It’s much easier to get a new one!” he said. “They play great, right out of the box. But… let’s face it, there’s nothing like a ’59 Gretsch 6120. They’ve just got some magic about them.”


    Special thanks to Aaron Feterl.


    Strayin’ to The Smithsonian
    Brian Setzer recently donated a replica of his ’59 Gretsch 6120 to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History. The original was used during the ’80s heyday of the Stray Cats, personalized with dice (taken from his Monopoly board game) for two control knobs, and stickers depicting a black cat, skull and crossbones, and a pin-up girl. Those touches were duplicated on the replica, which was built in 2006 by Stephen Stern, master builder at Gretsch. At the Smithsonian, it joined Edward Van Halen’s “Frank 2,” Prince’s Yellow Cloud, and non-stringed instruments such as John Coltrane’s saxophone and Dizzy Gillespie’s trumpet.

    “Brian Setzer is a prolific and distinctive contributor to American music,” said John Edward Hasse, the curator of American music at the Smithsonian. “Proof of his legacy exists not only in the longevity of his career and in his lengthy discography, but also in his ability to cross musical boundaries.” To learn more, visit http://americanhistory.si.edu.

    Brian Setzer
    Brian Setzer onstage at the Smithsonian.

    Homemade Royalty
    Brian May’s Red Special
    “I couldn’t afford to buy an electric guitar,” Brian May says about his teen years. “There was no way. I couldn’t even afford a copy of the Fenders and Gibsons that looked so enticing in the brochures. So my dad and I decided we would make one.”

    The result was the Red Special, one of the most famous guitars ever built. It ranks with Les Paul’s Log and Eddie Van Halen’s Frankenstrat in being home-brewed creations that have gone on to stardom.

    Like both of those guitars, the Red Special was an invention that innovated; May didn’t build the instrument simply because he couldn’t round up the shillings for your usual mass-produced, store-bought guitar. Rather, he experimented, and incorporated ideas that were far ahead of their time.

    And the Red Special has served him well. He began work on it in 1963 and – following many parts swaps, numerous stage-side repairs, and two restorations – he is still playing it today, more than 50 years later.

    “While the outfits, venue capacities, set lists, production, and even hair lengths varied wildly over the years, the Red Special remained the only constant,” May said of the Queen legacy.

    The story of the guitar is much more than just the details of some boards, screws, wires, and electrical components. It’s the tale of a father and son crafting the guitar together, then falling out over the son’s decision to throw aside a promising career to play rock and roll. But that’s not the end of the story…

     Brian SetzerMay grew up in the nondescript London suburb of Feltham, where his father, Harold, was an electronics engineer. During World War II, he served with radar and radio detachments, and in the decades following, built the family a radio, record player, TV, and tape recorder.

    “Dad was great at making all kinds of things,” May remembers in his new book, Brian May’s Red Special. “And though he didn’t know anything about guitars, he knew a whole lot about amplifiers, which was to become very useful.”

    While the elder May was a fan of big-band jazz, young Brian became smitten by the sounds of Little Richard, Buddy Holly, and others. When he first heard Ricky Nelson’s “Hello, Mary Lou” and the thoroughly electric solo by James Burton, he knew he had to play guitar.

    His parents bought a ukulele for him, then, in 1954, a simple, small-bodied Egmond acoustic. But, as rock and roll got louder and May heard the wonders of the Beatles, Jimi Hendrix, and Cream, he yearned for an electric. So, father and son made their own pickup starting with extra-fine copper wire from their workshop (in the converted spare bedroom of the family’s small suburban house) and three button magnets Brian bought at a hardware store. Winding thousands of turns by hand proved laborious and readily resulted in breaks in the fragile wire. So, Harold concocted a pickup winder from spare parts, complete with a revolution counter adapted from a bicycle odometer.

    They mounted the pickup to the Egmond acoustic and ran it through their homemade radio amplifier. It worked well. However, when Brian would bend strings, the signal blurred. And, it never got a true electric-guitar sound. Not having the money to buy one, the Mays went to work in the summer of ’63.

    “Dad made all kinds of stuff – test instruments for radios and TVs – and he had tools. He also had a lot of stock he thought might be useful one day, and if we wanted something for the guitar, we could normally find it in a corner of the workshop.”

    Brian brought something to the project beyond a budding rocker’s passion. At school, then at university, he was studying math and physics (he would eventually earn a PhD in astronomy), so he had the mind to analyze the mathematical problems inherent in the construction of a guitar, such as fret distances, and could draft detailed plans for all elements of the instrument.

    Together, they made the perfect father/son team. Brian’s vision was ambitious and farsighted; he planned to craft a vibrato bridge from scratch, his own three-pickup setup and switching system, and a chamber in the body.

    “I had big ideas!” he says. “We did actually sit down and design it; I wanted a full electric instrument with multiple pickups and a proper tremolo.

    “I wanted it to look like an acoustic guitar that had been cut away; it’s my own shape,” May explains. “I started with something that’s more or less the Egmond shape, then did my own cutaways. I decided on two because I genuinely wanted to get up to the top end of the fingerboard.”

    They began with a piece of an oak table as the basis for the central block running through the body. “It was hard, like steel, and to fashion it took hours of work – it blunted all of our tools and gave us blisters on our hands!” They then added “wings” made of blockboard and covered the whole with mahogany veneer.

    The body is semi-hollow. “It was designed to feed back in the right way – not so you’d get a booming body sound, but enhancing sustain through the strings. I think that was a first.” May originally planned to cut an f-shaped sound hole into the top, but decided the feedback was right without it.

    Brian Setzer
    Red Special Specs
    Body: chambered blockwood with central oak insert, mahogany veneer Body thickness: 1.6″ (40 mm)
    Mahogany bolt-on neck with truss rod; black-painted oak fretboard Fretboard radius: 7.25″ (184.15 mm) Width at nut: 1.84″ (46 mm) Width at 12th fret: 2″ (50 mm) Frets: 24 plus zero fret Scale length: 24″ (609.5 mm) String gauge: .09-.42 Pickups: Three Burns Tri-Sonic single coils, wired in series Vibrato arm: Made from bicycle saddlebag rack Controls: Volume, Tone, on/off slide switch for each pickup, in/out-of-phase switch for each pickup Weight: 7.99 pounds (3.63 kg) Red Special front/back: Andrew Guyton.
    Not having access to actual binding material, he used plastic shelf edging, front and back, then finished the veneer with layers of Rustin’s Plastic Coating wood stain that he buffed between coats. The result was a unique red that became the guitar’s trademark.

    May also modeled the neck on the Egmond, but in making it, miscalculated, forgetting to add the fretboard’s thickness. In the end, though, he was pleased with what he describes as the “huge” profile, and kept it.

    “For the neck, we used part of an old fireplace that at the time was 100 years old; it was just kicking around the workshop. If you look really closely, you can still see wormholes that I filled up with matchsticks.”

    He wanted the scale length to be shorter than usual, “making the fingering a little easier and tone a little brighter.” In the end, he decided on a scale length of 24″, shorter than a Gibson Les Paul or Fender Stratocaster.

    “I also couldn’t see why most electrics stopped at the 22nd fret – just short of two octaves. Why not have the full two? So, the guitar was given a fingerboard that went to 24 frets.” Being a young mathematician, he created a formula and worked out the exact fret distances with a slide rule.

    “The truss rod was anchored on a massive bolt which also fastened the neck to the body… so, tightening it up really held the neck rigid,” he says. “The neck is so robust it has never needed any truss-rod adjustment.”

    It has also never needed a fret job. May made a tool to set the frets, and despite several times replacing the zero fret, they’ve served their time. He made dot markers out of mother-of-pearl buttons sourced from his mum’s sewing box.

    May designed the headstock to allow the string to run straight laterally and vertically, so no friction was added to the vibrato setup. He used store-bought tuners – the only element other than its replacement pickups that were not made by May and his dad.

    From there, they turned to the components.

    “All of the hardware and electrics were designed from scratch,” May says. Again, he drew schematics and graphs for the parts. “The materials were, in many cases, made from things lying around Dad’s workshop – little pieces of steel, brass, and aluminum, washers, nuts and bolts and screws, and occasionally less-common objects.” For instance, the vibrato arm was made from a saddlebag support from a bicycle, while its tip came from one of his mum’s knitting needles.

    For the tailpiece, May began with theory – and inspiration from Hank Marvin with the Shadows. “There were no such things as tremolos and tremolo-friendly bridges in those days; there were just loose screws!” he remembers. “I wanted to make sure that if the tremolo was used even to extremes, the strings would return to correct pitch. The Fender Synchronized Tremolo system was essentially just some screws that aren’t fully screwed in and a bridge piece that wobbled about.”

    May’s uses two valve springs borrowed from a Norton motorcycle. Rather than stretching the springs to provide constant tension, as with the Fender bridge, his were designed to be compressed. “Unusually for the time, it sat completely in equilibrium in the center position,” he explains. “So, I could rock the pitch smoothly either way. I could take the bottom string down an octave and, in the days when we first went out as Queen in 1970, people would be curious as to how that could happen, but it was just because the tremolo was truly floating and returned to pitch.”

    To keep the bridge from creating friction on the strings, he made separate roller saddles for each string – a laborious job using just a hand file and drill! The rollers sat freely in bridge blocks; if he broke a string while playing, the roller wanted to fly free, so he always keeps spares in his pocket.

    “The roller bridge was unique in those days, and everybody was saying I should have patented it, but patents are a pain in the neck. Besides, why not share everything with the world?”

    May hand-made three pickups, but was never satisfied with them, so he eventually trekked to the Burns music shop on London’s Tottenham Court Road, to buy the three Burns Tri-Sonic single-coils that are still in it today. Combined with a Dallas Rangemaster treble booster and Vox AC30, the Red Special finally had its voice, he says.

    Brian Setzer
    With the Perspex pickguard removed, May has instant access to the pickups and electronics. The extra space in the cavity originally housed a Vox Fuzz effect. Red Special electronics cavity: Richard Gray.
    May wired the pickups in series with a shorting switch for each as well as a phase-reversal switch for each – six sliders in all.

    “I devised my own system for switching between combinations of the three pickups so that all the possible combinations of three pickups, in and out of phase, could be used in performance,” he says. “To my knowledge, nobody had attempted a system like this.”

    Covering the electronics is a pickguard made of black Perspex, an early transparent plastic. He wanted the guitar to be easy to service, so all of the electronics are screwed into the body and the pickguard lifts free.

    Controls were simple, just Volume and Tone potentiometers. Each has been replaced several times as they wore out.

    Initially, May used a Vox Fuzz effect unit inside the guitar, with its small, red on/off slider switch peeking through the pickguard.

    “I had an instantly deployable fuzz tone,” he explains. “However, pretty early on, I realized what I wanted was the kind of smooth distortion and compression you get from a valve amplifier, and the fuzz didn’t do that.” Taking it out left a hole in the pickguard, which was later filled with a “Brian May star.”

    Building the guitar in their spare time took father and son two years, using hand tools – planes, chisels, and saws – and a lot of sandpaper, fashioning the thing out of bits and pieces,” he says. “A lot of swearing went on, but eventually we got there. Quite often, we’d slip up and something would go wrong, and we’d think the whole thing was ruined. But we’d find some way around it, and repair it.

    “It was character-forming. Building this thing became our lives for two years, and we had to learn to forgive ourselves as well as try to achieve perfection. Lots of important life lessons there!

    “Dad was really great. He was helpful with anything I wanted to do; any passion I had, he’d back me up and get into it. I know he enjoyed building the guitar very much, and I don’t think we ever fell out over it.”

    May and his dad certainly bonded while building the guitar. But when it was finished, things went awry.

    “Dad and I got on very well during this period and it’s odd because the trouble happened later,” he says. During this time, May was studying at school and then university, working toward his PhD. “I was pursuing the kind of life that Dad imagined I was destined for – something academic – and the guitar was just a great hobby.”

    May first played the guitar in 1966, at the Molesey Boat Club in Putney, with his early band, called 1984. Their repertoire included songs like the Spotnicks’ “Happy Hendrik’s Polka,” Motown tunes such as “My Girl” and “Knock On Wood,” and covers of Cream and Hendrix.

    May soon dropped his studies and devoted himself to music. “Dad just could not compute it. He said, ‘You’ve got this far, you have all this education.’ And, of course, he’d sacrificed a lot of his life and worked so hard to get me through university. He just couldn’t believe I was chucking it all to be a pop star… or failure!”

    The Red Special became the wedge between them. Their relationship broke down and they hardly spoke.

    That all changed on February 5, 1977, when Queen played Madison Square Garden for the first time. To see the show, May flew his parents on the Concorde and put them up in the Ritz. He remembers the event fondly.

    “My parents sat in the audience, and the response we got from that audience was just mind-blowing. Dad wasn’t a physical, ‘huggy’ kind of person, but he came backstage afterward, shook my hand, and said, ‘Okay… I get it. I see what you’re doing, and why it is so important to you.’

    “That was a big moment for me, as it swept away all the problems that we’d had and, from that point on, he was unreservedly into the music. I think secretly he always had been, but now, being a musician, he was able to give himself over to it and enjoy it. That was a godsend for me. You can be a rebel, and we all do it – kick against our upbringing. But, in the end, no matter how far you’ve wandered off the rail, you always want your parents’ approval.”


    Adapted from Brian May’s Red Special, by Brian May with Simon Bradley, ©2014 Duck Productions Limited and Carlton Books Limited. Reprinted by permission of Hal Leonard.


    This article originally appeared in VG‘s February 2015 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Blackberry Smoke

    Blackberry Smoke

    Blackberry Smoke
    Richard Turner. Photo by Southern Reel.

    Comparisons between Blackberry Smoke and earlier Southern-rock bands may be inevitable, but the Atlanta-based quintet takes such observations in stride.

    “That’s way better than being compared to the Bay City Rollers,” wisecracked vocalist/guitarist Charlie Starr, who recently went on the record with VG along with bassist Richard Turner. “The musical freedom those bands enjoyed is very inspiring. They definitely took it and ran with it. We are most definitely influenced by what they did, but also by what inspired them.”

    “Calling us a rock band or a country band or a funk band or what have you, is sort of selling us short, because we are all of those things and more,” added Turner. “The beauty of being the bassist in a band from the beginning is (that) I can play a funk lick in a bluegrass song while wearing a Slayer shirt, and no one looks sideways at me. It sounds natural, because it is.”

    The band has honed its reputation for slightly over a decade by opening for many classic Southern rock bands, and BBS even played at George Jones’s 80th birthday party. Their most recent effort is The Whippoorwill, released last August. It followed a live DVD released earlier in the year.

    Blackberry Smoke
    Charlie Starr. Photo by Southern Reel.

    “In one of our ‘grand scheme’ sessions, we decided early on to plateau as soon as possible – you know, go ahead and put that behind us,” Turner recounted.

    “We actually filmed the show at the Georgia Theater for the DVD the day after we finished tracking The Whippoorwill,” Starr noted. “It was an exhausting undertaking, to say the least.”

    Among the producers of The Whippoorwill is Zac Brown, who met the band on a Lynyrd Skynyrd cruise. Their ongoing friendship and musical respect resulted in the band being signed to Brown’s Southern Ground Artists label.

    The 13 tracks showcase the band’s earnest and full-tilt commitment to finely-crafted music, and Starr and Turner credit its sound to having been able to concentrate on recording sessions, even if they were limited in number.

    “Clay Cook, of the Zac Brown Band, says it sounds more like us than anything we’ve previously done,” Starr enthused. “Our other albums were recorded in spurts, so to speak, which can really be frustrating. We’d never been able to block out more than a couple of days at a time to record. This time we had four and a half days, which seemed like an eternity. These sessions flowed like they should, I guess. Everyone was very focused, and I think we nailed it.”

    “We had previously been forced to record a song or two here, play for a few months, maybe mix a song or two, and maybe record another song or two here and there,” Turner remembered. “Never the same studio twice. This record was almost the ‘sweet spot’ for me personally.”

    Starr employed a plethora of guitars on the album.

    “I used a 1956 Les Paul Junior, a ’59 Les Paul Special, a custom-built Tele-style with a P-90 in the bridge and a Danelectro lipstick-tube pickup in the neck, a Dan Armstrong, a Fender Tele with a B-bender, a National Estralita resonator, a Gibson Hummingbird, and a Martin 0000-HD28,” the guitarist said. “In concert, I use pretty much the same instruments but I also have a bastardized SG Junior created from a single-pickup SG I and painted gold in my garage.”

    Blackberry SmokeOn the other hand, Turner used a vintage Fender Jazz bass borrowed from producer Matt Mangano, but recently acquired another bass he plays live.

    “I had Joe Hamilton build a P/J-style bass, and I cannot put it down,” he said. “I basically play one bass at a show, unless a failure occurs, and lately, I only play the Joe Hamilton.”

    The Whippoorwill has its share of sonically intriguing passages. The intro to “One Horse Town” has some (admittedly contradictory) low-volume feedback, during which Starr’s Hummingbird kicks in with a tough acoustic riff.

    “Tonal high jinx make the world go around,” Turner explained. “Zeppelin used to drop the bomb; we can, too. And anything that makes folks reach for the Volume knob twice – once to turn it up and real quick to turn it down when the volume hits – is fun.”

    Starr played a pedal steel on more than one track, and banjo on “Leave A Scar”; it and a Skynyrd-like whistle underline comparisons.

    “The steel is an old Fender three-pedal/two-lever thing that belongs to Richard,” Starr said. “Much to the chagrin of pedal-steel players everywhere, I’m just a guitar player who’s infatuated with their instrument. I only use E9 tuning. The banjo was a Deering; the same fingerpicks and thumbpicks were used on both.”

    BBS also references Led Zeppelin on songs like “Crimson Moon” with its hard-hitting note-for-note guitar and bass riffs. “Several solos on the record were live as we tracked,” said Starr. “That one, however, was overdubbed. I played it through a real-deal Marshall offset JTM-45 that belongs to the studio. I tried to take that amp home with me, but couldn’t fit it under my coat!”

    Blackberry Smoke is justifiably proud of The Whippoorwill, and they relish the opportunity to get it right.

    “It’s pretty powerful,” Turner summarized. “If we’d had a month and a half to play with textures and instrumentation, we would have scored an Exile On Main Street. We’ve proven we can string a year’s worth of single recordings into a full-length CD.”


    This article originally appeared in VG‘s February 2013 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Dogu Custom Electric Guitars’ MOS-01

    Dogu Custom Electric Guitars’ MOS-01

    Dogu Custom Electric Guitars’ MOS-01Dogu Custom Electric Guitars’ MOS-01
    Price: $2,200 (list)
    Contact: www.actionfigurestudios.com

    Improving upon classic designs is a consistent theme in the guitar-manufacturing community. While many companies take a pragmatic approach to updating older designs for better performance, Mehmet Dogu (pronounced “Dough”) took a wistful one. He was determined to replace the guitar that got away.

    The guitar in question was a 1968 Fender Stratocaster he acquired in the mid-1970s as a teenager. During the formative stages of his music education, Dogu developed a special attachment to the guitar, but at the end of his college years felt compelled to sell it to a good friend who showed more promise on the instrument. The lucky buyer went on to become a successful session guitarist and touring professional.

    Although Dogu remained steadfast in his decision, he always dreamed of replacing it. He searched for a guitar with a similar feel and sound, but eventually realized that the only way he’d find another instrument with that “special something” was to build it himself. Years later, the Dogu MOS-01 was born – the latest in Dogu Custom Electric Guitars’ impressive lineup catering to guitarists with a taste for traditional looks and modern playability. (MOS stands for “My Old Strat.”)

    Made in Santa Barbara, California, the MOS-01 may be Dogu’s attempt to re-create the magic of his long lost ’68, but it does come with a few updates. Weighing in at a solid 8.6 pounds, the MOS-01 is handsome, with its two-piece swamp ash body, sunburst finish under clear satin, parchment pickguard, and three aged control knobs and switch tip. It sports a unique V-shaped figured maple neck with a Pau Ferro fretboard and a compound radius from 10″ to 16″. The neck also has 22 6105 frets, a fatback shape, and a 111/16″ Corian nut. Hardware includes vintage-style Gotoh tuners and string tree, as well as a JP Woodtone bridge with titanium saddles for slightly narrower string spacing than the MOS-01’s vintage counterpart.

    For electronics, the guitar features three Seymour Duncan Antiquity II Surfer single-coil pickups. In keeping with the guitar’s vintage inspiration, the pickups are very clean and low-output, offering 5.15k in the neck, 5.27k in the middle, and 5.47k in the bridge. The rear Tone knob, however, acts as a blender to add degrees of the neck pickup into either the bridge or the two and four positions, or to add the bridge pickup in degrees to the neck pickup.

    Plugging into a Peavey JSX 120-watt head and a ’65 Fender Pro Reverb, ultra-clean shimmer and organic sparkle poured from the neck pickup. It lacked the warm lows one might normally find in the neck pickup of a vintage Strat, but it had enough bottom end to keep the guitar from sounding shrill. The exaggerated thickness and V-shaped curvature of the neck offered plenty of leverage to dig deep and push against the strings for expressive bends. Chords rang with unbridled integrity, clarity, and character. The guitar sounded best plugged into a loud and clean combo amp. It displayed luxurious nuance, complex spank, and earthy muscle.

    The MOS-01’s bridge pickup offered similar qualities but with a sharp kick. Using the two and four positions, it became apparent the guitar has a Nashville flavor. The pickups were pristine, allowing the wood to be heard, and the blender knob did an excellent job of incrementally warming up the bridge pickup; with the knob maxed, the guitar produces 50 percent neck and 50 percent bridge. Engaging the two and four positions with the blender knob produced convincing Tele and surf sounds.

    The super-clean nature of the MOS-01’s pickups isn’t a perfect match for overdrive much less distortion, and 60-cycle hum is present except for in the two and four positions. With electronics and sound consistent with vintage Strats, the MOS-01 might not be the best choice for heavy rock players with complex pedalboards and amp rigs, but the workmanship is tops and it feels spectacular, plays effortlessly, and looks awesome. The MOS-01 is a very special guitar with a classic design and cool appointments.


    This article originally appeared in VG January 2015 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • L-5 to Super 400

    L-5 to Super 400

    L-5 to Super 400
    1935 Gibson L-5 Special / Super 400 prototype, with serial number 91700. Photos: William Ritter. Instrument courtesy of George Gruhn.

    The archtop guitar is a uniquely American instrument which can be traced directly to the creative genius of one person – Orville Gibson.

    In the mid 1890s, the man who later formed the company started building guitars and mandolins with carved tops and backs, and though his creations were quite different from a modern jazz guitar, there’s no question his instruments were the inspiration for the archtops that followed.

    Upon first inspection, this 1935 Gibson appears to be an L-5 neck on a Super 400 body. Labeled an L-5 Special, it most likely is the earliest 18″-wide archtop f-hole model made by any builder. It is also very likely a prototype of the Super 400, as it precedes the introduction of that model by several months.

    Though it appears to be the earliest f-hole guitar with this body size and shape, Gibson would have had forms for it dating back to oval-soundhole instruments built by Orville. Gibson’s first f-hole archtop guitar was the 16″ L-5, and one known example (made in 1923) was signed by Lloyd Loar, an acoustic engineer at Gibson (more Loar-signed models were made through December of ’24).

    The L-5 remained the only archtop f-hole model in Gibson’s line until the introduction of the L-10 in 1929 (though it was not shown their catalog until ’31) and the L-12 in 1930, both with 16″ bodies.

    Gibson did not produce any archtop f-hole guitars larger than 16″ until 1935 (same year as this prototype L-5 Special), when it introduced the 17″ “Advanced” L-5, L-7, L-10, and L-12 models, then followed with the introduction of the 18″ Super 400 (the original version used the body form designed by Orville with a 121/2″ upper bout, and, early in the history of the company, a few were made with 18″ lower bout and 243/4″ scale). In early 1937, the Super 400’s body was given an enlarged upper bout (135/8″) and the scale was lengthened to 251/2″. The Advanced models not only had a larger body, but fancier Art Deco ornamentation with flashy inlays and bold bindings. Prior to 1930, the L-5 had narrow script “The Gibson” and “flowerpot” peghead inlays with simple dot fingerboard inlays. By 1930, the L-5 had block inlays starting at the third fret, but overall the ornamentation of the 16″ guitars was understated compared to the Advanced model 17″ guitars of ’35 onward.

    In 1931, Epiphone entered the market aggressively by introducing a full line of archtop f-hole acoustics, ranging from small-body student models on up to the 163/8″ Deluxe. Gibson was caught by surprise, but responded in ’32 with the competing L-50, L-75, and L-7 models; Epiphone made many of its earliest f-hole archtops with slightly wider bodies than their Gibson counterparts, and continued the trend even after Gibson introduced the Advanced models. In an effort to surpass Gibson’s 18″ Super 400, the Epiphone Emperor had an 181/2″ body when it was introduced in ’35, while the Epiphone Triumph, Broadway, and Deluxe were enlarged to 173/8″ to trump Gibson’s 17″ Advanced models. Not to be outdone, circa ’36, D’Angelico started producing the 18″ New Yorker and 17″ Excel models, followed shortly by Stromberg’s 19″ Master 400 and Master 300.

    The L-5 Special featured here has a Super 400-style/18″ body, spruce top with f holes, figured maple back and sides with sunburst finish, multiple body bindings, maple L-5-style neck with walnut backstripe, ebony fingerboard with pearl block inlays, and pearl peghead inlays. Gibson records indicate it was shipped to Coy Davison on September 6, 1935. According to research by Joe Spann (Spann’s Guide to Gibson 1902-1941), Davison was employed at Gibson as a string tester from 1937 to ’39. According to his family, he played music professionally in the ’30s and onward, and presumably was a player of some merit.

    At Gibson, this guitar was listed as “Spl L-5” both times it was returned for repair – in August of ’36 and again in December of ’42. Though it’s clear the guitar has been modified, Gibson records don’t provide much insight about the work that was completed. However, photos provided by the Davison family not only show the original appearance of this guitar, but help create a time line for the modification in the late ’30s and early ’40s. In the earliest photos (mid/late ’30s,) the guitar has a Super-400-style tailpiece (without the model name engraving) and pickguard, engraved/pen-back Grover tuners, a bell-shaped truss-rod cover, and sunburst top finish with bound f-holes. In later photos, it has an L-5-style pickguard, Grover Imperial tuners, and a natural-finish top with unbound f-holes (natural finish was not standard until ’38, though it was available as a custom option). With the exception of the truss cover, which had clearly been changed in the 1938 photo, all modifications appear to have taken place at the Gibson factory from 1940 to ’42.

    Though this instrument has been modified significantly from its original specs, the changes were made at Gibson not long after the instrument was produced. Prototypes were viewed as experimental, and as a result were frequently modified in the course of testing. It’s interesting to see that remarkably detailed records have been preserved for this and numerous other Gibsons. Quite a few salesman samples – and a surprising number of instruments – were shipped and returned several times, some were even reconditioned prior to being re-sold. This instrument represents the final stage of a model’s evolution, and as such is an important piece of Gibson history.

    Special thanks to Andre Duchossoir and Lynn Wheelwright.


    This article originally appeared in VG January 2015 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • The Mesa/Boogie Mark IIC+

    The Mesa/Boogie Mark IIC+

    Mesa/Boogie Mark IIC+
    Preamp tubes: four 7025 (12AX7 types)
    Preamp tubes: five 12AX7.
    Output tubes: two 6L6, two EL34.
    Rectifier: solid state
    Controls: Volume 1, Treble, Bass, Middle, Master 1, Lead Drive, Lead Master, five-band graphic EQ; Presence and Reverb on back panel.
    Speaker: EVM 12L
    Output: approximately 80 watts RMS SimulClass, switchable down to 15 watts Class A
    Photos: Matt Hertel. Amp courtesy of Todd Duane.

    Early Mesa/Boogie Mark Series amps were something of a sensation, but even with the line now having stretched all the way to the massively featured Mark V, many fans of these powerful little beasts feel the evolution peaked at the end of the Mark II range, with the Mark IIC+.

    Though at the time they were simply the next step along the line – a tweak to the Mark IIC, which was just a relatively minor twist away from the Mark IIB before it, and so forth – players soon noticed (often in hindsight) that these “+” amps sounded fantastic. Not only did they have a revised lead channel that issues delectably creamy, bright, high-gain lead tones, but their cleans were often hailed as sweet and superior, too. So revered is the Mark IIC+, in fact, that good ones often command up to twice or more the price of the Mark IIC and Mark III amps that immediately preceded and superseded them.

    So, given that this wasn’t an entirely new amp by any means, what was the big deal about that Mark IIC+ circuit? Depending on how you look at it, the answer can be “a lot” or “just a little.” Technically speaking, the Mark IIC and IIC+ used a slight modification of the same circuit board found in the Mark IIB. Mesa Engineering never officially distinguished the “+” in the literature at the time, either; it was simply the latest iteration of the “C” line, which itself was the last of the Mark IIs. Externally, the Mark IIC+ is recognized by the “+” sign added by hand in black marker above the power-cord entry point on the back of the chassis, and by a slight change in the front control panel, which says “Pull Deep” above the Master 1 control, rather than “Gain Boost” (some amps originally built as IICs might have had the “+” added when returned to the factory later for upgrade, but should generally have “Pull Gain” above Master 1).

    Much of what was different about the Mark IIC+, therefore, was begun with the Mark IIC, itself an upgrade that cured the Mark IIB’s noisy reverb circuit (on the amps that had reverb at all, of course) and “popping” lead/rhythm channel switching. What inspired the good folks at Mesa Engineering to tweak things a little further, though, and to add that hand-inked “+” to the chassis, seems to have been a staff member’s own quest for the ultimate shred tone.

    Mesa/Boogie Mark IIC+
    (LEFT) The “+” in black marker indicates this is the hallowed Mark IIC+, while the initials “MB” beneath show that Mike Bendinelli performed final testing. (RIGHT) 1984 Mesa/Boogie Mark IIC+.

    While the original Boogie is the brainchild of Randall C. Smith (who is still head honcho at Mesa to this day), staffers Doug West and Mike Bendinelli appear to have been the evil geniuses behind the “+” revisions. According to information compiled by Edward P. Morgan through direct chats with West and Bendinelli (much of which has been published in his informative entries on the Boogie Board forum, where he posts as “Boogiebabies”), the pair dug their hands into the Mark IIC lead circuit in late winter of 1983, while Smith was attending the Musicmesse trade show in Germany. Bendinelli, an engineer, pushed the gain further and further, also voicing it for West’s request to make it brighter, adding another gain stage to the already toothsome cascading-gain lead circuit for which Boogies have long been famous. Upon his return, Smith approved the revisions and the Mark IIC+ went into production in February of ’84. The run, however, was short, and the “+” went out of production surprisingly quickly, as the new Mark III – with added a crunch channel – was brought in circa March of ’85. Many Boogie players will tell you that certain iterations of the Mark III (again, there are several, designated by the color of marker stripe, or lack thereof, above the power cord entry point) achieve a lead tone that’s almost indistinguishable from that of the Mark IIC+. Aficionados of the latter, though, usually dispute this. Wherever your tonal preferences lie, the Mark III used a different and more affordably produced printed circuit board, as well as a less-formidable power transformer, so there were significant changes in production between Mark IIC+ and Mark III, however you slice it.

    Mesa/Boogie Mark IIC+Like the Mark amps before and after them, Mark IIC+ Boogies were available with a range of options. To the base 60-watt head or combo you could add reverb, graphic EQ, 100-watt output stage with SimulClass (a simultaneous use of Class A and Class A/B tube pairings, or one or the other independently), an export power transformer, an upgraded Electro-Voice or Altec speaker, and an exotic hardwood cabinet with wicker grille. Our featured amp, owned by Todd Duane, is a rare example of a rare breed, with all the extras other than the export transformer (pointless in and of itself, unless you plan to tour outside North America). It’s a major looker, too, in outstandingly clean and original condition, with a luscious Bubinga cabinet. Of its tone and performance, Duane tells us this “is one amp that can really do all styles exceedingly well. I’ve used mine for country, worship, and Top 40 classic rock gigs. You can do it all; metal (Metallica ‘Master Of Puppets’), progressive rock (Dream Theater), whatever you want to dial in. The clean channel is a great warm-blackface-type clean, while the gain channel has an awesomely warm, squishy and chewy rhythm/lead tone.”

    Further to Mark IIC+ lore, the marker scrawl below the power cord intake on the back of the chassis is most often “MB” for Mike Bendinelli, not because he designed the revisions (although he did), or even built all the amps (which he didn’t), but simply because he performed most of the final checks before each Boogie went out the door. Some amps might even display “RCS” for Randall Smith himself, who occasionally stepped in on final check duties. And while any “+” or scribbled initials in marker can obviously be forged by unscrupulous Mark II owners looking to add value to their non-“+” amps, there’s another well-publicized test to reveal the hallowed lead circuit, short of sending it to Mesa Engineering to open up and verify. This so-called “loop test” simply requires that you plug a guitar into the “Return” jack of the effects loop, switch the amp to Lead, play a sustained note, and change the Lead Drive and Volume 1 controls while the note decays. If these knob twiddlings can’t be heard in the sustained note – no change of volume or tone – the amp has the “+” lead circuit. Ka-ching!


    This article originally appeared in VG September 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Budda’s Baby Budda Amp Head

    Budda’s Baby Budda Amp Head

    Budda’s Baby Budda Amp Head
    Price: $1,199.99 (retail)
    Info: www.budda.com

    Budda Amplification staked its claim in 1995 with the Twinmaster boutique amplifier. Its hand-wired construction and user-friendly tones were hits in the guitar community and led to a broader line of amplifiers that catered to modern guitarists who craved old-school touch responsive. The Baby Budda is an 18-watt lunchbox-style head that pays homage to that first Budda, packing a wealth of tones in a convenient 17-pound package.

    With controls for Bass, Treble, and Volume, as well as Normal and Hi Gain inputs, the Baby Budda features high-grade audio components and a hybrid layout with both point-to-point hand-wiring and a brass-eyelet board. The Class AB power section runs off of two EL84s and a single 5U4 rectifier, while the cascading preamp section utilizes two 12AX7s and a custom-wound transformer. Housed in a metal chassis with a carrying handle, the Baby Budda includes an effects loop and a 4-/8-ohm output switch for connecting loudspeaker enclosures. An onboard slave output offers full preamp and power amp characteristics. It’s connected in parallel to the speaker outputs and sends a padded, non-powered signal for direct output for live or studio uses.

    With an array of Les Paul and boutique Strat-style guitars on hand, it was time to get down to business. Plugging into the Normal input, it became evident that the Baby Budda is for the guitarist who likes to crank an amp, walk away, and use the guitar’s volume to control their sonic universe. Starting with the Budda’s Volume knob at around 9 o’clock and slowly progressing clockwise, warm and earthy semi-clean tones gave way to cantankerous Bassman-like characteristics. Good guitar amplifiers love to be pushed, and the Baby Budda is no exception. To truly exploit its gifts, the overdrive pedals should be given some time off, the amp’s volume turned up, and the guitar’s volume used for color.

    That said, the Baby Budda is a loud 18 watts that adores effects pedals. Whether placed in front of the amp or through the effects loop, seamless compatibility is easy with any variety of dirt- and time-based effects. The Baby Budda is not the best choice for immaculate funk lines or lush jazz chording, but it can be tamed to offer its own personality in those genres. Where it truly shines, though, is in dirty rock and testosterone-fueled blues.

    At stage volume, the Baby Budda provides a gritty clean signal from the Normal channel – muscular, no-nonsense, single-note articulation, thickness, and full-bodied sustain. For its part, the Hi Gain channel provides a formidable organic old-school lead tone that is very spanky with single coils and generally much livelier than the Normal input, inviting a world of stinging, gainy Gary-Moore-style blues. But that’s the ceiling (high as it may be) – the risk is annoying volume in the pursuit of more saturation. Metal dudes should seek another amp or simply bust out their favorite distortion pedal. With the lead volume level set, it’s up to the player to dial in their EQ, tame the beast, and create subtleties using their guitar’s volume. The dirt and volume can be brought down to a whisper, the tones still vibrant, punchy, and never muddy.

    Though rock cleanliness can be made cleaner with the guitar’s Volume knob, it’s a Jimmy Page kind of clean, not a true clean. Then again, pristine, bell-like tones are not what this amp is about. At low volumes, the Baby Budda has a cloudy, boxy quality (using a Budda 1×12 closed-back cab) and lacks rich top-end sparkle, though that’s mostly rectified via increased Volume and Treble on the guitar.

    With the Baby Budda, you’ll need to be a volume twiddler, but with the creative use of this amp’s two inputs, as well as the guitar’s output, pickups, and Volume control, the Baby Budda can provide a wide range of gain and tonal options. And those tones are the big, organic variety, in a small package, to boot – all accompanied by a low learning curve.


    This article originally appeared in VG February 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Remembering B.B. King

    Remembering B.B. King

    B.B. King Manchester Bob Hewitt Vintage Guitar magazine
    Photo by Bob Hewitt.

    Ed. Note: Everyone associated with Vintage Guitar magazine is saddened to learn of the passing of B.B. King. In 1995, Mr. King sat for an interview with VG‘s Willie G. Moseley, and we offer it here as part of our remembrance of the King of the Blues.

    Riley B. King was born on a cotton plantation in Indianola, Mississippi, on September 16, 1925. Following a childhood spent in poverty, he made his way to Memphis in 1946, where he forged a career in the music business, under the stage name of B.B. King (B.B. is short for “Blues Boy”), and he’s been playing, touring, and recording almost non-stop ever since; he’ll be 70 this year.

    VG arranged an interview with King prior to a recent concert (he still performs about 250 times a year!), to inquire about facets of Mr. King’s fabled career. We were escorted into a dressing area, where a relaxed and eloquent Mr. King patiently answered our questions in a courteous and efficient manner. Some of his responses were somewhat surprising:

    The story of your dash back into a burning nightclub in Twist, Arkansas, to rescue your guitar is well-known, but do you remember the make and model of that guitar?
    I remember the make but not the model; it was a little black Gibson. You can see it in some old pictures that we’ve had made up; my name was put on it with a paint brush. It was an acoustic, believe it or not, with a DeArmond pickup on it to make it into an electric.

    Let me ask about some of the other instruments that I’ve seen you playing in some older photographs. There’s that famous picture of you performing onstage in shorts; you’re playing a big three-pickup Gibson ES-5.
    (laughs) That picture still haunts me! One of the reasons I liked that one was because my idol T-Bone Walker had one; he was so flashy with his. I liked it, but it just never seemed to “fit” me right. It was big; I had one that I gave to my father, and when he died I got it back. I still play it sometimes. When the guitar that became the “Lucille” model came out, that was the one for me; that did it.

    Do you remember which pickups you used the most on the ES-5?
    No; I don’t know much about the electronic parts of a guitar. If something went wrong with my guitar tomorrow, and I couldn’t find any-body to fix it, I’d be in big trouble! I like guitars where the neck feels right in my hands; that’s what’s important to me. Since ’49 I’ve played all kind of guitars, Epiphone, Fender, you name it.

    There’s another historical photo of you playing a single-pickup Fender Esquire.
    That was one of the first ones that came out.

    When the Gibson came out with their thinline semi-hollow series, which model did you start out with?
    The 335; it was like somebody knew what kind of guitar I’d been wanting. The 355 “Lucille”, with no f-holes, is what I play now.

    Do you use the Vari-Tone on it all that much?
    I never use it at all. I think of this guitar as sort of a big brother to the Les Paul; to me, the Les Paul guitar is one of the best guitars that’s ever been built, and the neck of the 355 is similar to the neck of the Les Paul. I like the larger, “butt” part of the 355 body, because it fits under my arm real well (pats right side of rib cage).

    Did you make your first recording in l949?
    It was the latter part of ’48; I made my first record for Bullet. The first four sides were “Take A Swing With Me”, “Miss Martha King”, “How Do You Feel When Your Baby Packs Up To Go”, and “I Got The Blues”.

    What about the amplifiers you’ve used over the years? That photo of you in shorts with the ES-5 showed you playing through a Fender tweed amplifier.
    Yes; the old Fender amplifiers were the best that were ever made, in my opinion. They had a good sound and they were durable; guys would throw them in the truck and they’d hold up. They had tubes, and they’d get real hot, but they just had a sound that is hard to put into words. The Fender Twin was great, but I have an old Lab Series amp that isn’t being made anymore. I fell in love with it, because its sound is right between the old Fender amps that we used to have and the Fender Twin. It’s what I’m using tonight.

    You mentioned T-Bone Walker being an idol of yours; he was from Texas instead of Mississippi, and he played unique chords and did arrangements, instead of “three-chord-and-three-string” blues songs.
    Well, he was just one of my idols. Lonnie Johnson was another; so was Django Rheinhardt; so was Charlie Christian. I also liked Chet Atkins; there was Blind Lemon Jefferson out of Texas.

    BB King vintage Guitar magazine

    Some people differentiate between what they call “Texas blues” and “Delta blues”.
    (chuckles) Well, I don’t agree with that; I think it’s the person. There’s a lot of us from Mississippi, and we all don’t play alike. John Lee Hooker and I don’t play alike; Muddy Waters and I didn’t play alike. I knew about Robert Johnson, but I wasn’t crazy about Robert Johnson like a lot of people are; I knew he was great, but my “Johnson” was Lonnie; he’s the one I was crazy about.

    I’ve always been wanting to play better; I was crazy about a guy named Johnny Moore, who had a group called the Three Blazers, which included Charles Brown. Johnny Moore was the brother of Oscar Moore, who was the guitar player for the Nat Cole Trio.

    Oscar Moore was usually seen playing a big Gibson L-5, I think.
    And Johnny Moore had one just like it! He taught his brother how to play.
    There are many other guitar players I could talk about that never made a name for themselves, and I listened to a lot of them as well.

    How did you get yourself into other performance venues other than what was known as the “chitlin circuit”?
    I augmented my group; we started to be like a Big Band, kind of like Count Basie. I was still able to play places where we’d played before, but we got into some new places. For example, there was a club in Chicago called Mr. Kelly’s; they’d never had blues in there; it was always jazzed-up. When I augmented my group, they brought me in. That was the first time that club went from strictly Jazz to a different sound. Elvis came on the scene around ’54, and after that the British bands “re-imported the blues”, as I call it. Then I started playing places like the Fillmores.

    Back then, you made a comment that Peter Green was a player who could make you “sweat”, so that’s at least one white British player who was playing what you considered to be “authentic” blues.
    The thing is, I didn’t think about what color he was, and I don’t think about such now. So when I said that, I didn’t mean he should be thought of as a white player, but just as, excuse the word, a damn good player. He could really get me excited. He was a great player and a good friend. He hasn’t been playing any lately; I saw him about two or three years ago, and he was working as something like a pallbearer in a graveyard.

    How many albums have you recorded?
    Seventy-four.

    A lot of guitar players are partial to live albums, and at your press conference earlier this evening, you alluded to the possibility of another one coming up. I’d like to ask about a couple of them; for example, your bio refers to the Live at the Apollo album as a “Big Band” album.
    Yes; that was done with an eighteen-piece all-star orchestra; every guy on that stage was a star in his own right.

    The guitar tone on the San Quentin live album seems to have a bit more of an “edge” to it. Any reason why?
    (chuckles) No; it was just the way I was feeling, the type of amp I had, and the facilities. Like I said earlier, the technical stuff is something I don’t think about; it’s just whatever’s sounding good to me now. (laughs)
    But there are a couple of sounds on albums that I made that stand out in my mind. I don’t really talk about it, but when I did “The Thrill Is Gone,” I thought I had a good sound. Then I did another tune called “Blues At Midnight,” the sound of that amp was exactly like I like. There’s been another song or two, but other than that it’s just a case of me feeling good and the amp sounding good. Those songs just stand out to me as having a sound I wish I could get more often.

    You were interviewed by Billy Gibbons for Guitar Player magazine, and when I interviewed him for this publication, he cited Ry Cooder’s observations about the “musicness” of Memphis. Comment?

    When I first got to Memphis in ’46, I heard sounds that I thought were heavenly; sounds I’d never heard before. The musicians weren’t putting on; they were just playing casually, like they were playing cards, and it sounded better than anything I’d ever heard. From time to time, you can still hear that. There are a lot of musicians that are in Memphis that have that sound that you wish you could have every day, but they don’t want to travel; they just hang around Memphis.

    BB King vintage Guitar magazine

    You’ve participated in some notable charity events, such as Live Aid and the first Farm Aid. There were a lot of different types of acts, but I thought the line in “How Blue Can You Get,” “I gave you seven children and now you wanna give ‘em back” was still the showstopper that it always seems to be.
    (laughs) It is one of my favorites. A lot of people don’t know that tune was written by a famous music critic, Leonard Feather, for Louis Jordan, who used to do funny things like that. But I heard it and liked it so well I decided I’d record it; I think many of the best recordings that I’ve done through the years have been tunes that were written by somebody else, for somebody else, and I happened to hear it, but it seemed like the songwriter was asking me: “B., is this the way you want it?” (chuckles)

    Another musician I once interviewed offered the opinion that “the blues always seems to come around and shake things up a bit whenever it’s needed.” (Mr. King laughs) It does seems like the interest in blues music has been somewhat “cyclical”, for lack of a better term.
    I don’t quite agree with all of his comment, but part of it I do agree with; it does seem to shake up things from time to time. I think what happened is there have been times like when the British bands came over in the early Sixties, and they made the U.S. as a whole aware of blues, when the blues had been there all the time.

    I’ve interviewed American players who acknowledged that the British bands made them aware of the blues; one of them told me that he was made aware of the original blues musicians, right here in his own back yard, so to speak.
    Right; that’s exactly what we’re talking about. So when a lot of them stopped playing it, then a lot of Americans thought that the blues had gone away, but the rest of us that had been here all along were still playing it, and we never stopped. Sometimes they use the word “re-surgence” when they talk about the blues, and I have a bit of a problem with that, because today the blues is more popular than it’s ever been since I’ve been trying to play it. And a lot of it has to do with the young people who are playing it and supporting it.

    You’re coming up on your Seventieth birthday; you’re not ever going to retire, are you?
    I don’t see any reason to, as long as people still want to hear me. What else would I do? I was a disc jockey once; that’s the only other job I’d like. I was born on a plantation; worked on a plantation. It was hard work, but it prepared me for what I do today, and I don’t regret any of it.

    There are so many young players that are great; they’ll keep the interest in the blues going. Stevie Ray Vaughan was one of the best blues players ever. Then there’s another young man named Robert Cray, and a young man out of Canada named Jeff Healy. (appreciative whistle) He’s mean! These players are superstars with the youth; in my case, I’m not a superstar, I’m just a guy that’s been out there for a long time; I’ve been doing this for forty-five years, so I might as well keep on.

    With all due respect, most blues lovers would debate you con-cerning your statement that you’re not a superstar.
    Well, thank you. (smiles)

    Following our interview, King and his band put on a show that ran almost twice its scheduled length. He plans on staying active; his future plans include not only the aforementioned live album, but a CD-ROM as well, and a possible autobiography. He’s a busy man, but is that any surprise? That he is able to look back at decades of accomplish-ments yet still look ahead to future projects is admirable, particularly since many blues lovers consider King the pre-eminent purveyor of the musical genre that he himself loves so much.


    Vintage Guitar would like to thank Mr. Sherman Darby and New Era Promotions for their courtesy and help in arranging the interview with B.B. King.

    (Further comments about the B.B. King interview and concert can be found in this month’s “Executive Rock” column.)

    This article originally appeared in VG September 1995 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


    To view our B.B. King playlist, Click Here.

  • Louis Electric Gattone

    Louis Electric Gattone

    Louis Electric GattoneLouis Electric Gattone
    Price: $2,595 (list)
    Contact: www.louiselectricamps.com

    Got the blues? Have we got the amp for you.

    Louis Rosano has been building boutique amplifiers from his workshop in New Jersey for 20 years, his first inspired by a ’58 Fender narrow-panel tweed Twin. His version was called the Twinmaster, and one of them wound up in the back line of Danny Gatton, who retired his own Twin in its favor.

    Little wonder, then, that Rosano’s new Gattone amp is a twin-speaker tribute to Gatton.

    Whereas the ’58 high-powered Twin peaked at 80 watts and boasted two 12″ speakers, the Gattone is a 35-watter with a 2×10 setup. And with its oh-so-cool beveled front, it’s more reminiscent of the classic 18-watt 1947 Fender Dual Professional.

    That’s a fine thing. The Gattone has more than enough power, volume, and all-round oomph for playing at home, in the studio, or in most any club – no matter how enthusiastic your drummer is.

    The fixed-bias amp uses custom power and output transformers. In the preamp stage, Rosano opts for three 12AX7 and one 12AT7 tube; the output runs through two STR6L6s. The rectifier is a 5AR4. The Gattone features two input jacks and controls for Volume, Treble, Middle, and Bass. The onboard reverb has controls for Reverb, Speed, and Intensity. All of that componentry pushes the signal into two Celestion G10 Vintage speakers with a speaker load of 4 ohms.

    Yet those specifications don’t begin to hint at the beauty of the construction. From the aged tweed with its gorgeous golden hue to the sweet chassis wiring and that front “face,” the fit and finish are stunning. A true Dual Pro would downright blush – no vintage Fender tweed amp ever looked this good back in the day.

    No one would ever accuse the Gattone of being a lightweight amp, tipping the scales at about 65 pounds. You’ll want to have spent some time in the gym before serving as your own roadie. But it’s that rock-solid construction you’re hefting around – and it pays off in the tone and, one would assume, the amp’s longevity.

    So, with Mr. Gatton in mind, we tried out the Gattone with a ’56 Esquire and ’54 Gibson ES-295.

    With all those chicken-head knobs twisted to the midway point (excepting the reverb), the amp has a truly vintage sound – call it “old-souled.” The tone is dark, but in a rich, mysterious way, making it ideal for blues rhythm vamps.

    Tweaking the sound into mid-range territory, the amp gets warm and throaty while still being clear and not husky.

    Dial in some treble, and that dark tone turns to a knife-edged “noir” sound. Add a little more and switch to the bridge pickup on the ES-295, and you’re firmly and happily into rockabilly territory.

    Going the other direction, the amp has a big, spanking low end, especially for 10-inchers. Yet even with all that bass, the note articulation remains defined. The amp’s cabinet construction does not use a baffle board, which Rosano says makes for a tighter bottom end, even at louder volumes. To challenge that, we turned it up. Play it softly, and the Gattone overdrives with a luscious, creamy sound. Play it hard, and it can truly honk.

    Time to try out the reverb. With a quick reverberation, the signal is accented wonderfully, boosting the amp’s tone. Set on slow, the sound is lowdown and swampy. You can almost feel the humidity.

    Rosano’s amps are all handbuilt by none other than Rosano himself. Plus, he tests and ear-tunes each one himself. With an unapologetic love for ’50s tweed Fenders and plexi Marshalls, his goal is to bring those vintage sounds into the present. With the Gattone, the result is a 35-watt, all-purpose amp that can play sultry blues, trebly country, and driving early rock and roll.

    Danny would be proud.


    This article originally appeared in VG January 2015 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Electro-Harmonix 45000 Multi-Track Recorder

    Electro-Harmonix 45000 Multi-Track Recorder

    E-H_45000_Multi-Track_01

    Electro-Harmonix 45000 Multi-Track Recorder
    Price: $476.21 (street); $119.25 (foot controller)
    Info: www.ehx.com
    .

    Looping has a rich history, with roots tracing to modern classical composers like Phillip Glass, Steve Reich, and John Adams, as well as rock musicians like Brian Eno, Robert Fripp, Peter Gabriel, David Bowie, and U2 (The Edge’s echo repeats on guitar, while played in real time, are essentially loops). More recently, guitarists like David Torn, Bill Frissell, Phil Keaggy, and Henry Kaiser have taken looping to new levels. There are looping conventions and a wildly active web universe devoted to the practice.

    Looping gear is nothing new. Simple pedals record a guitar pattern, then repeat it, while higher-end models layer one pattern on top of another to create more-complex compositions. Compared to anything before, the Electro-Harmonix 45000 Multi-Track Looping Recorder is the mothership. Ridiculously easy to use, it has features that beginners will dig and will make more-advanced loopers drool.

    The 45000’s trump card is that it blends the world of looping and digital multi-track recording. This makes perfect sense since looping is, in fact, a method of recording. With this box, however, the player can build a composition very quickly. Building on Electro-Harmonix’s previous looping pedals, the 45000 combines the layout of a multi-track digital recorder with easy looping functions. Each loop has four mono tracks and one stereo mixdown track. The 45000 records non-compressed, 44.1kHz/16-bit CD-quality audio direct to a removable SDHC card (4 to 32GB) that can hold up to 100 individual loops. Loop speed is adjustable over a two-octave range, and reverse recording and playback are also possible. There’s even a built-in metronome to a separate Monitor Out and a Headphone Out.

    While musicians from the hip-hop universe will be all over this pedal, so will guitarists and bassists who know all about the ambient magic of layering guitar parts to create veritable symphonies of chords, arpeggios, rhythms, and melodies. Cooler still, this layering can be done live with the 45000 – just turn on a track, lay down a part, and deactivate it on the beat. Then do the same with the next track and so on. Four mono tracks can be mixed down to the fifth track, which is stereo, to free up four more tracks. And if a loop is a little long, the Quantize feature will make it fit perfectly to a 4/4 beat.

    The Electro-Harmonix 45000 Multi-Track Looping Recorder was tested with a ’62 Gibson SG Junior. Playing with its features quickly led to some cool ideas that probably wouldn’t have come to light without the 45000 (that’s another secret of looping: one interesting loop can inspire another and, more often than not, a happy little “accident” of sound can take the music through the stratosphere).

    What makes the EHX 45000 big news in the looping world is the interface. It’s very easy to get going on this complex piece of gear. In no time the user can record reverse loops, change a loop’s speed over two octaves, and overdub and punch in and out on any track, like with an old Portastudio four-track. The master unit can be tweaked by hand, but the 45000 Foot Controller (sold separately) is indispensable for creating, building, and triggering loops in real time. While it’s an additional expense, it’s entirely powered via a regular 1/4″ cable from the main unit, so no extra wires or batteries are needed.

    Those who have already been bitten by the looping bug will likely be intrigued by the 45000. Those new to looping can certainly buy cheaper – and sometimes more-complicated – units, but why not start with a device that, while a bit more expensive, has a shallow learning curve and won’t discourage with a complicated interface? The EHX 45000 Multi-Track Looping Recorder is a killer device with buckets of power. There’s a loopy new kid in town and it’s a winner.


    This article originally appeared in VG February 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Washburn Paul Stanley PS2012 Time Traveler

    Washburn Paul Stanley PS2012 Time Traveler

    WASHBURN_TIME_TRAVELLER

    Washburn Paul Stanley PS2012 Time Traveler
    Price: $8,665.33 (retail)
    Info: www.washburn.com
    .

    Inspired by Kiss co-founder Paul Stanley’s appreciation for vintage instruments – and loosely based on Washburn’s Paul Stanley Starfire model – the PS2012 Time Traveler is hand-built in Washburn’s Custom Shop in Chicago and relic’d by Washburn’s Gord Miller to look and play like a 50-year-old instrument.

    Clearly inspired by the Gibson Firebird but with adaptations including an exaggerated upper horn, in several ways, the Time Traveler offers a number of improvements on the original. The guitar’s most noticeable feature is its funky tailpiece, milled from aluminum and hinting at the Stanley-as-Starchild connection. The body is a solid piece of mahogany with a raised center, further lending itself to the Firebird aesthetic. Because of the set-neck design, however, the bound ebony fingerboard, with its oversized pearl-and-abalone block inlays, sits higher from the body compared to the Firebird, with its neck-through design. The Time Traveler’s neck is of medium width, featuring a 243/4″ scale and 14″ radius. Other improvements on the original include the Buzz Feiten tuning system, a Tone Pros tune-o-matic-style bridge and traditional (versus banjo) Grover tuners.

    Plugged in, the Time Traveler is a knockout. Its low action makes for easy lightning-fast runs and access to every note on its 22-fret neck. When A/B’d with a vintage Firebird III, the Time Traveler played more easily, was lighter (at 71/2 pounds) and better balanced (no propensity to neck dive, thanks to the lighter Grovers), and simply sounded better! Rockers and blues cats will dig its variety of sounds, courtesy of its high-quality construction and electronics. The excellent-sounding Seymour Duncan SM-3 mini humbuckers provided enough output to overdrive a non-Master-Volume amp, yet remained crystal clear regardless of volume. In the middle pickup position with both Volume controls set to 8 through a ’66 Fender Vibrolux Reverb, it offered effortless transition from clean rhythms to singing leads.

    Washburn is positioning the guitar as a limited edition, and as such its price is a good bit beyond entry-level. Still, if you’re a Firebird player with a strong penchant for favoring a vintage model, it makes a great alternative.


    This article originally appeared in VG February 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.