Year: 2006

  • September 2006

    FEATURES

    LEFTY FRIZZELL’S GIBSON/BIGSBY J-200
    Lefty Frizzell was one of country music’s most influential artists, and a true honky-tonker. With his first royalty checks, he bought a diamond ring, a Nudie suit, and this SJ-200, and took it straight to Paul Bigsby. By Dan Forte

    GUILD STRATFORD X-350
    Few companies have successfully marketed both acoustic and electric guitars. Once Epiphone was no longer an independent company, Guild was Gibson’s only real competitor in the archtop market. By George Gruhn and Walter Carter

    NUDIE’S MOSRITE MANDO
    In the mid 1970s, Kosmo and Kathy Cominos collected knives, jukeboxes, wristwatches, etc… But their favorite finds were celebrity-associated musical instruments like this unique Mosrite mandolin, built for Nudie Cohn, the renowned cowboy tailor. By Ward Meeker

    G.L. STILES SOLIDBODY
    Its hint of “American primitive” construction proves it’s one of the earliest guitars from the renowned West Virginia luthier. After considerable detective work and with a lot of luck, we‘ve saved Stiles’ story from possibly slipping into obscurity. By Michael Wright

    ICON CORNER
    1973 Zemaitis Doubleneck
    Zemaitis instruments are true works of art, with the ultimate “Who’s Who” list of players. And while all Tony Z. axes have unique tops, this is perhaps one of two doublenecks by the late master. By Willie G. Moseley

    TOM SCHOLZ
    A Wizard Re-Works His Magic
    As a 20-something product engineer, he spent his spare time recording songs in his basement. Those songs became part of a 17x-platinum album, and were recently given a fresh digital polish. By Ward Meeker

    MARK SEBASTIAN
    Craving For Craviolas
    As a teenager in the mid ’60s, he co-wrote a smash hit for the Lovin’ Spoonful. And as a burgeoning recording artist in the early ’70s became an endorser for the unique Giannini Craviola. By Willie G. Moseley

    THE DIFFERENT STRUMMER
    Engineering Art: German Guitars, Part I
    If Germany hadn’t been defeated in WWII, German guitars might never have been a part of the American guitar landscape. And if it weren’t for the Beatles, a discussion of them might be academic! By Michael Wright

    DEPARTMENTS

    Vintage Guitar Price Guide

    Builder Profile
    DM Darling Guitars

    Upcoming Events

    Vintage Guitar Classified Ads

    Dealer Directory

    Readers Gallery

    FIRST FRET

    Reader Mail

    News and Notes
    Clifford Antone remembered, Easton update, new releases, Montreaux Jazz on DVD, In Memoriam, more!

    Rick Nielsen
    Rockford State of Mind
    By Willie G. Moseley

    Nick Colionne
    Smooth and Cool
    By John Heidt

    Ask Zac
    By Zac Childs

    J.J. Cale
    Up Close & Personal
    By Dan Forte

    Gary Moore
    Remembering Phil Lynott
    By Willie G. Moseley

    Eric Gales’ Crystal Vision
    By Oscar Jordan

    Andy Timmons
    No Texas Typecast By Willie G. Moseley

    Dueling Gut-Strings
    The Blazing Guitars of Del Castillo
    By Dan Forte

    COLUMNS

    Q&A With George Gruhn

    Acousticville
    I Want to Be Like Mike… and Matt
    By Steven Stone

    Fretprints
    Jeff Beck
    By Wolf Marshall

    TECH

    Dan’s Guitar Rx
    Bolt It On!
    By Dan Erlewine

    Guitar Shop
    A Cluster of Queries
    By Tony Nobles

    Amps
    Simply Functional
    By Gerald Weber

    Ask Gerald
    By Gerald Weber

    REVIEWS

    The VG Hit List
    Music and Video Reviews: Booker T. & The MG’s, Buck Page, Popa Chubby, Hacienda Brothers, Gary Moore, Freddy King, Darrell Scott, Fogerty Long Road Home DVD, more!

    Check This Action
    Music With No Expiration Date
    By Dan Forte

    Vintage Guitar Gear Reviews
    Charles Fox Ergo, Ernie Ball Axis SS and SM-Y2D, Nik Huber Orca, Magnus Ultimate Attenuator

    Gearin’ Up!
    The latest cool new stuff!

  • Rowan Cimarron

    Amazing craftsmanship, aesthetic appeal

    Michael Rowan operates a one-man custom gui-
    tar shop in Garland, Texas, and he recently submitted for review one of the most appealing guitars we’ve grabbed, groped, and fondled in quite some time.

    The Rowan Custom Guitars “Cimarron” is a hybrid double-cutaway acoustic/electric “stage” guitar. The small (about 7″ x 16″) super-light, one-piece mahogany body is hollowed out and capped with a 5-A flamed maple top. The bookmatched “Cinnamon burst” top is finished with a flawless high-gloss polyurethane finish and had incredible depth and color. And as if that was gorgeous enough, the guitar’s body is framed in walnut purfling with abalone inlay.

    The top of the Cimarron is flat until it hits the purfling, where it contours smoothly into the body. The one-piece set mahogany neck is capped with a 10″ radius Ebony fretboard and equipped with 24 medium jumbo frets that are nicely polished and leveled. There are no markers on the face of the fretboard – just an inlaid abalone “R” on the 12th fret space.

    The three-on-a-side peghead receives the same treatment; flame maple with walnut purfling and abalone inlays along with a nicely finished bone nut. A tall bone saddle is set into a top-loading Ebony bridge with a small ledge that hides the ball ends of the strings. On either side of the bridge, the Ebony knobs for the volume (treble side) and tone (bass side) are discretely incorporated into the bridge design. Hardware is minimal, locking Gotoh tuners and strap button are all chrome.

    Electronics are also minimal; volume, passive tone, end-pin jack, and a Fishman preamp. The 9-volt preamp battery is accessed through a cover on the back. Remove it, and you can see how the bridge is firmly pinned to the top and how the X braces are neatly applied.

    The first thing you notice when you pick up the Cimarron is how light it is (31/2 pounds) and how nicely its body is contoured. The 25.5″ scale length and Elixer strings give it a fantastically smooth feel with just enough string tension to avoid feeling mushy. With a small adjustment to the double-action truss rod, we were able to get the action good and low, and it stayed buzz-free.

    The medium C-shaped neck felt “Goldilocks good” – not too big, not too small.

    Of course the Cimarron was made to be plugged in, so we tried it in a variety of acoustic amps, including a Genz-Benz, a Peavey, and a Laney. We found the tone to be unique – not like a dreadnought or an electric with a piezo bridge. Instead, it proffered a natural, woody tone with a throaty quality. The Fishman’s pre-shaped EQ is very well-voiced, giving a punchy, thumpy, low-end and clean highs. The volume control is nicely tapered and placed well for doing volume swells. The tone control doesn’t work unless the volume is turned down a little first, but that makes it easy to use as a solo boost. And because there is no soundhole, the Rowan can be played loudly without fear of feedback or howl.

    We can only imagine how good it would sound through a big sound system or in a recording studio.

    We can’t say enough about the sheer aesthetic beauty of this guitar, or the outstanding craftsmanship that went into building it. It’s unique, natural, woody tone and excellent playability are just the icing on the cake.



    Rowan Cimarron
    Type of Guitar Semi-hollow acoustic/electric.
    Features Top-notch craftsman ship,, 5-A flamed maple top, abalone inlay, ebony appoint-ments, light weight, Fishman pickup system, custom fit case
    Price $2,900.
    Contact Rowen Custom Guitars, 809 Meadowgate Drive, Garland, TX 75040, www. rowanguitars. com.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Jan. ’03 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Yngwie Malmsteen

    Yngwie's New Attack!!

    As one of the most fiery players on the planet, Yngwie Malmsteen developed an identifiable style and tone that blends classical music and heavy metal. VG sat with Malmsteen following his stint on the 2003 G3 tour with Joe Satriani and Steve Vai, and Malmsteen filled us in on what made the tour so different from his solo ventures. He also offered a preview of his new projects, and explained why his days of shopping for vintage gear are largely over – even if there are are things that still tantalize him.

    Vintage Guitar: What was it like to be part of G3?
    Yngwie Malmsteen: The whole thing was a blast. The guys are great and it’s really cool that we all have very different styles; it was a great combination. I just got a rough cut of the DVD and it looks really good.

    It was a good lesson in discipline, because for the last 25 years I’ve been doing exactly what I want to do.

    What was your reaction when asked to join?
    I thought it would be perfect for me to play with these guys, and play nice places in America for a change. For the last few years, I’ve been concentrating on Europe and Japan.

    And I had no doubts. I called Uli Jon Roth, who did it with them, and Brian May, who has been up jamming with them. They said I was going to love it. I think that in the end, it turned out better than anybody expected, and we sold out virtually every show.

    Which guitars did you stage?
    All old stuff. My Strats are from ’67 up to about ’72. I just love the look and sound of cream-white Strats with maple necks and the big headstock, like the Hendrix Woodstock guitar. They’re all customized with deep scallops and huge frets. You can drive a train over the top of these things. They all have brass nuts. I like them because they don’t wear out. The tremolo is stock. The pickups are DiMarzio HS-3 in the back, and the middle and front are YJM models, which are my own DiMarzio pickup. It’s a single-coil sound, but it’s a humbucking stack. It’s very cool. I never really liked those double-coil things. You don’t get as much attack in the guitar. And they’re all four-bolt, as well. Even if they were three-bolt originally, I’ve had them re-done.

    Do you drill the fourth hole under the original three-bolt plate, to keep it looking original?
    No, it’s a regular four-bolt plate. But not only that, the four screws that hold in the neck are not wood screws, they’re machine screws. Inside the neck they’re reversed threaded brass inserts that go into the neck. With the machine screws, it’s as close to having a neck-through-body guitar, as far as sustain and steadiness. It’s ridiculous. You can move the neck around on a stock Strat, but not on mine.

    Have you added any instruments to your collection?
    I haven’t bought a guitar for a long time; I haven’t seen any like the one I play for a long time. The last time I saw one, I bought it, and that was about five years ago. It was at Guitar Center in Miami. Actually, the last guitar I bought was a Les Paul. That was three years ago. It was a newer one and it has this very nice tiger top. I don’t know much about Gibsons, but I have a few. I have an ES-335, I have three or four Flying Vs, an SG, and an amazing old goldtop Les Paul with humbuckers.

    The most amazing guitars I ever bought, I got them all in Sweden, like my ’56 Shoreline Gold Strat. I got a March ’54 Strat, which is the first month and the first year. It’s not scalloped. I left it original, but it might have been repainted before I bought it. It’s all bakelite parts. If you take the neck off, it’s written in pencil “3/54.”

    Then I have a ’55 and a ’56, and all the way up. I have a couple of really nice Burgundy Mist Strats. I’ve got over 200 Stratocasters.

    So you don’t actively look for guitars anymore?
    No. I’d rather spend money on something else. Also, the ones I really like are just not around. I wouldn’t buy a ’65 sunburst Strat, or even a ’64. But if I found a ’55 Mary Kay with the gold parts and blond finish, then we’re talking!

    But there was one guitar that I saw and had to have. When I was in Nottingham, England, this kid came up to me and said he wanted me to sign his Strat. It was a ’67 with a maple cap neck and big headstock with a transition logo. They didn’t make maple cap necks in ’67, so that must have been a one-off. So I bought it from the guy. I traded him for one of my guitars and I signed it. I gave it to the shop to refret it and scallop the fingerboard because I wanted to play it. It’s cream and has all the original parts.

    What’s in your live rig?
    I go through a Bradshaw, but there’s really nothing in it. The main sound is straight through the Marshalls with everything set full up. They’re all old amps from the ’60s and early ’70s, with four inputs and no master volume. They’re very primitive, but they have the most organic sound.

    I brought quite a few Marshalls on this tour; more than I normally use.

    The Bradshaw has six presets. The first is dry, and preset two splits the two stacks in stereo. One side is totally dry and the other has all the delay. I really love that effect! You can do little improvised fugues and stuff. The delay is a Korg DL-8000R.

    The third preset is bizarre, with a dry signal on one side and a delayed signal that’s an octave lower on the other side. So the octave divider comes only on the echo feed, and when I play with the volume knob for swells, it sounds like a violin and a cello together. The fourth preset is an octave higher up, using a TC Electronic G-Force. I only do that to annoy people.

    The last preset is an old Roland echo, which I also use to annoy people – like at the end of my guitar solo, which is quite annoying. Then I’ve got a Crybaby in there, and a DOD YJM Overdrive, which is a pedal I designed that’s based on the original ’70s 250 Overdrive. That’s it.

    The only reason I use these effects is to make it so it really is an effect. A lot of guys always have a little delay or chorus or harmonizer, and that’s cool for them. But I like it very organic, very straight. The playing should be more important than the effects.

    What are your plans for 2004?
    I signed a deal with Sony and Epic, and [my new album] is called Attack!! I’ll be touring in the States, Canada, Europe, Japan, and South America, then I’m going to start another album. I also recorded a live album in Europe and that’s going to come out, too. Then there’s also live DVD with me and the Japan Philharmonic. I’m really excited about that.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s April ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Stratospheric Variations

    When you think about it, it’s quite remarkable how few guitar archetypes there really are. By “archetypes” we’re referring to aesthetic design, or shapes.

    If you pull back and squint, there are basically only about half a dozen categories. The most basic is the Spanish guitar, that lovely, feminine figure-eight from antiquity. A Ramirez classical, a Martin dreadnought, a D’Angelico archtop, a Les Paul solidbody, arguably even the humble Telecaster and double-cut SG are all variations on this ancient archetype.

    At the other extreme is a kind of catch-all category we might call “exotica.” These include all those weird shapes that push the form. Explorers, Flying Vs, a Mockingbird, a Bunker, a Gittler, a Steinberger; all quite delightful, yet certainly eccentric interpretations of the form.

    In between fall designs such as the once-mighty Jazzmaster and one of the most remarkable and enduring creations of the 20th century, the offset double-cutaway Stratocaster invented in 1954 by Leo Fender, with help from Freddy Tavares.

    Even though it took a relatively long time for the Strat to exert itself as a dominant form, in retrospect, by any measure, Fender’s Stratocaster has been a phenomenal success. While slow to catch on, the Stratocaster has been in constant production for 48 years – virtually unchanged except for the pickup selector and the occasional detail or electronics permutation – and we can safely assert that no other guitar has influenced electric guitar design as much as the Strat.

    Bill Carson’s Dream
    From an organological perspective, the Strat was an attempt to build the ideal guitar as described by Bill Carson, the guitarist who served as Fender’s chief “consultant” in the early ’50s. He wanted a guitar that was balanced, contoured, with a Bigsby-style headstock, four pickups, and a vibrato that could raise or lower the strings a half step without going out of tune. So, he didn’t get one pickup!

    The offset double cutaways and the body contours were quite radical developments in 1954, and having three pickups was pure excess. The story of the Strat itself has been exhaustively documented, so there’s no need to dig deeper into that side of the story. This is more about the evolution of the form.

    An Elegant Solution
    From a manufacturing perspective, of course, the Strat, like its older sibling the Tele, were quite elegant. The Strat body required a bit more handwork to round the horns and create the contours, but both were essentially modular for streamlined construction. Unlike a Les Paul, there was no neck gluing, and no sandwich bodies, top carving, or elaborate binding. On maple necks, there wasn’t even a fingerboard to worry about! Just screw on the neck, hardware, and pickguard assembly. Admittedly, the vibrato, a piece of sheer engineering genius, did require a bit more work, but all-in-all, Fender’s guitars were remarkably designed for efficient manufacture.

    On ’50s Design
    Considered from a design point of view, the Strat is amazingly idiomatic of contemporary ’50s tastes. Coming in 1954, the Strat was right on the cusp of significant consumer design changes. The ’50s saw great strides in design changes. Americans, freed from the deprivations of World War II, were busy propagating and populating the newly-built suburbs with the post-war baby boom. Times were relatively good and there was pent up demand for goods of all kinds, necessary and leisurely. Household goods, for example, began to emerge from the quasi-utilitarianism of the Depression to incorporate design ideas intended to encourage consumption.

    The ’50s exhibited an uneasy truce between the geometric and the organic, between decoration and functionality. Curve-fitting sheath dresses were in for the ladies. Rockets were the sign of the times. Cars were on the verge of breaking away from the curvaceous bubbles of the ’40s. In ’48, the Cadillac acquired the first aeronautical fins, but by ’53 it was still sporting ample curves and lots of chrome, including a pair of bombs (or Dagmars) on the front bumper.

    However, in counterpoint (and also in ’53) there appeared the more elegant Eurostyle lines of the classic Studebakers designed by Raymond Loewy.

    Two of the most popular shapes of ’50s design were the boomerang and what Tom Hines, in his book on design, Populuxe, calls “the blob.”

    The popularity of the boomerang reflected the tension between geometry and organic. There, literally, was a great fad for boomerangs at the time! In ’55, Chrysler adopted a new logo that consisted of juxtaposed boomerang shapes. One of the most popular chairs of the era was the Hardog, or butterfly chair consisting of several boomerang metal structures over which was hung a canvas sling, often in orange. Even the golden arches of the new McDonald’s hamburger chain growing around the landscape were modified boomerangs.

    Perhaps the ultimate architectural expression of the boomerang was the spectacular TWA terminal at what was then Idlewild Airport (now JFK) in New York, its soaring swept wings designed by Eero Saarinen.

    Also ubiquitous was the blob. Although they’d been designed before the War, Alexander Calder’s mobiles, loaded with boomerangs and blobs, saw their greatest popularity in the ’50s. Blobby pole lamps were all the rage. Blobby coffee tables graced living rooms. Blobs were on wallpaper, curtains and counter tops. If you want to see a living treasure trove of ’50s boomerangs and blobs (plus lots of great neon), pay a visit to Wildwood, New Jersey.

    For guitar lovers, the Gibson Flying V, Explorer, and mysterious Moderne were expressions of boomerangs and blobs.

    Sign o’ The Times
    In any case, the ’54 Strat fell right in with these design notions. Its curves were organic, like the ’53 Caddy, but the dynamic thrust of the cutaways and angled lines of the lower bout moved it in more of a Loewy direction. If you just look at the cutaway horns, you have a classic boomerang. Look at the pickguard and you have a ’50s blob… with three pickups, like a three-hole Buick. Even the spaghetti logo is blobby.

    Despite its debt to Bigsby (and Stauffer, by the way; Leo Fender had visited Martin prior to designing the Strat, where he was shown an early Martin with the Austrian-style six-in-line headstock), the Strat’s head was clearly a fin, anticipating what was to come.

    In ’55, Virgil Exner designed Chrysler’s “Forward Look,” full of swept-wing fins. Indeed, you could easily see the Strat headstock shape as chrome trim on the side of a mid-’50s Buick Century, Ford Fairlane, or Plymouth Belvedere.

    Even the Strat’s colors reflected the times. Both kitchen appliances and bathroom fixtures were fashionable in color. One ad for refrigerators lists color options as Bermuda Pink, Dawn Grey, Buttercup Yellow, Sand Beige, Fern Green, and Lagoon Blue. Compare those with the Strat’s custom color options – Shell Pink, Inca Silver, Shoreline Gold, Foam Green, and Lake Placid Blue.

    What’s truly amazing about all this is, of course, that Dagmars (on cars) and boomerangs are now little more than curious artifacts (except in Wildwood), but the Fender Stratocaster has survived the vicissitudes of time and continues to thrive, more or less unchanged by the winds of fashion.

    A Slow Start
    As related by Fender’s chief salesman, Don Randall, dealers were at first reluctant about stocking the new Stratocaster. Its styling was too radical, and what was with that “tremolo” thing (one more time, these units are vibratos, not tremolos)?

    As we’ve discussed previously, the prevailing influence on the electric guitar in the ’50s was the Gibson Les Paul. Everything from Harmony Stratotones and the first Kays to Gretsch Round Ups and National/Supros, even early Japanese solidbodies – with only a few exceptions – were made in the Les Paul image. Since Les had been voted America’s most popular guitarist in ’53, this is no wonder.

    In an attempt to compete with the more upscale Les Paul, Fender introduced the more deluxe-appointed Jazzmaster in ’58. While the Jazzmaster never did set the guitar-playing world on fire, it did set guitarmakers everywhere on a track of imitating the blobby shape of this venerable Fender. Through much of the ’60s, the Jazzmaster would be a dominant factor in guitar design, especially among European and Japanese makers of budget guitars. Don’t forget, the classic single-cutaway Les Paul was replaced by the double-cutaway SG shape in ’61 (still called a Les Paul). While the SG has its advocates, this hapless guitar inspired very few imitations during its run.

    Early Inspirations
    When we talk about design influence during this early period, we’re not yet talking about “copies.” That would come later. Instead, companies would pay homage to the popular shapes, in order (no doubt) to capitalize on their recognition factors. No one at Harmony ever expected you to confuse a Stratotone with a Les Paul, even though, when you squint across a room, they look similar. There was a kind of unwritten rule that precluded exact copying during this era, though clearly manufacturers were not loath to borrow vibes. This would also be true when it came to making the first Strat inspirations.

    One of the earliest American luthiers to employ the Strat style was the late Gilbert Lee Stiles, Florida, who in 1960 or so began to make solidbody electrics in his garage. However, Stiles was primarily a single artisan. Stiles never set up a real production line so, while you encounter his pieces occasionally, he can’t really be considered a big industry influence.

    It appears that guitarmakers on both sides of the Atlantic discovered the Strat form at about the same time. In ’62, both Carvin (in the U.S.) and Hagstrom (in Sweden) introduced versions of the Strat shape. In retrospect, such a delay from ’54 is remarkable!

    Carvin, which was started in California in ’46 by Lowell Kiesel and evolved into a successful direct-to-consumer manufacturer, switched to a Strat-style shape in ’62. These were slab-bodied guitars with no contours and a bolt-on neck with a Strat-style headstock and Kluson tuners. These came with two or three Carvin-made pickups, either AP-6 or AP-1. By ’63 these were offered with a Bigsby vibrato.

    Crossing the Atlantic
    Hagstrom, which got into the music game in ’21 and began manufacturing accordions in ’31/’32, started making its plastic-covered Les Paul-shaped hollowbodies in ’58. In ’62 it switched to a Strat-style guitar known as the “Kent.” Known by a variety of names and sometimes sold in different countries with names other than Hagstrom, these had a downsized Strat shape with rounded corners but no contours. However, the most distinctive features of these little Strats included a colorful vinyl “fabricord” covering on the back and the famous molded plastic “swimming pool” pickup assembly and unique Hagstrom vibrato on the front.
    The bolt on necks (sometimes called Kord King) were ultra slim – perhaps the first super-thin necks – and had a Strat-style head. The pickup assembly, by the way, was perfectly bloboid.

    Carvin was the only American manufacturer to employ the Strat shape until later in the ’60s. But the design did catch on in Europe, which is interesting because the U.S. was the primary market for European guitarmakers, whose quality level put them in competition for the entry/mid-level guitars of the time (Harmony, Kay, Valco). Either consciously or intuitively, on some level they wanted to compete with real Strats.
    Both in terms of price point and the amount of work required to produce it, the Strat was perceived as being below a set-neck Gibson. By ’64, Höfner in Germany was offering its 170 series with a Strat shape and two fat single-coil pickups. The most famous of these was the 175 covered (like the Hagstrom) in a textured vinyl. By the following year, at least, Hoyer, also in Germany, was also offering models such as the 35, with a Strat shape.

    The German company, Klira, also produced Strat-inspired models, as did the English company, Watkins. Almost always, these had twin pickup layouts. In the U.K., the Burns Jazz Split Sound was a pretty good version of the Strat, with three fancy split-coil pickups, introduced around ’65.

    Further south, in ’65 the EKO company, in Recanati, Italy, had begun to move away from its Jazzmaster-shaped, sparkle covered models (which Karl Erik Hagstrom believes were a direct rip-off of his sparkle guitars), and introduced the Cobra, a slightly exaggerated Strat-style guitar. This was followed in ’67 by the Condor, which was even more like a Strat, including more contouring.

    Although he undoubtedly didn’t play one, Bill Carson’s ideal was fulfilled with the Condor, which finally had four pickups! And a Bigsby-style vibrato. While some of these were in fairly traditional finishes, others had very contemporary schemes, such as salmon pink and black similar to colors used on cars like the Ford Fairlane. Other Italian Strat-style guitars appeared in the later ’60s, including the ca. ’68 Juliet Delux in time-appropriate avocado green finish with groovy pop art plastic pickguard.

    But by then the bottom was dropping out of the market, and European costs were making selling into the American market prohibitive. Curiously, one of the major Euro guitarmakers, Framus, never really went after the Strat shape, but concentrated on the Jazzmaster style.

    By the ’70s, the Europeans, mostly insignificant in the U.S. by now, returned to a Gibson model. Some manufacturers such as Hagstrom and Framus hung on in America through most of the ’70s, but this would mark the end of any serious European role in the global guitar markets.

    Back Home in Kansas
    While most American companies sort of observed a “gentleman’s agreement” not to copy the designs of other American companies (although the Les Paul allusions didn’t seem to have a big effect on their consciences), at least one company did emulate the Fender Strat, the Holman-Woodell company in Neodesha, Kansas.

    Founded in May of ’65 by Howard E. Holman and Victor A. Woodell, its big coup was to score a contract with the Wurlitzer company to produce solidbody electric guitars. By ’65, of course, the blood lust was high for all companies to cash in on the electric guitar gravy train started by the Beatles in February of ’64. 1965 was the year CBS purchased the Fender company. This coincided with the first part of the Post-War baby boom’s achieving high adolescence, and arguably accounts for the existence of this magazine and the words you’re reading right now.

    In any case, Holman-Woodell produced several models for Wurlitzer, the most conservative of which was the Cougar Model 2512, a Strat-style guitar with a pair of single-coil pickups, a la Europa, and a Wurlitzer take on a Bigsby vibrato. Unfortunately for H-W, they didn’t really know how to finish their products right, and Wurlitzer experienced so many returns due to faulty finishes that the contract was ended in early ’66. If you’ve ever had one of these Kansas beauties, you’ve probably seen peeling paint. Holman subsequently briefly marketed these Strat-style guitars as the Holman Classic, but without Wurlitzer’s distribution clout, they were doomed. The company changed hands and struggled on for another year or so before becoming a footnote in guitar history.

    Crossing the Pacific
    We’ve also discussed the “copy phenomenon” before and pointed out that the Japanese manufacturers began to flex their muscle as quality improved and America presented what seemed to be an unlimited goldmine by the mid ’60s. Competing mainly with the Europeans (and somewhat with American makes such as Kay and Harmony), early on the Japanese began to imitate Old World guitars vying for the lower end of the market. Many early-’60s Japanese designs were based on the Jazzmaster, but that was more likely due to the fact that the Europeans were using that form, rather than an independent focus on Fender. Burns Bisons, EKO violins, and Vox teardrops would quickly inspire Japanese versions.

    The Japanese movement toward Stratdom occurred in around ’67, with several brands for American distributors. One was the Domino Olympic made for the Maurice Lipsky Music Co., Inc., in New York. The Domino line featured a number of near copies mostly made by Kawai. The Olympic was a bit thicker-waisted than a real Strat, but had slightly slanted, flat-poled single-coil pickups meant to suggest a Strat.

    Simultaneously, Buegeleisen & Jacobson, Lipsky’s Cooper Union neighbor, which had been one of the early companies turning to Japan in the late ’50s, introduced its Kent Model 742/4. This Kent was clearly a variant on the Strat, even though it had significant styling differences, ranging from pointed cutaway horns to a three-and-three headstock. Also, the body of the 742 was not contoured, but featured beautiful burled maple top and back and sides bound in wide, almost Baroque black and white plastic strips.

    Again, this featured four pickups (although they are some of the worst sounding pickups ever encountered). A real Bigsby was optional. Three- and two-pickup versions were also offered with the 741/3 and 740/2. Both the Domino Olympic and Kent 740s were history by ’68, as were a bunch of guitar companies (including Valco/Kay) with the big guitar washout.

    The Copy Era
    Almost quite literally 1968 marked the end of one era and the beginning of another. With the demise of Valco/Kay and a lot of Japanese manufacturers, the old model was realigned. The manufacturers who survived were put on a new road that lead to the “copy era,” and the beginnings of an entirely new relationship among international guitarmakers.

    Accounts of how copies began differ, but it’s probably safe to believe Shiro Arai of Arai and Co., makers of Aria and Diamond guitars (plus many others). Arai recalls visiting the 1968 NAMM show where Gibson reintroduced the Les Paul Custom, the Black Beauty. Arai mentioned to the Gibson people that he thought they no longer made that guitar and was told that it was a copy of the old model. The light went on and Arai returned to Japan to build a bolt-neck “copy” of the Les Paul Custom. By the following year Japanese “copies” of Les Pauls began coming into the U.S. It didn’t take long for the phenomenon to spread to other “copies” of popular American guitars.

    The first copy era Japanese Strat copies – although, like their Les Paul counterparts, not yet truly “copies” – appeared in 1970, from at least three different sources. One was a Strat-style guitar, the No. 1802, offered by none other than Gibson itself carrying the Epiphone brand name. This featured an Epi-style three-and-three headstock and a pair of black-and-white pickups that were common on Aria guitars of the time. Indeed, this was virtually identical to a contemporary Aria No. 1802. Both were probably made by Matsumoku. A year later, this guitar was changed to a Model ET270 designation, but was otherwise unchanged until around ’75.

    Another early Strat-style line came from W.M.I. carrying the Teisco del Rey moniker, the ET-440 and ET-220 Deluxe guitars (there was a similar EB-120 Deluxe Bass). Teisco had gotten closer to a Strat style with the WG series of a few years earlier, but their tubby profiles certainly lacked the Strat’s elegance. Both the ET-440 and ET-220 were “mini-Strats” with Spectrum Sound pickups, Framus-style plywood necks and wood-grained Strat-style heads. The ET-440 had four pickups, the ET-220 had two.

    These were offered for several years as W.M.I. made the transition from using the Teisco del Rey name to the Kay brand, which it had bought at auction in ’69. By ’73, the Kay name had prevailed and the line shifted toward more conventional copies, including Strats. Strat-style guitars would be a major part of the Kay line going forward, even as production shifted from Japan to Korea, and then parts beyond.

    The third early Strat-style copy came from Hoshino Gen Gakki as the Ibanez No. 2020 Electric Guitar. This was basically a wide-bodied, contoured Strat with a pair of chrome-covered single-coil pickups and a vibrato. Most had Strat-style heads, but a few have been seen with Teisco “checkmark” headstocks. The No. 2020 was joined in ’71 by the Model No. 2375 Strato. This initially had three Tele-style pickups and a stop tailpiece but quickly changed to be a more traditional vibrato-equipped Strat copy. These were made through the copy era until around ’78.

    By late ’72, St. Louis Music, which would be another big player in the copy game, had introduced its Avenger Series of Electra guitars. These were full-blown Strat copies with maple fingerboards in black, sunburst, and cream finishes.

    It was also in ’72 that Kasuga began advertising its copy guitars in The Music Trades magazine – and the copy era began to really kick in. While the primary focus of the copy era was on Gibson style guitars – being more expensive, they offered more margin to undercut – but Strats came in for their share of copying. Even Guild purchased some of the Kasugas, including Strats, and marketed them as Madeira guitars beginning in ’73. Strats were copied by companies as various as Aria (Aria Pro II after ’75) and Hondo throughout the main part of the ’70s, virtually all of them manufactured in Japan.

    Getting Playful
    While all this copying was going on, so was a fair amount playing with the form, either in terms of decoration or innovative electronics.

    Among the more interesting decorative variations was the use of carving to enhance the body. In ’74, fairly early in the game, Ibanez introduced a trio of Strat copies with bodies carved in Taiwan. These included the Models No. 2508-1 Artwood Orient, No. 2508-2 Artwood Nouveau and No. 2408-3 Artwood Eagle. The Orient featured an elaborate dragon design, the Nouveau a bunch of leaves and fruit in a botanical theme, and the Eagle with an obvious motif.

    The Ibanez carved Strats lasted only about a year, but were imitated in around 1977 by some more dragon-carved Strat copies including the Aria Pro II PE-160 Dragon and another identical guitar sold by Merson-Unicord carrying the Univox brand. These were, I believe, equally short-lived.

    Another curious innovation was the early addition of onboard electronic effects. Effects had originated mainly in the ’60s and took off in the early ’70s. They ranged from little square boxes by Dan Armstrong (e.g., the Orange Juicer) that plugged into the jack in front of the cord to various foot pedals that did everything from create distortion or phasing to wah and volume.

    In ’77, the Japanese company, Fresher, introduced the Straighter FSC100 that had onboard distortion, wah, and phaser, with an individual speed control knob for each. The effects were put on several guitar designs and remain quite amusing if you can find one. This notion would be picked up a few years later, quite independently, on the Effector guitar by Cort, the Korean partnership between Jack Westheimer and Yung H. Park. These effects, a little more complex than those of the Fresher, were mainly mounted on Explorer copies, but a very few ended up on Strat copies.

    One footnote to this Strat-with-novel-electronics theme was picked up again in ca. ’84 in a short-lived but remarkable Strat-style guitar called the Player, no relation to J.B. These were upscale guitars with one-piece mahogany body and a swell ebony fingerboard. These were the product of a company in Scarsdale, New York, headed by N.S. “Buck” Brundage (please contact me if you know more about Buck or this company).

    Besides being very fine guitars, Players had the novel feature of pickups mounted in plastic modules that let you change them at will by simply pushing them through the back and shoving in the new unit. Despite some positive press, these apparently lasted only about a year, but are one of the cooler electronic interpretations of the Strat form.

    Shifting Gears
    The copy era ended abruptly in ’77, when Norlin (parent of Gibson) filed a lawsuit in Federal Court in Philadelphia against the Elger Company, the American subsidiary of Hoshino, manufacturers of Ibanez guitars. The suit was settled out of court, and copying of Gibson products by all manufacturers ceased pretty much immediately.

    Since Fender was not party to the suit, Fender copies straggled on briefly, with Ibanez still selling Challenger Series Strats into ’78. In ’79, Ibanez introduced the Roadster Series, which still consisted of a Strat-style body and three pickups in a Strat-style configuration. However, in addition to a new blade-style headstock, the pickups were larger and mounted to the top on surrounds as opposed to a pickguard. These had heavy cast tailpieces instead of a vibrato, but still created cool, beefy Stratish sounds. The better Roadsters even had flamed maple tops and backs visible through a translucent butterscotch finish.

    In 1980, the Ibanez Roadster Strats were replaced by the Blazer series, initially very similar to the Roadsters, with either three single-coil pickups or two humbuckers. In ’82 the Ibanez Blazers transmogrified into the popular Roadstar II line. These added more distinctive styling touches to the basic Strat shape, with squarer, slightly hooked cutaway horns. They continued to rely on either the three single-coil or two-humbucker pickup layouts. The Roadstar IIs and their progeny, the RS and RG guitars, all come straight out of the lineage of the Fender Stratocaster, although they quickly became part of the associated SuperStrat story, which we’ll discuss in a subsequent essay.

    Similarly, companies such as Aria also continued to imply the Strat concept in modified form through the ’80s. After its initial run of Rev Sound RS guitars in the late ’70s, their version of the Ibanez Musician series, Aria Pro II switched to a svelte, slightly streamlined Strat shape, many with the typical three-pickup layout, although the active electronics gave them a distinctive sound. These quickly evolved into the passive Warrior series that dominated the ’80s. Some of these featured a Strat configuration, although, again, these Arias will be discussed in the SuperStrat story.

    Passing the Torch
    While shipping copies into America stopped, there was a concomitant burst of demand for them in Japan beginning ca. ’78. Companies such as Hoshino, which had become so heavily vested in the U.S. market, gave up the copy business. Aria continued a little while, but other companies in Japan picked up the torch. Even companies such as Yamaha, which had hitherto only made original designs, began to build copies for the Japanese market.

    Other companies that began making copies at roughly around this time were Tokai and Fernandes. As you might expect, these are of superb quality. One very amusing feature of these is the model names, especially on Yamahas. Using logo typeface that looked identical to the American original, the Les Paul was called the Love Rock, and the Strat – complete with spaghetti letters – was called the SuperRivroller!

    By the early ’80s, Tokai had perfected the art of copying to the point where it was making versions of vintage Strats. Play an ’82 Tokai AST ’56 Vintage Series with your eyes closed, and you have a ’56 Strat in your hands… at a fraction of the price.

    Some of the Fernandes and Tokai copy guitars began to make their way back into the U.S. market as the ’80s dawned. In ’81, alarmed at yet another prospect of market share erosion (at a time when the bloom had well worn off Fender’s rose for CBS), Fender had a container of Fernandes Strats held at port until a shipment of replacement necks could be provided, necks with a different headstock design. Thereafter, most Strat copies sent into the U.S. had modified headstock designs.

    Indeed, it was around this time that Fender initiated a joint venture with one of the Japanese manufacturers to begin Fender Japan, initially intended to make Fender’s Squier line. Both because the product quality was so good and costs became too high, Fender stopped importing Japanese guitars into the U.S. in the mid ’80s.

    (Leo) Fender Redux
    While the Japanese were paying all this attention to the venerable Strat, the form was also getting renewed attention from another, more intimate, corner. Indeed, from its creator himself – Leo Fender.

    Fender, who had been ill when he sold his company to CBS in ’65, had recovered and was anxious to return to the guitarmaking business. To that end, in ’72 Fender hooked up with former Fender Musical Instruments executives Forrest White and Tom Walker, and founded Music Man.

    Pursuing earlier interests, Fender first turned his attention to building guitar and bass amplifiers based on his previous designs. When he returned to guitars in ’76, it was to his stalwart Stratocaster that he turned. The first Music Man guitars were the Sting Ray I and II and the Sabre I and II (the I and II signifying different fingerboard radii). Both had contoured offset double-cutaway bodies similar to a Strat, with two new pickups of Fender’s design and an optional onboard preamp. Alas, as good as these guitars were, they were never quite as successful as Music Man amplifiers or basses.

    Not ready to give up, Leo left Music Man, and in 1980 teamed with another Fender veteran, George Fullerton, to form G&L (George and Leo). G&L’s first guitar was the F-100, essentially a reworked twin-humbucker Music Man with the famous Strat shape and two humbucking pickups. Another Strat-inspired guitar, the S-500, debuted in ’82, with three single-coil pickups and vibrato designed by Leo. G&L guitars didn’t really take off (if that’s the proper description) until ’85, with the introduction of the Broadcaster, a Tele copy. Its name, by the way, was quickly changed (déjà vu!) to the ASAT in ’86, and it would continue to be G&L’s most successful model.

    Hard Times and Parts
    The actual Fender Stratocaster had fallen on hard times in the ’70s. Following the CBS takeover, production began to change in attempts to make the company more efficient and therefore profitable. The most famous change was from a four-bolt to a three-bolt neck joint, which had player’s swearing that the new design was less stable and didn’t sound as good. Although you rarely hear this complaint today, this was the source of early vintage collector snobbery concerning pre-CBS and post-CBS Strats.

    As the ’70s dawned, the old, smaller headstock was redesigned to a larger shape, (no doubt following the old pre-gas-crisis American design axiom that bigger was better). This further annoyed Strat purists, and Fender returned to the smaller shape in the early ’80s. In any case, Fender, like Gibson, continued to suffer quality control problems throughout the ’70s, allowing other companies to make significant inroads on its market share.

    In part because of this deterioration of the Strat’s reputation, the late ’70s saw the emergence of a vibrant parts culture, with companies manufacturing Strat bodies and necks out of premium timbers and selling these parts to guitarists who would then assemble kit Strats. Three of the most successful were Mighty Mite, Schecter Guitar Research, and Charvel Manufacturing. Indeed, for a time, Schecter and Charvel were actually partners. All sold custom bodies, necks, and special pickups and wiring harnesses for the do-it-yourselfer.
    Any of these custom Strats may still be encountered and represent an interesting chapter in guitar history, although since many of the components were unbranded, identifying them might present a problem.

    Stratmania
    Charvel Manufacturing, in particular, was the creation of Wayne Charvel, who operated a respected repair shop and built a reputation for custom-made Strat-style guitar bodies and necks. Charvel began working with another luthier, Grover Jackson, ca. ’77, and in ’78 Jackson purchased the rights to Charvel Manfacturing Company. In ’79, Jackson began to offer bolt-neck Strats carrying the Charvel brand name. Ca. ’81 he started selling neck-through guitars under the Jackson brand name.

    The success of Jackson and Charvel Strat-style guitars turned the Strat into the dominant form of the ’80s, with the guitar press touting the new phenomenon called “Stratmania.” Coincidental with the success of Jackson/Charvel were significant developments by other established companies like Dean and Kramer. Together, these combined to create the ultimate shredding machine, the SuperStrat, a development that would immortalize the Strat form (which we’ll discuss later).

    Bizarro Strats
    Before we leave this tribute, it’s interesting to note that there have been some fascinating variations on the Strat form over the years, ranging from “anti-Strats” to obvious inspirations, to entertaining exaggerations.

    The first “anti-Strat” we’re aware of came in the early ’60s with the invention of Semi Moseley’s Mosrite solidbodies, which by mid-decade had become associated with the Ventures. Indeed, Moseley has described how he arrived at his “reverse Strat” design: he simply got a Strat and flipped it over to trace the outline, which he tweaked to become the Mosrite!

    Guitars that were clearly inspired by the Strat are probably legion, some better known than others. As we’ve seen, there were not too many of these until the 1970s when the Strat began to emerge from the shadow of the more popular Gibson Les Paul.

    One less well-known guitar was the Travis Bean TB-500, a more-or-less Strat-shaped version of Bean’s more familiar Gibson-style aluminum-necked wonder. When Martin decided to try it’s hand at solidbody electrics in ’78 with the E-18 and EM-18 (joined by the E-28 in ’80), the body shapes were decidedly Stratoid. Another highly significant guitar from ’78 was the Peavey T-60, the world’s first to be carved by numerically controlled carving machines (today a common practice). It combined a rounded, Gibson-style lower bout with the offset double cutaways of a Strat. Even though it had two humbuckers, the T-60 had a novel wiring scheme that gave a Stratish single-coil combination when the tone control was at 10 (it switched to humbucker at about 8).

    Identifying exaggerations of the Strat might be a little more subjective, but if you open your mind, they’re all around. It’s arguable, for example, that the famous pointed Burns Bison is little more than an exaggerated Strat form. A favorite take on this is the Japanese Avalon Shaggs model from the late ’60s. Even the wonderful tulip-shaped EKOs of the early ’60s are, if you will, Strats with the horns pulled outward.

    Indeed, Bernie Rico followed this notion when he came up with the B.C. Rich Eagle in ’75. Technically speaking, what became the Eagle was a redesign of his Seagull as a bass for Olivia Newton John’s bassist, Bill Bodine, re-dubbed the Eagle a year or so later. Despite it’s floral flair, if you squint, you can still detect some of the spirit of the Strat. In the ’80s, Rico introduced the ST series that was his version of the Strat/SuperStrat.

    One of the more bizarre Strat inspirations was the Peavey Vandenberg introduced in ’88, with a distorted profile and various quasi-fiddle notches cut out, designed for the Dutch guitar ace Adrian Vandenberg. Very out there.

    Ubiquity
    Leo Fender, the Strat’s inventor, died in ’91, but lived long enough to see his creation become ubiquitous. It is impossible for us to document the legions of Strat-inspired guitars that have appeared since the Stratmania of the early ’80s. Everyone from Martin (with its Stinger line) to Harmony to Peavey to Robin, and a host in-between, produced both similar and overt tributes to the Strat form. Today you can get a Johnson Strat made in Indonesia or China for a $150, or a high-end interpretation by Levinson for considerably more. Not to mention dozens of variations now offered by Fender itself. It has gotten so crazy that Fender has, over the last decade, begun to make replicas of its older Strats, first with the Relic series and now with its Closet Classics series. Both aim to copy the specs of certain year Strats and then employ sophisticated finishing techniques to make them seem, in the case of the Relics, as if they’d been played for decades in a beer bar (with fake fingerboard wear and dings, etc.), or, in the case of the Closet Classics, as if they’d just aged naturally under somebody’s bed, with just slight wear and finish crazing.

    A pretty impressive achievement for an elegant combination of boomerangs, blobs, and fin-like angles first carved out of maple in 1954.

    Stratospheric Variations, Part II

    Aclose first cousin to the phenomenally successful Stratocaster, the “Superstrat” was
    at one time the heir apparent to the throne of guitardom, and represents an interesting subtheme in the exploration of guitar archetypes or designs. From an aesthetic design perspective, the Superstrat is really a Stratocaster – pure and simple – and belongs with that discussion. However, since it was once a powerful expression of the electric guitar genre, it merits its own story.

    What is a Superstrat? There’s probably no universal agreement on a definition, and it may have drifted over time. Basically, the Superstrat is a hybrid form, a kind of “muscle guitar,” if you will, with three main characteristics. The first is the overall shape that derives directly from the Strat, with offset double cutaways and (usually) a six-in-line headstock of one shape or another (often pointed and derided as “pointy headed” guitars by vintage purists at the time).

    The second feature/hybrid element – one might argue the “compromise” element – comes from a fusion of the electronics of a Stratocaster and a Gibson Les Paul. For reasons we’ll touch on later, in the early ’80s, players wanted to be able to get the shimmering sonorities and flexibility of the Strat’s five single-coil positions, but also wanted to shift into the fat, crunching Les Paul humbucker mode for soloing. The solution (which first appeared on production guitars in about ’83) was to replace the bridge single-coil with a humbucker, leaving the middle and neck single-coils. A less common variation on this, which we’ll also look at, was to keep two humbuckers and put a single-coil in between.
    Third – the “muscle” part – the true Superstrat features a heavy duty double-locking vibrato system.

    Strat-mania
    The shape. We’ve recently discussed the Fender Stratocaster as an archetypal design shape surviving remarkably intact from the ’50s. And Strats continued to be a mainstay of the guitar scene throughout the ’70s, but they were somewhat in the shadow of the Gibson Les Paul, which was well-adapted to arena rock. Because it was a more expensive guitar, the Les Paul also offered more room for profit for companies making copies, helping to make the form almost ubiquitous.

    In addition, the ’70s were a difficult time for the Strat. CBS’ commitment was wavering, and quality control suffered. Although you wouldn’t believe from today’s prices, there was a time when you could hardly give away a ’70s Strat.

    In any case, by the ’80s, guitarists had begun to rediscover the Strat. Collecting interest began to focus on Strats and performers began to use them in greater numbers. The Strat fit much better into the anti-solo New Wave music that emerged at the end of the ’70s. The Strat caught on sufficiently that ca. ’82, Guitar Player magazine recognized the phenomenon with a cover story on “Strat-mania.” This proved prophetic and, formally speaking, the ’80s would belong to the Strat.

    Parts Guitars
    The ’70s copy companies also made Strat copies, of course, but they weren’t the primary focus, and not a big influence. The renewed interest in the Strat form appears around ’77 with the emergence of parts guitars. The main pioneers of the parts guitar business were Charvel Manufacturing, and Schecter Guitar Research. At least they were among the first to actively promote the notion.

    Wayne Charvel opened a guitar repair shop in Azusa, California, in ’74. David Schecter similarly opened a repair shop in Van Nuys, California, in ’75 or ’76 (and there was a very brief period when Charvel and Schecter were in business together). Charvel began advertising parts in GP in late ’76, with Schecter’s ads appearing the following year. These purveyors were soon joined by Mighty Mite and Boogie. All produced custom necks and bodies, and sometimes electronics, so you could make your own guitar… presumably better than Fender because of its reputation/situation and because its instruments employed a bolt-neck technology, Strats were the primary guitars pushed by these firms.

    From a manufacturing point of view, it was probably Kramer that started to steer designs toward the Strat. Early Kramer is best known for its wishbone aluminum necks, although it would become perhaps the driving force behind the Superstrat concept. Kramer’s first guitar, the 450G (from ’76), was one of the first new guitars to use something of a Strat shape, with offset double cutaways, not as pronounced as a Strat, although with more of a Gibsonish rounded lower bout and twin humbuckers. Subsequent Kramer models would vacillate between Kalamazoo and California. Still, it was a tentative step in a Strat direction.

    The first manufacturer to embrace the Strat more directly was Hoshino, with its Ibanez brand, introducing the Roadster in ’79. These had Strat bodies and a new blade headstock style, with either three large single-coils or twin ‘buckers and a heavy-duty cast fixed bridge. These lasted only a year and were supplanted by the Blazer series of Strat-style guitars with slightly squared off cutaway horns, more pickup switching options, and vibratos, beginning a decades-long Ibanez affection for Strat-style guitars. In ’82, the Ibanez Roadstar II line replaced the Blazers, and these would eventually become the Ibanez entry into the Superstrat game.

    It’s also about this time that another key player, Grover Jackson, entered the scene. Jackson is often credited with inventing the Superstrat, but it’s probably more accurate to say that his guitars were a major force in popularizing and legitimizing the form. As an up-and-coming luthier, Jackson began working with Wayne Charvel. Charvel Manufacturing ran into financial trouble and in ’78 Jackson bought the business, including rights to the Charvel name. Jackson continued to make replacement parts, including Strat bodies.

    EVH and RR
    Enter two more key players in the story. In ’78, a new band with a super-hot young guitarist debuted – Van Halen. Shown on the cover of their LP was young Eddie with his white guitar decorated with crisscrossing black stripes. The guitar was a Charvel neck and body, and other parts. More on him later.

    In ’79/’80 (depending on which account you believe) Charvel guitars debuted, designed and produced under the direction of Grover Jackson. These were basically Strat copies, most with a single Seymour Duncan humbucker at the bridge, and a volume control.

    In ’80, Jackson undertook a project to design a guitar for another young hotshot named Randy Rhoads, who had just signed with ex-Black Sabbath vocalist Ozzy Osbourne. This resulted in the twin-humbucker Randy Rhoads V-style guitar that debuted in ’81 and carried the Jackson brand name. It was a neck-through guitar. Neck-through Strat-style Jackson guitars quickly followed, and thenceforth, at least while Grover Jackson was in charge, Charvel was the brand used on bolt-neck guitars and Jackson on neck-throughs. Both Charvel and Jackson guitars would soon become highly influential ’80s brands, though by our definition they were not yet Superstrats.

    An Avalanche of Strats
    In ’78, following the out-of-court settlement with Gibson, Ibanez introduced several new lines of guitars, including the upscale Musician series, which featured neck-through construction and advanced active electronics, highly inspired by Alembic and B.C. Rich, both popular at the time. Ever competitive, Aria Pro II followed suit with its own version, the new Rev-Sound series in 1979. Featuring neck-through construction and similar active electronics, the Rev-Sounds took on much more of a Strat-style shape, with a modified Strat-ish kind of head. Not yet a Superstrat, but one step closer.

    These early Rev-Sounds were replaced by a svelter series of bolt-neck Revs in ’82 or ’83, most still with interesting pickup ideas. The Esprit, for example, was active with three single-coils, but the middle pickup was a dummy, allowing a range of out-of-phase sounds. The Classic also looked like three single-coils, but the middle was actually a double-coil pickup. These second-generation Rev-Sounds would later become the Cat series and represent Aria in the Superstrat sweeps.

    In ’78, Carvin, which had been mainly in a Gibson mode for most of the ’70s, began making its own bodies and necks again, and gluing them together. In ’79, Mark Kiesel designed Carvin’s first Strat-style guitar with offset pointy cutaways. This guitar debuted in ’80 and would anchor the Carvin line for most of the decade. Another brick in the wall.

    Kramer, known for its aluminum-necked guitars, added wooden necks to its repertoire in ’81 when it introduced the Pioneer and Pacer guitars, both basically Strat-style guitars with one or two humbuckers or three single-coils. The Pacer would go on play a big role in our story.

    By ’82, as the world was poised for the debut of the Superstrat, practically every manufacturer except Gibson offered Strat-style guitars. The Strat form had triumphantly reestablished itself.

    A Sound Compromise: The hybrid Pickup Layout
    Until the ’70s, guitars fell into two categories based on their pickups; they either had single-coil or dual-coil pickups. You could have any number of pickups (usually from one to four), but they were either single-coil or humbucker, and usually went straight out.

    Yamaha was one of the first to approach mixing the two types in ’66, when it introduced its innovative SG-5 and SG-7 guitars. While these still employed single-coil pickups, they had one neck pickup and two bridge pickups contained in a single housing. A three-way toggle selected the neck or bridge assembly, or both. However, the bridge pickups featured a “blender” knob that let you fade between them, in the middle getting both coils. This was still not a hybrid design, but it was way ahead of its time.

    Interest in pickups increased as the ’70s progressed. Early in the decade, Larry DiMarzio began to make a name for himself as a maker of high-output replacement humbucking pickups. A great deal of experimentation went on as the ’70s progressed. Bill Lawrence may have been one of the first to break the humbucker/single-coil dichotomy with his groundbreaking work for Gibson in the ’70s. Among his guitars were the L6-S (epoxy-potted Super Humbuckers), S-1 (three single-coils wired together as one large pickup), and Marauder. The ’75 Marauder sported a neck humbucker (for warm, fat jazz tones) and a bridge single-coil (for biting leads). The first Marauders had three-way selects, but quickly changed to a blender knob (a la Yamaha) that let you sweep through the pickups on a continuum.

    Probably the first to re-think this notion of the bridge single-coil/neck humbucker was Randy Curlee, who began S.D. Curlee guitars in 1975. Curlee was one of the early manufacturers to put DiMarzio pickups on his guitars. Among a number of other innovations, Curlee reversed the order, putting a single-coil at the neck and a high-output DiMarzio at the bridge. Between Lawrence and Curlee, the old conventions had been overturned, although it would be exaggeration to suggest that either solution took the guitar world by storm.

    In Search of First Place
    As far as can be determined at this time, the first mass-production guitar to employ the classic Superstrat pickup layout was the Peavey T-27, which was introduced in 1982 as part of a remake of the T-Series by Peavey designer Chip Todd. The original Peavey T-60 was a highly significant guitar designed by Hartley Peavey and Todd introduced in ’78. The T-60 was the first guitar produced using numerically controlled carving machines, an idea borrowed from rifle gunstocks. Today, virtually every production guitar is made using this technology. Although it did feature slightly offset double cutaways and a six-in-line headstock, in terms of inspiration the T-60 was probably still closer to Gibson than Fender. It did, by the way, feature a radical element in that the tone control also served as a coil tap, yielding a single-coil sound at 10 and a humbucker when rolled back a bit. The ’82 makeover changed the body styling a bit and changed pickups to a new blade-style Super Ferrite design. Several pickup layouts were employed, but the now familiar h/s/s pattern was first put on the T-27.

    Back to ’78 again, and Edward Van Halen mugging for the camera on the cover of Van Halen’s first LP. Although it may not have been immediately recognized, this record essentially set the mark for the following decade. Certainly, guitar players recognized that something new had been unleashed on the world, and it’s impossible to overemphasize the impact young Eddie had on guitar technique. Among other things, Eddie employed a two-handed tapping technique where he would tap notes with his left hand while slamming his right hand fingers onto the fingerboard higher up. Of course, this was nothing new. Classical guitarists had done similar things for centuries. In the modern era, Toledo’s Harry DeArmond (of pickup fame) is acknowledged for discovering the technique and applying it to jazz in the ’30s, though he rarely receives credit; that usually does go to his protegé, Jimmy Webster, who appropriated the technique from DeArmond and went on to be a major force for Gretsch. In any case, it’s unlikely Eddie was familiar with either, and certainly his playing came as revelation to kids in ’78.

    EVH and RR… Again
    However that may be, there on the album, in Eddie’s hands, was his custom guitar made up of Charvel parts and routed for a typical Strat pickup layout. But instead of three single-coil pickups, Van Halen simply had a single humbucker slapped in at the bridge. Before you knew it, there was a legion of young players trying to tap their way to fame on ripped up guitars with a single pickup.

    The success of Van Halen raised the bar for guitar players and established an underground taste for guitar-driven heavy rock, even at a time when punk and new wave, not to mention disco and synth music, were undermining it. One new guitarist who did measure up to the new standard was Randy Rhoads, whose soloing for Ozzy was equally stunning, who, as we said, was beginning to work with Grover Jackson in ’80/’81. Unfortunately, Rhoads’ promising career would be cut short when he perished in a light airplane crash (as it buzzed the band’s tour bus) in early ’82.

    The influence of the likes of Van Halen and Rhoads would erupt on the popular music scene in the early ’80s, with the semi-reactionary movement known as the New Wave of British Heavy Metal (NWOBHM). While music critics and record buyers had proclaimed the death of heavy metal in the late ’70s, this new movement began to well up in provincial England ca. ’79. Not to suggest that Van Halen spawned the NWOBHM, but there was something in the air, and VH is often accused of causing the American hair-band movement.

    In any case, NWOBHM bands wore spandex and big hairdos, sang about deep things like druids and doom, and played loud, fast, solo-laden guitar music through towers of Marshall amps, the more lead guitars the better. By the early ’80s, this music was beginning to reach the U.S. and change musical tastes back toward guitar music.

    Comparably styled music began to emerge in L.A., though for Druids and Doom you have to substitute Girls, Girls, Girls. Judas Priest and Ratt reflected the intercontinental poles. I remember moving to Philly in ’83 and strafing my Center City neighborhood magazine store every few weeks for the latest issue of Kerrang!, one of the leading fanzines covering the NWOBHM.

    Anyhow, the guitars of choice for these new metalists were generally high-output, humbucker-driven Les Pauls or a variety of pointy guitars emerging at the time. B.C. Rich guitars were very popular among the new metallists. In any case, it was the rise of this loud, heavy music that would collide with the growing desire for Strat-style guitars and set the stage for the appearance of the Superstrat.

    Divebombing
    The “whammy.”
    Almost from the beginning of electric Spanish guitars, guitarists have wanted mechanical devices to allow them to detune the strings. Thus the emergence of the vibrato or whammy bar in modern parlance. And yes, the misnomered tremolo. Once more for the record: vibrato is pitch variation, which a whammy does (detune the strings by loosening them). Tremolo is volume variation, which you can achieve by fiddling with your volume knob or, if you’re lucky, working the spring-loaded Orgeltone “spigot” on your Framus.

    Without belaboring this subject here, basically three designs dominated whammydom for the first 30 years: the Bigsby – top-mounted, a simple bar with the strings wrapped around sitting on a big spring under a handle; the Fender Stratocaster vibrato, an adjustable bridge assembly with a big chunk of metal descending into a cavity attached to some long tension springs at the end; and the Jazzmaster, kind of an inversion of a Bigsby with the spring inside a shallower cavity.

    All work pretty well if you’re content to limit the effect to little flourishes or even a little more ambitious wanking. But if you want to get more aggressive with one of these traditional whammies, you’d better like playing out of tune because once you back off the spring, the strings are likely to be stretched and/or the device won’t be in precisely the same place where you started.

    This brings us back to the wunderkind of ’78, Edward Van Halen. Not only did Eddie introduce rock guitarists to the idea of two-handed tapping, he was a vicious vibrato player, loving to divebomb his strings dead before bringing them back up to pitch. A Bigsby just won’t cut it with this kind of technique!

    A Better Way
    Enter a designer by the name of Floyd Rose, who began working on new ideas for the vibrato in the mid ’70s, and in the late ’70s hooked up with Van Halen to refine them.

    In a nutshell, the Rose solution was to take an in-body Strat-style vibrato and clamp the strings into it. Then he placed some clamps at the nut to lock the strings down. Add a necessary fine-tuning thumbwheel mechanism, and you have a revolutionary new vibrato that lets you divebomb to your heart’s content without putting the guitar out of tune.

    In ’82, he received a patent for his new double-locking design and also hooked up with Dennis Berardi, the main man at Kramer. Berardi and Rose came to an agreement that Kramer guitars would produce and distribute the Floyd Rose vibrato system, Eddie Van Halen endorsed Kramer guitars, and the Kramer juggernaut of the ’80s was truly launched.

    The Floyd Rose was not the only contestant in the race for the new vibrato. Ca. ’81, a German firm came up with the Rockinger double-locking vibrato, and in fact, Van Halen was briefly associated with this unit. These appeared on Kramer guitars as an option in ’82, after which the Rose became standard.

    Likewise, the Kahler company devised a number of double-locking designs around this same time, including several top-mounted units and an in-body similar to the Floyd Rose. Many other companies got into the game. Fender even came up with its own novel nightmare in the Elite. Ibanez created a number of interesting Power Rocker and Hard Rocker innovations. Aria had its versions. In Japan, ESP came up with the Flicker, which was employed on several production guitars, including Deans.

    All of these were viable options until after ’86 or ’87, when Floyd Rose successfully defended his patent claims, requiring all double-locking vibratos to pay him a license fee, ending any incentive to come up with new designs. We’ll return to this fascinating subject in another essay, but suffice it to say, by ’82 a revolution in guitar vibrato technology had occurred.

    Superstrat at Last
    In ’83, all of these influences came together to create the Superstrat, as we’ve defined it. We have guitarists wanting to play Strat-style guitars, cranking out crunching leads with fat, juicy humbuckers, and wanting to decorate their sound with divebombing vibrato pyrotechnics.

    It appears from this point in time that the classic Superstrat was developed coincidentally at the same time by Dean and Kramer.

    Dean, the brainchild of Chicago-area guitarmaker Dean Zelinsky, had spearheaded the movement, along with neighboring Hamer guitars, toward making upscale versions of Gibson guitars beginning in the late ’70s. Dean’s flame-topped, winged-headed, DiMarzio-humbucker-equipped versions of the Flying V, Explorer, and Les Paul quickly became popular among rock’s elite. These were soon followed by similar downscale Dean Babies. But by the early ’80s, the pressure was on to create a Strat-style guitar.

    According to Zelinsky, the inspiration for his first Strat-style guitar came to him in the middle of one night in late ’82 or early ’83. The next day, he sketched out a radical Strat-style shape that would become the Bel Aire; it would have an exaggerated, Strat-shaped body and a bolt-on neck with “shrimp fork” three-and-three headstock made by ESP in Japan. It was equipped with an ESP Flicker locking vibrato, a lead humbucker, and two single-coils operated by a five-way select. A Superstrat. It was introduced in ’83.

    According to Dean literature, this would become the first production guitar to employ what we have defined as the quintessential Superstrat features… Or was it?

    Kramer, which had begun in New Jersey around the same time, had built a good business selling guitars based on an aluminum-neck concept (also sporting DiMarzios). Kramer began to introduce wooden necks as an option in ’81, at the same time it introduced its first Strat-style guitar, the Pacer.
    In ’83, Kramer re-styled the Pacer and introduced the Pacer Deluxe, a Strat-style guitar with a bolt-on maple neck (banana six-in-line headstock), a Floyd Rose (optional ESP Flicker), and a lead humbucker with two single-coils on a five-way. A Superstrat.

    One could probably hone in closer on month of introduction or start of production to establish clear bragging rights, but the real point is that the Superstrat was an idea whose time had come in ’83. The new concept caught on like wildfire.

    Unfortunately for Dean, it did not have the exclusive contract with Floyd Rose and the endorsement of Eddie Van Halen, and the Bel Aire ended up a footnote in guitar history. Kramer, on the other hand, went on to become the largest, most successful American guitar company of the ’80s, with a huge stable of pointy-headed guitars that dominated tastes until the company imploded in late ’89.

    Bingo!
    The new Superstrat formula was virtually an overnight success. By ’84, practically every major guitar manufacturer was offering a variety of Strat-style guitars, typically in three basic pickup configurations, three single-coils, two humbuckers, and the new humbucker/single/single layout. Models lower in the line would typically have a standard non-locking vibrato. The better models had a double-locking vibrato so you could Van Halen the night away.

    By ’84, the neck-through Jackson Soloist came standard with the new h/s/s pickup pattern and locking vibrato. In that year, Ibanez added its evergreen RS440 to the Roadstar II line, with h/s/s pickups and locking vibrato. This would be followed by a long run of successful RS and RG Superstrats. Aria Pro II introduced a budget Diamond Jet Axe with the new Superstrat features in early ’84, but didn’t retool its ’83 RS line until later in the year. In November of ’84, Aria retooled the Rev-Sounds into the new RS Cat series (humbuckers or single-coils) and added the RS Knight Warrior, its first guitar with Hot Blades pickups in an h/s/s layout with a Kahler Flyer top-mount locking vibrato.

    Likewise, Yamaha introduced its new Strat-style SE series in ’84, with twin humbucker, three single-coil and true Superstrat models (bolt-neck SE-312, SE-612, and the neck-through SE-1212).

    Guild also introduced its first Superstrat – the Aviator – in ’84. While this had less of an offset feel to the body design than most other Superstrats, it nevertheless had h/s/s pickups and a locking vibrato system. Guild would continue making Superstrats, including the Detonator and elegant Liberator series in ’87, until it stopped making solids in with its bankruptcy in ’88. Even Ovation ventured briefly into the Superstrat arena in ’84/’85 with its Korean-made Celebrity solidbodies.

    After some less-than-successful promotion, the Dean Bel Aire gave way to a line of Korean-made Deans in ’85, most with the h/s/s format. St. Louis Music, which had been a big player in the ’70s with its Electra guitars, was caught in the middle of a brand transition when the Superstrat era debuted and caught the train a little late. In ’84, the Electra brand changed to Westone, without changing model designs. In ’85, SLM introduced a revised Westone Spectrum line that included the new Superstrat definitions, though still not quite as “Stratty” as the line would become a year or so later.

    Even Fender and Gibson
    Even the stalwart Fender and Gibson grudgingly climbed on the Superstrat bandwagon in ’85.

    Fender went through a period when its factory was being redesigned and no guitars were being made in the U.S. During this time, manufacturing was done only in Japan. Among the models produced were the Contemporary Stratocasters in a variety of forms including the h/s/s layout. These were made until ’87. Once U.S. production resumed in ’86 (with help from Chip Todd, who’d worked on the first h/s/s pickup layout with the Peavey’s T-27), the Superstrat tradition was continued by Fender Japan, though not in the U.S. right away.

    The Contemporary Stratocaster was supplanted by the HM Strat in ’88, which went through subsequent versions and today is known as the Fat Strat. The first U.S. Fender Superstrat was the adaptation of the Japanese HM Strat, plus the addition of the U.S. Contemporary Stratocaster, in ’89. In ’90, Fender introduced the U.S. Strat Ultra, which had a pair of single-coil pickups in a humbucker-type bridge configuration.

    Gibson also entered the fray in ’85 with the advent of the Spirit II XPL, its first guitar with the h/s/s layout. This guitar was actually an equal double-cutaway model more reminiscent of a Les Paul Junior than a Strat, but the pickups and six-in-line head were right. It had a glued-in neck, by the way, and was a pretty nice little number.

    Gibson yielded to the de rigeur offset double-cutaway shape in ’87 with its U-2 and US-1 models, both glued-neck guitars with droopy pointy heads and h/s/s arrangements. The U-2 featured true h/s/s pickups and a Floyd Rose locking vibrato system. The US-1 was more upscale, with a humbucker and two stacked humbuckers. The plainer version featured a Kahler locking vibrato, whereas the fancy one had a spectacular flamed maple top and a stop-tail (about the only real flaw with these is a very goofy molded plastic logo glued to the headstock). Neither was particularly well-received, though they’re satisfying as Superstrats with a decided Gibson feel.

    Gibson’s Charvel
    Gibson made one other Superstrat that deserves mention, though we’ll discuss it more at length another time. That’s the famous WRC, a.k.a. the SR-71, produced in ’87. This was a rather conventional Superstrat designed for Gibson by Wayne Charvel, namesake of Charvel guitars.

    This was a bolt-neck guitar with h/s/s and Floyd Rose. Initially this was called the WRC, but IMC, which owned the Charvel brand name, strenuously objected. Gibson promptly changed the name to SR-71 and published a letter from president Henry Juskewiscz pointing out that Wayne Charvel had no relationship with the Jackson/Charvel company.

    These were limited-edition guitars, in any case, and supposedly only 200 were made. These came with a letter of authenticity and were supposed to be signed by Wayne. These are not Gibson’s most memorable moments, but they are rare and curious because of their litigious history, and they’re pretty inexpensive.

    The Bandwagon
    In ’85, the rights to the Jackson and Charvel were leased from Grover Jackson by IMC of Ft. Worth, owners and importers of the highly successful Hondo line, by this time produced primarily in Korea, we believe, by Samick. In ’86, IMC purchased the Jackson/Charvel company. With the new relationship, Jackson continued to be neck-through-body and were still produced in the U.S. Charvel guitars could now be either bolt-neck or neck-through guitars and were produced in Japan. The Japanese Charvel line followed the same pattern as other manufacturers, with either humbuckers or single-coils, plus three classic locking vibrato h/s/s Superstrats, the Model 3 (bolt-on neck, passive electronics), Model 4 (bolt-on neck, active electronics), and Model 6 (neck-through, active electronics).

    Also in ’85, Kramer began to augment its highly successful wood-neck line with guitars made in both Japan (Focus series) and Korea (Striker series), like other makers available in humbucker, single-coil, or Superstrat configurations.

    By ’86, everyone else was joining in. B.C. Rich introduced its ST-III in a variety of configurations, some with fancy finishes, some with bolt-on necks, and some with neck-through construction.

    By ’87, the Superstrat had clearly triumphed and become the dominant form of solidbody electric guitar. The form continued to evolve, with some guitars adopting more down-sized body profiles (“dinky”) and some models being quite beautifully crafted. One popular variation also emerged, featuring a h/s/h layout. While not universally embraced, guitars with this arrangement were first championed by Westone and later anchored many Yamaha Superstrats.

    Shred
    Along with the success of the Superstrat, virtuoso guitar music continued to win the day. By the late ’80s, shredmeisters had become the new guitar gods, players such as Joe Satriani, Steve Vai, and Eric Johnson were admired, and often able to dispense with vocalists altogether!

    The vintage guitar dealers who cringed at the thought of pointy guitars needn’t have been so virulent or afraid. All pop trends come to an end, and the Superstrat’s ride died with the ’80s. The rock music scene, which had been dominated by L.A., was getting stale. By the late ’80s, the metal styles that had be fairly homogenous when they began had fragmented into subcategories in which the fans hardly spoke to each other. There was speed metal, death metal, Christian metal, grunge metal…

    The Seattle Challenge
    Ahhh yes, grunge. As the L.A. music scene began to loose its grip on pop music, centers of alternative music began to emerge, including most significantly Seattle.

    Instead of shred, with its spandex and pyrotechnical guitar solos, these musicians preferred to bang out chordal rhythms with narry a lead break in sight. Instead of sophisticated Superstrat shred machines, they preferred to play pawn shop prizes – the less popular the better. Jazzmasters were suddenly becoming cool.

    Simultaneously, vintage guitars were also becoming increasingly hip, due in no little part to readers of this magazine.

    Also simultaneously, the edifice that built the Superstrat was beginning to crumble. As we said, Guild, which had committed heavily to Superstrats in its later day, went out of business in ’88. While it was picked up quickly by the Faas organization, solidbodies were out of the picture.

    The Dean juggernaut was winding down, as well. In ’90, Dean Zelinsky sold the business to Tropical Music, and while Superstrats continued to roll out of Korea, it wasn’t the same. Also by ’90, the amazing Kramer roller coaster ride was over. The world’s largest guitar company in ’87, by ’90 Kramer was gone in a puff of mysterious, rumor-shrouded smoke.

    In September of ’91, the Seattle band Nirvana released Nevermind, and the nail was in the coffin of the Superstrat. Vintage and neo-vintage was in. Reissue Strats and Les Pauls were in. Nobody wanted (or needed) a double-locking Floyd Rose.

    In a neat parallel to its oblique announcement of the Superstrat in its article on Strat-mania at the beginning of the ’80s, in ’93 Guitar Player solemnly asked, “is shred dead?”

    Gone… But Not Forgotten
    Well, of course, death and nails are exaggerations. Shred did not die. It just went back underground. And the Superstrat, while ceding its organological dominance to other forms, receded into a niche as an ongoing (but not ubiquitous) option in the guitar firmament.

    Still, the Superstrat craze of the ’80s is a fascinating chapter in guitar history that’s still not fully appreciated, although as more and more guitar fans in their 30s come online, expect them to get more of their due as time moves on. For those older folks who first got interested in “vintage guitars” years ago, their first instruments were probably Harmonys, Kays, Danelectros, and Teiscos, and their dreams were for classic Gibsons and Fenders.

    For the younger generation, it was the guitars that Eddie Van Halen and Randy Rhoads played that fuelled visions of groupies and glory when the hormones first kicked in. Don’t be surprised to wake up before long and find a guitar with “vintage” Rockinger or Kahler fetching a premium as a prime example of the venerated pointy-headed Superstrat!



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s March & July ’02 issues. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Taylor Big Baby

    Acoustic bargain of the millennium

    When I review a guitar or amp for Vintage Guitar, the manufacturer usually sends a “loaner” to evaluate for a set period of time… say, 30 to 60 days.

    With Taylor’s Big Baby acoustic, however, I broke all the rules and took a different approach – I bought that sucker right off the rack!

    A few weeks ago, I tooled over to the local music mega-mart thinking I needed a better acoustic. This is because I’ve been recording fingerstyle pieces using condenser microphones, rather than using an acoustic/electric’s piezo pickup (for recording acoustics, mics almost always sound better than internal pickups).

    As such, I wanted a guitar with a full-bodied tone, nice bass, interesting mids, and a clear (but not annoying) high-end. I tried out a few acoustics, unimpressed as usual, then grabbed Taylor’s Big Baby, the older sibling of the company’s popular superb travel guitar, the Baby Taylor. Needless to say, I was finally impressed.

    Compared to other guitars in the under-$500 range, the Big Baby dominated the pack. From the get-go, this guitar appealed to me with its big, resonant tone, despite its slightly smaller 15/16 size. One reason for this resonance, I presume, is because the guitar is very light and has a bolt-on neck.

    Think about how various old Fenders, Gibsons or Danelectros (Mustangs, Les Paul Juniors, and the like) have a lively twang and spank that defy explanation, unlike over-built modern electrics with neck-thru-body designs and tone-sucking tremolos. Same goes with the Big Baby: instead of being over-built like a tank, it has just enough pieces to make it work and, obviously, its X-braced Sitka spruce top is neither over-braced nor lacquered. It really moves some air.

    If you’re like me – more comfortable playing a Strat than an acoustic dreadnought – the Big Baby’s neck is one you’ll really enjoy. It’s got a flat neck, making for a fast, smooth ride. Speedy runs are no problem, especially if you use the electric lead-guitarist’s trick of tuning your acoustic down a whole step; remember Van Halen’s “Spanish Fly?” Eddie borrowed producer Ted Templeman’s Ovation nylon-string and dropped it down to D-G-C-F-A-D. No wonder he was playing so damn fast! But I digress.

    The Taylor sports a Sapele laminate back and sides, spruce top with laser-etched soundhole rosette, American mahogany neck, headstock overlay made out of Lexan (a kind of sturdy plastic), and a 15″ radius ebony fingerboard with 20 frets and pearloid dots. One thing Taylor corrected from its smaller Baby version was to put side-position dots on the edge of the fingerboard. Nice move.

    So is there anything wrong with the Big Baby? Not for me – again, I bought it lock, stock, and barrel. If you’re particular about tone, however, you might notice it has a pronounced midrange, i.e. it’s a little more “nasal” than many other acoustics. I like that sonority myself, but that’s a subjective call; use your own ears. Also remember that it’s slightly smaller than full-size; great if you’re an electric player (like me) who feels uncomfortable with big acoustics, but less so if you prefer holding a full-sized guitar.
    Still, the Big Baby is an amazing value. I even told the salesman to keep the $40 soft case and simply walked out of the store cradling that Big Baby in my arms. Sweet.



    Taylor Big Baby
    Type of Guitar Acoustic dreadnought.
    Features Sapele back and sides, spruce top, laser-etched soundhole rosette, American mahogany neck, Lexan headstock overlay, ebony fingerboard with pearloid dots.
    Price $429 retail.
    Contact Taylor, 1980 Gillespie Way, El Cajon, CA 92020, 619-258-1207, taylorguitars.com.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Dec. ’03 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Aerosmith

    Rockin' on Bobo

    Although Honkin’ on Bobo was labeled by some as a blues record, Aerosmith views its new release as being a true rock record – and perhaps the most rockin’ record they’ve made in years! Bobo marks a return to the high-energy blues-influenced rock sound that launched the group’s career over 30 years ago. Featuring covers of 11 blues classics and one new original tune, Bobo captures the essence of what Aerosmith is all about.

    A primary part of reviving the group’s uninhibited sound and attitude was bringing back producer Jack Douglas, who collaborated on many of Aerosmith’s earliest works through the 1970s, as well as the ’98 live release, A Little South Of Sanity. By tracking the bulk of Bobo in a live studio setting, Douglas helped rejuvenate Aerosmith’s early energy and renew the carefree improvisational interplay between the musicians. A winner with fans and the group itself, Bobo keeps the Aerosmith train a rollin’.

    “This was a record we needed to make, and we waited a long time before we were finally able to do it,” acknowledges guitarist Joe Perry. “And the single most important aspect of making this record was that we were playing live, with everybody putting out their best on every take.”

    VG spoke with Perry, bassist Tom Hamilton, and guitarist Brad Whitford, all of whom expressed their delight with the results of their latest effort, and explained how the retro recording process strengthened the bonds of musicianship between them.



    Vintage Guitar: When were you introduced to the blues?
    Tom Hamilton: I was first introduced to the blues when I was playing in a band with Joe Perry called Plastic Glass. The singer, John Maguire, was a blues purist. We’d get together and show him the rock songs we wanted to learn, and he’d say, “What do you want to play that weenie music for? Why don’t you learn from the real stuff?” So he introduced us to John Lee Hooker and Muddy Waters, and it was then that we made the connection to Zeppelin, Ten Years After, and the Yardbirds, and understood that was where those guys got the ideas. I wouldn’t say we became students of the blues, because we were suburban kids totally into British hard rock, but it did give us an awareness.

    But Joe and I didn’t want to be a blues band. We wanted to be a pounding high-energy hard rock band. When we joined Steven, he brought a little more of a melodic pop influence, and Joey brought his soul influence because he had been playing in R&B bands. So we started just mixing all those elements in our approach to songs we were learning, and when we started writing.

    My playing was not influenced directly by blues music. I wasn’t seeking blues bass players. Although I had respect for the blues, when I wanted to hear music that moved me, I’d put on my British rock bands. But as we gained more awareness of the influence of blues on the music we loved, we learned blues songs. We always wanted to play a shuffle, but just give it a vibe nobody else was. So we decided to take that traditional style and master it, and we started coming up with songs like “One Way Street.” We would pick blues songs, and there’s always a blues song or two we consider for each Aerosmith record, but they usually wind up on the B list. It has always been part of our style, like “Reefer Headed Woman,” “Big Ten Inch Record,” and songs like that.

    We had been talking about making a blues record for a long time, but we all agreed that we would only do it if we felt the timing was right. We had been in touring mode for two or three years, and toward the end of 2002, we realized that we had a break coming up during the first half of 2003, so that might be a spot where we could do the blues album. We had support from the record company for us just going and making an esoteric, interesting, for-the-fun-of-it album, without worrying about radio or singles. Their enthusiasm was really great and it helped us relax and just go for it.

    We worked with Jack on it, and he brought a very retro way of recording, for us, and we were back to having the whole band in the room at the same time, playing all the way through from start to finish, and Steven doing vocals in real time. We cut it on 2″ tape, then the combination of tape and Pro Tools for mixing and editing.

    Does the album help regenerate ideas and reinvigorate the band?
    Yes. I knew that, by doing this album, we would start popping out riffs we’d want to make into Aerosmith songs, and that did start to happen. There are all these jams and riffs that are in the can, and we know where to go look for them when it’s time to come up with a new Aerosmith album. We wound up using one original – the rest are covers. There are three or four well-fleshed-out arrangements waiting to get finished. One is a really laid back song that I played stand-up bass on, which I’d never done before.

    How did you select material?
    When we were touring, we were getting a lot of blues music sent by the record company, and we’d choose from a lot of that stuff. We’d start working on a song in the morning, and if we thought we were getting something good from it, we’d keep going. Otherwise, we’d put it away and move on to something else. It was very much a spontaneous thing.

    Steven had always been into the version of “Baby, Please Don’t Go” done by Them in the ’60s. Actually, all of us were into it. Steven was always a big fan of The Pretty Things and he’s always wanted to cover “Road Runner.” “I’m Ready” is a blues classic, but we decided to make it into a riff-rock song. Then there’s the Aretha Franklin song. I forget who had the idea to try it. “The Grind” is an original. “Stop Messin’ Around” is a song that we’ve been playing onstage for five years, and Joe sings it. We’d recorded “Baby, Please Don’t Go” last July, then went on the road. We played it onstage every night and got it so good by the end of the tour that we decided to re-cut it. “You Gotta Move” is an old classic.

    “Eyesight To The Blind” was kind of a flipped-out thing for me because when we were arranging it, Jack asked me to try a couple of passes playing a simple I-III-V-III riff on all the chords. I thought it would be kind of boring, but it completely freed me spontaneously coming up with bass riffs as I went along, which is the way most of it was done. And without me realizing it, it allowed me to settle into the pocket with Joey, to create a rhythmic pocket for that song that just blows my mind. I’m so proud of how we nailed that.

    Did you re-track any of your parts?
    No, I managed to do it live. For instance, in “Shame, Shame, Shame,” there’s a part in the middle where I make this climb up to like the 16th fret on the G string and every time I hear it, I can hear the way I rushed it, and it kind of drives me nuts. But we left it that way.

    Was there much overdubbing in general?
    Not much. Part-wise, when we finished the tracks, each song was a bit more dense with riffing and guitar stuff than was necessary to really put the song across. So we brought in Marty Frederiksen, who is an extremely talented musician and a brilliant mixer and Pro Tools technician. He used a process to highlight the good stuff and de-emphasize stuff that was extra or not needed. Working with Marty, we were able to highlight the best riffs, parts, drums, vocals, and do moves that would enable Steven’s voice to really express a song better. It was like the ugly duckling turning into the swan.

    What was it like to work with Jack again?
    It was great. Jack brought a work ethic that made it possible for us to record enough material in a very short period of time. Jack had us in there six days a week, all day long for four or five months, and as we piled up more and more material, we got better at our studio chops, guitar chops, drum chops, singing and everything. Jack has a combination of a good work ethic, a great sense of humor, and a sense of fairness about everybody getting their licks in. It really helped us do what we wanted to, which was go back to recording with everybody in the studio at the same time, as a band. It was such a great feeling.

    What was your setup for the recording?
    I had an Ampeg B15 and a Hartke Kickback combo, plus a DI. I had a group of basses that I would try out at the beginning of working on a song, then between me and Jack, we would decide which one fit the best. I had an old Kay, a Höfner, Gretsch, Mosrite, Parker Fly bass, Sadowsky bass, G&L ASAT Bass, and a stand-up bass. I was avoiding the twangy, stringy bass sound and going for the old vintage sort of thump, almost subliminal sound. So the tones of the different basses aren’t quite as apparent as they would be if it was a regular Aerosmith record.

    My basses are set up with .045-.105 flatwound strings. I used a pick on a lot of the recorded versions of the songs on the album, but onstage, I only use a pick for “Baby, Please Don’t Go.” I use a Herco picks – the gray ones. I’ve loved them since I was 14 years old!

    Did you use any effects?
    I used some SansAmp and that was probably the most common effect I used if we wanted to put a little hair on the bass. I used Joe’s rackmounted one, and a SansAmp plug-in for mixing, which we used a couple of times for a little roughage.



    Joe Perry
    Vintage Guitar: You were introduced to the blues through British rock artists covering traditional blues songs. What was the first album that turned you on to the blues?
    Joe Perry: Definitely the [John Mayall’s Bluesbreakers with Eric Clapton]. That was the first stone-cold blues record I bought. Some songs sounded kind of hokey, like people played when the band was going to take a break. But others are absolutely incredible! There were these modern tones – it didn’t sound old. Muddy Waters, B.B. King, Robert Johnson and those guys sounded like old man’s music to me. There was little that was exciting in the rock sense. I was a 19-year-old wanting to hear wild electric guitars, and it didn’t occur on a lot of those blues records.

    So, for me it was the Bluesbreakers, then the Yardbirds’ Having A Rave Up, a couple of Stones records, then Chuck Berry Is On Top. Then I started listening to Muddy Waters, Bo Diddley, Johnny Winter, Buddy Guy.

    Were there techniques or tones you referenced for this record?
    No, not at all. I used everything at my disposal to change it around, to deconstruct and unlearn a lot of stuff, because I didn’t want it to have big, “plastic” solos. I just wanted good tone. I had this image of playing rhythm with a ’50s Gibson ES-350 through a GA-40 amp. I thought that if I could get that sound to work on the record, then we’d have something. So that’s what I was going for.

    Was that your foundation tone?
    An Epiphone Peacemaker and a Fender tweed Champ that I split with a VHT splitter box with a tube in it. I had a couple of pedals, and a Fatman compressor. I also had a César Diaz Vibramaster reverb and an old Fender reverb. For the pedals, I used a very hairy fuzz tone – one of those old red British Supa Fuzz pedals that’s kind of like what Townshend used. I used either that or this modern pedal by Chicago Iron called Octavian. It’s supposed to be an octave box, but it sounds like a cross between a really good Gibson Maestro and a Vox Tonebender. It’s got more bite and a tighter sound. It’s very close to that “Satisfaction” kind of sound. I also used an Electro-Harmonix Memory Man, a Digitech Whammy pedal into the Fatman, out to the splitter box, and then to the two amps.

    So that was the rig. Once in awhile I’d switch from the Epiphone to a Fender Deluxe Reverb because it was cleaner and had a little more bottom.

    I wouldn’t use the Diaz or Fender reverb in the line at that point. I used the Deluxe for the clean echo reverb, and I’d get all the dirt from the Champ. I have several Champs. I think I have two blackface and three tweed. The blackface seem to have a little more sustain, and the tweeds each have a different stage of dirt.

    I wanted to use the Peacemaker or the Deluxe because they give a cleaner tone. When you play, you can hold the chords together, and when you mix it together just right, you get the sustain and the nastiness from the Champ, but you still get that cohesiveness of the chords and the definition from the clean amp.

    My main guitars for the record were a ’66 Epiphone Casino and a late-’50s ES-175 with two P-90s, and it has a big crack in the neck. I think I used a Les Paul on “Stop Messin’ Around,” for old time’s sake. It was my original ’60 that I use onstage. I wanted to go with that one just for Fleetwood Mac’s sake, because that was how it was done. I had my Champ on a stool next to me, blowing right into the vocal mic.

    I played a lot of the record with fingerpicks or no pick. “Baby, Please Don’t Go,” “Temperature,” “I’m Ready,” and “Back Back Train” were done without a pick. I did “Shame, Shame, Shame,” “Road Runner,” and “Never Loved A Girl” with a pick. For “Jesus Is On The Main Line,” I used fingerpicks. I use them on three fingers – the thumb and the first two fingers.

    Playing without a pick makes you think a little differently about how you’re going to play things, and you can certainly play things right off the top different than you could with a pick. If you get real adventurous, you put fingerpicks on and you really realize that there’s a skill that you’ve got to spend some time learning. Jack had encouraged me to do that. So I got some metal ones and started working on it. But for a lot of the songs, I really wanted to get that sound where if you strum lightly, it’s just barely distorted. But when you start slapping the strings and pulling on them, it makes the speakers jump. It really contributes to the tone in a big way. You get a lot more dynamics when you use you fingers. And when you play an electric guitar without a pick, it’s a lot easier to get to the controls. My favorite thing is playing a Strat without a pick because then you can really go for it. You don’t have to worry about what you’re going to do with the pick when you go for the whammy bar or the controls and switches. All that stuff is just so much more automatic, so it’s a lot of fun.

    Did you do much overdubbing on this record?
    I did two overdubs – one for the slide lead answer-backs on “You Gotta Move” and a couple of leads on “The Grind.” That’s it.

    What was it like to be working with Jack again?
    It was great. He’s the only guy that knows us well enough to say things and push us in a certain direction. So it was great to have him there. I think he knew what we wanted. He’s been pretty outspoken about what he didn’t like about what Aerosmith has been sounding like over the last few years – much to the dismay of a few of the members of the band – but everybody’s allowed their opinion and he was really excited to get in there and make a record with us that was in the direction that he thought we should go.

    In what ways has your tone evolved over the years?
    I’ve kind of constantly gone cleaner, as a rule. When master volume amps came out, I thought it was wonderful, and now you’ve got an amp that you can get more hair out of without having to be cranking volume. But I think that what ends up happening is you trade off tone, at least for the kind of tone I like. To some people, the more distortion, and the fatter and richer, and multi-harmonics hairy tone, that’s tone. To me, hearing the strings and the organic sound of the guitar – the wood and all that – that is tone. In order to get that, you go with a lower output pickup and a cleaner amp. Then, if you want to add to it and get that kind of sustain and some distortion, you go with a little less distortion and you add a little compression in there. The guitar amp is a compressor, just by the nature of it. But I think that adding a little bit of compression can bring out some of that sustain without having to add distortion.

    So that’s how I’ve been changing over the years. I still like to let it get really hairy, especially when we’re playing some of the songs that call for that. There’s nothing like that ripping distorted guitar sound, but my basic setup is a lot cleaner. When my rig is turned up without my foot pedals plugged in, it’s a very clean, round sound, whereas five years ago, it would be a very dirty sound.

    What advice would you give to other musicians on developing their own style and tone?
    Try not to think about it too much and do what feels good. The best playing and the best sounds I get are when I’m not thinking about it. Take your mind out of the equation and let your ears go right to the subconscious, and right to your fingers.



    Bad Whiford
    Vintage Guitar: What was your setup for the record?
    Brad Whitford: I recorded almost all the tracks with a Fender Super Champ – the Rivera-designed blackface, and it worked great. I had it semi-isolated, mic’ed with a Shure SM57, and I was very close to it. Most of the basic tracks were done in Joe’s basement, and it’s tight in there! If I wanted feedback, it was easy to make happen.

    The nice part about this record was that it was very loose, so a lot of the stuff was just improvised on the spot. The basic tracks are live, and I was able to do whatever I wanted. A lot of the stuff I played was for the first time.

    Were other amps used for overdubbing?
    There was very little overdubbing. I did one solo on “I’m Ready” with a Germino Classic 45 and an ES-335. And I did an overdub with my Divided By 13 on “Stop Messin’ Around.” We did two versions of “Baby, Please Don’t Go,” the first with the Super Champ and the second with the Divided By 13. The second version made it onto the record. I also did a rhythm overdub with the Divided By 13 on “The Grind.”

    Did you choose older instruments to capture more of a classic vibe?
    Sometimes. I have a ’53 goldtop and the newer ES-335, which sounds killer. I also used a new G&L ASAT Special, which is a nice guitar that sounds incredible. I used that on the basic track on “You Gotta Move” and on “Temperature.” I also used a ’53 ES-295, but I honestly don’t recall where. I used an Olympic White ’66 Strat with a bound neck, but a couple other Strats and some newer guitars. I used a new Lace for a rhythm overdub on “The Grind.” It sounds great. I also had a Melancon Artist, ’58 reissue Les Paul, Tom Anderson T-Classic, Fender Telesonic, a new Floyd Rose guitar, an SG, a Dobro, a Taylor acoustic, and Martin DM12.

    What was your approach for crafting tones?
    My same old approach; I try to find something that complements what Joe’s doing, something to give us good variation, and that’s appropriate for the track.

    Did you use any stompboxes?
    Most was pretty much straight ahead. I experimented, but almost everything was just straight into the amp. I can’t think of anything I used. I might have used a little bit of a boost. I had all kinds of neat toys to play with. There was a great box that was the ultimate Hendrix box with three effects.

    But as much as I experiment, I tend to go as transparent as possible. I like to get the guitar and the amp sounding like it doesn’t need anything. To me, that’s just a more powerful sound.

    How are your guitars set up?
    On Les Pauls, I use .009-.042s. On Strats and Teles, I basically go with a .010, or in some cases a little heavier. If I tune a guitar down, I might go to an even heavier gauge. It helps if you can tune it down, because it gets a little slinky, and with that big meaty string, there’s nothing like that sound. The action is nominal – I don’t go super low or super high. I keep it high enough where I’m getting nice ring, but fret noise drives me crazy.

    What type of picks are you using?
    Dunlop 1 mm black nylon. I used to use a Herco kind of like it, then I was just using standard plastic picks, but I found that I like these Dunlop nylon ones. They are kind of like the Hercos, which are hard to find. I have a bunch stashed away, but I’d kind of like to hold on to them.

    Did making this record bring Aerosmith full circle, maybe closer to its roots?
    I think it’s beyond that. We went through periods where I barely had anything to do with the creation of albums or the creation of guitar parts. But this time, I didn’t have anybody in my face, telling me what to do.

    Although this is called a blues record, I think it is much closer to what Aerosmith is about – and we’ve spent years getting away from what Aerosmith is about.

    This is the kind of stuff that really lights our fire. For the last 15 years, I had a tremendous problem with having to write a “radio-friendly” song. In my mind, there’s no truth or honesty in that. Hopefully, we’re getting back to what turned us on from day one, and that was the Yardbirds, the Stones, Muddy Waters. I think that’s what people want to hear.

    So much of our audience don’t like “I Don’t Want To Miss A Thing’ or “Girls Of Summer,” and they ask, “When are you going to do an album like Rocks or Toys?” Well, this is it. This is about us having fun and playing the kind of music we love. I’m hoping it translates.



    Photos: Ross Haflin.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s July ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Peter Green – Man Of The World: The Anthology, 1968-1988

    Man Of The World: The Anthology, 1968-1988

    It’s difficult to write about Peter Green without accidentally lapsing into past tense, as though the founder of the original Fleetwood Mac were no longer here. He is, of course, very much in the present tense, touring and recording with Peter Green’s Splinter Group after long periods of inactivity in the grips of mental illness. On good nights, he can step up to the plate and show glimpses of the Greenie of old; other nights, bandmate Nigel Watson shoulders the lion’s share of the guitar duties.

    This two-CD, 36-track package compiles the best of Green’s tentative steps back into action, with 24 tracks from five solo albums recorded between 1979 and 1982 – In The Skies, Little Dreamer, Blue Guitar, Whatcha Gonna Do , and White Sky – along with 10 live tracks and studio outtakes from Fleetwood Mac’s peak.

    When the solo albums were originally released, it was apparent that one of the great voices in blues and rock guitar had lost much of his fire. But, in retrospect, hearing selected tracks from that period, Green holds his own – on cuts like the minor blues “Fool No More,” the funky “Loser Two Times,” and the jungly instrumental “Tribal Dance.” There are rough spots, like “Touch My Spirit” and “Trying To Hit My Head Against The Wall,” where his singing wanders off-key and his once-dynamic solos stumble and ramble. But the Mac tracks (including four from the group’s legendary Boston Tea Party stint of 1970) show the expressiveness Green was capable of at his best – as both guitarist and singer. What set Green apart was his unhurried economy and taste, but he could also turn up the heat. As B.B. King once said of his English disciple, “He makes me sweat.”

    The introspective title track and dark “Green Manalishi” dramatically reveal the demons that would soon put the guitarist out of commission, while two cameos with the Brunning Sunflower Blues Band (after leaving Fleetwood Mac) show him in a relaxed, playful mood.

    The best introduction to the man who has had tribute CDs devoted to him is still the Fleetwood Mac albums, from the band’s self-titled debut to the envelope-pushing Then Play On. But Man Of The World sheds new light on a period that was largely overlooked and deserves re-examination.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Nov. ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Kid Andersen – Rock Awhile

    Rock Awhile

    You listen to music long enough, and you end up seeing the damnedest things. Take, for instance, this record. Who is Kid Andersen? Well, let’s see. He’s a Norwegian bluesman. No, really. He’s been in the U.S. for about three years, and seems to have absorbed the blues.

    Now when I say absorbed, you might think he’s parroting the things he’s heard on old records. That doesn’t appear to be the case. Many of the cuts here are written by the Kid, and the feel and emotional content appear to be all his own, and not borrowed from a music source.

    “Aquavit Boogie” is an ode to the drink that has highlighted many a weekend. The distorted boogie perfectly fits the subject matter. There’s a nice cover of “Walkin’ Thru the Park” that features Mark Hummell on harp. The two of them run through this Muddy Waters stomper with reckless abandon, both soloing wonderfully. The menacing “You Ain’t So Pretty No More” is a nasty goodbye to an ex that lets the Kid showcase some of his chops.

    The influences here are all the greats of the American blues pantheon. A lot of the tunes have a real West Coast feel, and T-Bone Walker definitely shows up. The Chicago Blues are represented, as well, and the slow blues of “Someday You Got To Pay” makes it apparentthat early B.B. King music made its way to Norway.

    This record shows a young man developing into a fine player. My guess is the Kid will be heard from for many years to come, as he continues to grow on record, and on stage.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s May ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • August 2006

    FEATURES

    BILLY SQUIER
    Emerging from the East Coast pop-music scene, he rose to fame in the early 1980s playing cool guitars and making full use of vintage tones, Zeppelin-like licks, and the mega-hit “The Stroke.” By Ward Meeker

    ICON CORNER
    The Peter Green/Gary Moore Guitar
    We take a life-size look at the 1959 Gibson Les Paul Standard with a sound that has for decades fascinated guitar lovers and blues fans with its evocative, inimitable tone. By Willie G. Moseley

    MARTIN 00-18 SUNBURST
    A sunburst finish on a Martin puts it a notch above the same model with a natural top, and this 00-18 is a good example of a model that may well be a “sleeper” in the realm of collectibles. By George Gruhn and Walter Carter

    HAL LINDES
    The Walk of Life – Before, During, and After Dire Straits
    His career has brought him within arm’s reach of musical legends from Roy Buchanan to Tina Turner. That‘s his Strat you hear on “Private Dancer.” By Norm DeWitt

    VELENO ORIGINAL
    John Veleno’s aluminum guitars weren’t the first – or only – to be made of aluminum, but his aptly named Original model holds a special place in guitar lore as, indeed, an utterly unique “original.” By Michael Wright

    BASS SPACE
    Robin Medley
    Introduced in the mid 1980s, it was marked with a host of unusual features, not the least of which was a reverse chronology compared to most trends of its era. By Willie G. Moseley

    THE DIFFERENT STRUMMER
    The Bunker Guitar
    Imagine ordering a custom axe from a builder who finds a tree just for your guitar! Dave Bunker has been doing that for decades, while also contributing a host of innovative ideas to the world of guitars. By Michael Wright

    DEPARTMENTS

    Vintage Guitar Price Guide

    Builder Profile
    Lacey Guitars

    Upcoming Events

    Vintage Guitar Classified Ads

    Dealer Directory

    Readers Gallery

    FIRST FRET

    Reader Mail

    News and Notes
    Shindig in Dallas, Marian Hall passes, L.A. Amp Show, new releases, Stolen Gear, more!

    Tab Benoit
    Bayou Steel
    By John Heidt

    Van Wilks
    Big In Texas
    By Rick Turnpaugh

    Ask Zac
    By Zac Childs

    Richard Thompson
    The Box That Rocks
    By Dan Forte

    Fathers and Guitars
    VG celebrates Father’s Day ’06

    Jeff Richman
    The Royal Dan plan man
    By John Heidt

    Roine Stolt
    Flower King
    By Pete Prown

    Eric Lindell
    Soul music and cheap guitars
    By John Heidt

    COLUMNS

    Q&A With George Gruhn

    Acousticville
    The Dallas Two-Step
    By Steven Stone

    FretPrints
    Robert Johnson
    By Wolf Marshall

    “401K” Guitars
    Finding the Future
    By Gil Hembree

    TECH

    Dan’s Guitar Rx
    A Bigsby Quick-Fix
    By Dan Erlewine

    Guitar Shop
    The Fine Art of Stripping
    By Tony Nobles

    Amps
    Packing For Shipping
    By Gerald Weber

    Ask Gerald
    By Gerald Weber

    REVIEWS

    The VG Hit List
    Music and Video Reviews: Drive-By Truckers, Clarence “Gatemouth” Brown, Charlie Musselwhite, Redd Volkaert, more!

    Check This Action
    Fear Not – It’s Only Jazz
    Dan Forte

    Vintage Guitar Gear Reviews
    Duesenberg Carl Carlton, Rainbow Electronics Warmenfat Micro Amp

    Gearin’ Up!
    The latest cool new stuff!

  • Mastertone Guitar-Banjo

    Mastertone Guitar-Banjo

    While five-string banjos are far more popular today than any other style, during the height of the Dixieland Era of the 1920s, when Gibson introduced its famous Mastertone banjos, four-string tenor and plectrum models were in far greater demand.

    Five-string banjos were popular from the 1850s until shortly after the turn of the century, when mandolin orchestras achieved prominence and the banjo went into relative eclipse. Banjo regained great popularity starting in the late teens and peaking in the 1920s with the advent of Dixieland music. Banjo manufacturers concentrated on tenor and plectrum models to satisfy this market, but they continued to make five-string banjos to satisfy the old-style players, and offered neck options. Since a banjo’s parts can be mixed and matched (almost like Fender Stratocasters and Telecasters), it’s possible to offer a body with different necks. Gibson offered tenor, plectrum, mandolin, five-string, six-string guitar, four-string cello, and ukulele banjos. Ukulele-banjos featured downsized bodies, but the other instruments were offered with standard Gibson banjo bodies with necks that were essentially interchangeable.

    Gibson first offered Mastertone banjos in 1925. They were a significant advance, far more suited for Dixieland music than previous Gibsons with the hinged “trap door” resonator. While Mastertones had many innovative features, companies such as Paramount, Bacon and Day, and Vega had beaten Gibson to the punch by introducing high-grade Dixieland-style banjos with relatively modern construction as early as 1921. The Gibson Mastertone, to a large extent, was modeled after Paramount banjos. The peghead shape of the Mastertone tenor, plectrum, and five-string models was copied from the Paramount design, with the exception of the upper tip. The resonator was also very similar. The early ball-bearing-style Gibson tone rings used on the Mastertones of 1925 and ’26 were similar in appearance to the Paramount, but were quite different, structurally. The flange also looked similar to the Paramount design, but was structurally different.

    By 1927, Gibson switched to a solid raised-head tone ring rather than a tubular tone ring with ball bearings, and by the end of ’27 the tone ring was drilled with 40 holes. The two-piece tube and plate flange connecting the rim to the resonator was used until the early ’30s on many Mastertones, though the modern one-piece flange was introduced on some models in late ’29, then gradually introduced to the line thereafter. Models using ball bearings featured a tension hoop to hold down the head with a groove running the circumference of the hoop, and had flattened “cobra head” bracket hooks to fit into the hoop. By 1927, the more standard modern rounded brackets were utilized with a notched tension hoop. The modern-style/flat head tone rings were introduced in the early ’30s but were not standard until the introduction of the top-tension Mastertones in ’37.

    Over the years, Gibson has made dozens of Mastertone variations. The flat head, one-piece flange models are greatly soughtafter by bluegrass players. Original flat-head five-string Mastertones are on par in value with pre-World War II Martins and sunburst Les Paul Standards of the late ’50s.

    The GB-3 banjo shown here has construction typical of 1929 Mastertones, with the exception of the grooved tension hoop and flattened brackets used on earlier ball bearing models. This was done to accommodate the wider spacing of the six-string neck, which necessitated moving the brackets on either side of the neck further apart than on a four- or five-string banjo. As a result, the notched tension hoop used on the standard models would have to have been specially made for a guitar-banjo, whereas the grooved earlier-style hoop would accommodate the wider spacing of the bracket placement with no difficulty.

    As is typical of the GB-3 model of the ’20s, this banjo features a maple neck and maple resonator with a red mahogany stain, ebony fingerboard, two-piece flange, 3?4″ three-ply maple rim, and nickel-plated hardware. The tailpiece is a special six-string guitar-banjo design. The guitar-banjos featured a standard Gibson guitar-shaped peghead rather than the Mastertone banjo peghead used on tenor, plectrum, and five-string models. The tuners are standard banjo pegs rather than guitar-style.

    It should be noted that at this time in Gibson’s history, banjo-style pegs were available as an option on many standard guitars. Interestingly, the company inlaid the GB-3 guitar-banjos with a simpler pearl pattern in the neck than other style 3-series banjos. The peghead features “The Gibson” script inlay and the fingerboard has simple dots and a pearl block at the end, engraved with “Mastertone.” Other style 3 banjos of the ’20s, such as the tenor, plectrum, five-string, cello, and ukulele models, featured diamond shaped fingerboard and peghead inlays in a more elaborate pattern than seen on the GB-3 model.

    The less elaborate GB-1 and the GB-3 were featured in the Gibson catalog, but it offered any neck style on any model. I have encountered one ultra deluxe Bella Voce mandolin-banjo and gold-plated Mastertone Granada guitar-banjos, including one with Granada specifications and a six-string neck with the elaborate Bella Voce inlay. I have not encountered any records to indicate how many guitar-banjos were made by Gibson, but they are certainly far more rare than the other variations with the exception of cello-banjos, which are exceedingly scarce after the Mastertones were introduced. Most Gibson cello-banjos were made from 1920 through ’24 and do not have Mastertone specifications.

    Gibson guitar-banjos are of fine quality and are notably different in sound from a standard guitar banjo. The Reverend Gary Davis played a guitar-banjo in addition to his better-known Gibson J-200 and found it quite suited to some of his music. And Gibson was not alone in manufacturing guitar-banjos in the 1920s and ’30s; Vega, Paramount, Epiphone, and Bacon & Day all made them as a sideline.

    A six-string guitar-banjo in the hands of a skilled player has sound that rivals a good resonator guitar. It is not simply a banjo for guitar players who are too lazy to learn a new instrument.



    Photo courtesy of George Gruhn.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Jan. ’03 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.