Year: 2006

  • Marty Friedman

    Unleashed in the East

    Marty Friedman made his mark as one of the foremost shredders of the ’80s when he teamed up with guitarist Jason Becker in Cacophony.

    He achieved greater celebrity after joining Megadeth in late 1990 as the group’s third lead guitarist. In 10 years with the band, he recorded three albums while continuing his solo work and recording three discs of his own.

    Friedman’s solo work is characterized by a variety of exotic, new-age influences and interesting textures, in contrast to the full-on assault he demonstrates with his metal groups. VG caught up with Friedman at his home in Japan to talk about his new disc, Music For Speeding (Favored Nations) and playing with Japanese artist Aikawa Nanase.

    Vintage Guitar: In what ways was making Music For Speeding different from your previous solo work?
    Marty Friedman: I engineered it myself, which was kind of insane, being that I’m not an engineer.

    As I started to get better at it, I got into making loops and sequences, sampling guitar, and doing cool stuff like that. So I thought I’d engineer it then get great people to mix it.

    I got some great people to record a few days of lead guitar for me, so I could just concentrate on playing lead guitar parts, but I did all the other engineering myself. It took me four months to engineer it and I’m really happy, and I learned a ton about recording in the process. It definitely was satisfying.

    Did you use a variety of setups for the tracking?
    Yes. I used a Roland GT-6 for a lot of the scratch tracks, then wound up keeping some of the scratch tracks because the tones I tweaked from the GT-6 were sounding kind of fresh.

    The main amp was a Crate 300-watt model which is relatively new. I used the prototype, and it was the coolest thing I ever recorded through. I used it for most of the solos and clean parts. I didn’t expect it to have such a glassy clean sound out of a rocking amp, but it surprised me. I put it up against a bunch of other amps in the studio and I pretty much ended up using the Crate.

    I had a bunch of guitars in the studio – Gibsons, Jacksons, Ibanezes, and Fenders. At that time, I was basically playing anything I could get my hands on to get the sound I wanted.

    On the record, there are lots of flavors and lots of guitars – 30 or 40.

    For effects, I used stompboxes by Electro-Harmonix, like the Zipper. I have two Zippers and they’re great. I also used some Japanese prototype pedals and the Roland GT-6. Really, it was anything I could get my hands on. I morphed and mutated a lot of the effects inside the computer as I recorded using plug-ins and some actual recording tricks to kind of make the sounds a little bit more interesting. I was cutting them up, flipping them backwards, and stretching them out. I was doing that kind of stuff rather than only using traditional stompboxes and effects. So I just played normally and then made it a little bit different inside the computer.

    Describe the songwriting process and how the material came together.
    The songs started with a basic melody that I just heard and either wrote down or tried to record so I didn’t forget.

    Basically, everything was based around a melody or a few melodies I wind up embellishing until they become a song or a piece of music. If I don’t have a guitar handy, I just have to just make do. A lot of times I just hum into a tape recorder.

    The song “Lust For Life” was done without a guitar. I just kind of sang it into a little voice recorder. Then when I did pick up a guitar, I learned it from that.

    What is your main guitar these days?
    I’m not one of those guys who has a favorite guitar. A guitar is just a tool.

    I’ve been borrowing guitars from Ibanez for sessions and all the live stuff I’ve been doing. I just want a good work tool that stays in tune and sounds good. It doesn’t really go beyond that at all, boringly enough! I wish I had a Lucille story.

    Do you prefer a tremolo or non-tremolo guitar?
    Non-tremolo is pretty much what I’ve used forever, and probably what I’ll continue to use.

    Tell us about your current endeavors in Japan.
    I’m playing in a band with singer Aikawa Nanase. She’s a massive artist here. The music is hard-rock oriented, but the producer is hip and modern, and does a lot of cool stuff [similar to] what Garbage does, but maybe a little bit more dancey and with happier melodies. It’s definitely guitar rock – very aggressive, fast hard rock and kind of modern pop with great melodies. I’m so happy to be playing with an artist like her.

    I’ll also be recording three songs in Los Angeles with another Japanese artist, Sera Masanori. And I just did a bunch of seminars for Musician’s Institute in Japan. That’s what got me a visa to be here.

    How does the music differ between Japan and the U.S.?
    It seems there’s a bigger demand for more varied kinds of music here. There’s more music, and that means there’s more quality, because the standard is really high. Domestic music in Japan outsells international music by about 90 percent to 10 percent; U2, Celine Dion, Mariah Carey, Metallica, and those types of artists make up about 10 percent of what is sold over here.

    It’s absolutely a massive scene here, and it’s not unusual for a Japanese artist to sell a million copies. Aikawa Nanase has sold 12 million records in Japan.

    And the music is completely different from American music. They borrow from American music to some extent, but the sense of creating a melody is very different from in America. Because people intend to sing these songs at home or in karaoke, the melodies have to be relatively easy to understand and really sink into your head after the first listen.

    I think it’s an art to create a melody that’s easy to pick up and understand right away. It’s a lot harder than it sounds. Where do you see the most change in yourself as a musician? It’s easier to play now, than maybe ever. If I have an idea in my mind, it comes right out on guitar, whether it’s simple or difficult. I think there’s a lot less anxiety in playing and more just picking up the guitar and playing it without really even thinking. It seems to get easier the more I play.



    Friedman live in 2002. Photo: Lisa Sharken.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Oct. ’03 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Linc Luthier Impression

    Sculpture With Strings

    Sure, it’s great to pick up a vintage Strat or Les Paul and marvel at its aged patina. It’s also a wonderful feeling to pick up a customized, totally handcrafted guitar. And I can’t think of many custom guitars that are as hip and original as the Linc Luthier Impression – it’s a singular playing experience.

    Who exactly is Linc Luthier? Linc is a guitar builder in Southern California who makes electric guitars, basses, and baritones, each with the distinctive Linc body shape and headstock (he also makes modern-looking upright basses and violins). Frankly, with a body this original, either you’re going to love it or you’re not – a ’52 Telecaster, this ain’t. The sweep of its enormous horns reminds me of an ancient Greek lyre or a similar harp-link instrument, while others may see an upside-down B.C. Rich Mockingbird. Personally, I find the shape very alluring. If I was playing a gig and wanted to be noticed by everyone in the joint, I’d bring the Impression. It’s a showstopper.

    Like many Linc Luthier guitars, the body on our review instrument has a chambered body composed of exotic hardwoods – just check out those unique f-holes. The chambered construction also makes for a deep body – about 2″ from back to front. The top and back are made of dark, bookmatched Zirocote wood with walnut-colored Prima Vera sides. The headstock and neck is a sandwich of Zirocote and flame-maple pieces, with the maple continuing through the body to the endpin, allowing for a totally smooth heel for upper-fret playing. The neck scale is 2511/32″ and the radius is “completely flat,” according to the builder.

    The fret dots are made of black mother-of-pearl and the side markers are thin, inlaid maple strips. The nut is pink ivory – the rarest wood in the world, according to Linc’s literature – and the circular crown on the headstock is a sandwiched section of Paua shell, Koa, and flame maple. It’s clear that Linc spares no expense when it comes to materials. (Heck, if I had the space I’d also tell you about the plush, handmade case that comes with each Linc Luthier instrument. Trust me – it’s sweet.)

    Pick up the Impression, and again that word comes to mind: “distinctive.” Grab the neck and note the ergonomic, offset-V profile that sits comfortably in the palm. The smooth heel and 24 frets invite you to play fast and precise all over the neck. Although you can play any style of music on it, the Impression would definitely be at home with sophisticated progressive and fusion players,

  • Ritchie Blackmore

    From

    “Renaissance,” “Medieval,” “Baroque,” and other musical terms are applicable to the unique modern-day efforts of the most recent aggregation that counts legendary guitarist Ritchie Blackmore as a member.

    Along with partner/singer/lyricist Candice Night and other associates, the combo known as Blackmore’s Night has released four albums since its inception in the mid 1990s: Shadow of the Moon (’97), Under a Violet Moon (’99), Fires at Midnight (’01), and a live double album, Past Times With Good Company, which debuted in February ’03 (all on the Steamhammer/SPV label).

    Not only has Blackmore’s Night nurtured Ritchie’s longtime love of ancient musical genres, the band also uses many ancient-style instruments in its presentation.
    In a recent conversation with Vintage Guitar, the veteran player enthusiastically brought us up to date on his decision to head down different musical paths.

    Vintage Guitar: When we conversed in 1997, you alluded to going in the direction of what Blackmore’s Night is doing. But how would you explain your decision to someone accustomed to hearing you play a Stratocaster – loudly?
    Ritchie Blackmore: Well, it’s not very different. When I first heard Medieval/Renaissance music, the harmonic structure was very similar to rock and roll. It’s quite easy to imagine something like the “Smoke on the Water” riff being played by medieval instruments from the 1500s, like shawms. It’s very similar music, and what I’m playing on the acoustic guitar is not that dissimilar to what I’ve played on electric.

    For instance, back in the days of Rainbow, when I played songs like “Temple of the King” or “Rainbow Eyes” on the electric guitar, it still had a Medieval/Renaissance influence; a “minstrel” influence. The only difference is the volume.

    Is it fair to say that each of the three studio albums became more diverse? The title track from Fires at Midnight sounds like it has a Middle Eastern or Turkish influence…
    It’s hard to say. I know that when I started Shadow of the Moon, I wanted to stick strictly to acoustic guitar. But as it has progressed, I’ve kind of gone back to playing electric and acoustic guitar – whatever fits the bill.

    But in the beginning, I wanted to make it very “woody” and organic. I tried to steer clear of playing any electric solos, although I did on one or two tracks. It had gotten to the point six years ago where I had to put the electric guitar down, because I was kind of boring myself.

    The (“Fires at Midnight”) melody line was originally written in the 1200s by King Alphonse X of Spain. I’d kind of envisioned a witches’ meeting in Germany, which is where the Walpurgis Night legend came from.

    One of the most “electric” tracks so far was “Written In The Stars,” but even it has a horn chart.
    That was taken from a Tchaikovsky concerto; the “Swan Lake” piece. It’s very famous, and I’ve always liked it. So it was very easy to introduce into that song. It was almost tongue-in-cheek, like we’d done a disco version of it. Some people asked, “Why is it on the CD? It’s so out of-place.” And yet other people would tell me it’s their favorite song.

    And speaking of tongue-in-cheek, the intro to your cover of Bob Dylan’s “The Times They Are A-Changin’” is a direct cop from Sonny and Cher’s “I Got You, Babe.”
    That is exactly what we wanted to do! (chuckles). It was done on purpose; we wanted the oboe to do it exactly like “I Got You, Babe.” I tell people we’re trying to copy Sonny and Cher.

    The new live album was recorded in the Netherlands. Have England and the European continent been more receptive to Blackmore’s Night?
    Yes, they have. But I think it’s more the agencies and people involved when we’ve toured who have been receptive.

    In the United States, promoters are bit more skeptical of this kind of music. But the people in America are just as “into” this music as the people in Europe, even though in Europe, I think they’ve been a bit blasé about the history they have, yet they know about that type of music, and they like it.

    I get the feeling Americans look at it like a fairy tale, with castles; I feel like the Americans get more excited about the music than even the Europeans. We’re about to start touring in America, but we’re always working in Europe.

    I think Americans have been left out because promoters can sometimes be a little bit lazy over here. If they know something’s an instant sell, they’ll book it into rock clubs. But we don’t want to play rock clubs. We don’t have to play in a castle, but would like to play in some place with a sort of special feel, like a big stone church. Logistically, you could get into some problems, but this music is special.

    The mix on the live album is fuller than some might expect.
    We had three dates that we were going to record, but ended up with only one due to equipment problems. The one we got in Holland has all the mistakes, as well (chuckles).

    Let’s discuss some of the instruments you played on the new live album. Isn’t the oval-shaped 12-string instrument on the cover a mandola?
    Yes, it is. Most of the time, I use a similar tuning to a guitar. Other times, I’ll tune down, or do a Medieval tuning in A-D-A-D; sort of a drone tuning. It’s made by Freshwater, a Scottish builder; I think he only turns out three or four a year. It projects very well. I also use a Mid-Missouri mandolin.

    As for guitars, I’ve been playing a special Alvarez-Yairi made for me. There’s a Fender Telecaster acoustic/electric; I think they only made them about six months, which is a shame; they’re not bad guitars. I use that with a synthesizer on “Shadow of the Moon” and “The Clock Ticks On” to get a fuller sound. I use Lakewood guitars more in the studio.

    And I’ve been playing the hurdy gurdy for a couple of years. It has two chromatic octaves and a wheel that you turn that acts like a violin bow against the strings, which are made of gut. It gets a constant sound as the wheel revolves.

    Comments about other ancient-style instruments that have appeared on your recordings, such as the shawm and the cornamuse?
    The shawm is a wind instrument that Candice plays on “The Clock Ticks On.” The cornamuse is heard on “Mid-Winter’s Night.” And it’s funny – I don’t collect guitars; I collect shawms, and I can’t play a note on them! Candice does very well, though.

    There are token covers of a Deep Purple song (“Soldier of Fortune”) and a Rainbow song (“16th Century Greensleeves”) on the live album. Many rock bands will play mostly electric, and will do a short acoustic “unplugged” segment in the middle of their performance. It sounds like your band did the reverse, as “16th Century Greensleeves” is about the only fully electric song on the album…
    We do a 21/2 hour set, and most of it is “electro-acoustic,” but we throw in four or five heavy rock songs. “16th Century Greensleeves” is one, but we also do “Written in the Stars,” “Writing On The Wall,” and others.
    I take out the Strat and play loud, which is kind of tricky onstage, because you’ve had an acoustic balance in the sound instead of a “heavy” balance… although it’s not really purely acoustic because we run through amplifiers.

    The title track of the live album is also on Under a Violet Moon, and is credited to King Henry VIII, of all people.
    It’s a very popular traditional song; it’s credited to Henry VIII, although maybe somebody in his court wrote it, and he chopped off their head. It’s always been one of my favorite tunes from the old, traditional repertoire. Using it as the title track fit it with what we were trying to convey; having a good time with friends.

    It would seem a natural move for the band to do soundtracks; have you ever considered such?
    Yes, we have; that would be very time-consuming, but a lot of the films that come out seem to have more-popular bands playing rock and roll – AC/DC, Aerosmith, U2, whatever. So far, this kind of music hasn’t been used in any films, which is a pity. I’ve been to see certain movies, like Elizabeth, which is a brilliant film, and I couldn’t believe that they actually played the correct music! I suppose I’m a purist when it comes to listening. When I’m playing, it’s more like I’m interpreting.

    What do you envision in your musical future?
    I just want to go on playing the music that appeals to me. In the old days, of course, you had certain obligations with the big record companies, and you had to play within that “box.” But in this project, we can basically do what we want, including cover versions of Bob Dylan songs, or whatever. It’s up to us, and I’m very happy with that.

    I don’t know if anybody else would want to be into what we’re doing (chuckles), but there are bands doing it even more historically correct, with proper instruments. It seems there are an awful lot of bands playing the same type of music – blues, jazz, or straightaway pop – and that’s it. I never hear anything particularly new; it’s good music, but I’ve heard it before. What we’re doing seems to be generating some excitement among those who hear us, and that’s nice to know.



    Photo courtesy of Steamhammer/SPV.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Sep. ’03 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Richie Hart – Blues In the Alley

    Blues In the Alley

    It’s become obvious to me that a certain style of jazz guitar will never go out of style. Blues-based jazz nuts who can really swing like Wes Montgomery and Grant Green will be around no matter the prevailing tastes. Problem is, some guys get it and some don’t. Some have the soul, and some don’t.

    Richie Hart gets it. And man, does he have soul.

    Richie’s not new on the scene. Back in the late ’70s he worked with Lonnie Smith. He’s also worked with John Patton and Jack McDuff. That organ-trio influence shines through on plenty of cuts here. The funky “Well You Needn’t” has Hart darting in-and-out of the funk with single-lines, double-stops, and octaves that would make Wes smile. Through the whole thing, Hart’s tone matches his soulful playing. It’s red-hot, but not in the “rock” way. It literally burns. That goes for much of the record. The hard-swinging title cut lets him show off his comping skills behind Pete Levin’s fine organ playing before he takes a solo that navigates the changes nicely. His ballad chops are put to use on a fine version of Coltrane’s “Black Pearls.” He opens things with a marvelous octave solo, and then moves on to an original and inventive solo combining single-line elements with other techniques. His solo open on “Georgia On My Mind” is about as gorgeous as it gets. By the time the band joins in, it’s a bluesy swingfest.

    The basic setup here is a trio with help on keyboards and sax. Rick Petrone plays bass and Joe Corsello drums. They help propel the music and Richie. This is one of the best straight-ahead jazz guitar efforts I’ve heard in awhile. The old cliché about meaty music sticking to your bones applies here.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Mar. ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Fleetwood Mac – Tusk

    Tusk

    Considering Fleetwood Mac’s enormous popularity in the 1970s, which can be traced to the moment Lindsey Buckingham and Stevie Nicks joined the waning band, Buckingham would have to rank as one of the most underrated guitarists in rock. He is also one of the more unorthodox.

    An ex-folkie who displays his acoustic fingerpicking on “Landslide” and “World Turning” from the group’s self-titled 1975 comeback, Buckingham’s “technique” on electric lead was closer to clawhammer banjo – flailing away with pickless fingers, which usually ended up bloody by the end of a set. But his sensibility was best exhibited on “I’m So Afraid,” from the same album, which became his extended showstopper onstage. The licks were simple, but with Lindsey’s sense of dynamics (and a super-long setting on his delay), the effect was mesmerizing.

    By the time of Tusk, in 1979, Mac’s triple threat of singer/songwriters was still in place, but Buckingham had become the album’s (and band’s) clear visionary. When critics compared the double album to the Beatles’ “White Album,” which signaled the Fab Four working as four solo artists backing each other more than the work of a unified quartet, Buckingham replied, “I like the ‘White Album.’ I consider that a compliment.”

    Like the “White Album,” Tusk jumps all over the map, stylistically and sonically, with a conscious disregard for continuity. It was anything but a logical followup to Rumours‘ mega-success – which was, of course, the whole point.

    Nicks continued to represent the band’s mystical bent, while McVie contributed more love songs. But feeling the influence of the burgeoning new wave scene, Buckingham’s stance is more aggressive, the rhythms heavier-handed, his guitar lines more jagged, its tone more squawky. And his solo on Stevie’s “Sisters Of The Moon” is among his most impassioned.

    Again, the second disc of this double-set is mostly alternate takes and demos of the same material, but a couple of non-originals that didn’t make the album are of special interest. “Kiss And Run” was written by Jorge Calderon (who recently won a Grammy for co-producing Warren Zevon’s final album, The Wind), and the Beach Boys’ “Farmer’s Daughter” would turn up on 1980’s Fleetwood Mac Live.

    If Tusk was merely an exercise in self-indulgence in the wake of mass appeal, it would be understandable. But, like its title song (featuring the USC Trojan Marching Band), it’s more adventurous than that, and, in any case, a bold artistic statement.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Sep. ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Peter Case – Who’s Gonna Go Your Crooked Mile? Selected Tracks

    Who's Gonna Go Your Crooked Mile? Selected Tracks

    Peter Case is one of those “folky” types who deserve more than a trite description. Yes, he plays acoustic guitar, occasional harmonica, and writes great songs. But he shows a background that encompasses rock and soul, too. This compilation of his work on Vanguard puts that element in the spotlight.

    “Crooked Mile” is the perfect example of his versatility. It’s the only live cut here. Stunning country-blues with great playing and vocals. “Two Heroes” is a rocker with a New Orleans feel and a great lyric. “Coulda Shoulda Woulda” is a country stomper whose lyric invokes James Brown in a very cool way. “Something’s Coming” is a funky acoustic tune with amazing dobro from the incomparable Greg Leisz, who appears on several songs.

    All but two songs appeared on Case’s past Vanguard albums, so it’s a good way to catch up if you haven’t been listening. Two new cuts address recent events; “Wake Up Call” is a rocker with crunchy guitars that addresses Iraq. And “My Generation’s Golden Handcuff Blues” is an extremely clever take on today’s business world (and as you’d expect, there are Who quotes). This one’s a good way to catch up with a fine singer/songwriter.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Feb. ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • 1939 Martin D-45

    From 1933 to ’42, Martin produced a total of 91 D-45 guitars.

    At the time, the model was the most deluxe and highest-priced flat-top guitar in the Martin line. Today, these instruments are among the most sought after of all steel-string flat-tops, and without doubt bring the highest prices of any vintage American-made acoustic guitars.

    The first D-45, made in 1933, was a custom-order instrument for Gene Autry. This guitar is on display at the Gene Autry Museum of Western Heritage in Los Angeles. It features a 12-fret slothead neck, torch peghead inlay, Gene Autry’s name inlaid in pearl script on the fingerboard, and the extended-length 12-fret dreadnought-size body. The second D-45, made in ’34, was for a Milwaukee performer named Jackie “Kid” Moore. It also featured a 12-fret neck, but had a solid peghead and the owner’s name inlaid on the fingerboard. A third 12-fret D-45 with a solid peghead was made in ’37.

    All other D-45s had 14-fret necks, but two made in ’36 were listed as having a wide body. These two guitars look like typical 14-fret D-45s of the period, with snowflake inlay and vertical C.F. Martin peghead logo inlay, however, their body width is 161/4″ rather than the typical 155/8″ Martin dreadnought size.

    Prior to 1939, D-45s featured the same snowflake inlay pattern on the fingerboard as other Martin style 45s in the 0, 00, and 000 size. D-45s were made in very limited quantities and were not featured in the Martin catalog until 1939, at which time the abalone hexagon fingerboard inlay pattern was introduced on the model. Interestingly, both the vertical C.F. Martin inlay pattern for the peghead and the hexagon inlay pattern for the fingerboard were not designed for Martin flat-top guitars, but were used on the archtop models. The vertical logo first appeared on the Martin style C-2 and C-3 archtops in 1931. The hexagon inlays were also used on the C-2 beginning in 1939 and on the Martin F-7 and F-9 archtops beginning in ’35.

    As an interesting aside, while the D-45 was Martin’s most expensive flat-top prior to World War II, the F-9 archtop cost $250 new while the D-45 was only $200. As rare as the D-45 is with a total production of only 91 prior to World War II, the F-9 is even more rare with only 72 having been produced. The price of $200 retail for a D-45 is often cited as being the reason for the model’s scarcity since money was hard to come by during the height of the Depression. If price alone, however, were the factor in the rarity of this model, then Gibson’s L-5 listing at $275 and the Gibson Super 400 selling for $400 should be far more scarce, but that is not the case. The L-5 and Super 400, as well as the Epiphone Emperor and expensive handmade D’Angelico guitars which also cost more new than a D-45, sold quite well because they appealed to professional jazz, swing, and orchestral musicians of the time. During the 1930s and very early ’40s, the big band era was in full swing and there was money to be made playing that style of music. By contrast, dreadnought-size flat-top guitars, and for that matter flat-tops in general, were often viewed as “hillbilly” instruments. There was far less money to be made playing flat-top guitars at that time, and as a consequence, far fewer expensive flat-tops were made.

    Martin had made pearl-trimmed fancy guitars since the 1830s, but the actual style 45 was not introduced until 1902. The typical specs of the model 45 included an Adirondack spruce top with scalloped bracing, Brazilian rosewood back, sides, and peghead veneer, mahogany neck, abalone trim around all body edges of the top, back, and sides, white binding on the body, fingerboard, and peghead, snowflake fingerboard inlays (the exception being hexagon inlays on the D-45 model only from 1939 through 1942), and torch peghead inlay until late 1933 at which time the vertical C.F. Martin inlay was introduced on style 45s featuring a solid peghead. The D-45 features typical style 45 construction on a dreadnought-sized instrument. The smaller 0, 00, OM, and 000-45s were built with the same materials and the same standards of ornamentation and quality of workmanship as the D models.

    The appeal and value of the D-45 is not simply a matter of scarcity. There are numerous Martin models which are more rare, but none which are as sought after. Pre-World War II Martin dreadnought guitars are today considered the standard by which virtually all other flat-top steel-string guitars are judged against. In the opinion of many collectors, while there have been other great makers of flat-top steel-string guitars, none have beaten Martin when it comes to the quality and sound of their 1930s flat-tops. The dreadnought-sized instruments are particularly prized, not only due to their relative scarcity but because they have a powerful sound sought by bluegrass and country musicians, as well as players of virtually of every style utilizing flat-top steel-string guitars.

    While Martin’s records are clear as to how many D-45s were made, and their specifications, there is no directory of how many of these instruments survive today, but the majority are still with us.

    While it’s true that not all old D-45s have survived in pristine condition (and some had been repaired or refinished poorly), almost all have survived sufficiently intact to be highly desirable instruments. In view of their great desirability and high monetary value, those which have survived in less-than-pristine condition are worth whatever effort it takes to restore them properly. If there is any one flat-top steel-string vintage American guitar which can be viewed as a “holy grail” to collectors, the pre-World War II D-45 Martin is it.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s July ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Groove Tubes Soul-O Single

    Soul-O Single

    Groove Tubes founder Aspen Pittman is a tube connoisseur. For 24 years, he has listened to, tested, designed, and manufactured many variants of the familiar glass bottles that melt the hearts of guitar tone aficionados.

    The latest outgrowth of Pittman’s passion for tubes and their many tones is his company’s new class A all-tube single-ended guitar amps designed for those of us who may be amp tweakers at heart, but don’t have the skills, time, or hardcore desire to build or buy amps that use different tube types.

    The new member of GT’s family is the Soul-O Single. “Single” refers to the number of output tubes sported by the amp in its five configurations – a 1×10 combo, a 1×12 combo, a Top Cab, the LapTop model, with its two 4″ Auratone speakers in a top-grill baffleboard, and a 1×12 piggyback.

    Capable of employing one of 25 output tubes ranging from EL84 to KT66 without having to modify or re-bias the amp, the Soul-O Single is a sweet studio or live amp. Its output, depending on the power tube used, ranges from seven to 15 watts. The head and combo share certain features, including black tolex cabinets with tan grillecloth, chrome chassis, black Bakelite knobs, and a chromed steel emblem.

    Controls are also shared and include passive bass, mid, and high tone knobs, as well as presence, gain (with footswitchable pull boost), master volume, and an effects loop blend control. The tone section does not boost or cut frequencies. Rather, it filters them, which means a user can adjust tones based on what they hear, rather than what the knob is telling them.

    GT says one major key to the amp’s tone and bass response – and its ability to use so many tubes without sacrificing tone – is its huge triple-tapped output transformer with an impedance selector (4/8/16-ohm). The Single’s OT is the physical size of one in a 50-watt Marshall.

    The combos are equipped with a Jensen speakers, while the piggyback cab (which boasts a removable backside “plug”) is loaded with a 12″ Jensen Ceramic Classic Clone.

    Soul-O Test-E
    To get a grasp of the tones the Soul-O Single is capable of, we snared a triumvirate of classic guitars; a ’62 reissue Fender Strat, ’59 Fender Esquire, and a Gibson Gary Moore signature model Les Paul. We also brought an EH Holy Grail reverb unit for when we needed to wet things up a bit.

    The “standard equipment” tube complement is Groove Tubes’ top-of-the-line GT6L6GE and two GTECC83 preamp tubes. Pittman told us the company considered shipping the amp with a “six-pack” of tubes, but decided against it, citing price and the complicated nature of personal tube preferences. Also, Pittman noted, GT’s recently introduced Silver Series of tubes will feature non-matched/non-rated tubes at a substantially lower price – a prime deal for Single owners.

    For our test, GT sent seven power tubes (GTEL84S, GT6L6GE, GTEL34L, GT6V6R, GT6550, GT5881, GTKT66HP) and three preamp tubes (GT12AX7C, GT7025, GTECC83) to facilitate our Soul-O workout. Changing them was snap since the chrome-plated chassis is spartan, with plenty of room to get at its two tube sockets.

    The first power tube we chose was the GTEL34L, which we ran through the 1×12 cab. This configuration gave us the best overdrive and a tone that could most closely be compared to a Marshall amp. So it made sense that to our ears, it sounded best with the backside plug installed, which tightened the low-end much like a 4×12 cab.

    With the rear cabinet plug out and the GT6L6GE or GT6V6 installed, we were able to get a more round/Fender Deluxe-like sound. And in keeping with the spirit, if we pushed it too hard, we experienced a touch of authentic low-end fart-out… just like a Deluxe!

    The GTKT66HP was the loudest power tube, and had the most personality. In the combo, it had a nice sparkle, with clean mids and a fair amount of overdrive. The GTEL84S, with its “928” pin adapter was the quietest and cleanest. With most of the tubes, we avoided using a lot preamp overdrive, opting instead to push the power tubes so they’d better reveal their differences.

    The tone controls were transparent and natural-sounding, and worked best in the 10 o’clock to 2 o’clock positions. The effects loop was also very transparent, and the blend control allowed us to use the controls on the effects unit more effectively.

    Either of these Soul-O Singles – and a handful of tubes – is capable of being a great workhorse in the studio, at a rehearsal, jam session, or a gig.



    Groove Tubes Soul-O Single
    Type of Amp: Single-ended Class A combo or head/cab piggyback.
    Features: All-tube circuits, uses any of 25 output tubes and a variety of preamp tubes without re-biasing, effects loop with blend, classic styling, high-quality speakers.
    Price: Combo, $1,099; piggyback head/cab, $1,498; gain-boost footswitch, $59.
    Contact: Groove Tubes, 12866 Foothills Blvd., Sylmar, CA 91342, 818-361-4500, www.groove-tubes.com.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s May ’03 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Analog Man’s Guide to Vintage Effects Pedals – Tom Hughes

    Tom Hughes

    “Analog Mike” Piera was one of the first to recognize the power of the internet to disseminate information and as a tool for commerce. Peira’s background as a software engineer with a degree in computer science made him ideally suited to explore the possibilities of the new medium. His original website, on the earliest version of AOL, boasted more info about vintage pedal effects than any other. As connectivity grew and his skills in internet coding increased, Piera added graphics, manufacturer histories, and began to offer services in modifying pedals such as the Ibanez TS-9 reissue. This also grew quickly, and by 2000, Piera had quit his day job to work on the Analog Man line of pedals. His website (analogman.com) has grown to incorporate over 100 pages.

    Now, with the help of “Analog Tom” Hughes, that knowledge and info has been captured in print.

    The recent explosion of guitar effects books is the latest manifestation of an enthusiasm that began with early tremolo and reverb and quickly led to more substantial outboard effects with multiple adjustments – and the birth of an industry. The history has been documented in book form, but not to the extent of Analog Man’s Guide . Every facet has been gathered: vintage effects history, guide to manufacturers, effects technology, interviews with major designers and manufacturers, photos, FAQs, the state of the stompbox today and also its future. The book covers many rare and previously unknown pedals, made briefly by small, unsuccessful companies, and covers the majors in depth.

    The interview with Mike Matthews of Electro-Harmonix is the most complete documentation of the company extant. If you play electric guitar and use any pedal, or if you collect and document various pedals, you need this book. Production is first-rate, with coated paper and a full-color photo section. There are also catalog reprints, a host of black-and-white photos, and an effects directory. A tip of the hat to Hughes and Piera for covering this subject with such depth and knowledge.



    For Musicians Only Publishing 2005, Softbound 280 pages, ISBN 0-9759209-0-1, $40



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s May ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Paul Curreri – The Spirit of the Staircase

    The Spirit of the Staircase

    I was a big fan of Curreri’s Songs for Devon Sproule. That record, produced by guitarist Kelly Joe Phelps, was a solo acoustic country-blues effort that took the form places it hadn’t yet gone, or at least not often.

    On his new record, Curreri takes a band route. Things are quiet, and in some respects represent a time gone by. Banjos fill the air with the guitars, Aaron Evans adds atmospheric electric guitar, and the brisk-but-subtle snap of a snare drum highlights most of these. Paul’s guitar playing is very strong. “Drag Some Revelating” has a nice acoustic arrangement that almost has a ragtime feel. “Memory Makes All This” has gorgeous changes set to an almost march beat. “The Party at the House” has a lovely lyric with fine acoustic. For the most part, Paul’s guitar playing takes a back seat to well-written songs, but it’s up front on the instrumental “March Kitchen and What Was Said.” The song is full of wonderful chords and beautifully dissonant single-string bends. He does go back to the solo vocal and guitar only a couple of times, including on “You Will Look at Me.” It’s a perfect showcase for his playing.

    This is a fine and logical followup to the last record. It gives him a chance to spread out with his lyrics and keep the music interesting, but different. For folks interested only in the hot licks, this one might disappoint. But a hard listen reveals lots of layers underneath. Paul’s a unique talent who deserves more attention.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s May ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.