Year: 2006

  • The Duhks – The Duhks

    The Duhks

    I despise most “multi-cultural” bands because they end up being musical jacks-of-all-trades and masters of none. The Duhks (pronounced like duck) manage to avoid this musical pitfall due to their enormous talents and obvious reverence for their musical roots.

    Comprised of 20-somethings hailing from Winnipeg, Manitoba, The Duhks have been together for two years. The CD leads off with the gospel-flavored song “Death Came A Knockin’.” A powerful percussion line followed by strong three-part lead harmonies and fiddle obbligato sounds sort of like Sweet Honey and The Rock goes Celtic. The second tune, “Mists of Down Below” combines a bluesy lead vocal with Celtic fiddle and modal guitar. Once more, the strong percussion section drives the song forward with elegant syncopation. My favorite tune, a cover of Ruth Unger’s “Four Blue Walls,” uses all the band’s strengths for great effect. Tania Elizabeth’s fiddle lines mesh with Scott Senior’s percussion to provide a poignant counterpoint to Jessica Harvey’s heartfelt vocals.

    Co-produced by banjo whiz Bela Fleck along with engineer Gary Paczosa, The Duhks couple outstanding dynamic agility with natural timbral accuracy. On the first tune, a penny whistle punctuates the end of the first musical line. Even when I’m expecting it, that whistle never fails to whip my head around. It sounds so real that my ears perk up like Pavlov’s dog at feeding time.

    If you long to hear music that combines what Bill Monroe used to call “the ancient tones” with a modern musical sensibility, look no further than The Duhks. Their music will roll over you like liquid off a waterfowl’s back.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s March ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • U2 – How To Dismantle an Atomic Bomb

    How To Dismantle an Atomic Bomb

    U2 has hit another home run. Try and think of another major rock and roll band this far into it and still making consistently good albums. Hell, at this point in their career, the Rolling Stones were putting out albums as an excuse to go on tour!

    You won’t be surprised by what you hear on this record. The 11 cuts are pure U2. The rhythm section cooks, Bono sings his ass off, the lyrics range from self-righteous indignation (yes, grating at times) to pure loveliness. And as you’d expect as a guitarist, the Edge uses his instrument as a weapon of mass instruction. Every sound we’ve come to expect from him, and more, is here. Just check out the lead cut, “Vertigo.” It’s been everywhere and is one of those songs that just sounds great blasting out of your speakers. The bass and drums lay down the foundation before crunchy chords come flying at you from the speakers. Before the song is over, you get a sampling of the atmospheric playing, soaring notes, and chimey chords that are the trademark of a generation of guitar players. And you hear it from the guy who did it first. And every song has Edge highlights.

    If you love the sound of U2, you’ll love this record. There are amazing hooks, musically and lyrically. Plain-and-simple, this is one of the best rock records you’ll hear this year.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Mar. ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • May 2006

    FEATURES

    BASS SPACE
    The Travis Bean TB 4000 Wedge
    Though Travis Bean was a mere flash-in-the-pan ’70s builder, its unique, funky Wedge models left an impression that carries over today with collectors. The company built fewer than 40 Wedge basses. By Willie G. Moseley

    JAKE LANGLEY
    The JUNO award winner grew up in a musical family and is today making his mark both as a solo performer and as one third of the Joey DeFranceso Trio, where he lives out his dream, playing in an old-school-jazz organ trio. By Ann Wickstrom

    NATIONAL STYLE O
    Although it has never been the favorite guitar of Hawaiian players, it stands today as an icon for the Hawaiian music that was the foundation of the resonator guitar’s popularity in the early 1930s. By George Gruhn and Walter Carter

    IN DETAIL
    Fender’s 1966-’71 Stratocaster
    In the mid ’60s, Fender’s flagship models were fitted with decorative elements that ran in stark contrast to its founder’s style. The Stratocaster, however, was less victimized by the CBS takeover. By R.J. Klimpert

    BEYOND THE PARLOR
    Part III: Women
    Having established that the guitar was not limited to the parlor, let us now consider how women did use the guitar in 19th-century America, and what the instrument meant to them. By Tim Brookes

    MAGNATONE G-216
    The Hawaiian phenomenon and Tiki lounges of the 1950s are but a dim memory, but this month we enjoy this artifact from an era when pineapple chicken and “Yellow Bird” were exotic forms of American entertainment! By Michael Wright

    THE DIFFERENT STRUMMER
    The Wacky World of Wiring
    One, two, or three pickups; humbuckers or singles; two, three, or five switching options; volumes and tones. If you ever think about how to improve a guitar’s tone, the topic is resplendent with possibilities. By Michael Wright

    DEPARTMENTS

    Vintage Guitar Price Guide

    Builder Profile
    JD Bluesville

    Upcoming Events

    Vintage Guitar Classified Ads

    Dealer Directory

    Readers Gallery

    FIRST FRET

    Reader Mail

    News and Notes
    Ernie Ball gets new digs, Peavey Honored, Tommy Jams with Jake, Stolen Gear, In Memoriam, more!

    Greg Martin
    It Was a Very Busy Year…
    By Willie G. Moseley

    Matt Rae
    Country Out of Connecticut
    By John Heidt

    Amplified Heat
    By Ken Johnson

    Dan Peterson
    By John Heidt

    Take Me Out to NAMM!
    By Stephen Patt

    Ask Zac
    By Zac Childs

    Wanda Jackson
    The Queen is Back
    By R.J. Klimpert

    Folk Alliance 2006
    Not Just Hummin’ & Strummin’
    By Dan Forte

    COLUMNS

    Q&A With George Gruhn

    Acousticville
    Stirring Up Trouble
    By Steven Stone

    401K Guitars
    Validating Vintage in a Retirement Plan
    By Gil Hembree

    Fretprints
    Mick Taylor
    By Wolf Marshall

    Gigmeister
    Gigging Made Simpler
    By Riley Wilson

    TECH

    Dan’s Guitar Rx
    A Glass Glenwood, 40 Years Later
    By Dan Erlewine

    Guitar Shop
    er Harness: Built-To-Last Wiring
    By Tony Nobles

    Amps
    The 12AX7 Preamp Tube
    By Gerald Weber

    Ask Gerald
    By Gerald Weber

    REVIEWS

    The VG Hit List
    Music, Book and Video Reviews: Bob Brozeman, Jeremy Wakefield, Eric Gales, John Mayer Trio, Lee Rocker, G.A.S.: Living With Guitar Acquisition Syndrome, more!

    Check This Action
    Whole Lot of Shakin’
    Dan Forte

    Vintage Guitar Gear Reviews
    RS Guitarworks Rock Master, Fuchs Train 45.

    Gearin’ Up!
    The latest cool new stuff!

  • Danny Marks – Big Town Boy

    Big Town Boy

    On his Off The Floor Live! album, from 1996, Amos Garrett talks about all the clubs and acts he heard as a kid along Toronto’s Yonge Street – the Shays, David Clayton Thomas’ pre-Blood Sweat & Tears, with Freddie Keeler on guitar – over a John Lee Hooker boogie. Stuff we never heard “south of the border.”

    Danny Marks has filled that void with a trip through space and time, back to the Toronto scene of the ’60s. Or I should say, the Toronto radio scene – because it’s a mix of local heroes, Canadian covers of English and American hits and B-sides, and the eclectic sounds that were streaming out of the radio when radio was cool. So the repertoire represents a regional scene, but isn’t confined to a regional sound; it encompasses all the sounds that were blasting into and out of Toronto – some blasted by Marks himself. And he recreates the Shays’ “Take Me Back” in perfect garage fashion, with a gnarly nod to the aforementioned Keeler.

    Thanks to excellent, no-nonsense production by bassist Alec Fraser, with assists from Marks and drummer Leon Stevenson, the sound is great throughout, without resorting to nostalgia or gimmicks.

    Similarly, Marks plays what the tune calls for, not what would show off his hottest licks. In other words, he’s got taste – even when all a song like “Tiger” needs is a repeated one-note bend through the 12-bar changes. The Fabian cover is one of the CD’s two non-Canadian entries, and if you’re thinking Fabian personifies the lightweight end of early rock and roll, you’re right – but Danny proves that “Tiger” is a cool song, nonetheless.

    Our friends to the north got a lot of these songs second-hand – so the Sevilles’ classic “Charlena,” was a standard by Ritchie Knight And The Mid Knights; Young Jessie’s “Mary Lou” was a bigger hit by Ronnie Hawkins whose part-Canadian combo, the Hawks, later became the Band.

    The album closes with Danny covering himself (as it were), with Edward Bear’s 1970 hit, “You, Me And Mexico.” All I need now is a compilation CD of the original (or, I should say, Canadian) versions of these songs. Marks has piqued my interest.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s May ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Kramer Duke

    If you think the headless, downsized Kramer Duke series was conceived and designed as a copy of the groundbreaking Steinberger bass, think again, because that’s not half of the story.

    Kramer began producing its eye-catching aluminum-neck instruments in the mid 1970s, touting their resistance to neck warpage and other problems. The aluminum necks had a slightly T-shaped profile, with wood inserts on the underside in an attempt to evoke a more natural feel. Fretboards were made of Ebonol, a substance similar to the material used in bowling balls.

    While inspired by the even more unique Steinberger bass, the Duke series happened somewhat accidentally. According to a former Kramer employee, another model, the TL-8 eight-string bass (which had four tuning pegs on the headstock and the extra four anchored to the end of the body), was experiencing production problems, and when he happened to chop off the wood “wings” of one, he noticed the Steinberger-like silhouette with the remaining body portion and strings attached to it behind the bridge. Hacking off the headstock conjured up even more of a Steinberger-ish profile, so the first 100 or so Dukes were made from bodies intended for TL-8 basses. All Duke necks have wood inserts, but they were painted over to match the body.

    Duke models differed from Steinbergers in more than one facet. Kramer’s effort at the downsized style had a short-scale of 301/2″, while the original had a full 34″ scale. Unlike Steinbergers, which were intended for use with double-ball/quick-change strings, Dukes used regular bass strings, with the ball end anchored at the headless portion of the neck. Regular strings could be used on Steinbergers if a special clamp was installed. Moreover, the tuners on Steinbergers were knurled and cylinder-shaped, whereas Dukes used conventional Schallers in a deeply routed area on the end of the body.

    Both brands eventually offered headless guitars, and on Kramer Dukes, a set of string posts was installed behind the bridge to guide each string to its tuner.

    The Duke bass was available in two models – the Standard and the Deluxe. Pickups were usually DiMarzios on Standards and a Schaller “Double J” on the Deluxe, which also offered a three-way mini-toggle for series, parallel, or phase pickup coil selection. The Deluxe also came with an upgrade Schaller bridge/tailpiece.

    There are other differences on Dukes; the bottom edge of the white Deluxe seen here sports a ridged “pad” to allow the instrument to rest in a more stable manner on a seated player’s leg. And while the jack on the Deluxe is on the same bottom edge, the Standard’s jack is on the top, where the mini-toggle is on the Deluxe. Some variants may be encountered, however; a Standard might be found with a bottom-edge jack, for example. Both instruments sport aftermarket graphics.

    As for sound, well, Duke basses are “sonically challenged,” for a couple reasons – the smaller body and the short scale both detract from realizing decent resonance compared to most full-scale basses with normal-sized bodies. However, they’re extremely lightweight and easy to play, and their pickups provide decent sound.

    Kramer Dukes were the last of the aluminum-neck Kramers. Usually found in black or white (though other colors exist), these small, easy-to-handle instruments represent a brief and interesting glimpse at not only the Kramer company, but the saga of American guitar building.



    Early-’80s Duke Deluxe, serial #B6038 (white) and an early-’80s Duke Standard, serial #B3736 (black). Instruments courtesy of Charles Farley and John Kotlowski.

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Aug. ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Tommy Castro – Soul Shaker

    Soul Shaker

    It’s time to give Tommy Castro his due. And with this new record, he might actually get it. For years, he has played the blues circuit, doing his thing – singing about as well as anybody, playing guitar forcefully and soulfully, and being the ultimate showman. He has released fine records in the process. This one seems to have a little more soul influence. And that’s a good thing.

    Very few voices in the music industry can do this style of music this well. The Southern soul of “Anytime Soon” is a vehicle for Castro’s voice. His rhythm guitar helps set the pace for that one. Same for the uptempo “What You Gonna Do Now?.” Throw in a solo full of double-stops and chord work, and you’ve got a winner. The boogie-soul mix and pull-offs on “Take Me Off the Road” match the urgency of the lyric. Funk takes over on “Big Love” with a blistering, in-your-face wah solo. The title cut is exactly what it says. It also gets a push from the slide guitar of Roy Rogers. All of these tunes were written or co-written by Castro. All are driven by his guitar, his voice, and some nice horn charts.

    I’ve always enjoyed Castro’s material and his pure command of this style of music. In a perfect world, this album would break a very talented artist. If you’re unfamiliar with Castro, check this one out. Then move backwards through the catalog. The reward will be well worth the effort.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s March ’05 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • Fu Manchu – Go For It… Live!

    Go For It... Live!

    Britain’s NME magazine nailed Fu Manchu’s oeuvre when it dubbed them “damn near the most conceptually perfect rock band since the Ramones.” Now comes a damn near perfect double live album. Fu’s concept: Southern Cali pinball playin’ surfer dude into classic American muscle cars, ’70s hard rock and skate punk, belting fuzzed-to-the-gills, yet economical and catchy riffs cranked to 10… er, 11. No frills. Loud-fast-rules for maximum impact. Certainly not far removed from the Ramones’ glue-sniffin’ NYC street-brat shtick.

    Recorded on the Cali quartet’s ’02 international tour, the two-disc Go For It features 22 songs culled mainly from Fu’s last three CDs. There are enough old-school Fu nuggets to satisfy longtime fans, though (the band has been recording and touring for more than a decade). The sound is excellent, the performances are head-buttingly strong, and there’s no time for useless stage banter.

    If you aren’t lucky enough to own a tricked-out ’72 Camaro, pop this in the player, hit the gas, and you’ll feel like you do. That’s truly one of the beauties of Fu. Sex on four fat tires. Killer tracks: “Boogie Van,” “Regal Begal,” “Downtown in Dogtown” “Weird Beard” and the band’s awesome longtime live cover of BOC’s classic “Godzilla.”

    Ultimately, Fu’s got such a sly wink-wink I’m-in-on-the-joke-myself-man, sense of rawk and fun (again, like da Ramones) you can’t help but want to join the club.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Feb ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • April 2006

    FEATURES

    BRAD PAISLEY
    Even though his name is dropped on major-celebrity news shows and he has performed on Letterman, Conan, and Kimmel, Brad Paisley is still a hardcore guitar guy. We take a listen to his new record and a peek at his collection of guitars and amps. By Zac Childs

    JOHN MONTELEONE
    The Next One Is Always The Best One
    One of the premier builders practicing the art today, he lacks formal training as a luthier. From summers spent working as a pattern maker in his father’s shop to his Quattroport model, we tell his story. By George Gruhn

    BRIAN BROMBERG
    Bass All Over The Place
    He has gigged with numerous notables, is a longtime session player in L.A., and has designed and helped market several models of professional-grade electric solidbody basses. By Willie G. Moseley

    BASS SPACE
    Windy City Weirdness
    Fun to plunk and funky-sounding, the Harmony H22-1 electric bass arrived on the scene late from the Chicago-based instrument manufacturer, but nonetheless offers a nice time-warp experience. By Willie G. Moseley

    SOVEREIGN AUDITORIUM
    Most are only vaguely aware that two names associated with a major East Coast guitarmaker stretch back to the late 19th century – a company whose legacy is belied today by pale memories and shadows, but can indeed be savored in guitars like this. By Michael Wright

    THE DIFFERENT STRUMMER
    Molding a New Idea of Guitars, Part 3
    No more trees! Well, that may be a bit premature. But it doesn’t hurt to consider the possibility that the traditional timbers we know and love may not be available in the future. By Michael Wright

    DEPARTMENTS

    Vintage Guitar Price Guide

    Builder Profile
    WCR Pickups

    Upcoming Events

    Vintage Guitar Classified Ads

    Dealer Directory

    Readers Gallery

    FIRST FRET

    Reader Mail

    News and Notes
    PRS wins again, Martin museum, Ventures Grammy nod, In Memoriam, Stolen Gear, more!

    Hank Marvin
    England’s Original Guitar Hero
    By Elliot Cohen

    Rocky Athas
    Touch of Texas VooDoo
    By Ward Meeker

    Jon Butcher
    Back To Barefootin’
    By Willie G. Moseley

    Alex Lifeson
    Three at 30
    By Willie G. Moseley

    Ask Zac
    By Zac Childs

    Deke Dickerson
    Confessions of a Guitar Geek
    By Teisco Del Rey

    Stoll Vaughan
    Lead-In For Legends
    By Willie G. Moseley

    Roscoe Beck
    All Over the Map
    By Willie G. Moseley

    COLUMNS

    Q&A With George Gruhn

    Acousticville
    Twelve Strings, Lots of Punch
    By Steven Stone

    Fretprints
    Kenny Burrell
    By Wolf Marshall

    Guitars With Guts
    1955 Marcelo Barbero Flamenco
    By R.E. Brune

    Gigmeister
    Will ’06 Be The Year?: Seven Ways to Improve Your Playing
    By Riley Wilson

    TECH

    Dan’s Guitar Rx
    Black Beauty
    By Dan Erlewine

    Guitar Shop
    PAFs: Reissue vs. Real
    By Tony Nobles

    Amps
    Better Reverb Reliability
    By Gerald Weber

    Ask Gerald
    By Gerald Weber

    REVIEWS

    The VG Hit List
    Music, Book and Video Reviews: Otis Rush, Greg Koch, British Blues Revival, Southern Culture on the Skids, The Blackguard, and more!

    Check This Action
    Who Needs Pickups?
    Dan Forte

    Vintage Guitar Gear Reviews
    Warren Classic II, Garcia Amplification 60-watt, Taylor T5, Subdecay Liquid Sunshine, Kangaroo Covers

    Gearin’ Up!
    The latest cool new stuff!

  • Randall MTS RM50/RM100

    For the gotta-have-more tube amp lover

    After trying to get together for several years, in 2002, tube amp guru Bruce Egnater officially joined forces with Randall Amplification. The result? Randall’s MTS guitar amps!

    With its interchangeable all-tube preamp modules, the MTS line is essentially “amp modeling” done the old-fashioned way. Using one of three chassis designs and Randall’s 14 preamp modules, one can achieve most any tone.

    Flagship of the line is the RM4, a two-space rackmount frame with tube-buffered series/parallel effects loop that holds four preamp modules. It’s mated with the RT2/50 power amp that features two channels – one with a pair of Ruby Tubes 6L6s, and the other with a pair of Ruby EL34s – as well as individual volume, presence, and density controls on each channel. Channels on the RT2/50 are MIDI footswitchable between the pairs of power tubes.

    Next in the line is the RM100, a three-module/100-watt head that features four Ruby 6L6s, MIDI footswitch, master volume, presence and density controls, and series/parallel effects loop with a mix control.

    The combos feature room for two modules, single-button footswitches, master volume, presence and density controls, and the same effects loop. The bigger of the two is the RM80, which has two Ruby 6550s producing 80 watts through two 12″ Celestion G12T-75 speakers. The smaller combo (which we tested) has two Ruby 6L6s producing 50 watts through a single Celestion G12T-75 speaker.

    The modules slide in and out of the chassis on nylon rails and are held in place with knurled thumbscrews. Swapping them out takes about 30 seconds (most of which is spent waiting for the amp to go into standby). A contact strip at the back of each module slips into a port in the chassis, which eliminates fumbling with multi-pin connectors.

    We plugged several modules into the RM100 running through a Celestion-loaded Randall 4×12″ cab. All MTS amps feature adjustable power-tube bias and fuse protection for the power tubes, as well as high-quality transformers, components, and Baltic birch plywood cabinets (excluding the RM4). And all MTS amps have three preamp tubes that are not part of the modules; one is a phase inverter, one buffers the effects loop, and one runs the input.

    Cosmetically, the MTS combos have a clean, simple look, with black tolex and metal corners, with anodized black knobs and highly polished chrome faceplates on the modules. The modules include four “California-flavored” units – Tweed, Blackface, DLX, and Recto. U.K.-style modules include the SL+, Plexi, Top Boost, and JTM. With a little imagination, you can decipher the tones these modules are chasing. The Ultra, Ultra Lead, and Modern modules cover the heavier/high-gain U.S. sounds.

    Finally, the Brown and Clean modules cover everything the others don’t. All modules use the same controls – gain, master volume, bright switch, and controls for bass, middle and treble. Each module has a pair of 12AX7 preamp tubes, some Ruby, others Electro-Harmonix. Randall encourages the user to try different preamp tubes, i.e. 12AT7s in the California modules for less gain, and a more vintage tone.

    To test the modules, we used a ’59 Fender Esquire, an early-’80s Ibanez Artist with Wolftone pickups (VG “Gear Reviews,” August ’03) and a Strings-n-Things classic single-cut.

    To keep it interesting, we grouped the modules by flavor, with the appropriate guitar(s), i.e. Tweed, Blackface, an DLX with the Esquire and the Strings-n-Things, while the Plexi, SL+, and JTM were teamed with the Ibanez. And to ensure we were hearing exactly what the preamp modules were doing, we limited our adjustment of the chassis’ presence and density controls.

    We got rolling by installing the Blackface and Tweed modules, and plugging in the Esquire. Straight away, we were pleased; the amp offered a nice, round low-end and crisp high-end for which vintage SoCal amps are famous. The Blackface stayed pristinely clean and crisp with a big, wide-open sound, while the Tweed had a tighter, slightly darker tone with more mids that we were able to overdrive without having the tone get mushy. The Tweed also produced plenty of musical overtones that gave the preamp more attack and note clarity without getting harsh.

    Swapping the Deluxe for the Blackface, it was immediately apparent that it fit right in the middle, tone-wise, with the added mids and drive of the Tweed module. But it retained the “open” quality of the Blackface.

    The Recto definitely offered the most aggressive of the California-style modules, with plenty of crunchy overdrive and smooth midrange. The bright switch added noticeable life to the tone, without getting buzzy.

    Switching to the Ibanez and popping in the Plexi and JTM modules, we started checking out the U.K. flavors.

    The Plexi offered a very tight, focused sound with a lot of sustain and punchy mids, while the JTM’s tone was more loose, with the mids pulled back just a touch. When we pushed it hard, the JTM did get a bit mushy on the low-end, while the Plexi stayed tight and punchy, even with the gain cranked.

    We swapped out the JTM for the SL+ and found it also very focused and tight-sounding, but with considerably more usable gain. In fact, with the gain cranked, the SL+ sustained nicely as it rolled into sweet musical feedback! The only downside compared to the Plexi module was that it did lose some of the clarity and note separation.

    Our final U.K.-style modules were the Top Boost and Brown, which fit somewhere between the Plexi and the SL+. Both retained good note separation like the Plexi, but had more sustain and overdrive, like the SL+. The Brown was like a hot-rodded version of the Plexi, while the Top Boost had a more loose, somewhat “trashier” sound.

    Using the Ibanez, we checked out the Modern, Ultra, and Ultra Lead modules , in both the RM50 combo and the RM100 head with the Randall 4×12″ cab. These three are definitely for hard rock and metal, with gobs of gain, thumpy lows, and sizzling highs – just enough of that trashy sound to make it fun! All had similar gain characteristics, but with obvious individuality. We ran the Plexi in the RM100 through the 4×12″ cab with a Fender American Strat, and it produced a great “Smoke On The Water” tone with lots of singing sustain and crunchy highs that cleaned up nicely when we rolled back the guitar’s volume knob.

    Last up was the Clean module, which for the most part had a flat response; a good platform to add without over-coloring the tone.

    An especially pleasant feature with the RM4 chassis and the RM100 head is the MIDI channel switching. This makes it easy to incorporate into a larger rig with a MIDI footswitch for controlling other processing, instead of having separate footswitches.

    The Randall MTS 50 combo is extremely versatile, and each module has a distinct, high-quality sound, accurate to the classic from which it was inspired. And, as versatile as the combo is, one can surmise that with the RM4, a handful of modules, the RT2/50 power amp, and a couple cabinets, one would have a very satisfying rig for either studio or stage.



    Randall MTS Guitar Amplifiers
    Type of amp All-tube chassis with preamp modules.
    Features Interchangeable tube-driven preamp modules, Accutronics spring reverb, Ruby Tubes 6L6s, parallel and series effects loops, Celestion G12T-75 12″ speaker.
    Price $699 to $1,299 for the amps, $249 for each module (retail).
    Contact Randall Amplifiers, 444 East Courtland Street, Mundelein, IL 60060, phone 800-877-6863, www.randallamplifiers.com.



    This article originally appeared in VG‘s June ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.

  • David Grissom

    Passion + Discipline = Success

    At the end of his clinic at the National Guitar Workshop in July, after two information-packed hours of tips on equipment, technique, session work, and more, David Grissom was asked, “When you were a teenager starting to play guitar, did you ever think you would do all the things you’ve done? Were you hungry at an early age?”

    He answered, “I was definitely hungry to do things that I wound up doing. I never expected it, but I was on a mission. It was my church, my spiritual thing. There was something that happened when I could improvise, and still does, that feels like nothing else. Having said that, a lot of things happened that were unbelievable – whether it was touring with Joe Ely or the first time playing with John Mellencamp. Yeah, this is what I wanted to do, but when it happened it was incredible. And you realize, it’s not putting a list on your resume; it’s finding the next thing, keeping your heart and fire going. When you do things you’ve sort of dreamt about, it doesn’t always feel like you think it’s going to feel in the long run, but the journey is more fun than getting there.”

    That journey has taken Grissom from his hometown of Louisville, Kentucky, to Bloomington, Indiana, to Austin, Texas, and Nashville, not to mention countless miles on the road. It has included stints with Ely and Mellencamp, five years with the band Storyville, a call from the Allman Brothers to sub for Dickey Betts on 24 hours notice, and a spot as guitarist/bandleader for the Dixie Chicks’ 2003 “Top Of The World Tour,” resulting in live CD and DVD counterparts.

    Along the way, sessions have cropped up with Robben Ford, Ringo Starr, John Mayall, Lee Ann Womack, Chris Isaak, Buddy Guy, Montgomery Gentry, the Fabulous Thunderbirds, John Anderson, Shannon Curfman, Pat Green, Martina McBride, Kevin Welch, James McMurtry, Charlie Robison, Pam Tillis, Jack Ingram, Bruce Robison, Webb Wilder, the Texas Tornados, and Jennifer Warnes. And besides shouldering the lion’s share of the songwriting with Storyville, including the band’s trademark track, “A Good Day For The Blues,” his songs have been recorded by the aforementioned Mayall, Gentry, Womack, Curfman, and Wilder, as well as Billy Ray Cyrus, Trisha Yearwood, and others.

    In the process, Grissom found time to release two excellent Hot Licks instructional videos – “Lone Star Electric Guitar, Parts 1 and 2” – and write a handy method book, A Guide To Blues/Rock Guitar Soloing (Cherry Lane).

    But more impressive than (and largely to thank for) his diverse, growing resume is the fact that David Grissom has a unique, identifiable sound and attitude. In fact, his style has seeped into the fabric of other session players and sidemen.

    A few days after his clinic, we sat in his studio outside of Austin, as he rehearsed for the “Vote For Change” shows, where he accompanied the Dixie Chicks and James Taylor.

    Vintage Guitar: When people think of you, their impression is probably of this very spontaneous, aggressive, from-the-hip style. It wouldn’t dawn on anybody that the word “Mixolydian” would ever come into that paradigm. Does the technical aspect of what you’re doing flash through your mind as you’re playing?
    David Grissom: It’s really just kind of under my fingers. I think there’s enough familiarity with the fingerboard that there’s a visual element, as well. In other words, if I’m looking at the neck while I’m playing, I can see the other notes around the note I’m playing; I can hear them by looking at the fretboard, relatively. You have a visual component where you can see where you want to go, the shape of the sound you want to make. Because my ear is developed to a certain point, if I’m closing my eyes and I’m playing the minor 3rd, I know where all the other notes are around that. So, “Here comes the II minor, so I should play the Dorian mode” was sort of something I did a long time ago; now I don’t think about it.

    It seems almost contradictory for a guitar player who plays so from-the-gut to also be very disciplined.
    I think initially it wouldn’t have been classified as discipline as much as just passion for it. I didn’t look at it as work; I just wanted to play all the time. I wanted to be able to play like B.B. King and then Duane Allman and Hendrix and then George Benson and Pat Metheny and Wes Montgomery, or Norman Blake. I couldn’t wait to wake up the next day, just to start trying to do it again. Like the “Sweet Little Lisa” solo by Albert Lee (from Dave Edmunds’ Repeat When Necessary), I worked on it for a year. I was just kind of consumed by it. Also, I would call my father very disciplined, in an inspiring way – an incredibly hard worker. I think a lot of that rubbed off on me.

    I’ve been fortunate to work with some people who were pretty hard workers themselves, and when I started going to Nashville, I had a couple of friends who, when they didn’t have a session, would book time for a writing appointment. They worked every day. You realize that you don’t spend an hour every other day and expect to get to a different level. I guess now, because I’m involved in a lot more than just playing guitar, I do look at it as being disciplined. I could work here from 8:30 to 6:00.

    I loved your answer to the “were you hungry” question at the clinic – because the typical response would be to rub your foot in the sand and say, “Aw shucks, in my wildest dreams, I had no idea.”
    I consider myself a pretty humble person, and I tried to worm around that question in my head for a couple of seconds – but, no, there was never any question.

    How formal was your guitar training?
    At first, it was very informal. I started playing guitar when I was 12. My very first guitar teacher was Sam Todd. He taught me “House Of The Rising Sun” and “Sympathy For The Devil,” which I had never heard before. It’s E, D, and A. When I got home, I bought Get Yer Ya Yas Out – “There it is! They’re playing my song; I’m playing their song.” I was a really cool feeling.
    Then I took lessons from a guy named Philip Franchini for a year and a half. “Here’s how you play an Eddie Taylor rhythm; here’s how you play a 9th chord, so you can play ‘Stormy Monday.’ Here’s the pentatonic scale; here’s the blues scale.” That was kind of the extent of theory at that point.

    When I got with Jeff Sherman, who was a jazz player, that’s when I got most of my theoretical knowledge. I was 15 or 16 at that point. Each week, he would give me a jazz standard to learn – “Just Friends,” “St. Thomas.” That whole experience really expanded my horizons, harmonically. He turned me on to Wes Montgomery and Kenny Burrell. He got me on the Berklee books by William Levitt – A Modern Method For Guitar, Vols.1, 2, 3 – so I gradually learned to read a little bit and learned stuff like the whole major scale up and down the neck, and basic things like the treble clef, repeat signs, D.S., codas, the degrees of the major scale, the modes. And even in the [Nashville] number system, those things are written on charts. As rudimentary as that sounds, it became indispensable. Being able to read and write rhythms, which is the hardest part, is very important.

    When did you go to Berklee?
    I was there for six weeks at a summer program when I was 17, which is where I took lessons from Metheny. I also met Pat Martino, because he was playing at the jazz workshop, and his amp [quit] onstage. I offered to get my amp, so he put me on the guest list for the whole week, and I took a lesson from him. When I was 19 or 20, I went to Jimmy Raney’s house in Louisville, and we just got “The Real Book” out and played, trading off, and it was one of the most amazing experiences. He was such a kind, soulful guy, but we were playing “Out Of Nowhere” or something like that, and about 20 minutes into it, almost every note, I started to sound more like him. Just being in his presence.

    Your influences cover a range of styles. A lot of good players who go through that learning process come out the other end sounding like a collection of those influences – like switching from T-Bone Walker to Magic Sam, like an impersonator. But they don’t have an identifiable style, something that’s uniquely theirs. Was that a goal that you shot for, or did it evolve on its own?
    I wasn’t smart enough to have this grand scheme to develop “my style.” It evolved on its own. Truthfully, when I think about Norman Blake, Pat Metheny, B.B. King and the other influences, I think about a certain beauty and grace and power in the music. I don’t think about what guitar he plays or which strings he uses. There’s a quality in a lot of the guys I’m attracted to that I hear – a musicality and a depth of expression.

    I didn’t make a conscious effort to learn some bluegrass, then some jazz; I think after a while I became aware of the fact that there were certain players who had developed their own niche – Metheny being one of them. When I heard Bright Size Life, it was like, “I don’t know what this is. I don’t understand this in the least, but it touches me on a very deep level.” When I heard Roy Buchanan for the first time, during the era of his first two albums – “I don’t know what this guy is doing, but it’s knocking me over.” It was powerful and otherworldly. He combined all those different styles and came up with his own thing.

    Like him, you didn’t become a chameleon…
    Or a musicologist. An academic, music-school thing – I have no interest in doing that. I wanted to leave some room to make it my own. I loved learning, and I think the more you know about music and theory, the more knowledgeable you are, the better. But there’s a certain music-school vibe that has nothing to do with music. I don’t think that knowing about music and learning about music and playing with fire are mutually exclusive. But the bottom line is, you’ve got to study in an environment that you can learn in for a certain amount of time, but then you’ve got to get out and start playing gigs.

    The stereotype of musicians is that they don’t have any business sense. You, on the other hand, studied business at Indiana University.
    Actually I went to music school [at IU] for a year, then went on the road for two years with a group called Streamwinner, with Kenny Aronoff on drums. Then I went back and got a finance degree. But while I got that finance degree, I was in a house country band, Sam Collins & The Hard Times Boys, every Friday and Saturday night at The Hopp, and then a band called the Last Safari, who covered everything from NRBQ to King Crimson to George Jones.

    Was the finance degree to have something to fall back on, or did you have the foresight to realize that it would come in handy if you were going to become a professional musician?
    It would give me something to fall back on, but at the same time I heard so many stories and saw firsthand so many people getting screwed over. To this day, I’ve never had a manager, and I do all my own negotiating. Every tour is a new negotiation, every record – unless you’re doing a union thing in Nashville, which is a godsend.

    There have been times when I had to hire a lawyer to look it over, but I have to read book contracts, publishing deals. I understand how these things can be negotiated, and I understand points that can be given and taken away. Hopefully, people respect the fact that I know what I’m talking about. I’ve been doing this long enough, if somebody’s going to screw me over I can pretty much figure it out, and I have no patience for it. But there’s no excuse; anybody can go out and buy Everything You Need To Know About The Music Business by Donald Passman and read it in a week. Use it as a reference, whether you’re negotiating a management contract, a publishing deal, or to learn about how you make money when you write songs.

    It’s idealistic to think, “All I care about is the music.” The reality is you’re going to get screwed over if you don’t at least take an interest in the business side.

    How do you view Storyville, in hindsight?
    After three years with John Mellencamp, I came back to Austin to regroup, and I had an offer to go play with Rod Stewart. But I chose Storyville, because in my gut I felt like it was something that had incredible potential. And it was a dream band, in a way, for what I wanted to do at the time. I think on a good night it was one of the most powerful bands I’ve ever been in, and I really like our first record, Piece Of Your Soul. All the pieces just were not in place. We started out as sort of a band of five leaders. We’d all been around the block and knew how the business worked. But it started out as five chiefs and became five Indians – from “I know what to do here” to “I don’t care; what do you want to do?” We just kind of gave it away or threw in the towel. That was a tough thing to go through, to have invested that much in something.

    Pat Metheny once told me, “It’s my opinion that bands work best when there is clearly a leader.”
    I agree. Any other way really doesn’t work; you just fight all the time. Storyville did not have a leader. It was death by democracy.

    The title of your method book is Blues/Rock Guitar Soloing, yet you’re the bandleader of the Dixie Chicks and most of your session work is in Nashville.
    I think I play “American guitar.” If I try to think about what defines my style or why I listened to these different players, I think it just comes back to a certain quality. Metheny is a very Midwestern guitar player, very uniquely American. Norman Blake is a uniquely American guitar player. From growing up in this country and traveling around – coming from Kentucky to Indiana and then Texas – you could say it’s “roots rock,” but it’s not really. I enjoy rootsy styles, but I enjoy modern players, too.

    I think it just comes out of my experience in life and where I was brought up. I think losing my mother when I was 10 years old influenced my life in a very big way, and I think guitar was a way for me to have a way to express myself – whether it was grief or yearning for love or just something to transport me. That’s a quality I hear in B.B. King, in Albert King, and Albert Collins. I certainly hear it in Metheny; it takes me someplace else – I can’t put my finger on it.

    After switching gears into session work, you were offered the job of lead guitarist and bandleader with the Dixie Chicks for an eight-month tour. How much did you have to think about it?
    I had to think about it a lot; I had to talk to [wife] Shelli about it a lot. I was reluctant, because I was concerned it would cut into sessions. But I had a really good feeling when I talked to them, and the Home record, which I think is really great, had just come out. It really intrigued me that I’d be playing acoustic half the night, and it was heavily bluegrass-based. What a great opportunity to learn more about bluegrass.

    The girls are really smart and really talented. When we were rehearsing, Lloyd Maines [producer and father of Dixie Chick Natalie Maines] said, “Hey, Grissom, did you ever think back when we were playing with Ely that you’d be working for my daughter one day?” (laughs).

    Onstage, we all had in-ear monitors, so it was like playing in the studio. I could hear everything, and there was never an out-of-tune note. They’re real talented. It was a rewarding musical experience, and I really respect them as artists. I’m intrigued by what they’re going to do next; I have no idea.

    How much of your playing with the Dixie Chicks is duplicating the parts off the records?
    Like any situation, there are certain signature licks that are part of the song, but I never play the same solo twice, ever, and they’re very cool about that. They didn’t require anybody in the band to copy solos. Knowing I can improvise a certain amount every night keeps the juices flowing.

    With Mellencamp, you guys played everything note for note, like the records, right?
    Except for two or three spots, and one long spot – which helped me keep my sanity. But, yeah, it basically was theater. The Chicks are like that except solos, but that’s a big thing – to be able to improvise your solos every night. It’s a big difference.

    What guitars do you use with the Chicks?
    Most of the electric stuff, I use the Paul Reed Smith, because Natalie wants it crunchy. I play a Telecaster on a few things, like “Some Days You Gotta Dance,” because I felt that was more appropriate.

    The main acoustics are a Collings D1A and a CJ, both mahogany with Adirondack spruce tops. I also have a Collings D-2H Brazilian and Adirondack spruce, which is modeled after a pre-war D-28, and I have a smaller model that they don’t make any more – a red C-100. In my opinion, Bill’s guitars are the best acoustics being made today, and he’s making the best guitars he’s ever made right now.

    For about 10 years, I’ve had a ’56 Gibson J-50, and about three years ago I got a ’51 blond J-200 – definitely Elvis-approved.

    Any guitars you’re shopping for?
    I’m in pursuit of a good Gretsch. I have one, a White Falcon reissue, but it doesn’t sound Gretschy enough for me, and the Bigsby doesn’t have enough tension, so I ordered some new springs. I recently got a Custom Shop Thinline Tele that’s as good a Telecaster as I’ve ever owned. It’s not a production guitar; it’s really a Nocaster. Everything is flat screws, Nocaster knobs, V neck. I’d say the pickups are medium, in terms of hotness, but they’re perfectly balanced. It’s a Nocaster that’s hollow, built by C.W. Fleming. It’s badass – like a 335 meets a Tele. The guitars being made by the Fender Custom Shop now are the best guitars they’ve ever made.

    How do you go about getting a good tone?
    It’s touch. For me, the variables are in how hard you strike the string, what part of the pick do you hit it with, do you strike it with your finger, with the fleshy part of your finger, or do you get your fingernail in there a little bit. The variations in that are infinite. It’s also string pressure with your left hand; how hard you fret the note really influences the tone. And I don’t think about it; it’s just that “I want it to sound like this,” and that’s what happens.

    I think lucking into finding a Paul Reed Smith guitar was a really big thing. When I moved to Austin, everyone was playing Stratocasters, and I had an incredible Strat – still have it – but some part of me said, “I don’t want to play what everyone else is playing.” I got the Paul Reed Smith in ’85 or ’86, just about the first year they came out. And I got them to make me a goldtop a year later. To me, playing a Paul Reed Smith is somewhere between a Les Paul and a Telecaster. Its scale length is between the two. Playing rhythm, there’s a certain clarity to it – which you don’t necessarily get out of a Les Paul. But there’s a certain beefiness that you don’t get out of a Telecaster. The pickups I put in mine are weaker, because I want a clear-sounding humbucker.
    When you became a little more visible, some trademarks of your sound started showing up on other records – featuring other guitar players. Did you notice that, or do you now?
    Sometimes I’ll be listening to the radio, and I’ll think, “That kind of sounds like me,” and I’ll try to remember what record it was – if it is me. So, yeah, that’s happened. But every now and then, it’s me (laughs). So I guess I’ve had that experience; it’s kind of eerie.

    When I sit down to play a part, I don’t have a “David Grissom formula” that I try to do. There are things that I’m comfortable with, and there are hallmarks of my style – a bag of approaches that I can bring. If you have to be on the spot and in the moment, you look into your little bag and see what the possibilities are.

    But in the case of people sounding like me, first of all, if you’re playing on records, if you’re good enough to be a studio player, you’ve got to be pretty damn good. (I’m talking about these other guys.) So a good player with an arsenal of equipment can figure things out. And that’s part of being a studio player, learning to become different people, as necessary. That’s really not the way I choose to approach it, but that is a very common thing in the studio – “Let’s make it sound like this record or that record.” I don’t want to play anything that doesn’t serve the record we’re making and the artist we’re working with, but so far I’ve been lucky enough that I feel like I’m playing me, and I haven’t gotten fired for it.

    What I don’t do is play something that I know I can play without making a mistake, just because I can get it on the first try. I’d like to think that because I’m also a songwriter I’m empathetic to what the song requires, what it needs. It’s about the song and the artist, as opposed to showing what a groovy guitar player I am. That’s not why we’re there.

    The instructional videos I don’t understand are the ones where the artist just shows you the solos he played on various records. What are you supposed to do with that?
    Yeah, what do you do with that? If you’re so lazy that you can’t take the time and really give yourself some benefit by figuring it out. And guess what – you might figure out a different way to finger it; then it might become part of your style; and then you might have a chance to take it someplace different.

    I have a certain way of bending strings and doing pedal steel licks that I feel is somewhat unique. And it’s probably due to the fact that I learned Albert Lee’s solo on “Sweet Little Lisa,” for instance, but didn’t know what a String Bender was.

    When I was growing up, you had to work to find things. There was so much more learning by ear because of the lack of transcriptions. Someone at the clinic said, “I wish you had the Storyville stuff in tab.” Man, it’s not that hard; why don’t you just learn it? There’s nothing in Storyville that you shouldn’t be able to learn if you sit down with the CD and take the time. Develop your ear.

    Also, these days there are fewer live gigs in general, and live playing is not where you come up. To me, that’s where it all happens – that’s where you learn. You’ve got to play gigs, or at least play with other people on a regular basis. I mean, the way I make music here (in his home studio) is playing by myself, but luckily I have 25 or 30 years of playing a bunch of gigs.

    I can’t tell you how many songwriters I run into who are looking for an artist career, and they’ve never played a gig. They can’t understand why they can’t get a record deal. I’m thinking, “You can’t get a record deal because you haven’t done the work. You don’t deserve a record deal. Do you want to do this? If you wanted to do this, you’d be out there in a van playing gigs. You wouldn’t be waiting for somebody to give you $250,000 so you can make a record.”

    They’re missing the whole point: you either do this or you don’t do this. You want it or you don’t want it.

    When you’re writing, do you put more weight into the lyrics or the music?
    I think they’re married to each other; they’re part of the same whole. Personally, I’m as moved by music as I am by lyrics. Having said that, the lyric is generally considered king in country music and the Nashville thing.

    I think they’re equally important. If you wrote out the words to Beatles songs, I don’t think they’re going to affect you quite as much [as the music]. Certainly as a kid, I responded to the vibe of the whole thing, as opposed to exactly what it was saying. I think there are words and music, and then there is an overall vibe. They’re all equally important.

    Having said all that, I started a little experiment with doing some instrumental stuff where I play everything. I’ll use drum loops or program drums or chop up drums of real performances to fit what I’m doing. I build the drum track, but from that point on, to make up for the lack of spontaneity, the fact that it’s not five guys in a room playing, I will play a track and just do it one time. I’ll get a drum track that feels cool, so it’s time to start recording, and I’ll lay that down. Then I do the next thing. So everything I do, I’m only playing it one time. There are mistakes left in, or I can go back and edit sections. That’s my little project I’ve started. I’m not convinced that I need to be singing on a record, except in a background capacity. But I want to get a record done, and put something out. I’m tired of people asking me about it (laughs).



    Photo by Martha Grenon

    This article originally appeared in VG‘s Dec. ’04 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.